Prospective study of the reproducibility of X-rays and CT scans for assessing trochanteric fracture comminution in the elderly: a series of 110 cases

Irreducible Intertrochanteric Fractures: Analysis of Various Fracture Patterns and Reduction Techniques

Background Numerous classifications exist for intertrochanteric (IT) fractures, commonly focused on stability. However, the currently utilized Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthesefragen and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification has limitations in identifying irreducible fractures. This study aims to answer the following questions: does fracture stability imply irreducibility; which fracture fragments complicate reduction; and which reduction techniques should be employed? Materials and methods Eligibility criteria included fractures in adult long bones without pathological fractures being treated by native conservative means. Preoperative pelvic X-rays were obtained from 49 patients who had intertrochanteric fractures and classified according to the 2018 AO Classification. Anterior-posterior pelvic X-rays were reviewed by six experienced surgeons, who reached a consensus on type, group, and subgroup classifications in this prospective observational study. The methods for intraoperative fracture reduction used by five different unit chiefs were recorded and tabulated. All fractures were reduced on a fracture table with traction and rotation and subsequently checked under C-arm imaging. Persistent non-anatomical alignment with displacement was classified as an irreducible IT fracture. Various reduction techniques, using either semi-open or open methods, were analyzed. Results Fractures classified as AO types A1.1, A1.3, and A2.1 were generally more reducible, while types A2.2, A2.3, A3.1, A3.2, and A3.3 were more frequently irreducible. Patients under 65 years of age were more likely to present with irreducible fracture patterns (P = 0.026), a statistically significant association. A semi-open method using spikes or Hohman's retractors was most commonly employed, with no preliminary cortical fixation using K-wires after reduction. Conclusion Irreducible fractures exhibit unique features on C-arm imaging, potentially leading to increased anxiety and longer operation times. Awareness of these fracture characteristics can assist surgeons in achieving effective reduction and reducing operation time. The 2018 AO classification alone does not reliably predict irreducible IT fractures.

Preoperative CT improves the assessment of stability in trochanteric hip fractures

Aims

To investigate if preoperative CT improves detection of unstable trochanteric hip fractures.

Methods

A single-centre prospective study was conducted. Patients aged 65 years or older with trochanteric hip fractures admitted to Stavanger University Hospital (Stavanger, Norway) were consecutively included from September 2020 to January 2022. Radiographs and CT images of the fractures were obtained, and surgeons made individual assessments of the fractures based on these. The assessment was conducted according to a systematic protocol including three classification systems (AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), Evans Jensen (EVJ), and Nakano) and questions addressing specific fracture patterns. An expert group provided a gold-standard assessment based on the CT images. Sensitivities and specificities of surgeons' assessments were estimated and compared in regression models with correlations for the same patients. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were presented as Cohen's kappa and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1).

Results

We included 120 fractures in 119 patients. Compared to radiographs, CT increased the sensitivity of detecting unstable trochanteric fractures from 63% to 70% (p = 0.028) and from 70% to 76% (p = 0.004) using AO/OTA and EVJ, respectively. Compared to radiographs alone, CT increased the sensitivity of detecting a large posterolateral trochanter major fragment or a comminuted trochanter major fragment from 63% to 76% (p = 0.002) and from 38% to 55% (p < 0.001), respectively. CT improved intra-rater reliability for stability assessment using EVJ (AC1 0.68 to 0.78; p = 0.049) and for detecting a large posterolateral trochanter major fragment (AC1 0.42 to 0.57; p = 0.031).

Conclusion

A preoperative CT of trochanteric fractures increased detection of unstable fractures using the AO/OTA and EVJ classification systems. Compared to radiographs, CT improved intra-rater reliability when assessing fracture stability and detecting large posterolateral trochanter major fragments.

