Primary cervical decompression surgery may improve lumbar symptoms in patients with tandem spinal stenosis

Low back pain improvement after cervical laminoplasty in patients without tandem lumbar stenosis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) on LBP after cervical laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenosis by analyzing the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 56 consecutive patients with cervical spinal stenosis who underwent cervical laminoplasty. Data on age, sex, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (BPEQ), and visual analog scale (VAS) were collected. The patients with VAS for LBP ≥ 30 or more were included and divided into two groups: without LSS [LSS (-)]or with LSS [LSS (+)]. Preoperative clinical characteristics and postoperative changes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Preoperative VAS for LBP were 50.7 ± 16.2 mm and 59.8 ± 19.5 mm in the LSS (+) and LSS (-), respectively (p = 0.09). Patients in the LSS (-) were younger (57.6 ± 11.2 vs. 70.7 ± 8.6, p < 0.001) and showed significantly milder preoperative lumbar symptoms in terms of JOA and BPEQ. Patients in the LSS (-) group showed more postoperative changes in low back pain (18.3 ± 26.4 vs. - 8.3 ± 37.6, p = 0.005) and lumbar function (10.8 ± 25.7 vs. - 2.0 ± 22.5, p = 0.04) at BPEQ, and higher recovery in terms of VAS of LBP (23.0 ± 23.8 mm vs. 5.3 ± 25.9 mm, p = 0.008) and buttocks and low limbs (12.5 ± 35.0 mm vs. - 4.3 ± 24.4 mm, p = 0.029). Nine patients in the LSS (+) group underwent lumbar surgery at 12.8 ± 8.5 months after cervical laminoplasty.

CONCLUSION

LBP improved after cervical laminoplasty in patients without lumbar stenosis.

Meta-Analysis of Simultaneous versus Staged Decompression of Stenotic Regions in Patients with Tandem Spinal Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) refers to simultaneous spinal canal stenosis of noncontiguous regions. There is no consensus in the surgical strategies for patients with symptomatic TSS because of the confusing clinical manifestations. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of 1-stage and 2-stage decompression of all stenotic regions (cervical and lumbar/thoracic segments) in patients with TSS.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, and a comprehensive literature search with the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, was carried out using MEDLINE, Web of Science, and PubMed databases from inception to September 13, 2022. Observational studies reporting the outcomes after 1-stage or 2-stage decompression of all symptomatic regions were included. Possible heterogeneity among studies was assessed by the Higgins I² test, and heterogeneity was statistically investigated using the Q statistic.

RESULTS

Thirteen retrospective observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score improvement in patients with TSS involving either the cervical-thoracic or cervical-lumbar segments. Regarding the surgical parameters and complications, 1-stage decompression showed comparable operation time, blood loss, and major complications to 2-stage decompression in patients with cervical and lumbar TSS. In patients with cervical and thoracic TSS, 1-stage decompression had significant advantages compared with 2-stage decompression in operation time, blood loss, and major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with cervical and lumbar TSS, 2-stage decompression showed slight advantages in clinical outcome without exposing patients to unnecessary surgical risks. For patients with cervical and thoracic TSS, 1-stage decompression showed comparable clinical outcome, although with better operative parameters and lower complication rate than in simultaneous decompression.

Outcomes in surgical treatment for tandem spinal stenosis: systematic literature review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) refers to a narrowing of the spinal canal in distinct, noncontiguous regions. TSS most commonly occurs in the cervical and lumbar regions. Decompressive surgery is indicated for those with cervical myelopathy or persistent symptoms from lumbar stenosis despite conservative management. Surgical management typically involves staged procedures, with cervical decompression taking precedence in most cases, followed by lumbar decompression at a later time. However, several studies have shown favorable outcomes in simultaneous decompression.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to provide a literature review and compare surgical outcomes in patients undergoing staged vs simultaneous surgery for TSS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines to identify original research articles for tandem spinal stenosis. PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for electronic literature search. Original articles from 2005 to 2021 with more than eight adult patients treated surgically for cervical and lumbar TSS in staged or simultaneous procedures were included. Articles including pediatric patients, primarily thoracic stenosis, stenosis secondary to neoplasm or infectious disease, minimally invasive surgery, and non-English language were excluded. Demographic, perioperative, complications, functional outcome, and neurologic outcome data including mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association), Nurick grade (NG), and ODI (Oswestry disability index), were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 667 articles were initially identified. After preliminary screening, 21 articles underwent full-text screening. Ten articles met our inclusion criteria. A total of 831 patients were included, 571 (68%) of them underwent staged procedures, and 260 (32%) underwent simultaneous procedures for TSS. Mean follow-ups ranged from 12 to 85 months. There was no difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) between staged and simultaneous groups (p=.639). Simultaneous surgeries had shorter surgical time than staged surgeries (p<.001). Mean changes in mJOA, NG, and ODI was comparable between staged and simultaneous groups. Complications were similar between the groups. There were more major complications reported in simultaneous operations, although this was not statistically significant (p=.301).

