Minimum five-year follow-up of posterior-only pedicle screw constructs for thoracic and thoracolumbar kyphosis

Long-term results of surgical correction of Scheuermann’s kyphosis

Objective. To analyze long-term results of surgical correction of kyphosis due to Scheuermann’s disease.

Material and Methods. Design: retrospective cohort study. The study group included 43 patients (m/f ratio, 34/9). The mean age was 19.1 (14–32) years; the mean postoperative follow-up was 6 ± 10 (5–20) years. Two-stage surgery including discectomy and interbody fusion followed by posterior correction and fusion was conducted in 35 cases (Group A). Eight patients (Group B) underwent only posterior correction and spinal fusion. The following parameters were determined for each patient: thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL) (scoliotic deformity of the thoracic/thoracolumbar spine, if the curve magnitude was > 5°), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sagittal stable vertebra (SSV), first lordotic vertebra (FLV), proximal junctional angle (PJA) and distal junctional angle (DJA). All measurements were performed immediately before surgery, one week after surgery, and at the end of the follow-up period. All patients answered the SRS-24 questionnaire after surgery and at end of the follow-up period.

Results. Groups were comparable in terms of age and gender of patients, body mass index and initial Cobb angle (p < 0.05). The curve decreased from 77.8° to 40.7° in Group A and from 81.7° to 41.6° in Group B. The loss of correction was 9.1° and 6.0° in groups A and B, respectively. The parameters of lumbar lordosis remained normal during the follow-up period. At implant density less than 1.2, deformity correction and correction loss were 44.5° (54.7 %) and 3.9°, respectively (p < 0.05). Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was detected in 21 out of 43 patients (48.8 %). The frequency of PJK was 45.4 % among patients whose upper end vertebra was included in the fusion and 60 % among those whose upper end vertebra was not included. PJK developed in eight (47.8 %) out of 17 patients with kyphosis correction ≥ 50 % and in 13 (50.0 %) of those with correction < 50 %. The rate of DJK development was 39.5 %. The lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was located proximal to the sagittal stable vertebra in 16 cases, with 12 (75 %) of them being diagnosed with DJK. In 27 patients, LIV was located either at the SSV level or distal to it, the number of DJK cases was 5 (18.5 %); p < 0.05. Only two patients with complications required unplanned interventions. According to the patient questionnaires, the surgical outcome score increases between the immediate and long-term postoperative periods for all domains and from 88.4 to 91.4 in total. The same applies to answer to the question about consent to surgical treatment on the same conditions: positive answers increased from 82 to 86 %.

Conclusions. Two-stage surgery, as a more difficult and prolonged one, has no advantages over one-stage operation in terms of correction magnitude and stability of the achieved effect. Surgical treatment improves the quality of life of patients with Scheuermann’s disease, and the improvement continues in the long-term postoperative period.

Comprehensive Perioperative Approach to Complex Spine Deformity Management

OBJECTIVE

Study perioperative strategies for optimizing neuroprotection in complex spine deformity correction surgery.

METHODS

We report the case of a patient with severe lumbar dextroscoliosis, thoracolumbar junction hyperkyphosis with a 40-degree Cobb angle levoconvex scoliosis who underwent spinal deformity correction with loss of neuromonitoring during surgery. We performed a literature review on perioperative management of complex spine deformity.

RESULTS

A 50-year-old man presented with lumbar pain and right L4 radiculopathy. Surgical intervention for deformity correction and decompression was indicated with T4-L4 posterior instrumentation L2/L3 and L3/L4 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surgery was aborted due to the loss of neuromonitoring. Postsurgery, the patient had left sensory deficit and the neurocritical care team clinically suspected and deduced the anatomic location of the spinal cord compression. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a T10-T11 hyperintensity suggestive of cord ischemia due to osteophyte compressing the spinal cord. The patient underwent a second corrective surgery with no intraoperative events and has no long-term neurological sequela.

CONCLUSIONS

This case illustrates that a comprehensive perioperative approach and individualized risk factor assessment is useful in complex spine deformity surgery. Further research is needed to determine how this individualized comprehensive approach can lead to intraoperative and postoperative countermeasures that improved spine surgery outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Limited Cost Benefit of Lateral Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the utility and cost-effectiveness of multilevel lateral interbody fusion (LIF) combined with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) (L group) and conventional PSF (with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) (P group) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of multilevel LIF for ASD have been reported favorable; however, the cost benefit of LIF in conjunction with PSF is still controversial.

METHODS

Retrospective comparisons of 88 surgically treated ASD patients with minimum 2-year follow-up from a multicenter database (L group [n = 39] and P group [n = 49]) were performed. Demographic and radiographic data, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the direct hospitalization cost for the initial surgery and 2-year total hospitalization cost were analyzed.

RESULTS

Analyses of sagittal spinal alignment showed no significant difference between the two groups at baseline and 2 years post-operation. Surgical time was longer in the L group (L vs. P: 354 vs. 268 minutes, P < 0.01), whereas the amount of blood loss was greater in the P group (494 vs. 678 mL, P = 0.03). The HRQoL was improved similarly at 2 years post-operation (L vs. P: SRS-22 total score, 3.86 vs. 3.80, P = 0.54), with comparable revision rates (L vs. P: 18% vs. 10%, P = 0.29). The total direct cost of index surgery was significantly higher in the L group (65,937 vs. 49,849 USD, P < 0.01), which was mainly due to the operating room cost, including implant cost (54,466 vs. 41,328 USD, P < 0.01). In addition, the 2-year total hospitalization cost, including revision surgery, was also significantly higher in the L group (70,847 vs. 52,560 USD, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LIF with PSF is a similarly effective surgery for ASD when compared with conventional PSF. However, due to the significantly higher cost, additional studies on the cost-effectiveness of LIF in different ASD patient cohorts are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.