Antegrade intramedullary nailing for fifth metacarpal neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Retrograde Intramedullary Pinning of Metacarpal Fractures Through the Collateral Recess

There are several common types of fixations for metacarpal fractures: pins, plates, lag, and intramedullary (IM) screws. The advantages of pins are that they are ubiquitous, cost-effective, have shorter operative times, and preserve soft tissues, thereby minimizing adhesions. In this article, we describe metacarpal fracture fixation utilizing the technique of retrograde IM pinning through collateral recess access. We present the postoperative outcomes of our patients who underwent metacarpal fracture fixation utilizing this technique. Details of the fractures, patient comorbidities, demographics, and postoperative outcomes were gathered. Primary outcomes investigated were nonunion, malunion, need for revision, and range of motion (ROM). A total of 29 fractures in 14 patients were included, with multiple fractures present in 8 patients. The fractures were open in 8 cases. The orientation of the fracture was transverse in 22 cases and oblique in 7 with comminution noted in 13 fractures. Full ROM was obtained in 15 digits with 6 digits noted to have a good ROM and 6 digits still undergoing therapy. There were no nonunions noted and only one malunion. In conclusion, retrograde, double IM pinning through collateral recess access represents a reliable, cost-effective, and minimally traumatic method of metacarpal fixation, including carpometacarpal fracture dislocations.

Management of paediatric fifth metacarpal neck fractures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMCNFs) are common among paediatric patients. Complications include reduced metacarpophalangeal (MCP) range of motion and grip strength, which impede the hand's functional abilities. Various management options are available, but indications are not standardised. This systematic review aims to assimilate all available evidence on the management of paediatric FMCNFs to determine appropriate treatment pathways.

METHODS

PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar were used to identify evidence pertaining to the management of these fractures.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified, involving 237 patients with a mean age of 14.4 years (Range 9-17). Ninety percent of patients were male. Sixty-one (26%) patients, with an average fracture angulation of 27° (Range 16°-33°) and no rotational deformities, were managed with immobilisation alone. These patients returned to normal metacarpophalangeal range of motion and grip strength. Fifty-four (23%) patients, with an average fracture angulation of 42.7° (Range 33°-54°), were managed with fracture reduction and immobilisation. This technique did not yield sustained reduction of fractures with significant angulation or rotation after intervention. One hundred twenty-two (51%) patients, with an average fracture angulation of 48.3° (Range 30°-58°) and including cases of malrotation, were managed with fracture reduction and surgical fixation. These patients experienced good functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests paediatric FMCNFs can be safely managed with immobilisation alone when there is an absence of rotational deformity and an angulation of < 30°. In the case of a higher fracture angulation or rotational deformity, fracture reduction and surgical fixation is an appropriate method of management.

Intramedullary K-wires versus Alternate Techniques for Metacarpal Shaft and Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Intramedullary K-wire (IMKW) fixation is one of the mainstays for surgically treating metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. However, there remains a lack of literature comparing outcomes of the various available surgical repair techniques in all indicated metacarpals. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical advantages and drawbacks of IMKW compared with alternate fracture repair techniques. A comprehensive systematic literature review was performed to identify studies that compared clinical outcomes of IMKW to alternate metacarpal fixation modalities. Outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH/ quick DASH) scores, grip strength, union rate, visual analog scale pain, operative time, and complications. A random-effects model was used to compare IMKW to the pooled effect of other fixation techniques. A total of 10 studies were included in our analysis, comprising 497 metacarpal fractures (220 shafts and 277 necks). IMKW fixation was identified as the control group in all studies. The pooled experimental group included plates, transverse K-wires (TKWs), interfragmentary screws (IFSs), and K-wire cross-pinning (CP). In treating metacarpal shaft fractures, IMKW showed significantly shorter operative time ( p  = 0.04; mean difference = - 13; 95% confidence interval = -26 to -0.64). No significant differences were observed in treating metacarpal neck fractures for disability, grip strength, healing rate, pain, operative time, or complication rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no difference in clinical outcomes among various surgical techniques for treating metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. Further high evidence studies are required that investigate the efficacy and safety of IFS, CP, TKW, and intramedullary screws versus IMKW for treating closed, unstable metacarpal fractures.

