Comparison of the prognostic factors of total en bloc spondylectomy and total piecemeal spondylectomy in patients with Enneking stage III giant cell tumor in the thoracic and lumbar spine

Giant cell tumor of the thoracic spine: An unusual cause for spinal cord compression

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone are uncommon neoplasms, typically located in the metaphysis of long bones, with rare occurrences in the spine, especially in the thoracic region. We report the case of a 34-year-old woman with a history of psoriasis and celiac disease, who presented with progressive inflammatory back pain and paraparesis. Imaging revealed an osteolytic mass at the T11 vertebra, causing dorsal spinal cord compression. Emergency surgery was performed, with histopathology confirming GCT. Despite initial recovery of motor function, surgical stabilization was later necessary to prevent spinal instability. The patient was started on adjuvant Denosumab therapy and remained asymptomatic on follow-up. This case highlights the rarity of GCT in the thoracic spine and associated diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Though benign, GCTs can cause severe spinal cord compression, necessitating prompt surgical intervention to preserve neurological function. Denosumab therapy shows promise in controlling tumor progression and enhancing surgical outcomes. Multidisciplinary management and regular follow-up are essential to prevent recurrence and improve prognosis.

Thoracic giant cell tumor after two total en bloc spondylectomies including one emergency surgery: A case report

BACKGROUND

For patients with acute paraplegia caused by spinal giant cell tumor (GCT) who require emergency decompressive surgery, there is still a lack of relevant reports on surgical options. This study is the first to present the case of an acute paraplegic patient with a thoracic spinal GCT who underwent an emergency total en bloc spondylectomy (TES). Despite tumor recurrence, three-level TES was repeated after denosumab therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 27-year-old female patient who underwent single-level TES in an emergency presented with sudden severe back pain and acute paraplegia due to a thoracic spinal tumor. After emergency TES, the patient's spinal cord function recovered, and permanent paralysis was avoided. The postoperative histopathological examination revealed that the excised neoplasm was a rare GCT. Unfortunately, the tumor recurred 9 months after the first surgery. After 12 months of denosumab therapy, the tumor size was reduced, and tumor calcification. To prevent recurrent tumor progression and provide a possible cure, a three-level TES was performed again. The patient returned to an active lifestyle 1 month after the second surgery, and no recurrence of GCT was found at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This patient with acute paraplegia underwent TES twice, including once in an emergency, and achieved good therapeutic results. TES in emergency surgery is feasible and safe when conditions permit; however, it may increase the risk of tumor recurrence.

En Bloc Surgery in the Thoracic Spine: Indications, Results, and Complications in a Series of Eighty-Five Patients Affected by Primary and Secondary Malignant Bone Tumors

BACKGROUND

En bloc resection remains the cornerstone treatment for malignant bone tumors affecting the spine. The thoracic spine poses unique challenges because of the proximity of crucial structures. This study assesses outcomes of patients who underwent en bloc spondylectomy for malignant bone tumors at the thoracic level.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 85 cases of primary and secondary bone tumors in the thoracic spine, undergoing en bloc spondylectomy from 1996 to 2016. Evaluation encompassed clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, complications, survival, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients, 40 presented directly, whereas 45 had undergone previous intralesional surgery. Chondrosarcoma and chordoma comprised the most prevalent primary histologic types; thyroid and kidney carcinomas were the most frequent secondary tumors. Pain was reported in 75 patients at diagnosis. Margins were adequate in 54 cases and intralesional in 31. Immediate postoperative deaths amounted to 4. Major complications included substantial blood loss, neurologic deterioration, and paraplegia. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 58.7%, significantly influenced by the surgical margin: patients with wide margins experienced a 5-year local recurrence-free survival of 85.7%, whereas those with marginal and intralesional margins had rates of 56.7% and 45.6%, respectively; overall recurrence was 22.3%, with no notable disparities between previously treated and untreated patients. The 5-year overall survival was 63.2% and 56.2% for primary and secondary tumors, respectively. The overall survival was not significantly influenced by surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Managing malignant thoracic bone tumors poses significant challenges. This study underscores the criticality of achieving adequate margins, particularly after previous intralesional approaches.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

Comparison of En Bloc Resection and Intralesional Excision for Re-resection of Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine

OBJECTIVE

Re-resection of spinal giant cell tumors is an exceedingly difficult procedure. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with en bloc resection or intralesional excision for re-resection has rarely been reported. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of en bloc resection with that of intralesional excision in patients undergoing re-resection for giant cell tumors of the spine.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent revision surgeries for relapse of giant cell tumors of the spine at our center between January 2005 and January 2021. Local progression-free survival represents the duration between en bloc resection or intralesional excision and tumor recurrence. Neurological recovery, survival rates, local control, and complications were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients (nine men and 13 women) with a mean age of 34.1 (range 19-63) years were included. Significant statistical differences were found in the local tumor recurrence rate between patients treated with en bloc resection and those treated with intralesional excision (p < 0.05). The 5- and 10-year local progression-free survival rates were both 90% in the en bloc resection group, while in the intralesional excision group, the 5-year local progression-free survival rate was 80% with a 10-year rate of 45.7%. The en bloc resection group had a lower local tumor recurrence rate than that of the intralesional excision group (p < 0.05), but the former had a higher rate of complications (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a low local recurrence rate in patients who underwent en bloc resection for giant cell tumors, while the perioperative complication rate was high.

Biomechanical effects of transverse connectors on total en bloc spondylectomy of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) on spinal stability is substantial, necessitating strong fixation to restore spinal stability. The transverse connector (TC) serves as a posterior spinal instrumentation that connects the left and right sides of the pedicle screw-rod system. Several studies have highlighted the potential of a TC in enhancing the stability of the fixed segments. However, contradictory results have suggested that a TC not only fails to improve the stability of the fixed segments but also might promote stress associated with internal fixation. To date, there is a lack of previous research investigating the biomechanical effects of a TC on TES. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects of a TC on internal fixation during TES of the lumbar (L) spine.

METHODS

A single-segment (L3 segment) TES was simulated using a comprehensive L spine finite element model. Five models were constructed based on the various positions of the TC, namely the intact model (L1-sacrum), the TES model without a TC, the TES model with a TC at L1-2, the TES model with a TC at L2-4, and the TES model with a TC at L4-5. Mechanical analysis of these distinct models was conducted using the Abaqus software to assess the variations in the biomechanics of the pedicle screw-rod system, titanium cage, and adjacent endplates.

RESULTS

The stability of the surgical segments was found to be satisfactory across all models. Compared with the complete model, the internal fixation device exhibited the greatest constraint on overextension (95.2-95.6%), while showing the least limitation on left/right rotation (53.62-55.64%). The application of the TC had minimal effect on the stability of the fixed segments, resulting in a maximum reduction in segment mobility of 0.11° and a variation range of 3.29%. Regardless of the use of a TC, no significant changes in stress were observed for the titanium cage. In the model without the TC, the maximum von Mises stress (VMS) for the pedicle screw-rod system reached 136.9 MPa during anterior flexion. Upon the addition of a TC, the maximum VMS of the pedicle screw-rod system increased to varying degrees. The highest recorded VMS was 459.3 MPa, indicating a stress increase of 335.5%. Following the TC implantation, the stress on the adjacent endplate exhibited a partial reduction, with the maximum stress reduced by 27.6%.

CONCLUSION

The use of a TC in TES does not improve the stability of the fixed segments and instead might result in increased stress concentration within the internal fixation devices. Based on these findings, the routine utilisation of TC in TES is deemed unnecessary.