Treatment results for lumbar epidural lipomatosis: Does fat matter?

Is there a relationship between lumbosacral epidural spinal injections and lumbosacral epidural lipomatosis? A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

We aim to investigate the potential association between the administration of Lumbosacral epidural steroid injections (LESIs) and the subsequent onset or progression of Lumbosacral epidural lipomatosis (LEL) in patients devoid of established risk factors for LEL.

METHODS

We carried out a single-center retrospective study on patients who underwent LESI. We collected demographics including age and gender as well as clinical and radiological characteristics including the type of corticosteroids utilized, the number of LESIs administered, the use of epidural guidance during LESI procedures, and LEL grading. Any patient aged ≥18 years who underwent LESI was included. Exclusion criteria encompassed the absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data both prior to and following the intervention, presence of endocrinopathies such as Cushing's syndrome or hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia.

RESULTS

A total of 3,000 patients were initially screened, 268 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Mean age was 53.63 years (±12.27), and 50% were male. The predominant treatment administered was methylprednisolone (96.4%). 86% of the patients underwent a single LESI. Fluoroscopy was the guiding modality in 250 (94%) patients. An analysis of LEL grades both before and after LESI revealed variations, with a 7.5% incidence of grade change observed. Logistic regression analysis indicated a trend between male gender and the occurrence of LEL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study emphasizes the relationship between LESIs and the development of LEL and the progression of existing LEL. Further research should investigate this link by conducting larger controlled imaging studies.

Acute neurologic decline in a patient with spinal stenosis: blame it on the epidural fat

Spinal epidural lipomatosis [SEL] is defined as an excessive accumulation of extradural normal adipose tissue. This condition may be idiopathic or acquired. Surgical decompression is considered the gold standard treatment in patients presenting with progressive neurologic deficit. We report a case of a 69-year-old male patient presented with neurogenic claudication and lower left limb radiculopathy. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a L5-S1 epidural compression sustained by a large epidural plaque whose signal was consistent with adipose tissue. A conservative approach, including weight loss attempt, revealed unsuccessful and the patient presented some months after the diagnosis at the emergency department with acute onset bilateral drop foot, more severe on the right side and urinary disturbances. Microsurgical decompression via L5 laminectomy and partial L4 laminectomy and fatty plaque debulking was performed. The post operative course was uneventful and at the two months post operative follow up the patient reported a significative improvement of the pre operative neurological signs and symptoms and of pain control. SEL deserves attention as an identifiable cause of radiculopathies, typically attributed to spinal stenosis, with a higher incidence than previously reported. Moreover cases of acute onset of cauda equina like syndrome were reported in patent affected by SEL, probably related to a local venous engorgement with stasis and edema. Therefore it should be considered as a possible diagnosis not only in patients complaining of stenosis-type symptoms but also in cases of acute neurological decline with cauda equina like syndrome, especially when provided with a "benign" imaging reading.

Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis

BACKGROUND

In contrast to osteoligamentous lumbar stenosis (LSS), outcome of surgical treatment for spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is still not well defined. We present risk factors for SEL and clinical long-term outcome data after surgical treatment for patients with pure SEL and a mixed-type pathology with combined SEL and LSS (SEL+LSS) compared to patients with pure LSS.

METHODS

From our prospective institutional database, we identified all consecutive patients who were surgically treated for newly diagnosed SEL (n = 31) and SEL+LSS (n = 26) between 2018 and 2022. In addition, a matched control group of patients with pure LSS (n = 30) was compared. Microsurgical treatment aimed for posterior decompression of the spinal canal. Study endpoints were outcome data including clinical symptoms at presentation, MR-morphological analysis, evaluation of pain-free walking distance, pain perception by VAS-N/-R scales, and patient's satisfaction by determination of the Odom score.