Single Buried Intramedullary K-Wire Fixation in Nonthumb Metacarpal Shaft Fractures with Immediate Postoperative Mobilization without Any Immobilization

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of single intramedullary K-wire fixation in nonthumb, metacarpal shaft fractures with immediate postoperative hand mobilization without any immobilization.

Method

This is a retrospective case series conducted from January 2019 to December 2022. We included patients with closed, simple transverse, or short oblique metacarpal shaft fracture treated with single, 1.4 mm, intramedullary K-wire fixation. Gentle postoperative range of motion exercise was encouraged in every patient without any hand, finger, or wrist motion restriction material. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with total active flexion; grip strength; disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score; and the American Society for Surgery of the Hand Total Active Flexion (ASSH TAF) score.

Results

This study included 34 patients, 25 males and 9 females with a mean age of 33.14 years (ranging 18-59). A total of 43 metacarpal shafts were treated. The mean DASH score at two and 6 weeks postoperative was 41.5 (ranging 19.16-60.34) and 9.58 (ranging 0.83-23.27). The mean final DASH score at last follow-up was 3.48 (ranging 0-8.33). Mean TAF at 2 weeks postoperative, 6 weeks postoperative, and at final follow-up was 203.8 (ranging 185-240), 238.2 (ranging 220-270), and 259.25 (ranging 240-270) degrees, respectively. The mean grip strength of the injured hand was 66.14 and 86.1% of the uninjured hand at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperative. There was no nonunion, malrotation, or infection. In conclusion, single intramedullary K-wire fixation gives excellent outcomes in the treatment of single or multiple, simple, metacarpal shaft fractures without the need of postoperative immobilization.

Intramedullary Single-Kirschner-Wire Fixation in Displaced Fractures of the Fifth Metacarpal Neck (Boxer's Fracture)

The fracture of the fifth metacarpal neck (also called a boxer's fracture) is the most common fracture of the hand^1,3. Displaced fractures often result in volar angulation of the metacarpal head, shortening, and residual malrotation^4-7. The present video article demonstrates the steps of performing intramedullary single-Kirschner-wire fixation of the fifth metacarpal neck¹, with the aim of the procedure being to achieve a closed reduction and internal stabilization of such a fracture. Although many fractures can be treated with a splint only, surgery should be performed in patients with excessive volar angulation, relevant shortening, or rotational deformity^5-7.

Description

For this procedure, the injured arm of the patient is placed on an arm table. The incision is made 1 to 2 cm longitudinally over the ulnar base of the fifth metacarpal bone. The cortical bone is opened with an awl, and a bent 1.6-mm Kirschner wire is inserted into the medullary canal. After reaching the fracture region, the fracture is anatomically reduced. The Kirschner wire is then advanced into the head of the fifth metacarpal, securing the reduction. Malrotation can be addressed in this stage by rotating the wire under fluoroscopic control. After ensuring anatomical reduction clinically and by fluoroscopy, the wire is shortened under the skin, followed by closure of the incision. We utilize a mid-hand brace for splinting.

Alternatives

Nonoperative treatment is common for fifth metacarpal neck fractures in the absence of malrotation, excessive angulation, and shortening. Other surgical techniques include a similar procedure that involves the use of multiple Kirschner wires, plate fixation, transverse Kirschner wire pinning, and, less commonly, retrograde headless screw fixation^2,7-9.

Rationale

The main advantage of this technique is the preservation of the metacarpophalangeal joint and the minimal soft-tissue damage. Additionally, the use of a single Kirschner wire provides stability at low cost. With some experience, this surgery can be performed within 20 minutes^1,9.

Expected Outcomes

This procedure provides good fracture reduction and stabilization⁸. The outcome is usually satisfactory, with very low Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores¹. Malrotation, angulation, and shortening are sufficiently addressed, and the technique shows the same results as fixation performed with use of 2 intramedullary wires.

Important Tips

Bending the Kirschner wire to ensure easy gliding in the medullary canal provides the opportunity to reduce the metacarpal neck once the wire is safely in the head.Aim distally as you open the cortical bone with the awl in order to facilitate the insertion of the Kirschner wire.The primary reduction should be made manually, not by the wire. Subacute fractures and substantially displaced fractures require direct force for a satisfactory reduction, which cannot be achieved by rotation of the wire only.The cortical bone on the metacarpal head is very thin. Take care not to drive the Kirschner wire through the cortical bone and into the joint.Shorten the wire under the skin approximately 1 cm above the bone surface; this ensures easy removal and prevents skin irritation.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

K-wire = Kirschner wire.

