Can cavity-based pedicle screw augmentation decrease screw loosening? A biomechanical in vitro study

Posterior fixation for pyogenic spondylitis following osteoporotic vertebral fracture: A retrospective study of five challenging cases

BACKGROUND

Pyogenic spondylitis following osteoporotic vertebral fracture is rare but serious with a poor clinical outcome. Although posterior fixation is an effective treatment for pyogenic spondylitis, surgical outcomes following osteoporotic vertebral fractures remain largely unreported. We present the outcomes of five challenging cases treated with posterior fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent posterior fixation for pyogenic spondylitis between January 2021 and July 2023. Five patients with pyogenic spondylitis following osteoporotic vertebral fracture were identified. We examined the age, sex, location of the vertebral fracture and infection, time from fracture to infection diagnosis, C-reactive protein levels, causative organisms, antibiotic therapy, operative procedures, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Three male and two female patients were included; they had a mean age of 75.4 years (standard deviation [SD], 7.1; range, 65-83 years). The mean time from fracture to diagnosis was 37.0 days (SD, 15.9; range, 21-55 days). All causative organisms were identified. Initial posterior fixation proved insufficient in four of the five patients, and additional surgery was required. The remaining patient developed significant screw backout. Additional procedures included fixation extension, anterior vertebral replacement, and fibular strut grafting. Infection control was achieved in all patients, and the mean follow-up duration was 20.4 months (SD, 9.9; range, 15-38 months).

CONCLUSIONS

We encountered five patients in whom posterior fixation alone proved insufficient for treating pyogenic spondylitis following osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Treatment strategies for this condition should address both infection control and spinal reconstruction, incorporating anterior column support and posterior fixation techniques.

Cementation strategies in the osteoporotic, metastatic, or ankylosing thoracolumbar spine in older adults: Cement-associated complications and implant failure

Background

Although cement augmentation of pedicle screws increases stability, complications, such as pulmonary embolism, must be considered. One possible approach to minimize complication risk is not augmenting all pedicle screws. It remains unclear whether full augmentation is necessary or if restricted cement augmentation is sufficient regarding cement-associated complications, implant failure, or adjacent fractures.

Research question

Is there a difference in cement-associated complications, implant failure rate, and revision rates in non-cemented, fully augmented, and restricted cement-augmented long-segment posterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine?

Methods

In a single-center retrospective observational study, patients aged ≥60 years who underwent pedicle screw fixation of ≥3 segments in the thoracic/lumbar spine treating an osteoporotic fracture, metastatic lesion, or ankylosing spondylitis fracture were enrolled and categorized into no, full, and restricted cementation groups. Demographics, cement-associated complications, revision surgeries, implant failures, adjacent fractures, and other complications were also recorded.

Results

Cement leakage rate was significantly higher in the full than in the restricted cementation group (p < 0.05), with no sign of pulmonary embolism in either group. Patients with osteoporotic fractures experienced implant failure and adjacent fractures significantly more frequently than those with other pathologies (p < 0.05). In the full cementation group, the rate of screw cut-out with fractures of the last instrumented vertebra and adjacent fractures was the highest (p < 0.05).

Discussion and conclusion

Restricted cementation does not result in a higher rate of complications, particularly cement-associated complications, screw cut-out, or implant failure, and appears more favorable than full cementation.

Comparison of four in vitro test methods to assess nucleus pulposus replacement device expulsion risk

Background

Nucleus replacement devices (NRDs) are not routinely used in clinic, predominantly due to the risk of device expulsion. Rigorous in vitro testing may enable failure mechanisms to be identified prior to clinical trials; however, current testing standards do not specify a particular expulsion test. Multiple methods have therefore been developed, complicating comparisons between NRD designs. Thus, this study assessed the effectiveness of four previously reported expulsion testing protocols; hula-hoop (Protocol 1), adapted hula-hoop (Protocol 2), eccentric cycling (Protocol 3), and ramp to failure (Protocol 4), applied to two NRDs, one preformed and one in situ curing.

Methods

Nucleus material was removed from 40 bovine tail intervertebral disks. A NRD was inserted posteriorly into each cavity and the disks were subjected to one of four expulsion protocols.

Results

NRD response was dependent on both the NRD design and the loading protocol. Protocol 1 resulted in higher migration and earlier failure rates compared to Protocol 2 in both NRDs. The preformed NRD was more likely to migrate when protocols incorporated rotation. The NRDs had equal migration (60%) and expulsion (60%) rates when using unilateral bending and ramp testing. Combining the results of multiple tests revealed complimentary information regarding the NRD response.

Conclusions

Adapted hula-hoop (Protocol 2) and ramp to failure (Protocol 4), combined with fluoroscopic analysis, revealed complimentary insights regarding migration and failure risk. Therefore, when adopting the surgical approach and animal model used in this study, it is recommended that NRD performance be assessed using both a cyclic and ramp loading protocol.

Establishment and Validation of Nomograms and Web Calculators for Different Cement Leakage Risk Types in Pedicle Screw Augmentation for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis in Osteoporotic Vertebrae

BACKGROUND

The use of cement in pedicle screw augmentation (PSA) enhances the pullout force of pedicle screws in vertebrae affected by osteoporosis. Risks involved in the use of cement for PSA include nerve injury and vascular damage caused by cement leakage.

METHODS

This study included all patients who received PSA for degenerative lumbar stenosis in osteoporotic vertebrae from January 2014 to May 2022. Postoperative computed tomography was used to assess cement leakage. Correlation analysis and logistic regression analyses were used to establish the associated clinical or radiological factors, which were then used to construct nomograms and web calculators.

