Treatment of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humerus plate

Intramedullary versus locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: indications and technical considerations

Background

The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) continues to increase with an aging population, and intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locking plate fixation are two commonly employed techniques for the surgical management of PHF. However, the optimal fixation method can be a source of ongoing controversy. Some influencing factors include the extent of humeral head involvement, fracture complexity, patient age, and surgeon preference. There are many studies that provide a mix of data either when comparing the two techniques or analyzing them in isolation. The aim of this review is to further elucidate the indications and technical considerations involved specifically in IMN vs. locking plate fixation for PHF to further aid orthopedic surgeons when choosing surgical management.

Methods

A narrative approach was chosen for this review allowing for a comprehensive review of literature, including recent findings pertaining to the comparison of management options for PHF. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria involved studies that discussed "proximal humerus fracture" and either "intramedullary nail" or "locking plate fixation."

Results

Complications such as avascular necrosis, hardware failure, additional surgical interventions, infection, fracture redisplacement, rotator cuff rupture, and nonunion did not show significant differences between the two groups. Newer generation humeral nails have minimized early complications. As both techniques undergo further refinement and utilization when specifically indicated, functional outcomes, potential complications, and postoperative pain continue to be improved.

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests that both intramedullary nails and locking plates can effectively restore shoulder function in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, with unclear superiority of either method. The choice of technique should be tailored to patient factors such as fracture type, age, bone quality, and functional expectations. Surgeon experience also plays a role. While certain presentations may exhibit trends that favor one fixation, no specific technique can be universally recommended. Both IMN and LP have shown comparable and satisfactory outcomes, and the final fixation method chosen should take into account the unique characteristics of each patient.

Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for Proximal Humeral Fractures: Primary Treatment vs. Salvage Procedure

Background: The optimal treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) lacks consensus, with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) often being a final resort rather than a primary approach. This study aimed to compare outcomes and satisfaction rates of primary RTSA for PHFs versus salvage RTSA for previously unsuccessful treatments. We hypothesized that primary RTSA would yield superior clinical outcomes, functional scores, and patient satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective analysis of RSA procedures between 2011 and 2021 was conducted, focusing on primary RTSA for PHFs or salvage RTSA for failed osteosynthesis. Patients meeting inclusion criteria underwent clinical and radiological follow-up for at least two years. Demographic characteristics, outcomes scores, and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Results: Of 63 patients, 42 underwent primary RTSA and 21 underwent salvage RTSA. The median follow-up was 50 months. Statistically significant differences favored primary RTSA in forward flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and Constant shoulder score. Patient satisfaction levels did not significantly differ between groups. Complications occurred in 7.15% of primary RTSA cases and 14.28% of salvage RTSA cases. Conclusions: Primary RTSA may yield slightly better outcomes and lower complication rates compared to salvage RTSA. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings.

PHILOS Synthesis for Proximal Humerus Fractures Has High Complications and Reintervention Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to quantify the rate of complications and reinterventions in patients treated with PHILOS plate for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) synthesis. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to 7 October 2021. Studies describing medium and long-term complications in PHF synthesis using the PHILOS plate were included. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on complications and causes of reinterventions. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was performed with the Downs and Black’s “Checklist for Measuring Quality”. Results: Seventy-six studies including 4200 patients met the inclusion criteria. The complication rate was 23.8%, and the main cause was screw cut-out (4.1%), followed by avascular necrosis (AVN) (3.1%) and subacromial impingement (1.5%). In patients over 55 years, the complication rate was 29.5%. In the deltopectoral (DP) approach the complication rate was 23.8%, and in the delto-split (DS) it was 17.5%, but no difference between the two approaches was seen when considering the type of fracture. The overall reintervention rate was 10.5% in the overall population and 19.0% in older patients. Conclusions: Proximal humerus synthesis with a PHILOS plate has high complications and reintervention rates. The most frequent complication was screw cut-out, followed by humeral head AVN and subacromial impingement. These results need to be further investigated to better understand both the type of patient and fracture that is more at risk of complications and reintervention and to compare pros and cons of the PHILOS plate with respect to the other solutions to manage PHFs.