Concurrent musculoskeletal complaints in elbows, shoulders, and necks after common hand and forearm injuries or conditions: A cross-sectional study among 600 patients

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study among 600 patients.

INTRODUCTION

Isolated hand and forearm injuries or conditions are common in the emergency and orthopedic departments. So far, little is known about whether these patients suffer from concurrent musculoskeletal complaints (MSCs) besides their hand and forearm complaints. Neglecting concurrent MSCs in the upper limbs and necks could hamper rehabilitation and prolong the time taken to return to daily and work-related activities.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of concurrent MSCs in the elbow, shoulder, and neck after common hand and/or forearm injuries or conditions.

METHODS

This study included 600 patients with any type of diagnosis referred to rehabilitation after hand and/or forearm injuries or conditions. Basic characteristics, diagnoses, and location of patients' symptoms were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of concurrent MSCs was 40%. Twenty-eight percent of the whole sample developed concurrent MSCs after the hand and forearm injury or condition. The gender distribution was 68% women and 32% men. The most common location for complaints was the shoulder (62%), followed by the elbow (49%), and the neck (32%).

DISCUSSION

The present results suggest that MSCs from the elbows, shoulders, or necks are very common in patients with hand and/or forearm injuries or conditions.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians treating patients with isolated hand and forearm injuries or conditions should be aware of the high prevalence of concurrent MSCs. Future research should investigate if specific rehabilitation, focusing on concurrent MSCs, may influence the outcome in this population.

Antegrade intramedullary fixation for adolescent fifth metacarpal neck fracture and its impact on epiphyseal growth

Background

Antegrade intramedullary nailing (AIMN) with Kirschner wire (K-wire) is a minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique. This procedure has been widely performed to treat the fifth metacarpal neck fracture (FMNF) in adults. This study was performed to determine whether using AIMN with a single K-wire to treat FMNF in adolescents would have good clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 21 children (aged 11–16 years) with FMNF were treated using AIMN with a single K-wire from May 2017 to January 2020 in our hospital. Indications for intervention were severe displacement with malrotation deformity, apex dorsal angulation of greater than 40°, or both. Collected data included apex dorsal angulation, range of motion (ROM) in the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, grip strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

Results

All patients were followed up for 12–24 months (average, 16.57 months), and all patients obtained anatomical reduction postoperatively. The healing time was 2.69 ± 0.83 months (range, 2–4 months). Average apex dorsal angulation was reduced significantly from 44.49°±2.64° to 15.74°±2.47° (P < 0.001). The average ROM in the MCP joint and apex dorsal angulation of the injured side were not significantly different from those of the uninjured side. The average DASH score was 1.76 ± 1.48 (range, 0–4), the mean VAS was 0.19 ± 0.60 (range, 0–2), and the mean grip strength was 91.55 %±4.52 % (range, 85–101 %). No secondary displacement, dysfunction, nonunion, infection, or osteonecrosis was observed during the follow-up. Although premature epiphyseal closure was found in one patient, no long-term clinical finding of angulation or shortening was identified.

Conclusions

Antegrade intramedullary fixation with single K-wire was an effective and reliable technique that successfully resulted in good functional and cosmetic outcomes for treating adolescents with FMNF. The impact on the growth plate was low in this population given that most patients were at or approaching skeletal maturity.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04436-w.

Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures

Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with single or dual antegrade elastic intramedullary nails (AEIMNs). Thirty-three patients were treated with a single 2.0 mm AEIMN and 34 patients were treated with two 1.5 mm AEIMNs. Clinical and radiological outcomes included grip strength, active range of motion (ROM), active flexion and extension of the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, dorsal angulation loss, and metacarpal shortening of the fifth metacarpal at 12 months after treatment. No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to grip strength, ROM or flexion of the fifth MCP joint. The average values of dorsal angulation loss, metacarpal shortening, and extension of the fifth MCP joint of the dual nails group were better than those of the single nail group (dorsal angulation loss, 2.79 ± 1.93° vs. 4.05 ± 1.59°, P = 0.009; metacarpal shortening, 1.66 ± 0.80 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.88 mm, P = 0.028; extension of the fifth MCP joint, 7.71 ± 4.43° vs. 4.82 ± 4.09°, P = 0.012). In conclusion, dual AEIMNs fixation provided better MCP extension and radiological outcomes than single AEIMN fixation.

