Suture anchors, properties versus material and design: a biomechanical study in ovine model

All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon is frequently performed in shoulder surgery, and all-suture anchors have become more popular as fixation methods. However, uncertainty still exists regarding the ultimate load to failure of all-suture anchors and the best insertion angle at a cortical humeral insertion point.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of three types of all-suture anchors frequently used for biceps tenodesis. In addition, the influence of two different insertion angles was observed in a porcine humeri model.

METHODS

The ultimate load to failure and failure mode of three types of all-suture anchors (1.6 FiberTak®, 1.9 FiberTak®, 2.6 FiberTak®, Arthrex®) applicable for subpectoral biceps tenodesis were evaluated at 90° and 45° insertion angles in 12 fresh-frozen porcine humeri. The anchors were inserted equally alternated in a randomized manner at three different insertion sites along the bicipital groove, and the suture tapes were knotted around a rod for pullout testing. In total, 36 anchors were evaluated in a universal testing machine (Zwick & Roell).

RESULTS

The 2.6 FiberTak® shows higher ultimate loads to failure with a 90° insertion angle (944.0 N ± 169.7 N; 537.0 N ± 308.8 N) compared to the 1.9 FiberTak® (677.8 N ± 57.7 N; 426.3 N ± 167.0 N, p-value: 0.0080) and 1.6 FiberTak® (733.0 N ± 67.6 N; 450.0 N ± 155.8 N, p-value: 0.0018). All anchor types show significantly higher ultimate loads to failure and smaller standard deviations at the 90° insertion angle than at the 45° insertion angle. The major failure mode was anchor pullout. Only the 2.6 FiberTak® anchors showed suture breakage as the major failure mode when placed with a 90° insertion angle.

CONCLUSIONS

All three all-suture anchors are suitable fixation methods for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Regarding our data, we recommend 90° as the optimum insertion angle.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The influence of anchor size and insertion angle of an all-suture anchor should be known by the surgeon for optimizing ultimate loads to failure and for achieving a secure fixation.

Risk Factors and Corresponding Management for Suture Anchor Pullout during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

INTRODUCTION

Due to the aging of the population, the incidence of rotator cuff tears is growing. For rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic suture-anchor repair has gradually replaced open transosseous repair, so suture anchors are now considered increasingly important in rotator cuff tear reconstruction. There are some but limited studies of suture anchor pullout after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, there is no body of knowledge in this area, which makes it difficult for clinicians to predict the risk of anchor pullout comprehensively and manage it accordingly.

METHODS

The literature search included rotator cuff repair as well as anchor pullout strength. A review of the literature was performed including all articles published in PubMed until September 2021. Articles of all in vitro biomechanical and clinical trial levels in English were included. After assessing all abstracts (n = 275), the full text and the bibliographies of the relevant articles were analyzed for the questions posed (n = 80). Articles including outcomes without the area of interest were excluded (n = 22). The final literature research revealed 58 relevant articles. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to bring together the findings from studies included in this review.

RESULT

Based on the presented studies, the overall incidence of anchor pullout is not low, and the incidence of intraoperative anchor pullout is slightly higher than in the early postoperative period. The risk factors for anchor pullout are mainly related to bone quality, insertion depth, insertion angle, size of rotator cuff tear, preoperative corticosteroid injections, anchor design, the materials used to produce anchors, etc. In response to the above issues, we have introduced and evaluated management techniques. They include changing the implant site of anchors, cement augmentation for suture anchors, increasing the number of suture limbs, using all-suture anchors, using an arthroscopic transosseous knotless anchor, the Buddy anchor technique, Steinmann pin anchoring, and transosseous suture repair technology.

DISCUSSION

However, not many of the management techniques have been widely used in clinical practice. Most of them come from in vitro biomechanical studies, so in vivo randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to see if they can help patients in the long run.

