Sagittal realignment: surgical restoration of the global alignment and proportion score parameters: a subgroup analysis. What are the consequences of failing to realign?

Redefining physiological whole-body alignment according to pelvic incidence: normative values and prediction models

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinopelvic alignment assessment needs to account for pelvic incidence (PI).

PURPOSE

This study aimed at providing normative values for commonly used parameters in whole-body alignment analysis based on PI.

DESIGN

Multicentric prospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study included healthy volunteers with full-body biplanar radiograph in free-standing position.

OUTCOME MEASURES

All radiographic data were collected from 3D reconstructions: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), spino-sacral angle (SSA), sagittal odontoid-hip axis angle (ODHA), pelvic parameters, sacro-femoral angle (SFA), knee flexion angle (KFA), ankle flexion angle (AA), Pelvic shift (PSh), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK) and cervical lordosis (CL).

METHODS

Population was divided into five groups according to PI. Normative values were described for each group. Linear regressions including age and PI provided prediction formulas for PT, TPA, SSA and SFA.

RESULTS

642 subjects were included. Mean age was 37.7 ± 16.3 years (range: 18-90). Mean PI in the cohort was 49.3 ± 9.5°. LL, PT, SFA, SSA and TPA correlated with PI and age. ODHA, TK, CL and the other lower limb parameters were not associated with PI. All normative values across PI groups are provided for segmental, regional and global alignment parameters. Prediction formulas were: PT=-12.7 + 0.38*PI + 0.14*Age, TPA=-16.9 + 0.34*PI + 0.15*Age, SSA = 109.8 + 0.58*PI-0.19*Age, and SFA = 173 + 0.39*PI + 0.11*Age.

CONCLUSIONS

SSA, PT, TPA and SFA must be assessed according to patient's PI. This study provides normative values for each PI group, and predictive formulas taking age and PI into account. PI cannot be used to define thoracic and cervical curvatures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Wearable bio-adhesive metal detector array (BioMDA) for spinal implants

Dynamic tracking of spinal instrumentation could facilitate real-time evaluation of hardware integrity and in so doing alert patients/clinicians of potential failure(s). Critically, no method yet exists to continually monitor the integrity of spinal hardware and by proxy the process of spinal arthrodesis; as such hardware failures are often not appreciated until clinical symptoms manifest. Accordingly, herein, we report on the development and engineering of a bio-adhesive metal detector array (BioMDA), a potential wearable solution for real-time, non-invasive positional analyses of osseous implants within the spine. The electromagnetic coupling mechanism and intimate interfacial adhesion enable the precise sensing of the metallic implants position without the use of radiation. The customized decoupling models developed facilitate the precise determination of the horizontal and vertical positions of the implants with incredible levels of accuracy (e.g., <0.5 mm). These data support the potential use of BioMDA in real-time/dynamic postoperative monitoring of spinal implants.

Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study

STUDY DESIGN

Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the distribution of GAP scores in the MEANS cohort and compare the spinal shape via stratification by GAP alignment category, age, and country.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The GAP score has been used to categorize spinal morphology and prognosticate adult spinal deformity surgical outcomes and mechanical complications. We analyzed a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort to assess the distribution of GAP scores.

METHODS

Four hundred sixty-seven healthy volunteers without spinal disorders were recruited in five countries. Sagittal radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. The GAP total and constituent factor scores were calculated for each patient. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed to compare variables across groups, followed by the post hoc Games-Howell test. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The significance level was set to P <0.05.