RESULTS

Patients with osteoligamentous SEL were significantly more likely to suffer from obesity (body mass index (BMI) of 30.2 ± 5.5 kg/m2, p = 0.03), lumbar pain (p = 0.006), and to have received long-term steroid therapy (p = 0.01) compared to patients with SEL+LSS and LSS. In all three groups, posterior decompression of the spinal canal resulted in significant improvement of these symptoms. Patients with SEL had a significant increase in pain-free walking distance during the postoperative course, at discharge, and last follow-up (FU) (p < 0.0001), similar to patients with SEL+LSS and pure LSS. In addition, patients with pure SEL and SEL+LSS had a significant reduction in pain perception, represented by smaller values of VAS-N and -R postoperatively and at FU, similar to patients with pure LSS. In uni- and multivariate analysis, domination of lumbar pain and steroid long-term therapy were significant characteristic risk factors for SEL.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of pure SEL and SEL+LSS allows significant improvement in pain-free walking distance and pain perception immediately postoperatively and in long-term FU, similar to patients with pure LSS.

The Mysterious Role of Epidural Fat Tissue in Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Descriptive Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Though both neurosurgeons and orthopedic spinal surgeons are keenly aware of the clinical importance of epidural fat (EF), surgical practice varies amongst individual surgeons and across both fields. Thus, an in-depth understanding of the anatomical structure and composition of EF is vital, as it will play a significant role in the therapeutic management and the surgical choice of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to extensively review the anatomical and biological properties of EF and further outline the surgical importance of EF management.

STUDY METHODOLOGY

(i) MEDLINE search 1966-July 2019. Keywords: Review of the Literature. Authorship, Meta-analysis, Descriptive/Narrative overview; (ii) CINAHL search from 1982 to May 2019. Keywords: Review of the Literature spinal epidural fat; Authorship; Meta-analysis; Descriptive/Narrative overview; (iii) Hand searches of the references of retrieved literature; (iv) Personal and college libraries were searched for texts on research methods and literature reviews; and (v) 200 articles were downloaded, 50 were excluded because of similarity of topics and also because of new update on the same topics. (vi) Discussions with experts in the field of reviews of the literature.

DISCUSSION

Though excessive or reductive amounts of EF usually exacerbates neurological symptoms and lead to various pathologic conditions such as spinal epidural lipomatosis, but there is no basic science, experimental, or clinical research that proves the role of EF in the aforementioned pathologic situations.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical illustration, biological function and properties of EF knowledge may lead to changes in the stages of the surgical approach to avoid postoperative complications. However, the role of EF is exclusively bound to a scientific hypothesis as one cannot be sure if an excessive or reductive amount in EF is entirely responsible for the pathologic findings, or just only an incidental finding.

Extensive Symptomatic Thoracolumbar Epidural Lipomatosis Treated With Minimally Invasive Hemilaminectomies: Technical Case Report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Spinal epidural lipomatosis is a rare condition commonly associated with chronic corticosteroid use and obesity that involves deposition of adipose tissue in the epidural space of the spinal canal. This accumulation of adipose tissue may cause compression of the spinal cord and/or nerve roots and result in compressive symptoms such as myelopathy or radiculopathy. Spinal involvement is usually confined to either the thoracic or lumbar spine but can infrequently affect both regions. Depending on pre-existing conditions, treatment options include weight loss and discontinuation of exogenous steroid use, both of which have been shown to be effective therapeutic methods. Surgical decompression may be useful for appropriately selected patients in whom conservative therapy has failed or who experience acute neurological deterioration, although this is rarely indicated.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

In this study, we describe a patient receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy who presented with symptomatic epidural lipomatosis that involved the thoracic and lumbar spine. She was treated with decompression by continuous T3-L5 hemilaminectomies performed through 5 small incisions of alternating laterality. After surgery, the patient experienced clinical improvement and was able to return to her baseline.

CONCLUSION

We illustrate a successful spinal decompression of extensive epidural lipomatosis through a less-invasive surgical approach using several small incisions to accomplish uninterrupted hemilaminectomies. This alternative approach to a standard continuous incision can be considered in cases of extensive spinal epidural lipomatosis in patients with multiple medical comorbidities in whom wound healing is believed to be an issue and for whom minimizing blood loss is crucial.

