The retropharyngeal steroid use during operation on the fusion rate and dysphagia after ACDF? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Investigating the use of peri-operative systemic steroid administration in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) - A systematic review

Objective

The study aims to analyze the utility of peri-operative systemic intravenous (IV) steroids in mitigating postoperative complications and improving clinical outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase databases for studies assessing the role of IV or systemic steroids in ACDF surgery. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers using Covidence, with a third reviewer finalizing the data and settling any conflicts. The systematic review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered on Prospero under the title, Investigating the Effectiveness of Early "SYSTEMIC" (oral or IV) Steroid Administration, within a 24-hour to one-week timeframe post-operatively, in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review. The Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool was used for clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for retrospective studies.

Results

Six studies were included and showed that IV steroids effectively mitigated dysphagia for up to a month, with higher efficacy compared to topical steroids used intraoperatively. However, IV steroids did not significantly impact the incidence of paravertebral swelling. Reductions in dysphonia, pain scores, and airway compromise were observed, but their long-term effects were insignificant. Systemic steroids were also found to delay fusion in some cases for up to six months, but long-term healing and fusion were not significantly impacted.

Conclusions

The use of IV steroids in the perioperative period after ACDF surgery is beneficial in mitigating dysphagia, with multiple doses showing long-term effectiveness compared to the transient effects of local steroids used intraoperatively. Patients may experience perceived benefits in terms of airway compromise, pain, and dysphonia without significant systemic complications or fusion failure. However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal steroid dosing, frequency, and formulation and thus strong recommendations cannot be made.

Corticosteroid Effects on Upper Esophageal Sphincter Function in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Study Using High-Resolution Impedance Manometry

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to explore the effect of local corticosteroids on dysphagia in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). To address a gap in the limited research on this topic, we utilized high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) questionnaire to assess the effects on key swallowing muscles, including the upper esophageal sphincter (UES).

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients undergoing ACDF to either the corticosteroid group or the saline solution group. Patients received 10 mg of local triamcinolone or saline solution prevertebrally at the cervical spine level before wound closure. Swallowing function preoperatively and at 1 month postoperatively were compared between the groups with use of HRIM parameters (e.g., UES relaxation, UES opening extent, intrabolus pressure, and pharyngeal contraction) and EAT-10 scores. Patients were also followed for postoperative complications and mortality within 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty patients completed the study. The median age was 55 years in the corticosteroid group and 57 years in the saline group, and each group had 8 female patients. All participants were Taiwanese. We found no significant difference in median preoperative UES relaxation pressure between the corticosteroid and saline solution groups (33.8 and 31.3 mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.54). Postoperatively, the corticosteroid group had significantly lower median UES relaxation pressure than the saline solution group (24.5 versus 33.6 mm Hg; p = 0.01). Before and after surgery, all other HRIM parameters and EAT-10 scores were similar between the groups, with the corticosteroid group demonstrating median pre- and postoperative EAT-10 scores of 0 and 4, respectively, and the saline solution group demonstrating scores of 2 and 3, respectively. There were no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that local corticosteroids may reduce UES relaxation pressure at 1 month after ACDF, potentially enhancing UES opening. Further research is required to verify our findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluating the effectiveness of the transcorporeal approach in minimally invasive spine surgery for cervical spinal disease: a comprehensive review and technical insights

BACKGROUND

The evolution of minimally invasive spine surgery, propelled by microscopy and endoscopy techniques, has reshaped the landscape of spinal interventions. The anterior approach to the cervical spine is widely recognized for its reproducibility and effectiveness in treating pathologies leading to radiculopathy or myelopathy. Apart from the traditional transdiscal approach, this study delves into the anterior transcorporeal approach, a minimally invasive technique, exploring its applicability in various cervical spinal pathologies.

PURPOSE

The objective is to comprehensively illustrate the anterior transcorporeal approach, exploring its historical development, biomechanical underpinnings, technical nuances, and clinical applications in managing cervical spine disorders.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The search was focused on the minimally invasive anterior transcorporeal approach for cervical pathologies, with an emphasis on evaluating the methodological evolution, technical execution, and clinical outcomes across diverse studies.

RESULTS

The review identified a significant body of literature supporting the efficacy of the minimally invasive anterior transcorporeal approach. Over the past two decades, this approach has demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes, suggesting its potential as an alternative strategy for specific cervical spine diseases. The evolution of this technique is tightly linked to the advancements in medical equipment and the innovative endeavors of surgical pioneers.

CONCLUSIONS

The anterior transcorporeal approach marks a milestone in minimally invasive cervical spine surgery. Its development reflects ongoing efforts to refine surgical techniques for better patient outcomes. While offering a promising alternative for treating certain cervical spine conditions, the approach demands precise case selection and is influenced by the rapid progression of medical technology. Future research and technological advancements are expected to further enhance the efficacy and safety of this approach, potentially expanding its indications in spinal surgery.

Lateral Deviation of the Hyoid Bone and Thyroid Cartilage Influences Prevertebral Soft-Tissue Swelling and Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prevertebral soft-tissue swelling (PSTS) after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is known to be influenced by several factors. We considered the effect of lateral deviation on the traction force and attempted to find a relationship with the PSTS. This study was designed to evaluate the preoperative lateral deviation of the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage and its effect on PSTS, airway collapse, and clinical outcomes after ACDF.