RESULTS

The study comprised 181 patients including 886 screws inserted into 443 vertebrae. Perivertebral cement leakage was significantly associated with female sex, decreased bone mineral density, solid screws, and scattered cement distribution. Cement leakage through segmental veins (type S, 72.1%), leakage through basivertebral veins (type B, 23.9%), and instrument-related leakage (type I, 13.9%) accounted for most cement leakage. Patients with lower bone mineral density and scattered cement distribution were more likely to experience type S or type B leakage. Our analysis data showed that cement augmentation with cannulated and fenestrated screws tended toward concentrated cement distribution. Creation and verification of each nomogram additionally showcased the prognostic capability and medical significance of the corresponding model.

CONCLUSIONS

Nomograms and web-based calculators can accurately forecast the probability of cement leakage. PSA should be routinely performed using cannulated and fenestrated screws, along with a moderate amount of high-viscosity cement, with continuous monitoring using fluoroscopy.

The incidence and risk factors for extensive epidural cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation: a multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

In cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPSF), epidural cement leakage (CL) is a frequently reported complication with the potential for neural injury, especially when it is extensive. To date, there has been no reports discussing basivertebral foramen morphology and pedicle screw placement, which is critical in the analysis of the risk of extensive epidural CL. Thus, this study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for extensive epidural CL in osteoporotic patients with CAPSF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

371 osteoporotic patients using 1898 cement-augmented screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was utilized to characterize basivertebral foramen morphology. Following CAPSF, the severity of epidural CL, the implantation position of pedicle screw and cement extension within the vertebral body were determined by postoperative CT. In this study, significant risk factors for extensive epidural CL were identified through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 19 patients (5.1%) and 32 screws (1.7%) with extensive epidural CL. Nine patients (involving 19 screws) had neurological symptoms. The independent risk factors for patients with extensive epidural CL were decreased BMD and increased number of augmented screws. Significant predictors for extensive epidural CL were a magistral type of basivertebral foramen, more volume of cement injected, solid screw, a shallower screw implantation, and the smaller distance between the tip of the screw and the midline of vertebral body.

CONCLUSION

Extensive epidural CL risk was significant in CAPSF when a magistral basivertebral foramen was present; solid screws and more volume of cement were used; and screw tip was implanted shallower or closer to the midline.

Anatomic distribution of basivertebral foramen with a magistral form in vertebral bodies of T10~L5 and its clinical significance for extensive epidural cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation: a multicenter case-control study

BACKGROUND

There are no reports discussing anatomic distribution of basivertebral foramen (BVF) in the osteoporotic vertebral body, which is critical in the analysis of the risk of epidural cement leakage (ECL) after cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPSF).

METHODS

371 osteoporotic patients using 1898 cement-augmented screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was used to determine the frequency, width, height, and depth of magistral BVF in T10~L5. Additionally, we measured the distance between BVF and the left/right borders of vertebral body as well as the distance between BVF and upper/lower endplates. Following CAPSF, the severity of ECL and the position of pedicle screws were determined by postoperative CT. Finally, significant risk factors for extensive ECL were identified through binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2968 vertebral bodies ranging from T10 to L5, 801 (42.2%) had a magistral BVF. From T10 to L5, the frequency of magistral BVF appeared to gradually increase. The magistral BVF was much closer to the upper endplate and the depth accounted for about a quarter of anteroposterior diameter of vertebral body. Overall, there were 19 patients (5.1%) and 32 screws (1.7%) with extensive ECL, nine of whom had neurological symptoms. The independent risk factors for extensive ECL were the magistral BVF (OR = 8.62, P < 0.001), more volume of cement injected (OR = 1.57, P = 0.031), reduced distance from screw tip to vertebral midline (OR = 0.76, P = 0.003) and vertebral posterior wall (OR = 0.77, P < 0.001) respectively.

CONCLUSION

When planning a CAPSF procedure, it is important to consider anatomical distribution of BVF and improve screw implantation methods.

The Potential Impact of Basivertebral Foramen Morphology and Pedicle Screw Placement on Epidural Cement Leakage With Cement-Augmented Fenestrated Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 282 Patients and 1404 Augmented Screws

BACKGROUND

Epidural cement leakage (CL) is a common complication in cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw fixation (CAFPSF) with the potential for neural injury. However, there are no reports discussing basivertebral vein morphology and pedicle screw placement, which are critical in the analysis of the risk of epidural CL after CAFPSF.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the incidence and risk factors of epidural CL in osteoporotic patients during CAFPSF.

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty-two osteoporotic patients using 1404 cement-augmented fenestrated screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was used to characterize the morphology of posterior cortical basivertebral foramen. After CAFPSF, the severity of epidural CL, the implantation position of the screw tip, and cement extension within the vertebral body were determined by postoperative CT scans. In this study, significant risk factors for epidural CL were identified through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 28 patients (18.8%) and 108 screws (7.7%) had epidural CL and 7 patients (13 screws) experienced neurological symptoms. Although local epidural CL was generally not clinically significant, extensive epidural leakage posed a higher risk of neurological symptoms. Significant predictors for extensive epidural CL were a magistral type of basivertebral foramen and the smaller distance between the tip of the screw and the posterior wall of the vertebral body.

CONCLUSION

In osteoporotic patients receiving CAFPSF, epidural CL is relatively common. The morphology of basivertebral foramen should be taken into account when planning a CAFPSF procedure. It is important to try and achieve a deeper screw implantation, especially when a magistral type of basivertebral foramen is present.