Challenging the dogma: severely angulated neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal must be treated surgically

Cadaveric studies suggest that the acceptable deformity in fifth metacarpal neck fractures is maximally 30° palmar angulation. This systematic review verifies the validity of these threshold values. Eighteen prospective comparative studies on operative and/or conservative treatment options in adults were included. None of the studies demonstrated any correlation between the residual or initial angulation and the clinical results despite accepting more severe angular deformities. Closed reduction and immobilization without internal fixation improved the palmar angle by 5° to 9° in three studies and 29° in a fourth. Operative treatments compared with non-reducing conservative treatments showed no benefit of the surgery other than aesthetic issues. The synthesis of this review indicates that 90% of fractures of the metacarpal neck with apex angulation up to 70° can be treated successfully with a functional metacarpal brace without reduction. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores <10 are uniformly reported. I modified my own practice accordingly a decade ago to treating these fractures conservatively regardless of the palmar angulation, except in patients with exceptional demands or other fracture deformities.

Flexible Stable Intramedullary Nailing for the Management of Metacarpal Neck Fractures

Introduction  When dealing with metacarpal neck fractures, the aim of treatment should include clinical and radiological objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of flexible stable intramedullary nailing for the management of metacarpal neck fractures. Materials and Methods  A total of twenty four patients (22 males and 2 females; mean age: 28.2 ± 7.7 years) with metacarpal neck fractures (second in 7 patients and fifth in 17 patients) whether isolated or associated with other body injuries and managed by percutaneous flexible stable intramedullary nailing were reviewed for a retrospective case series. Personal interviews were conducted together with clinical and radiological assessments. The final results were recorded at the time of personal interviews. Results  The mean duration of surgery was 19.3 ± 2.5 minutes. The mean time of radiological union was 5 ± 1.3 weeks. The mean postoperative active range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint was 102.4 ± 11 degrees. The mean supination power of the involved hand in comparison to the contralateral side was 97.8 ± 3.4%, whereas the pronation power percentage was 99.2% ± 1.6. The mean power grip percentage to the contralateral side was 96.4 ± 2.9%, whereas the mean percentage of the pinch grip was 96.1 ± 4.2%. The mean postoperative DASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score was 0.3 ± 0.5. Conclusion  Percutaneous flexible stable intramedullary nailing for the treatment of metacarpal neck fractures has expanded the armamentarium of the orthopaedic surgeons as an easy, cost-effective technique overcoming all possible deformities and allowing early and reliable active rehabilitation. Level of Evidence  This is a Type IV, therapeutic retrospective case series.

Osteosynthesis of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with a photodynamic polymer bone stabilization system

Metacarpal neck fractures with severe displacement are commonly treated surgically with intramedullary Kirschner wires. We present the results of treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures using a light curable intramedullary photodynamic polymer (IlluminOss™, IlluminOss Medical Inc., East Providence, RI, USA). Twenty-nine patients with isolated displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures were included and followed up for 12-24 weeks. All fractures had radiologically healed after 3 months. In two cases, a secondary loss of reduction was seen, which did not require further correction. During the follow-up period, range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint was 89% after 6 weeks and increased to 100% after 3 months compared with the uninjured side. Grip strength improved over time from 61% to 85%. No implant removal was necessary. We conclude that osteosynthesis using an intramedullary photodynamic polymer is a reliable treatment option for displaced fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck. Level of evidence: IV.

Single versus dual Kirschner wires for closed reduction and intramedullary nailing of displaced fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck (1-2 KiWi): a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate whether clinical and radiological outcomes after intramedullary nailing of displaced fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck using a single thick Kirschner wire (K-wire) are noninferior to those of technically more demanding fixation with two thinner dual wires.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicentre, parallel group, randomized controlled noninferiority trial conducted at 12 tertiary trauma centres in Germany. A total of 290 patients with acute displaced fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck were randomized to either intramedullary single-wire (n = 146) or dual-wire fixation (n = 144). The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire six months after surgery, with a third of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) used as the noninferiority threshold. Secondary outcomes were pain, health-related quality of life (EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D)), radiological measures, functional deficits, and complications.