CONCLUSION

Staged and simultaneous surgery for TSS have comparable perioperative, functional, and neurologic outcomes, as well as complication rates. Careful selection of candidates for simultaneous surgery may reduce the length of stay and consolidate rehabilitation, thereby reducing hospital-associated costs.

Radiographic predictors for recurrence of lumbar symptoms after prioritized cervical surgery in patients with tandem spinal stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the current study was to explore radiographic predictors for recurrence of lumbar symptoms after prioritized cervical surgery in patients with tandem spinal stenosis (TSS).

METHODS

The current retrospective cohort study included 74 patients with TSS, who underwent prioritized cervical surgery. Based on presence or absence of improvement in lower limb symptoms, patients were grouped into improved and non-improved groups. Medical records and radiological parameters including age, sex, body mass index, cervical and lumbar parameters were analyzed. In improved group, patients were divided into relapsed and non-relapsed groups based on recurrence in lower limb symptoms.

RESULTS

Lumbar symptoms improved in 70.1% (n = 52) of patients. Comparison between the improved and non-improved group showed that there were no statistically significant differences in cervical parameters while comparisons between the relapsed and non-relapsed groups showed significant differences in redundant nerve roots (RNRs) (p = 0.029), narrow segment (p = 0.042) and lumbar stenosis index (LSI) (p = 0.003). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LSI > 10 (p = 0.016) was independently associated with recurrence of lumbar symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Finding of the current study indicated that LSI > 10 was associated with recurrence of lumbar symptoms in TSS patients following cervical surgery.

Current understanding of tandem spinal stenosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and surgical strategy

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is defined as the concomitant occurrence of stenosis in at least two or more distinct regions (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar) of the spine and may present with a constellation of signs and symptoms. It has four subtypes, including cervico-lumbar, cervico-thoracic, thoraco-lumbar, and cervico-thoraco-lumbar TSS. The prevalence of TSS varies depending on the different subtypes and cohorts.

The main aetiologies of TSS are spinal degenerative changes and heterotopic ossification, and patients with developmental spinal stenosis, ligament ossification, and spinal stenosis at any region are at an increased risk of developing TSS.

The diagnosis of TSS is challenging. The clinical presentation of TSS could be complex, concealed, or severe, and these features may be confusing to clinicians, resulting in an incomplete or delayed diagnosis. Additionally, a consolidated diagnostic criterion for TSS is urgently required to improve consistency across studies and form a basis for establishing treatment guidelines.

The optimal treatment option for TSS is still under debate; areas of controversies include choice of the decompression range, choice between simultaneous or staged surgical patterns, and the order of the surgeries.

The present study reviews publications on TSS, consolidates current awareness on prevalence, aetiologies, potential risk factors, diagnostic dilemmas and criteria, and surgical strategies based on TSS subtypes. This is the first review to include thoracic spinal stenosis as a candidate disorder in TSS and aims at providing the readers with a comprehensive overview of TSS.

Simultaneous decompression of all stenotic regions versus decompression of only the most symptomatic region in patients with tandem spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Selection of anatomic region of spine for decompression in patients with symptomatic tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) remains a challenge due to the confusing clinical presentation as well as uncertain evidence. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies were conducted to compare the outcomes between simultaneous decompression of all stenotic regions (cervical and lumbar, Group 1) and decompression of only the most symptomatic stenotic region (cervical/lumbar, Group 2) in patients with TSS.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, and a comprehensive literature search with well-established inclusion and exclusion criteria with JOA score as an outcome measure was done on PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE database (till January 2021). Observational studies reporting outcomes after simultaneous decompression or only the most symptomatic region were included. NIH quality assessment tool was used to check the quality of each study, and treatment effects were calculated using Dersimonian and Laird random effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the analysis out of which all were retrospective observational studies (Level 4 evidence) except one (Level 3 evidence). Overall proportional meta-analysis showed no significant difference in change in JOA scores, operative time, blood loss, total and major complications between Group 1 and Group 2. However, minor complications were significantly increased on performing decompression of both regions simultaneously (p = 0.04). On performing subgroup analysis comparing cervical surgery cohort with lumbar surgery cohort, no difference was found in change in JOA score and requirement of second-stage surgery.

CONCLUSION

Decompression of the most symptomatic region alone irrespective of its location has equal clinical outcomes with less complication rate than simultaneous decompression in patients with TSS.