Posterior Protrusion Measures (PPM) for Three-Dimensional (3D) CT Classification of Pertrochanteric Fractures

Introduction We introduced a novel numerical index known as posterior protrusion measures (PPM), derived from lateral plain radiograph images, which effectively serves to distinguish stable from unstable pertrochanteric fractures. The present study aims to scrutinize PPM values among two classified fracture patterns, stable and unstable, within the three-dimensional (3D) CT classification system, establishing a numeric threshold for PPM to differentiate between these groups; explore the potential relationship between the PPM index and unclassified categories; investigate how groups divided by the PPM threshold value can predict fracture stability based on 3D CT. Materials and methods In this study, three observers were tasked with measuring PPM on a single occasion. The chi-square test assessed the association between each demographic parameter on a categorical scale and stable/unstable groups. Continuous variables were also subject to examination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to determine optimal cut-off points of PPM for predicting the presence of stable versus unstable groups. Additionally, the chi-square test examined the linear relation between separated groups based on the defined threshold PPM value and the stable/unstable groups. Results A total of 106 pertrochanteric fractures were identified using CT scan images and plain radiographs in the 3D CT classification system, revealing the stable group of 35 patients and the unstable group of 71 patients. The PPM values for stable/unstable fractures were, on average (± standard deviation), 0.34±0.25/0.50±0.29 for observer 1, 0.31±0.23/0.57±0.31 for observer 2, and 0.41±0.29/0.57±0.26 for observer 3, respectively (p<0.01). We established 0.3 as the cut-off value for PPM. The average PPM value among three observers represented each patient to assess fracture stability. The group with PPM <0.3 included 27 patients (16 stable and 11 unstable), and the group with PPM ≥0.3 group comprised 79 patients (19 stable and 60 unstable; p<0.005). Conclusion The present study revealed a significant difference in PPM values among stable and unstable 3D CT classification groups. Additionally, a threshold PPM value of 0.3 suggests a pivotal point for differentiating fracture stability. This innovative methodology makes a substantial contribution to clinical endeavors, potentially circumventing the necessity for 3D CT scanning.

A Demographic Survey of Pertrochanteric Fractures Based on the Revised Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) Classification Using 3D CT Scan Images

Introduction A demographic survey of femoral pertrochanteric fractures provides several important information for the healthcare system of a country since this fracture is commonly seen in the elderly and has a poor postoperative functional prognosis that is a burden on society. The importance of accurately classifying pertrochanteric fractures as stable or unstable cannot be understated. However, the use of plain radiograph images alone is known to underestimate fracture severity with low inter- or intra-observer agreement. Computed tomography (CT) images offer information for a more accurate classification of pertrochanteric fractures. With this three-dimensional (3D) CT-based study using the revised Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, the purpose of this study is to elucidate the epidemiological demography of patients with pertrochanteric fractures. Material and methods We retrospectively collected 808 patients from five hospitals, classified into two groups: stable (A1) or unstable (A2). Age, gender, fracture laterality, and surgery timing were identified as epidemiological variables. Patients with both preoperative plain radiographs and 3D CT scans were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were AO/OTA A3 type fractures, pathological fractures, previous ipsilateral surgery, 60 years old or younger, and conservatively treated patients. The primary outcome involved detailing the total number of fractures based on classification (A1 or A2) and variables. The secondary outcome involved a comparison between the A1 and A2 groups. Results The mean age of patients at the time of surgery was 85 years (range: 61-103 years). There were 637 female and 171 male patients. There were 463 left-sided fractures and 345 right-sided fractures. Of the 808 patients, 371 (45.9%) were classified to have A1 fractures, and 437 (54.1%) had A2 fractures. The age at surgery, gender, fracture laterality, and surgery timing between the A1 and A2 groups were compared. The mean and standard deviation of the age at surgery for patients in the A1 and A2 groups were 84.9±7.7 and 86.9±6.8, respectively. The number of patients for each age distribution of 61-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90-94, and 95 or older for the A1 and A2 groups was 18 and 7, 18 and 12, 43 and 44, 76 and 82, 107 and 132, 79 and 110, and 30 and 50, respectively, showing that the difference in categorial distribution was statistically significant (p=0.002). Overall, 278 females and 93 males were classified to have A1 fractures compared with 359 females and 78 males with A2 fractures (p=0.01). There were 166 right-sided and 205 left-sided stable A1 fractures and 179 right-sided and 258 left-sided A2 fractures (not significant (NS)). Among the total number of A1 and A2 surgeries by month, the most were in December with 77 surgeries (37 and 40, respectively), and the least was in June with 37 (18 and 19, respectively). The seasonal classification for A1 and A2 surgeries is as follows: spring with 172 (74 and 98, respectively), summer with 150 (70 and 80, respectively), autumn with 193 (90 and 103, respectively), and winter with 208 (97 and 111, respectively) (NS). Conclusion In this demographic study of 808 patients with pertrochanteric fractures classified by 3D CT images, 371 had A1 fractures and 437 had A2 fractures. A2 fractures were significantly more in females with an age peak of 85-89 years.

