Preoperative lumbar epidural steroid injections administered within 6 weeks of microdiscectomy are associated with increased rates of reoperation

Preoperative Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: Utilization and Postoperative Complications in ACDF, PCDF, and Decompression

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Identify factors associated with cervical epidural steroid injection (CESI) receipt before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), or decompression; evaluate the association between CESI receipt and 90-day postoperative complications; and determine characteristics of CESI associated with complications.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous literature has suggested that a preoperative CESI may increase the risk of postoperative complications. However, these studies were limited in the procedures and complications they evaluated.

METHODS

The IBM MarketScan database was queried for patients aged 18 years or older who underwent ACDF, PCDF, or cervical decompression for disc herniation, stenosis, radiculopathy, myelopathy, and/or spondylosis without myelopathy between January 1, 2014 and September 30, 2020. CESI receipt within 12 months preoperatively, injection characteristics, and postoperative complications were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between patient characteristics and receipt of CESI, receipt of a CESI and each 90-day postoperative complication, and CESI characteristics and each 90-day complication.

RESULTS

Among the unique patients who underwent each procedure, 20,371 ACDF patients (30.93%), 1259 (22.24%) PCDF patients, and 3349 (36.30%) decompression patients received a preoperative CESI. In all 3 cohorts, increasing age, increasing comorbidity burden, smoker status, and diagnosis of myelopathy were associated with decreased odds of preoperative CESI receipt, while female sex and diagnosis of radiculopathy and spondylosis without myelopathy were associated with increased odds. There were no meaningful between-group comparisons or significant associations between preoperative CESI receipt and any 90-day postoperative complications in multivariable models (all P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study elucidated the main determinants of CESI receipt and found no differences in the odds of developing 90-day postoperative complications, but did identify differential outcomes with regard to some injection characteristics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Elective hand surgery and concomitant corticosteroid injection: Confirming increased infection risk using A national dataset

Background

Recent studies demonstrate a link between corticosteroid injection and surgical complications when procedures occur shortly after steroid administration. These publications focus on single procedures like carpal tunnel release. This study seeks to demonstrate how surgical site infection risk changes across thirteen common elective hand procedures when steroid injection is performed contemporaneously.

Methods

The Truven MarketScan® database identified patients who had undergone elective hand surgery between 2015 and 2016. Two cohorts were created based on the administration, or absence thereof, of contemporaneous corticosteroid injection. The primary outcome measure was infection within 30 days of surgery as measured by antibiotic prescription or repeat surgical intervention. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between concomitant corticosteroid injections and post-operative infections while controlling for demographics and comorbidities.

Results

149,689 patients underwent elective hand surgery. 6104 (4.1 %) received concomitant corticosteroid injection and 14,070 (9.4 %) received post-operative antibiotics or underwent secondary surgical intervention for infection. Treatment for post-operative infection was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group (10.2 % versus 9.3 %; p = 0.02) driven by difference in severe infection requiring surgical intervention (3.7 % versus 3.1 %; p = 0.03). This finding persisted when controlling for demographics and comorbidities with adjusted OR of 1.10 (CI 1.01-1.20) for all infections and 1.16 (CI 1.01-1.33) for severe infections.

Discussion

These results support prior findings that patients undergoing concurrent steroid injections and surgery have increased rates of infectious complications though the absolute risk remains small. Limitations of the database preclude further investigation into the details of each procedure (e.g. ipsilateral vs contralateral injection, peri-operative antibiotics) which may impact infection rates.

Conclusions

Concomitant steroid injection with elective hand surgery may increase the risk of postoperative infection, particularly severe infection. However, that relative increase lies between 1 and 33 percent and should be weighed against the benefit from intraoperative corticosteroid administration.

Predicting and analysing of the unfavourable outcomes of early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: development and validation based nomogram

OBJECTIVE

To predict and analyse the unfavourable outcomes of early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

Information of 426 patients treated by early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at our hospital from June 2017 to October 2021 in addition to 17 other features was collected. The risk factors were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO) regression. Then, a prediction model (nomogram) was established to predict the unfavourable outcomes of using the risk factors selected from LASSO regression. Bootstrap (n = 1000) was used to perform the internal validation, and the performance of the model was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) were used to assess the clinical utility of the model, respectively.

RESULTS

Finally, 53 of 426 patients showed unfavourable outcomes. Five potential factors, Modic change, Calcification, Lumbar epidural steroid injection preoperative, Articular process hyperplasia and cohesion, and Laminoplasty technique, were selected according to the LASSO regression, that identified the predictors to establish nomogram model. Meanwhile, the C-index of the prediction nomogram was 0.847, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value was 0.847, and the interval bootstrapping (n = 1000) validation C-index was 0.809. The model has good practicability for clinics according to the DCA and CIC.

CONCLUSION

This nomogram model has good predictive performance and clinical practicability, which could provide a certain basis for predicting unfavourable outcomes of early applicated PEID for LDH.