Management of Posttraumatic Avascular Necrosis of the Proximal Humerus

The etiology of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the proximal humerus can be classified as idiopathic or posttraumatic, the latter being mainly due to proximal humerus fractures. Evidence suggests that posttraumatic AVN may require surgical intervention more often than idiopathic AVN of the proximal humerus. This article provides a comprehensive review of the management of posttraumatic AVN of the proximal humerus. Early stage AVN (stages 1 to 3) is commonly treated with nonoperative intervention or core decompression of the humeral head, whereas later stage disease (stages 4 and 5) may require hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty to restore function. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):367-375.].

Dual Locking Plate Osteosynthesis for 3- or 4-Part Proximal Humeral Fractures Combined with Multiple Fractures of the Greater Tuberosity

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of dual locking plate osteosynthesis for treating 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures combined with multiple fractures of the greater tuberosity.

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2018, 19 skeletally mature patients, who suffered 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures combined with multiple fractures of the greater tuberosity, were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using a dual locking plate technique through a delto-pectoral approach. Indexes for evaluation included fracture healing, quality of reduction, and incidence of complications (infections, screw perforation into the glenohumeral joint, subacromial impingement, hardware failure, avascular necrosis, and loss of reduction). Shoulder function was evaluated using Constant-Murley scoring.

RESULTS

The patients were assessed at a mean time of 25.3 months after surgery. Union of fractures was radiographically confirmed for all 19 patients. The mean Constant-Murley patient score was 85.2 points, and complications were identified in two patients during follow-up evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of using dual locking plate osteosynthesis through a delto-pectoral approach resulted in a satisfactory union rate, excellent fracture reduction, low complication rate and good shoulder function for patients with complex proximal humeral fractures. The method is effective for treating 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures combined with multiple fractures of the greater tuberosity.

Late screw-related complications in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review

Locking plating is a common surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with satisfactory clinical results. Implant-related complications, especially screw-related, have been reported, however, the lack of information regarding their onset, used surgical technique, complexity of the fracture, bone quality etc., prevents from understanding the causes for them. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the potential risk factors for late screw complications by gathering information about the patient characteristics, comorbidities, fracture types, surgical approaches and implant types. A PubMed search was performed using humerus, fractures, bone and locking as keywords in clinical papers written in English. All abstracts and manuscripts on distal or humerus shaft fractures, and those on proximal humerus fractures without any or with only iatrogenic complications were excluded. One hundred studies met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 33% of the reported cases having at least one complication, with 11% of all complications being screw-related. Most of the latter were secondary screw perforations and screw cut-outs, being predominantly linked to poor bone quality, while screw loosening and retraction were found less frequently as a result of locking mechanism failure. Overall, the amount of information for complications was limited and screw perforation was the most frequent screw-related complication, mostly reported in female patients older than 50 years, following four-part or AO/OTA type C fractures and detected four weeks postoperatively. The sparse information in the literature could be an indicator that the late screw complications might have been under-reported and under-described, making the understanding of the screw-related complications even more challenging.

High risk for revision after shoulder arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures

Background and purpose - It is unclear whether previous osteosynthesis is a risk factor for inferior outcome following shoulder arthroplasty for a proximal humeral fracture. We used data from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (DSR) to examine this question. Patients and methods - All 285 patients treated with a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis of a proximal humeral fracture reported to DSR from 2006 to 2013 were included. Each case was matched with 2 controls (570) treated with a primary shoulder arthroplasty for an acute proximal humeral fracture. Patient reported outcome was assessed using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS) and the relative risk of revision was reported. Results - The mean WOOS was 46 (SD 25) for a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis and 52 (27) after a primary shoulder arthroplasty. The relative risk of revision for a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis was 2 with a primary arthroplasty for fracture as reference. In a separate analysis of patients treated by locking plate the mean WOOS was 46 (24), with a relative risk of revision at 1.5 with a primary arthroplasty as reference. Interpretation - Compared with primary arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture, we found an inferior patient-reported outcome and a substantial risk of revision for patients treated with a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis for a proximal humeral fracture. The risk and burdens of additional surgery should be accounted for when deciding on the primary surgical procedure.