METHODS

Preoperative lateral deviations of the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage at the superior cornu and inferior cornu were measured. To assess the effect of lateral deviation, patients who underwent 1 or 2 level ACDF with the left-sided approach were divided into a deviation group (left-sided deviation >5 mm or >10 mm) and a nondeviation group (left-sided deviation <5 mm or <10 mm). Difference of preoperative and postoperative PSTS (dPSTS), airway collapse, dysphagia score, and Neck Disability Index were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Lateral deviation was measured in 290 patients, and 145 were enrolled to assess the effect of lateral deviation. Left-sided deviation was more common than right-sided deviation in all 3 structures (the hyoid bone, superior cornu, and inferior cornu of the thyroid cartilage). The deviation group demonstrated a significantly larger dPSTS at the C3 and C4 levels, more airway collapse at the C4 level, and a higher dysphagia score. There was no significant difference in the Neck Disability Index between the 2 groups. Lateral deviation significantly correlated with dPSTS (C3, C4, C5, and C6 levels) and airway collapse (C3 and C4 levels).

CONCLUSION

A left-sided deviation of more than 5 mm of the hyoid bone or thyroid cartilage discouraged the left-sided approach for ACDF because of the aggravation of dPSTS, airway collapse, and dysphagia postoperatively.

Use of Steroids in Spine Surgery

Steroids are commonly used in spine pathologies. A broad range of providers from different specialties such as primary care, emergency medicine, and spine surgeons use steroids. The indications and controversies of steroid use are discussed in this article. A literature review was conducted on the use of steroids in spine pathologies. Steroids have been successfully used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to prevent dysphagia, in spinal cord injuries to improve neurological function, in acute back and neck pain for pain control, and in spinal metastasis. Steroid injections have been used for axial as well as radicular pain. Techniques and complications are further discussed. Local and systemic steroids have been successful in preventing dysphagia after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Steroids failed to improve the neurologic outcomes after spinal cord injuries, and they were associated with multiple complications. Systemic steroids have not been proven to provide better clinical outcomes for acute low back pain. Steroid injections are more effective in radicular pain rather than axial pain. There are not enough high-quality studies on the use of steroids for metastatic spinal cord compression.

Performing the 3-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Technical Pearls to Maximize Fusion Rates and Reduce Postoperative Complications

The anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is a common and effective treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy, either with or without concomitant radiculopathy. In many cases, patients with degenerative cervical spondylosis can present with disease at multiple levels. With each additional level included in the procedure, rates of complication rate can increase-both due to the nature of the anterior cervical approach (dysphagia) as well as fusion across all levels. Here, we review several technical considerations with the goal of increasing efficiency and improving outcomes with the 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Effect of perioperative steroids application on dysphagia, fusion rate, and visual analogue scale (VAS) following anterior cervical spine surgery: A meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Objective

To conduct a high-level meta-analysis of the RCTs to evaluate perioperative steroids use in the management of fusion rate, dysphagia, and VAS following anterior cervical spine surgery for up to 1 year.

Methods

We searched the database PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov without time restriction to identify RCTs that evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative steroids after anterior cervical spine surgery. A subgroup analysis was undertaken to investigate the effects of intravenous and local steroids. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database prior to initiation (CRD42022313444).

Results

A total of 14 RCTs were eligible for final inclusion. This meta-analysis showed that steroids could achieve lower dysphagia rate (p < 0.001), severe dysphagia rate within 1 year (p < 0.001), lower VAS scores at both 1 day (p = 0.005), 2 weeks (p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (p = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding operation time (p = 0.670), fusion rates (p = 0.678), VAS scores at 6 months (p = 0.104) and 1 year (p = 0.062). There was no significant difference between intravenous and local steroid administration regarding dysphagia rates (p = 0.82), fusion rate (p = 1.00), and operative time (p = 0.10).

Conclusion

Steroids intravenously or locally following anterior cervical spine surgery can reduce incidence and severity of dysphagia within 1 year, VAS score within 2 weeks, and shorten the length of hospital stay without affecting fusion rates, increasing the operating time, VAS score at 6 months and 1 year.

A deep learning framework for vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement with external validation

PURPOSE

To propose a fully automated deep learning (DL) framework for the vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement from three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) images of the spine, and validate the proposed framework on an external database.

METHODS

The vertebrae were first localized and segmented in each 3D CT image using a DL architecture based on an ensemble of U-Nets, and then automated vertebral morphometry in the form of vertebral body (VB) and intervertebral disk (IVD) heights, and spinal curvature measurements in the form of coronal and sagittal Cobb angles (thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis) were performed using dedicated machine learning techniques. The framework was trained on 1725 vertebrae from 160 CT images and validated on an external database of 157 vertebrae from 15 CT images.

RESULTS

The resulting mean absolute errors (± standard deviation) between the obtained DL and corresponding manual measurements were 1.17 ± 0.40 mm for VB heights, 0.54 ± 0.21 mm for IVD heights, and 3.42 ± 1.36° for coronal and sagittal Cobb angles, with respective maximal absolute errors of 2.51 mm, 1.64 mm, and 5.52°. Linear regression revealed excellent agreement, with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.943, 0.928, and 0.996, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The obtained results are within the range of values, obtained by existing DL approaches without external validation. The results therefore confirm the scalability of the proposed DL framework from the perspective of application to external data, and time and computational resource consumption required for framework training.