Different standing postures are the influencing factors for the efficacy of laminoplasty in the treatment of K-Line (-) patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

Effect of K-line (-) or (+) on surgical outcomes in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A systematic and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the influence of K-line status on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with cervical posterior longitudinal ligament ossification (OPLL).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, OVID, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for English-language literature related to K-line and OPLL up to June 7, 2024. The study underwent rigorous selection, quality assessment, and data extraction, followed by meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 17.0 software. This study has been registered with the international PROSPERO registry (registration number: CRD42024558578).

RESULTS

Seventeen articles encompassing 1247 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that patients with a positive K-line (K-line (+)) exhibited significantly enhanced Japanese Orthopaedic Association score recovery rate (mean differences [MD] = 19.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.28-26.28, P < .00001), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (MD = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.64-2.37, P = .0007), C2-C7 Cobb angle (MD = 6.45, 95% CI: 3.73-9.17, P < .00001), alongside reduced occupation ratio (MD = -7.67, 95% CI: -10.86 to -4.49, P < .00001), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (MD = -6.18, 95% CI: -8.36 to -3.99, P < .00001), and neck disability index (MD = -1.85, 95% CI: -3.18 to -0.52, P = .006) at final follow-up compared to those with a negative K-line (K-line (-)). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complication rates (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.41-3.20, P = .79), final follow-up visual analog scale scores (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.80 to 0.59, P = .77), or T1 slope (MD = 2.66, 95% CI: -0.20 to 5.52, P = .07) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

A positive preoperative K-line (K-line (+)) is a better predictor of prognosis and is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with multi-segmental cervical OPLL compared to a negative K-line (K-line (-)).

Outcomes and Vertebral Osteophytes and Bulging Intervertebral Discs Occupancy as a Decision-Making Tool for Surgical Success in Patients Undergoing Microendoscopic Foraminotomy for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of microendoscopic foraminotomy in treating lumbar foraminal stenosis and identify the optimal extent of decompression that yields improved results and fewer complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study reviewed the medical records of 95 consecutive patients who underwent microendoscopic foraminotomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system and visual analog scale for low back and leg pain. Surgical success was determined by meeting significant improvement thresholds for back and leg pain at 2 years postoperatively. Multiple regression analysis identified factors associated with improved pain scores. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the cut-off values for successful surgeries.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were observed in Japanese Orthopaedic Association and visual analog scale scores for back and leg pain 2 years postoperatively compared with preoperative scores (P < 0.0001) and sustained over a ≥5-year follow-up period. Reoperation rates were low and did not significantly increase over time. Multiple regression analysis identified occupancy of the vertebral osteophytes and bulging intervertebral discs (O/D complex) as surgical success predictors. A 45.0% O/D complex occupancy cutoff value was determined, displaying high sensitivity and specificity for predicting surgical success.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence supporting the long-term efficacy of microendoscopic foraminotomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis and predicting surgical success. The 45.0% O/D complex occupancy cut-off value can guide patient selection and outcome prediction. These insights contribute to informed surgical decision-making and underscore the importance of evaluating the O/D complex in preoperative planning and predicting outcomes.

Usefulness of K-line in predicting prognosis of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND

K-line is widely recognized as a useful index for evaluating cervical alignment and the size of the cervical ossification at the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the K-line could be a useful clinical tool for predicting the prognosis of laminoplasty (LP) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

Adult CSM patients scheduled for cervical LP were recruited for this study. C2-7 angle, local kyphosis angle, and K-line was evaluated by T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical findings were evaluated by the JOA score and the recovery rate. Clinical and radiological findings were evaluated preoperation and final follow-up. Patients were grouped into K-line ( +) and K-line (-). Patients with Kline (-) were further divided into two sub-groups: disc type (anterior cord compression due to disc protrusion with kyphosis) and osseous type (due to osseous structure such as osteophyte).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The recovery rate of K-line (-) group (n = 11,19.4%) was significantly worse than that of K-line ( +) group (n = 57, 50.6%, p<0.05). Among 11 K-line (-) patients, 7 were disc type and 4 were osseous type. Over the period of follow-up, the disc type K-line (-) patients changed to K-line ( +) and showed significantly better recovery rate (27.6%) compared to the osseous type K-line (-) group (5.0%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present of this study indicate that K-line may have a predictive value for clinical outcome in patients undergoing LP for CSM. K-line (-) of osseous type was worse than k-line (-) of disc type.

Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Complex in Spinal Deformity Secondary to Surgical Resection of the Intradural Tumor

OBJECTIVE

In most cases, complete resection of the intradural tumor is accompanied by long-term neurological complications. Postoperative spinal deformity is the most common complication after surgical resection of intradural tumors, and posterior longitudinal ligament complex (PLC) plays an important role in postoperative spinal deformity. In this study, we investigated the role of PLC in spinal deformity after the surgical treatment of intradural tumors.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 218 consecutive patients who underwent intradural tumor resection from 2000 to 2018 in this retrospective study. Before 2010, patients underwent laminoplasty without maintaining the integrity of PLC (laminoplasty group, n = 155). After 2010, patients performed single-port laminoplasty to maintain the integrity of PLC (laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group, n = 63). The score of quality of life, painful cortex, spinal cord movement, progressive kyphosis or scoliosis, perioperative morbidity, and neurological results were analyzed in the laminoplasty group and laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group. The distributed variable was shown as mean ± standard deviation and an independent t-test or one-way analysis of variance was calculated.

RESULTS

There are 155 patients (71.1%) included in the laminoplasty group, and 63 patients (28.9%) in the laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group. The average age of patients was 42 ± 2.3 years, and the average modified McCormick score was 2. There were 158 (72.4%) patients with intramedullary tumors and 115 (52.7%) patients with extramedullary tumors. The length of hospital stays (8 days vs. 6 days; p = 0.023) and discharge to inpatient rehabilitation (48.4% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.012) were significantly lower in the laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group than the laminoplasty group. There was no significant difference in the risk of progressive deformity between the two groups at 18 months after surgery (relative risk 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.25; p = 0.258) and at 20 months after surgery (relative risk 0.24; 95% CI 0.21-2.1).

CONCLUSION

Laminoplasty retains posterior ligament complex showed no impact on the spinal deformities compared with laminoplasty, but significantly improved the postoperative spinal activity, alleviated pain symptoms, and reduced hospital recovery time.