When deadman theory meets footprint decortication: a suture anchor biomechanical study

Background

The optimal insertion angle for suture anchor insertion has long been of great interest. Although greater tuberosity decortication is commonly performed during rotator cuff repair, the effect of decortication on the suture anchor insertion angle remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the pullout strength of threaded suture anchors inserted at 45° and 90° in decorticated and non-decorticated synthetic bone models.

Methods

Two kinds of synthetic bones were used to simulate the decorticated and non-decorticated conditions, for which 40 metallic suture anchors were used. Anchors were inserted at 45° and 90° in both decorticated and non-decorticated models and tested under cyclic loading followed by load-to-failure testing. The number of completed cycles, ultimate failure load, and failure modes was recorded.

Results

In the decorticated model, the ultimate failure load of anchors inserted at 45° (67.5 ± 5.3 N) was significantly lower than that of anchors inserted at 90° (114.1 ± 9.8 N) (p <  0.001). In the non-decorticated model, the ultimate failure load of anchors inserted at 45° (591.8 ± 58 N) was also significantly lower than that of anchors inserted at 90° (724.9 ± 94 N) (p = 0.003). Due to the diverse failure modes in the non-decorticated model, specimens with a failure mode of suture anchor pullout were analyzed in greater detail, with results showing a significantly larger pullout strength for anchors inserted at 90° (781.6 ± 53 N) than anchors inserted at 45° (648.0 ± 43 N) (p = 0.025).

Conclusion

Regardless of decortication, the pullout strength of anchors inserted at 90° was greater than those inserted at 45°. The clinical relevance is that inserting suture anchors at 90° is recommended due to the significantly larger ultimate failure load in both decorticated and non-decorticated bones.

Effect of anchor threads on the pullout strength: A biomechanical study

Pullout tests to determine the effect of anchor threads on the pullout strength was conducted by using universal testing machine, synthetic cancellous bone and thread-less metallic anchor. Anchors were inserted at 45°, 90° or 135° from the surface and they were pulled at 45° from the surface. The maximum load to failure was compared among the 3 insertion angles. Pullout strength of the anchors inserted at 45° was significantly greater than those inserted at 90° or 135°. Pullout strength of the thread-less anchor was the greatest when it was inserted at 45° to the bone surface.

Level of evidence

level II.

A biomechanical study on suture anchor insertion angle: Which is better, 90° or 45°?

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare the pullout strength of anchors inserted at 90° and 45° to the bone surface using synthetic bones and porcine humeri.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Pullout tests were performed by universal testing machine. Synthetic cancellous bones of 0.08, 0.16, and 0.24 g/cm³ (defining as low, medium and high density, respectively) with 2-mm-thick cortical bone model attached on one side and the greater tuberosity of porcine humeri (average bone density, 270 mg/cm³) were chosen for pullout tests. Metallic anchors were inserted at 90° or 45° to the surface and pulled at 90° or 45° from the surface. The maximum load to failure for each condition was recorded. Differences in pullout failure loads between insertion angle, pulling angle, and bone density were analyzed.

RESULTS

When the sutures were pulled at 90° in low, medium, high density bones, and porcine humeri, 90°-inserted-anchors showed higher pullout strength than the 45°-inserted-anchors (534.6 ± 28.9 N vs. 488.1 ± 25.3 N (p < 0.05), 636.8 ± 25.3 N vs. 517.5 ± 27.4 N (p < 0.01), 735.6 ± 45.1 N vs. 557.0 ± 42.5 N (p < 0.01), and 285.6 ± 47.2 N vs. 181.4 ± 31.3 N (p < 0.01), respectively). When the sutures were pulled at 45° in low, medium density bones and porcine humeri, 90°-inserted-anchors showed higher pullout strength than the 45°-inserted-anchors (651.1 ± 38.3 N vs. 529.4 ± 37.6 N (p < 0.01), 711.4 ± 25.3 N vs. 599.2 ± 29.8 N (p < 0.01), and 265.3 ± 49.0 N vs. 181.5 ± 29.4 N (p < 0.01), respectively).

CONCLUSION

Pullout strength of the anchors inserted at 90° to the bone surface was greater than the anchors inserted at 45° regardless of the bone density.