Is there an association between lumbosacral epidural lipomatosis and lumbosacral epidural steroid injections? A comprehensive narrative literature review

Background

Exogenous systemic steroid exposure is a well-established risk factor for spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL), however the association between lumbosacral epidural steroid injections (LESIs) and lumbosacral epidural lipomatosis (LEL) is generally regarded as poorly understood. Our objective was to investigate the rationale and the evidence implicating LESI(s) as a potential cause of LEL as well as the evidence related to use of LESI(s) as a potential pain relieving treatment option for radicular pain in the setting of LEL.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, OVID were searched from inception until April 2021. Three investigators identified literature that provided original descriptive patient clinical data attributing the development/progression of LEL to LESI(s) or described the use of LESI(s) as a pain relieving modality for radicular pain in the setting of LEL.

Results

Fourteen publications were included for review. Overall, the current level of evidence is of low-quality. There are significant methodological gaps on this subject matter and many studies do not account for confounding variables independently associated with LEL.

Conclusions

This review has identified substantial limitations in the literature regarding that which is truly known regarding LESI(s) and LEL, as well as conservative management overall. To provide a well-rounded perspective, we synthesized literature as it pertains to: 1) current knowledge regarding SEL, notable associations and potential implications for corticosteroid exposure; 2) corticosteroid exposure and lipoatrophy; 3) current management recommendations for SEL and 4) areas for future focus. Although LESI(s) have been associated with LEL in the literature, presently due to a lack of rigorous, high-quality studies, the presence or absence of an independent causal relationship between LESI(s) and LEL cannot be stated with confidence.

Surgical management of thoracic myelopathy from long-segment epidural lipomatosis with skip hemilaminotomies: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Thoracic spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) involves the pathological overgrowth of histologically normal, unencapsulated adipose tissue that can compress the spinal cord and cause myelopathy. SEL has been associated with multiple medical conditions, including Scheuermann kyphosis (SK). Optimal treatment strategies for SEL, especially in the setting of a sagittal spinal deformity, remain unclear.

OBSERVATIONS

In this report, the authors discussed surgical management of a patient with thoracic SEL and SK using skip hemilaminotomies for resection of the epidural adipose tissue. To the authors’ knowledge, only one other report described a similar surgical technique in a patient who did not have a spinal deformity.

LESSONS

When conservative efforts fail, thoracic SEL may require surgical treatment. Surgical planning must account for co-medical conditions such as SK. The described approach involving skip laminotomies, which minimizes spine destabilization, is a viable option to treat SEL spanning multiple spinal segments. Prognosis after surgical treatment varies and is impacted by multiple factors, including severity of preoperative neurological deficits.

Lumbar Epidural Lipomatosis is Increased in Patients With Morbid Obesity and Subsequently Decreases After Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is characterized by symptomatic neurogenic compression from adipose tissue in the spinal canal. The question arises whether patients with morbid obesity have higher volumes of epidural adipose tissue (EAT) in their lumbar spinal canal compared with patients with a normal weight, and to what extent this decreases after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

In this explorative study the lumbar EAT volume was assessed in 25 patients with morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI] >40) using available lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to their bariatric surgery. An age- and sex-matched control group (n = 25) of patients with a normal weight (BMI 20-25) was used for comparison. Participants from the obesity group underwent a postoperative control MRI.

RESULTS

The mean volume of EAT per MRI slice of the group of patients with obesity was significantly higher than for the group of patients with normal weight (mean: 83.3 ± 30.7 mm³ vs. mean 56.5 ± 25 mm³; P < 0.001). Fifteen participants with obesity (15 of 25) agreed to undergo a follow-up MRI. There was a significant decrease in EAT volume per MRI slice for these 15 participants (mean 82 ± 25.5 mm³ vs. 46 ± 20.0 mm³; P < 0.001) over time up to 3.6 (range: 1.2-6.0) years after bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with obesity have significantly larger volumes of EAT in comparison with patients with normal weight. After bariatric surgery, a significant weight loss coincided with a significant volumetric reduction of this adipose tissue in the spinal canal. Future prospective studies in patients with symptomatic SEL may elucidate whether decreases in EAT volume influence concurrent neurogenic claudication symptoms.

Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis: A Comprehensive Review

Purpose of review

This is a comprehensive review regarding the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL).

Recent Findings

SEL is a relatively rare condition that has gained scientific relevance over the past few decades. Recent findings include expanding treatment strategies to include minimally invasive surgical techniques.

Summary

SEL is caused by an excess of adipose tissue accumulation localized to the thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine. While the exact pathogenesis is not fully elucidated, the etiology of SEL can be broadly classified based on five commonly associated risk factors; exogenous steroid use, obesity, endogenous steroid hormonal disease, spine surgery, and idiopathic disease. Progression of SEL may lead to neurological deficits, myelopathy, radiculopathy, neurogenic claudication, loss of sensation, difficulty voiding, lower extremity weakness, and rarely cauda equina syndrome. Conservative management is largely patient-specific and aimed at mitigating symptoms that arise from shared risk factors. If more advanced treatment measures are necessary, minimally invasive surgery and open surgical techniques, have proven successful.

Obesity is a risk factor for epidural lipomatosis: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence of associations between obesity factors and spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) and to evaluate the strength and validity of these associations.

METHODS

Electronic databases such as Wiley Online Library, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library were searched and manual retrieval of references, the time limit was from the establishment of the database to May 2020. Methodological quality evaluations of the included studies were assessed using the bias risk assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane Guidelines. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Finally, seven studies were included for meta-analysis, all of which were observational studies with mixed bias risk. These studies involved 807 patients, with an average age of 64 to 73.6 years, and 59.4 percent of the participants were male. The sample sizes for the included studies ranged from 28 to 288. The results of meta-analysis showed that high body mass index (BMI) was one of the factors affecting SEL (P < 0.01, MD 1.37, 95% CI [0.81, 1.92]). All reviews had a high risk of bias, and the most common source of bias was that there was no strict unified case diagnosis standard between researches, and some studies (four items) did not clearly describe the confounders that they controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that physicians should consider high BMI as a factor leading to SEL, and to control body weight actively should be considered as the preferred treatment strategy before surgical intervention is conducted.

MRI Features and Clinical Significance of Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis: All You Should Know

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is defined as the abnormal accumulation of unencapsulated adipose tissue in the spinal epidural space. SEL can be asymptomatic or can cause a wide range of symptoms, the most common of which is neurogenic claudication. Several other neurological manifestations may also occur, above all myelopathy and radicular symptoms. The spinal level most frequently involved in patients with SEL is the lumbar one, followed by the thoracic one. Imaging plays a key role in disease assessment. MRI is considered the most effective and sensitive modality for diagnosing and staging SEL. Anyway, also CT scan can diagnose SEL. The diagnosis may be incidental (in mild-moderate disease) or may be taken into account in cases with neurological symptoms (in moderate-severe disease). There are some recognized risk factors for SEL, the most common of which are exogenous steroid use and obesity. Recent studies have found an association between SEL and obesity, hyperlipidemia and liver fat deposition. As a matter of fact, SEL can be considered the spinal hallmark of metabolic syndrome. Risk factors control represents the initial treatment strategy in patients with SEL (e.g. weight loss, steroid therapy suspension). Surgical decompression may be required when conservative treatment fails or when the patient develops acute/severe neurological symptoms.

Lumbar laminotomy and replantation for the treatment of lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis: A case report

RATIONALE

Lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is a rare condition characterized by excessive overgrowth of extradural fat within the lumbar spinal canal. Surgical decompression is commonly performed to treat symptomatic SELs. Fenestration or laminectomy with epidural fat debulking was a routine surgical procedure according to the literature, that may be causing postoperative lumbar instability. In the present study, we presented a brief report of lumbar SEL and introduced another surgical approach.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 55-year-old man complained of severe low back pain and right leg radicular pain for a year, accompanied by neurogenic intermittent claudication. He received a variety of conservative treatments, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acupuncture, and physical therapy. However, his pain did not diminish. Finally, a posterior epidural mass in the dorsal spine extending from the L3 to L5 level, which caused dural sac compression was found on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. This mass was homogeneously hyperintense in both T1W1 and T2W1 images, suggestive of epidural fat accumulation.