Assessment of Risk Factors and Rate of Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Within 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy Utilizing a Large Database of Commercially Insured Patients in the United States

Background

The conversion rate of hip arthroscopy (HA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be as high as 10%. Despite identifying factors that increase the risk of conversion, current studies do not stratify patients by type of arthroscopic procedure.

Purpose/Hypothesis

To analyze the rate and predictors of conversion to THA within 2 years after HA. It was hypothesized that osteoarthritis (OA) and increased patient age would negatively affect the survivorship of HA.

Study Design

Cohort study; Evidence level, 3.

Methods

The IBM MarketScan database was utilized to identify patients who underwent HA and converted to THA within 2 years at inpatient and outpatient facilities between 2013 and 2017. Patients were split into 3 procedure cohorts as follows: (1) femoroacetabular osteoplasty (FAO), which included treatment for femoroacetabular impingement; (2) isolated debridement; and (3) isolated labral repair. Cohort characteristics were compared using standardized differences. Conversion rates between the 3 cohorts were compared using chi-square tests. The relationship between age and conversion was assessed using linear regression. Predictors of conversion were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The median time to conversion was estimated using Kaplan-Meier tests.

Results

A total of 5048 patients were identified, and the rates of conversion to THA were 12.86% for isolated debridement, 8.67% for isolated labral repair, and 6.76% for FAO (standardized difference, 0.138). The isolated labral repair cohort had the shortest median time to conversion (isolated labral repair, 10.88 months; isolated debridement, 10.98 months; and FAO, 11.9 months [P = .034). For patients >50 years, isolated debridement had the highest rate of conversion at 18.8%. The conversion rate increased linearly with age. Factors that increased the odds of conversion to THA were OA, having an isolated debridement procedure, and older patient age (P < .05).

Conclusion

Older patients and those with preexisting OA of the hip were at a significantly increased risk of failing HA and requiring a total hip replacement within 2 years of the index procedure. Younger patients were at low risk of requiring a conversion procedure no matter which arthroscopic procedure was performed.

Nomogram for predicting the unfavourable outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

Objective

To investigate and integrate multiple independent risk factors to establish a nomogram for predicting the unfavourable outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2019, a total of 425 patients with LDH undergoing PETD were included in this retrospective study. All patients were divided into the development and validation cohort at a ratio of 4:1. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the independent risk factors associated with the clinical outcomes of PETD for LDH in the development cohort, and a prediction model (nomogram) was established to predict the unfavourable outcomes of PETD for LDH. In the validation cohort, the nomogram was validated by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

29 of 340 patients showed unfavourable outcomes in the development cohort, and 7 of 85 patients showed unfavourable outcomes in the validation cohort. Body mass index (BMI), course of disease (COD), protrusion calcification (PC), and preoperative lumbar epidural steroid injection (LI) were independent risk factors associated with the unfavourable outcomes of PETD for LDH and were identified as predictors for the nomogram. The nomogram was validated by the validation cohort and showed high consistency (C-index = 0.674), good calibration and high clinical value.

Conclusions

The nomogram based on patients' preoperative clinical characteristics, including BMI, COD, LI and PC, can be used to accurately predict the unfavourable outcomes of PETD for LDH.

Do We Need to Wait 3 Months After Corticosteroid Injections to Reduce the Risk of Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid injections administered within 3 months before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been linked to increased risk of postoperative infection. However, it would be beneficial to further delineate the timing of injections to determine whether a narrower window exists for safe administration of corticosteroid injections. The purposes of our study were to (1) determine whether there were a different time frame between corticosteroid injection and primary TKA that increased infection risk and (2) determine risk factors associated with infection after TKA.

METHODS

TKA patients were identified from a national database from 2007 to 2017 and stratified based on their history of corticosteroid injections within the 6-month preoperative period. Patients who received injections were stratified into biweekly cohorts by the timing of their most recent injection. The 1-year rate of postoperative infection treated by surgical débridement was compared between injection and noninjection cohorts. Univariate logistic regressions of risk factors and a multivariate analysis for patient comorbidities and injection cohorts associated with increased infection risk were conducted.

RESULTS

In the 76,090 TKA patients identified, corticosteroid injection within 2 weeks before TKA increased the risk of postoperative infection (P = 0.02) and injections within 2 to 4 weeks trended toward increased infection in univariate regression. No significant differences were observed in any other injection time frames. In the multivariate analysis, injections within 2 weeks before TKA were identified as an independent risk factor (odds ratio: 2.89; P = 0.04) for postoperative infection. Additional risk factors included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, and tobacco, whereas female sex and patient aged older than 65 were protective.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that TKA performed within four weeks of a corticosteroid injection may be associated with a higher risk of postoperative infection; however, delaying surgery more than four weeks may not provide additional infection risk reduction. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal timing of TKA after corticosteroid injections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.