RESULTS

In the MEANS cohort, 13.7% (64/467) of volunteers were ≥60 years old, and 86.3% (403/467) were <60 years old. 76.9% (359/467) was proportioned, 19.5% (91/467) was moderately disproportioned, and 3.6% (17/467) was severely disproportioned. There was no significant difference in the frequency of proportioned, moderately, or severely disproportioned GAP between subjects from different countries ( P =0.060). Those with severely disproportioned GAP alignment were on average 14.5 years older ( P =0.016), had 23.1° lower magnitude lumbar lordosis (LL) ( P <0.001), 14.2° higher pelvic tilt ( P <0.001), 13.3° lower sacral slope ( P <0.001), and 24.1° higher pelvic-incidence (PI)-LL mismatch ( P <0.001), 18.2° higher global tilt ( P <0.001) than those with proportioned GAP; thoracic kyphosis and PI were not significantly different ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The GAP system applies to a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort. Spinal alignment should be considered on a spectrum, as 19.5% of the asymptomatic volunteers were classified as moderately disproportioned and 3.6% severely disproportioned. Radiographic malalignment does not always indicate symptoms or pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

What factors are associated with a better restoration of pelvic version after adult spinal deformity surgery?

INTRODUCTION

Poor restoration of pelvic version after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is associated with an increased risk of mechanical complications and worse quality of life. We studied the factors linked to the improvement of postoperative pelvic version.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter ASD database. Selection criteria were: operated patients having preoperative severe pelvic retroversion as per GAP score (Relative Pelvic Version-RPV < - 15°); panlumbar fusions to the pelvis; 2-year follow-up. Group A comprised patients with any postoperative improvement of RPV score, and group B had no improvement. Groups were compared regarding baseline characteristics, surgical factors, and postoperative sagittal parameters. Parametric and non-parametric analyses were employed.

RESULTS

177 patients were studied, median age 67 years (61; 72.5), 83.6% female. Groups were homogeneous in baseline demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative sagittal parameters (p > 0.05). The difference in RPV improvement was 11.56º. Group A (137 patients) underwent a higher percentage of ALIF procedures (OR = 6.66; p = 0.049), and posterior osteotomies (OR = 4.96; p < 0.001) especially tricolumnar (OR = 2.31; p = 0.041). It also showed a lower percentage of TLIF procedures (OR = 0.45; p = 0.028), and posterior decompression (OR = 0.44; p = 0.024). Group A displayed better postoperative L4-S1 angle and relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), leading to improved sacral slope (and RPV), and global alignment (RSA). Group A patients had longer instrumentations (11.45 vs 10; p = 0.047) and hospitalization time (13 vs 11; p = 0.045). All postoperative sagittal parameters remained significantly better in group A through follow-up. However, differences between the groups narrowed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

ALIF procedures and posterior column osteotomies improved pelvic version postoperatively, and associated better L4-S1 and lumbar lordosis restoration, indirectly improving all other sagittal parameters. However, these improvements seemed to fade during the 2-year follow-up.

Clinical significance of relative pelvic version measurement as a predictor of low back pain after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between the preoperative global alignment and proportion (GAP) score and low back pain (LBP) after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of 200 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA for hip osteoarthritis. The following variables were compared between individuals with (n = 76) and without (n = 124) LBP after THA over a mean follow-up of 2 years: age, sex, GAP score, and patient-reported outcome measures. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to detect predictive factors.

RESULTS

The following parameters were predictive of post-THA LBP: relative pelvic version (RPV) <-7° (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.72; P = 0.032) and relative lumbar lordosis <-15° (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.13; P = 0.041) preoperatively. Using an RPV cutoff value of - 7° (specificity 61/64 = 0.953; sensitivity 121/136 = 0.890), there were significant between-group differences in LBP visual analog scale (P = 0.020), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, P = 0.014), EuroQol 5-Dimension (P = 0.027), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS JR, P = 0.012), patient satisfaction (P = 0.024). There was clinically meaningful improvement for LBP visual analog scale (P = 0.001), ODI (P = 0.004), and HOOS JR (P < 0.001). The RPV before THA was correlated with HOOS JR (r = 0.773, P = 0.012) and ODI (r = - 0.602, P = 0.032) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Among the GAP score, a moderate-to-severe pelvic retroversion was significantly associated with LBP post-THA. The RPV measurement may be a useful predictor of THA outcome, which may influence patient satisfaction.