DIAGNOSES

Lumbar SEL.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent lumbar laminectomy, epidural fat debulking, and spinous process-vertebral plate in situ replantations.

OUTCOMES

The patient presented with complete recovery of radiculopathy and low back pain after surgery. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed that the increased adipose tissue disappeared, and the dural sac compression was relieved. A computed tomography scan revealed the lumbar lamina in situ. He was able to walk normally and remained relatively asymptomatic for 12 months after the operation at the last follow-up visit.

LESSONS

Lumbar laminotomy and replantation provide an ideal option to treat lumbar SEL because it can achieve sufficient and effective decompression, simultaneously reconstruct the anatomy of the spinal canal, and reduce the risk of iatrogenic lumbar instability.

Clinical Implications of the Epidural Fat Thickness in the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar epidural lipomatosis is a rare condition defined as the excessive accumulation of epidural fat (EF). We herein investigated the indicators of the posterior compression factors, EF and yellow ligament, to identify the clinical features of lumbar epidural lipomatosis.

METHODS

Five hundred consecutive patients who underwent posterior lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were retrospectively reviewed. The EF/SC-L index (the ratio of the anteroposterior length of the EF to that of the spinal canal [SC]) was evaluated at the spinal level that exhibited maximum dural tube compression. The participants were divided into 3 groups: grade I, EF/SC-L index ≤50%; grade II, EF/SC-L index 51%-74%; grade III, EF/SC-L index ≥75%. EF/SC-A (the ratio of the cross-sectional area of EF to that of SC) and YL/SC-A (the ratio of the cross-sectional area of yellow ligament [YL] to that of SC) were calculated. The clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Japan Orthopaedic Association scale for lumbar disease.

RESULTS

EF/SC-L exhibited a significantly positive correlation with EF/SC-A (r = 0.82, P < 0.001), and a negative correlation with YL/SC-A (r = -0.71, P < 0.001). The Japan Orthopaedic Association score recovery rate was 56.7 ± 22.6 in the case-matched control group, 34.5 ± 31.2 in the grade II group (P < 0.001), and 39.6 ± 24.9 in the grade III group (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The EF/SC-L index is a simple and reliable indicator to quantitatively evaluate posterior compression in patients with LSS. As the accumulation of EF is associated with worse operative outcomes, the EF/SC-L index should be considered when planning lumbar decompression surgery for patients with LSS.

Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis from the Perspective of Locomotive Syndrome and Metabolic Syndrome: A Narrative Review

Patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) have impaired activities of daily living because of pain or motor paralysis, but no effective preventive treatment is currently available. The number of patients with LSS is predicted to continually increase as the average age of the global population increases. To provide a conceptual framework for improving healthy life expectancy, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association introduced the concept of locomotive syndrome, to which LSS is related. Ours and other studies have shown that LSS exacerbates locomotive syndrome and that surgical treatment is one method for improving it. Furthermore, we propose that the two-step test, a locomotive syndrome risk test, is effective for assessing the risk for falls and severity of LSS. Meanwhile, lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis (LSEL), which is a manifestation of LSS, has been shown to be related to metabolic syndrome. Previous studies have suggested that the whole LSS can be also associated with metabolic syndrome. Although locomotive syndrome is very different from metabolic syndrome, which involves lipid metabolism, these two syndromes overlap, such as in LSS. Conducting research on LSS from the perspectives of both locomotive syndrome and metabolic syndrome may lead to novel methods for prevention and treatment of LSS and, conversely, may yield clues for resolving symptoms of the two syndromes. This review provides an overview of LSS from the perspective of locomotive syndrome and metabolic syndrome, along with findings from our research group.