RESULTS

Overall, 151/290 of patients (52%) completed the six months of follow-up, leaving 83 patients in the single-wire group and 68 patients in the dual-wire group. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis set, mean DASH scores six months after surgery were 3.8 (sd 7.0) and 4.4 (sd 9.4), respectively. With multiple imputation (n = 288), mean DASH scores were estimated at 6.3 (sd 8.7) and 7.0 (sd 10.0). Upper (1 - 2α)) confidence limits consistently remained below the noninferiority margin of 3.0 points in the DASH instrument. While there was a statistically nonsignificant trend towards a higher rate of shortening and rotational malalignment in the single wire group, no statistically significant differences were observed across groups in any secondary outcome measure.

CONCLUSION

A single thick K-wire is sufficient for intramedullary fixation of acute displaced subcapital fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck. The less technically demanding single-wire technique produces noninferior clinical and radiological outcomes compared with the dual-wire approach. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1263-1271.

Plate Fixation versus Percutaneous Pinning for Unstable Metacarpal Fractures: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether percutaneous pinning or plate fixation is more appropriate for metacarpal fractures is still open to debate. Our study purpose was to review the current literature in an attempt to determine the optimal treatment modality for metacarpal fractures on the basis of functional outcomes, radiographic outcome and rates of complications.

METHODS

We selected Pubmed, Cochrane library, EMBASE and the relevant English orthopedic journals and pooled data from eligible trials including four comparative studies and one retrospective review. Overall, the studies contained 222 patients with 231 fractures, 143 treated with pinning and 88 treated with plates and screws. Mean follow up was 7.5 months (4-12 months). Data were analyzed and the fixed effects are assumed for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing pinning for metacarpal fractures have higher motion scores when compared to open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws. Functional scores, grip strength, radiographic parameters, time to union and complications were found not to be significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to support the use of pins over ORIF with plates and screws in the treatment of metacarpal fractures. This may have practical advantages, including minimal dissection, easier insertion and availability of the pins. The limitations of this study include the small number of eligible studies, lack of reporting of standard deviation value, and the lack of DASH score assessments at follow up. Further randomized controlled trials that include a larger patient numbers with longer follow up are needed to substantiate the superiority of one fixation method over another.

A single antegrade intramedullary k-wire for fifth metacarpal neck fractures

OBJECTIVES

Antegrade intramedullary nailing (AIMN) using 2k-wires seems to be superior to other modalities in treating displaced fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck (FFMN). Few reports demonstrated similar results retrospective with a single k-wire. The aim of the study is to describe our single k-wire technique and evaluate the related results.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a continuous series of patients treated with a single intramedullary k-wire for FFMN. It includes 30 patients who met the criteria for surgery: a dorsal angulation of more than 30°, malrotation, or both. The mean clinical follow-up period was 7 ± 14.9 months.

RESULTS

The mean pre-operative angle was 50° ± 11.35° and the mean immediate post-operative angle was 4.86° ± 2.8°. The mean immediate correction was 47° ± 9.3°. The mean correction at last follow-up was 45.14° ± 8.55°. Healing was obtained in all patients and bone union was achieved at a mean of 5.6 ± 1.2 weeks. The mean operative time was 8.5 min. The mean C-arm usage (number of clicks) was 7.2 times. The mean exposure radiation time was calculated at 3.6 s. The mean radiation dose was 0.08 mGy/mm². The mean satisfaction score was 1.26 ± 0.45. Quick-DASH and EQ-5D scores yielded excellent values.

CONCLUSIONS

With potential benefits like lesser surgical time, radiation and cost, the use of a single AIMN could be safer, quicker and cheaper while reproducing similar clinical, functional and radiological outcomes to those reported with the use of 2k-wires.

Treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with antegrade single elastic intramedullary nailing

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes of fifth metacarpal neck fractures using antegrade single elastic nail and to explore ideal puncture point to avoid iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.

Methods

A single elastic nail with suitable diameter was used in 27 cases of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with dorsal angulation over 45°. An initial entry point was perforated at the ulnar-dorsal base of the metacarpal. The nail was inserted in an antegrade approach. The nail was usually removed at about 5 weeks postoperatively.

