Matching correction of main and compensatory curves is critical for immediate postoperative coronal balance in correction of severe adult idiopathic scoliosis

Risk Factors of Postoperative Coronal Balance Transition in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential risk factors influencing the transition of postoperative coronal balance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As time passes after surgery, the spinal sequence of DLS patients may dynamically shift from coronal balance to imbalance, causing clinical symptoms. However, the transition of postoperative coronal balance and its risk factors have not been effectively investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 156 DLS patients. The cohort was divided into immediate postoperative coronal balance with follow-up balance (N=73) and follow-up imbalance (N=21), immediate postoperative coronal imbalance (CIB) with follow-up balance (N=23), and follow-up imbalance (N=39). Parameters included age, sex, classification of coronal balance, coronal balance distance, fusion of L5 or S1, location of apical vertebra, apical vertebral translation (AVT), Cobb angle of the main curve and lumbar-sacral curve, tilt and direction of L4/5, tilt and direction of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), and Cobb angle of T1-UIV. Statistical testing was performed using chi-square/Fisher exact test, t tests or nonparametric tests, correlation testing, and stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified a significant difference in preoperative AVT, preoperative Cobb angle, and immediate postoperative UIV tilt between patients with and without follow-up balance. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated factors associated with follow-up CIB included preoperative AVT ( P =0.015), preoperative Cobb angle ( P =0.002), and tilt of immediate postoperative UIV ( P =0.018). Factors associated with immediate postoperative CIB in patients with follow-up coronal balance were sex, correction ratio of the main curve, and direction of L4. Logistic regression analysis further identified a correction ratio of main curve ≤0.7 ( P =0.009) as an important predictive factor.

CONCLUSION

Patients with immediate postoperative coronal balance and higher preoperative AVT, preoperative Cobb angle, and tilt of immediate postoperative UIV were more likely to experience follow-up CIB. A correction ratio of the main curve ≤0.7 was an independent predictor of follow-up CIB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Factors Related to Preoperative Coronal Malalignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: An Analysis on Coronal Parameters

Objectives

Recently the effects of coronal malalignment (CM) in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) have been reported, however, there was few studies on the correlated parameters of coronal alignments at pre‐operation. The aims of this current study were to investigate the associations of coronal parameters with scoliosis and coronal alignment, and to explore the relationships between the coronal pelvic tilt and coronal alignment in DLS.

Methods

One hundred and sixty‐one DLS patients in our hospital from May 2016 to December 2020 were reviewed and documented. The coronal balance distance (CBD, the offset between the center of C7 and the plumb line drawn from the center of S1), major Cobb (MC), fractional Cobb (FC), L4 coronal tilt, L5 coronal tilt, coronal pelvic tilt, apical rotation, and the vertebras in major curve were measured and documented. CM was considered if the CBD ≥ 30mm. All of those participants were assigned into group A (CBD ≥ 30 mm) and group B (CBD < 30 mm). Comparisons of demographic and radiographic data were performed between groups A and B. Pearson correlation and further multiple regression with stepwise method analysis were used to investigate those coronal parameters correlated to MC and CBD, respectively.

Results

Thirty‐one patients suffering from CM were assigned into group A, and the rest of 130 patients were assigned to group B accordingly. Then the incidence of CM was about 19.3% (31/161). Patients in group A had less vertebras in the main curve (P = 0.009), however, the apical rotation (P < 0.001) and the L4 coronal tilt (P = 0.007) were much larger. Although the MC (P = 0.426) and FC (P = 0.06) had no difference between the two groups, the match between MC and FC was much smaller (p = 0.021) in group A. The coronal pelvic tilt correlated significantly with FC (r = 0.552, p < 0.001), but mildly with MC (r = −0.366, p < 0.001), L4 coronal tilt (r = 0.348, p < 0.001), and L5 coronal tilt (r = 0.351, p < 0.001), respectively. The CBD correlated strongly with L4 coronal tilt (r = −0.471, p < 0.001) and L5 coronal tilt (r = −0.468, p < 0.001), respectively, but mildly with FC (r = −0.255, p = 0.016). Further multiple regression analysis revealed that only L4 coronal tilt was the independent factor for MC (r² = 0.549, p < 0.001) and CBD (r² = 0.221, p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

The prevalence of CM in DLS patients is about 19% at pre‐operation. With similar major Cobb, the less the vertebras in the major curve, the larger the CBD. L4 coronal tilt may correlate significantly to scoliosis and CBD. Coronal pelvic tilt may be just one of the compensations for the scoliosis deformity but effects CBD directly.