Cadaveric study of the anatomical reference points for proximal humeral plate positioning

BACKGROUND

Complications following locking plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures often related to malposition plates and inadequate screw fixation. However, literature did not define the best anatomical reference point for plate positioning. We conducted a study to assess the occurrence of subacromial impingement and screw perforation with two anatomical reference points for proximal humeral plate positioning.

METHOD

Sixty shoulders of 30 cadavers were dissected, and proximal humeral locking plate was placed in two different levels in the coronal plane of the upper tip of plate: (1) the proximal portion of bicipital groove group and (2) the most prominent of lesser tuberosity group. Subacromial impingement during passive forward elevation and screw perforation were assessed in relation to the plate positioning.

RESULTS

No subacromial impingement during passive motion contacted to the plate in both groups. The calcar screw perforation rate was significantly lower in the proximal portion of the bicipital groove group (2 of 60 specimens, 3.33%) than the most prominent of lesser tuberosity group (52 of 60 specimens, 86.67%). The most proximal screws of the plate were no humeral head perforation in all specimens.

CONCLUSION

Our study would suggest that two anatomical reference points could be used to be the landmark to avoid the subacromial impingement and the most proximal screw perforation. However, the placement of the locking plate using the proximal portion of bicipital groove reference is better for calcar screw insertion.

Plate fixation of the proximal humerus: an international multicentre comparative study of postoperative complications

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to evaluate the number of complications following locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures in country X and in country Y. The secondary aim was to identify risk factors for complications.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective case series of 282 consecutive patients with proximal humeral fractures, treated with a locking plate between 2010 and 2014.

SETTING

two level 1 trauma centres in country X and one in country Y. Data pertaining to demographics, postoperative complications and re-operations were collected. Fractures were classified according to the AO and Hertel classifications and experienced surgeons assessed the quality of reduction and plate fixation on the postoperative X-rays. Outcomes of the two different countries were compared and logistic regression analysis was performed to analyse the relationship between risk factors and complications.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 370 days, 196 complications were encountered in 127 patients (45%). The most frequent complications were: screw perforation in the glenohumeral joint (23%), persistent shoulder complaints (16%), avascular necrosis of the humeral head (10%) and secondary fracture displacement (5%). In 80 patients (28%), 132 re-operations were performed. The patients operated in country X had significantly more complications compared with the patients operated in country Y. For implant-related complications, advanced age, non-anatomic reduction of the greater tuberosity, and country of operation were risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The use of locking plates for proximal humeral fractures was associated with a high number of complications in both countries; the patients operated in country Y, however, had better results compared with the patients operated in country X.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Locking plates versus intramedullary nails in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcome and complications of locking plates versus intramedullary nails in patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference between these two implants with regard to clinical outcome and complications.

METHODS

We performed a systemic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective comparative studies on April 26, 2017. The studies of locking plates compared to intramedullary nails in patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were included. We conducted a meta-analysis of shoulder functional scores, range of motion, pain scores, and complications.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 13 comparative studies with 958 patients (529 in the locking plate group and 429 in the intramedullary nail group). A significantly greater external rotation (MD = 9.67; 95% CI, 4.22-15.12; P = 0.0005) and a significantly higher penetration rate (RR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.11-2.77; P = 0.02) were observed in the locking plate group compared with the intramedullary nail group. Constant-Murley scores, DASH scores and total complication rate were comparable between the two groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in forward elevation, VAS scores, and other complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence indicates that locking plates and intramedullary nails have similar performance in terms of the functional scores and total complication rate. No superior treatment was suggested between locking plates and intramedullary nails for displaced proximal humeral fractures.