Results

At final follow up, all fractures proceeded to bony union. The mean total passive motion was 285° and the mean total active motion (TAM) was 270°. The mean angulation decreased from 50.2 ± 6.3° preoperatively to 7.4 ± 2.3° postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean DASH-Score was 2.1 ± 3.6 points after surgery. Two cases of skin irritation and one case of the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (DCBUN) injury were observed. Superficial wound infections were not observed.

Conclusions

Collectively, antegrade single elastic intramedullary nailing was a minimally invasive and reliable fixation technique for fifth metacarpal neck fractures with dorsal angulation over 45°. Appropriate puncture position helped to reduce nerve damage.

Headless Compression Screw Versus Kirschner Wire Fixation for Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the biomechanical stability of headless compression screws in the fixation of metacarpal neck fractures and to compare them with another common, less invasive form of fixation, K-wires. The hypothesis was that headless compression screws would show higher stiffness and peak load to failure than K-wire fixation.

METHODS

Eight matched-paired hands (n = 31), using the ring and little finger metacarpals, had metacarpal fractures simulated at the physeal scar. Each group was stabilized with either a 3.5-mm headless compression screw or 2 0.045-in (1.1-mm) K-wires. Nineteen metacarpals were tested in 3-point bending and 12 in axial loading. Peak load to failure and stiffness were calculated from the load displacement curve. Bone mineral density was recorded for each specimen.

RESULTS

Bone mineral density was similar in the 2 groups tested for 3-point bending and axial loading. Stiffness was not significantly different in 3-point bending for headless compression screws and K-wires (means, 141.3 vs 194.5 N/mm) but it was significant in axial loading (means, 178.0 vs 111.6 N/mm). Peak load to failure was significantly higher in headless compression screws in 3-point bending (means, 401.2 vs 205.3 N) and axial loading (means, 467.5 vs 198.3 N).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with K-wires, headless compression screws for metacarpal neck fractures are biomechanically superior in load to failure, 3-point bending, and axial loading.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Headless compression screws demonstrate excellent biomechanical stability in metacarpal neck fractures. In conjunction with promising clinical studies, these data suggest that headless compression screws may be an option for treating metacarpal neck fractures.

Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: fixation with antegrade locked flexible intramedullary nailing

Background: Fifth metacarpal neck fractures (commonly named “boxer’s fractures”) are the most common metacarpal injuries and usually affect young active people. These lesions are mainly treated conservatively. Their surgical management, if indicated, is still a matter of debate. Different procedures have been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of 18 boxer’s fractures which were synthesized with antegrade locked flexible intramedullary nailing. Materials and methods: All patients, at a mean follow-up of 45 months, were clinically evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE). Active and passive range of motion (ROM) of metacarpo-phalangeal (MP), proximal and distal interphalangeal (PIP and DIP) joints and Total Active Motion (TAM), and grip strength were also analyzed. Apex dorsal angulation and axial shortening were radiologically measured preoperatively and at final follow-up. Results: Clinical and radiological results which were observed were satisfactory. No TAM and grip strength differences were recorded between the operated and healthy contralateral hand. Conclusions: According to the positive outcomes and the low rate of complications of this study, antegrade locked flexible intramedullary nailing can be considered a valid treatment option in boxer’s fractures. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Intramedullary Pinning for Displaced Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures: Closed Reduction and Fixation Using Either an Open Antegrade or Percutaneous Retrograde Technique

Introduction

Although the majority of fifth metacarpal neck fractures can be treated nonoperatively, surgery may be indicated when there is severe shortening or angulation of the metacarpal bone¹.

Indications & Contraindications

Step 1 Antegrade Intramedullary Pinning Operating-Room Setup and Making the Incision

Proper positioning of the image intensifier and the treating surgeons is important.

Step 2 Antegrade Intramedullary Pinning Bend the Kirschner Wires

Prepare and bend the Kirschner wires before insertion.

Step 3 Antegrade Intramedullary Pinning Make a Hole in the Fifth Metacarpal Base

Create a hole for Kirschner wire insertion in the center of the fifth metacarpal base.