Two-year outcome comparison of decompression in 14 lipomatosis cases with 169 degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis cases: a Swiss prospective multicenter cohort study

PURPOSE

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is defined as an abnormal and extensive accumulation of unencapsulated adipose tissue within the spinal epidural space. To date, there is a lack of high-level evidence studies reporting the outcome of surgical treatment of symptomatic SEL in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The aim was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic LSS with and without SEL who underwent decompression surgery alone at the 12- and 24-month follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 had mainly SEL on at least one level operated in addition to possible degenerative changes on other levels and 169 degenerative LSS only. The main outcomes were pain (Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) symptoms), disability (SSM function), and quality of life [EQ-5D-3L summary index (SI)] at 24-month follow-up, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in SSM symptoms, SSM function, and EQ-5D-3L SI.

RESULTS

The multiple regression linear models showed that SEL was associated with worse SSM symptoms (p = 0.045) and EQ-5D-3L SI scores (p = 0.026) at 24-month follow-up, but not with worse SSM function scores. Further, depression (in all models) was negatively associated with better clinical outcomes at 24-month follow-up. In the outcomes SSM symptoms and EQ-5D-3L SI, distinctly more patients in the classical LSS group reached MCID than in the SEL group (71.3% and 62.3% vs. 50.0% and 42.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that decompression alone surgery was associated with significant improvement in disability in both groups at 2 years, but not in pain and quality of life in patients with SEL.

Negative impact of spinal epidural lipomatosis on the surgical outcome of posterior lumbar spinous-splitting decompression surgery: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) results from excess lumbar epidural fat (EF) accumulation that compresses the cauda equina or nerve roots. Guidelines for the therapeutic management of SEL are not currently available.

PURPOSE

To elucidate the efficacy of lumbar decompression surgery in SEL.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 288 consecutive patients who underwent posterior lumbar spinous-splitting decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis and followed up greater than 2 years at participating institutions were retrospectively reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ).

METHODS

Participants were divided into two groups according to the ratio of EF to anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal (EF/SC-L) at the spinal level with maximum dural tube compression. Patients with EF/SC-L of ≥0.6 and <0.6 were defined as those with SEL and non-SEL, respectively. We assessed whether surgical treatment was "effective" or "not effective" using the JOABPEQ based on the following: an increase of ≥20 points in the postoperative score compared with the preoperative score, or a preoperative score <90 with a postoperative score ≥90 points. We constructed a multiple Poisson regression model by adjusting for confounding factors, and determined estimated relative risk (RR) for "not effective" with surgical treatment using the JOABPEQ. Additionally, we selected age-, sex-, BMI-, and decompression levels-matched patients with non-SEL and compared the frequency of "not effective" between SEL patients (n=60) and non-SEL patients (n=60).

RESULTS

Analysis using the RDQ and JOABPEQ showed that the 1- and 2-year postoperative scores were significantly better than the preoperative scores in the both groups. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis demonstrated that SEL was significantly associated with "not effective" for decompression surgery in the 1-year postoperative outcomes of walking ability ([RR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.2) and social life (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.8) and the 2-year postoperative outcomes of walking ability (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.3). Matching analysis showed that SEL was significantly associated with "not effective" with lumbar decompression surgery in the 2-year postoperative outcomes of walking ability (p=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SEL exhibited significant improvements in surgical outcomes at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. However, compared with the non-SEL group, the efficacy of posterior lumbar spinous-splitting decompression surgery was worse in the SEL group, especially for walking ability. These results indicate that EF accumulation should be considered when planning treatment for patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis and estimating the efficacy of lumbar decompression surgery.

MRI Diagnosis of Obesity-Related Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis

A 61-year-old male presented to our hospital complaining of claudication: bilateral leg weakness impeding mobility. Symptoms started after 100 m of walk and recede after several minutes of rest. The patient was obese, with a body mass index (BMI) of 41 kg/m2 and reported a weight gain of about 55 pounds in the last year. Patient's comorbidities were dyslipidemia, hypertension, and antithrombin III deficiency. The patient also suffered from chronic low-back pain recently worsened and cervical pain. Pulses in the lower limbs were present. Neurological examination was also unremarkable.