Return to sports after plate fixation of humeral head fractures 65 cases with minimum 24-month follow-up

Background

Humeral head fractures requiring surgical intervention are severe injuries, which might affect the return to sports and daily activities. We hypothesize that athletic patients will be constrained regarding their sporting activities after surgically treated humeral head fractures. Despite a long rehabilitation program physical activities will change and an avoidance of overhead activities will be noticed.

Methods

Case series with 65 Patients, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months participated in this study. All patients were treated using a locking plate fixation. Their sporting activity was investigated at the time of the injury and re-investigated after an average of 3.83 years. The questionnaire setup included the evaluation of shoulder function, sporting activities, intensity, sport level and frequency evaluation. Level of evidence IV.

Results

At the time of injury 61 Patients (94%) were engaged in recreational sporting activities. The number of sporting activities declined from 26 to 23 at the follow-up examination. There was also a decline in sports frequency and duration of sports activities.

Conclusion

The majority of patients remains active in their recreational sporting activity at a comparable duration and frequency both pre- and postoperatively. Nevertheless, shoulder centered sport activities including golf, water skiing and martial arts declined or were given up.

Computerized Virtual Surgery Planning for ORIF of Proximal Humeral Fractures

The authors evaluated the effectiveness of computerized virtual planning for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humeral fractures. Between June 2011 and July 2013, a total of 46 patients with proximal humeral fractures were included in the current study. Preoperatively, fracture data were obtained via computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. Based on the dataset obtained from CT scanning, the 3-dimensional model of fractures was constructed and virtual segmentation, restoration, and internal fixation were performed. All eligible cases were treated by ORIF with locking plates. Intraoperatively, operative time, blood loss, and fluoroscope frequency were recorded. Postoperatively, the curative effect was evaluated by quality of fracture restoration reconstruction and plate position. In addition, fracture healing time and complications were recorded in the follow-up period. Average operative time was 85.6 minutes, and intraoperative blood loss ranged from 60 to 150 mL. Postoperatively, 1 patient experienced avascular necrosis, and no cases of screw penetration or screw loosening were observed. The coincidence rate of plate position was 91.3% according to height and 95.7% based on the position of the intertubercular sulcus and greater tuberosity. At the end of the follow-up period, mean shoulder function score was 83.9 (range, 58-96). Eighty-seven percent of patients had an excellent or good outcome. Computerized virtual planning facilitated ORIF and showed good results for patients with complex proximal humeral fractures. It may be a favorable option for treating fractures of the proximal humerus.

Comparison between the spatial subchondral support plate and the proximal humeral locking plate in the treatment of unstable proximal humeral fractures

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of the S3 (spatial subchondral support) humeral plate and to compare the clinical outcomes and complications after ORIF (open reduction and internal fixation) of proximal humeral fractures using either a S3 plate or a PHLP (proximal humeral locking plate).

METHODS

A total of 144 patients with displaced unstable proximal humeral fractures were treated with either a S3 plate or a PHLP. Each patient had a follow-up at least for one year. We retrospectively collected the data and compared the shoulder functional outcome as well as complications of these two methods.

RESULTS

During the one-year follow-up, the average Constant scores gradually improved for both groups. Patients treated with use of an S3 plate had better functional results at three and six months (P < 0.05). The one-year Constant score for all fracture types (Neer classified) were not significantly different between the S3 and PHLP group (P > 0.05). The complication rate was comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment using an S3 plate for displaced unstable proximal humeral fractures resulted in a good union rate and functional outcome, which is comparable to the PHLP treatment. The S3 humerus plate can be considered as an effective implant for ORIF of displaced unstable proximal humeral fractures.

Evolution of treatment of of the proximal humerus fractures (review)

The article in generalized form acquaints with the publications devoted to the bases of proximal humeral fractures treatment. A brief digression on anatomy and biomechanics of the humeral joint allows to consider the main morphological features of it. The most commonly used classification of proximal humeral fractures concisely classify many types of damage. According to the clinical and anatomical characteristics of fractures tracked the historical aspect, the development and the current state of the most common methods of treatment. In his review collected works authors share their experience in the application of methods. It allows to further the perspective directions.