Step 4 Antegrade Intramedullary Pinning Insert Kirschner Wires and Close the Wound

Insert the Kirschner wires through the hole of the fifth metacarpal base.

Step 5 Antegrade Intramedullary Pinning Postoperative Care

An additional skin incision is necessary to remove the Kirschner wires after bone union.

Step 1 Percutaneous Retrograde Intramedullary Pinning Operating-Room Setup

Proper positioning of the image intensifier and treating surgeon is important.

Step 2 Percutaneous Retrograde Intramedullary Pinning Fracture Reduction

Reduce the fifth metacarpal neck fracture using the Jahss maneuver.

Step 3 Percutaneous Retrograde Intramedullary Pinning Insert Kirschner Wires

Fix the reduced metacarpal neck fracture using 2 Kirschner wires placed percutaneously in a retrograde direction, with the second wire inserted after the first wire passes the fracture site but before it passes the metacarpal base.

Step 4 Percutaneous Retrograde Intramedullary Pinning Kirschner Wire Management

The proximal end of the Kirschner wire penetrating outside the dorsal skin of the wrist enables the surgeon to percutaneously retrieve the Kirschner wire after fracture union.

Step 5 Percutaneous Retrograde Intramedullary Pinning Postoperative Care

The percutaneous Kirschner wire is retrieved.

Results

In a previous prospective randomized analysis of patients treated with antegrade intramedullary pinning and percutaneous retrograde intramedullary pinning for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fracture¹, we found that the flexion arc of the MCP joint, visual analog pain scale score, grip strength, and DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score⁴ were significantly better in the antegrade intramedullary pinning group at 3 months postoperatively.

Pitfalls & Challenges

Treatments for the Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The fifth metacarpal neck fractures (commonly termed boxer's fractures) are the most common type of metacarpal fractures. Many types of treatments are available in clinical practice, some of which have already been compared with other treatments by various researchers. However, a comprehensive treatment comparison is lacking. We estimated the comparative efficacy of different interventions for total complications, through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We conducted a systematic search of the literature through October 2015. The outcome measurements were the total complications. We used a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence and to estimate the relative effects of treatment. We identified 6 RCTs registering a total of 288 patients who were eligible for our network meta-analysis. The literature's quality is relatively high. The median Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study score for the included trials was 33.8. The overall methodological quality was high. Of the 6 studies, all were 2-arm controlled trials comparing active intervention. Among the 4 treatments--conservative treatment (CT), antegrade intramedullary nailing (AIMN), transverse pinning (TP) with K-wires, and plate fixation (PF)--CT had the best rankings (ie, lowest risk of total complications), followed by PF, AIMN, and TP (ie, highest risk of total complications). Furthermore, we also presented the results using surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve probabilities were 94.1%, 52.9%, 37.3%, and 15.7% for CT, PF, AIMN, and TP, respectively. In conclusion, current evidence suggested that conservative treatment is the optimum treatment for the fifth metacarpal neck fractures because of reduced total complication rates. Moreover, the TP with K-wires is the worst option with highly total complication rates. PF and AIMN therapy should be considered as the first-line choices. Larger and higher-quality randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these conclusions and better inform clinical decision-making.

Surgical outcomes of fifth metacarpal neck fractures--a comparative analysis of dorsal plating versus tension band wiring

The purpose of our study is to retrospectively compare the use of tension band (TB) wiring and dorsal plating (DP) for the fixation of fifth metacarpal (MC) neck fractures. A retrospective study of patients who had surgical treatment of 5th MC fractures from 2009 to 2013 was performed. Data including patient demographics, mechanism of injury, pre and postoperative pain score, range of motion (ROM), duration of follow-up and whether implants were removed were documented. Three radiological parameters: angulation (in degrees), radial-ulnar displacement (in millimetres) and MC height ratio were measured. There were a total of 84 patients with isolated closed 5th MC neck fractures, of which 41 underwent DP and 43 underwent TB. Patients who underwent DP demonstrated better improvement in fracture angulation, radial-ulnar displacement, MC height ratio and final ROM compared to those who underwent TB. This study has shown that DP is a viable surgical treatment option for 5th MC neck fractures.

Antegrade intramedullary pinning versus retrograde intramedullary pinning for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Severe angulation or shortening can be a surgical indication for fifth metacarpal neck fracture. In a previous meta-analysis, antegrade intramedullary pinning was shown to produce better hand function outcomes than percutaneous transverse pinning or miniplate fixation for treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures. However, the outcomes of retrograde intramedullary pinning, to our knowledge, have not been compared with those of antegrade intramedullary pinning.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether the clinical and radiographic outcomes of antegrade intramedullary pinning are different from those of percutaneous retrograde intramedullary pinning for treating patients with displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures with an apex dorsal angulation greater than 30° were enrolled in our prospective study. Subjects were treated randomly by antegrade intramedullary pinning (antegrade group) or by percutaneous retrograde intramedullary pinning (retrograde group). Clinical evaluations, which included active ROM of the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint, VAS for pain, grip strength, and DASH score, were performed at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Radiographic evaluations of apex dorsal angulation and axial shortening were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients in the antegrade group achieved better outcomes than patients in the retrograde group for all clinical parameters at 3 months postoperatively (ROM: antegrade median 80° [range, 57°-90°] versus retrograde 69° [range, 45°-90°], difference of medians 11°, p < 0.001; VAS: antegrade median of 2 [range, 0-5] versus retrograde 4 [range, 0-7], difference of medians 2, p < 0.001; grip strength: antegrade median 81% [range, 60%-100%] versus retrograde 71% [range, 49%-98%], differences of medians 10%, p < 0.001; DASH: antegrade median 4.3 [range, 0-15.8] versus retrograde 10.3 [range, 0-28.4], difference of medians 6, p < 0.001), but these differences, with the numbers available, were not observed at 6 months postoperatively for any clinical parameters (ROM: antegrade median 88° [range, 81°-90°] versus retrograde 87° [range, 80°-90°], difference of medians 1°, p = 0.35; VAS: antegrade median 1 [range, 0-2] versus retrograde 1[range, 0-3], difference of medians 0, p = 0.67; grip strength: antegrade median 93% [range, 78%-104%] versus retrograde 91% [range, 76%-101%], difference of medians 2%, p = 0.41; DASH: antegrade median 3 [range, 0-12.5] versus retrograde of 4.3 [range, 0-15.8], difference of medians 1.3, p = 0.48). At 6 months postoperatively, there also were no differences, with the numbers available, in radiographic parameters between the antegrade and retrograde fixation groups. Residual angulation was not different (antegrade median: 7° [range, 2°-11°], retrograde: 9° [range, 3°-13°], difference of medians 2°, p = 0.56). Shortening between the two groups also was not different (antegrade median: 1 mm [range, 0 mm-2 mm], retrograde median: 1 mm [range, 0 mm-2 mm], difference of medians 0, p = 0.78).

CONCLUSION

Our study findings suggest antegrade intramedullary pinning has some clinical advantages during the early recovery period over percutaneous retrograde intramedullary pinning for treatment of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures, but the advantages are not evident at 6 months postoperatively. In addition, our study showed no differences in radiographic outcomes between antegrade and retrograde techniques. For patients who require an early return of hand function, such as athletes, antegrade intramedullary pinning can be recommended. Otherwise, treatment could be decided according to the surgeon's preference and patient status, and based on consideration of the need for an accessory procedure for pin removal after antegrade intramedullary pinning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

The non-operative management of hand fractures

Most hand fractures can be treated non-operatively. Some hand fractures, such as open injuries or markedly displaced intra-articular fractures, are almost always treated operatively. The treatment of many fractures, such as proximal interphalangeal joint fracture subluxations or spiral phalangeal fractures, is unclear. The aim of this review is to establish those injuries where the outcome of non-operative treatment is unlikely to be improved with surgery. This may help to prevent unnecessary surgery, concentrate work on finding the sub-groups that may benefit from surgery and to establish which injuries do so well with non-operative treatment that the only valuable clinical research in future will be large cohort studies of non-operative treatment or randomized controlled trials comparing operative and non-operative treatments. The relevant fractures are spiral metacarpal fractures, transverse metacarpal shaft and neck (boxer's) fractures, base of proximal phalanx avulsion fractures, thumb metacarpophalangeal joint ulnar and radial collateral ligament injuries and bony mallet injuries. For the majority of these injuries, current knowledge suggests that the outcome of non-operative treatment cannot reliably be improved upon with surgery.