Recognition and Segmentation of Individual Bone Fragments with a Deep Learning Approach in CT Scans of Complex Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Retrospective Study

The characteristics of bone fragments are the main influencing factors for the choice of treatment in intertrochanteric fractures. This study aimed to develop a deep learning algorithm for recognizing and segmenting individual fragments in CT images of complex intertrochanteric fractures for orthopedic surgeons. This study was based on 160 hip CT scans (43,510 images) of complex fractures of three types based on the Evans-Jensen classification (40 cases of type 3 (IIA) fractures, 80 cases of type 4 (IIB)fractures, and 40 cases of type 5 (III)fractures) retrospectively. The images were randomly split into two groups to construct a training set of 120 CT scans (32,045 images) and a testing set of 40 CT scans (11,465 images). A deep learning model was built into a cascaded architecture composed by a convolutional neural network (CNN) for location of the fracture ROI and another CNN for recognition and segmentation of individual fragments within the ROI. The accuracy of object detection and dice coefficient of segmentation of individual fragments were used to evaluate model performance. The model yielded an average accuracy of 89.4% for individual fragment recognition and an average dice coefficient of 90.5% for segmentation in CT images. The results demonstrated the feasibility of recognition and segmentation of individual fragments in complex intertrochanteric fractures with a deep learning approach. Altogether, these promising results suggest the potential of our model to be applied to many clinical scenarios.

Posterior Protrusion Measures (PPM) as an Innovative Index in Classifying Plain Lateral Radiograph Images of Pertrochanteric Fracture Using the Revised AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) Classification

Introduction The absence of a precise fracture classification system that classifies pertrochanteric fractures into either stable or unstable contributes to a burden on healthcare and has several major implications. We propose an innovative graphical index, which we refer to as posterior protrusion measures (PPM), using plain lateral view radiograph images for the revised AO Foundation (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesesfragen)/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification system. This study aims to: (i) introduce the use of PPM for classifying fractures into stable or unstable under the revised AO/OTA classification system and set the threshold numeric value, (ii) elucidate the reproducibility of inter and intra-observer agreement, and investigate the consistency of fracture classification using PPM versus computed tomography (CT) scan images. Materials and methods Out of 146 patients identified from the database, a total of 126 patients were enrolled in the study. Pertrochanteric fractures were classified as either stable or unstable. Three surgeons were assigned for PPM determination. Regarding the demographical data, the chi-square test was used to assess the significance of each parameter on a categorical scale between the two groups. The independent sample t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the two independent groups. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for continuous variables and kappa values (κ) for categorical variables were calculated to assess inter-observer and intra-observer agreement. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine optimal cut-off points of PPM to predict consistency between separate fracture classification groups, one using PPM values with a threshold derived from plain radiograph images, and the other using CT scan images. Results Among a total of 126 pertrochanteric fractures, the A1 (stable) group consisted of 39 patients (10 males, 29 females), whereas the A2 (unstable) group consisted of 87 patients (14 males, 73 females) (not significant, NS). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of PPM for the inter-observer agreement were 0.796 (0.723-0.852), 0.664 (0.554-0.751), and 0.702 (0.601-0.781) at first examination and 0.729 (0.635-0.801) at the second. The intra-observer agreement was 0.869 (0.819-0.906) and 0.603 (0.480-0.703). We examined for consistency of fracture classification group of PPM values with a threshold of 0.4 (A1<0.4, A2=0.4 or more) and CT-based group. For the first examination, there was mostly "moderate" agreement in fracture classification (stable or unstable) between plain radiograph and CT scan images, κ (95%CI): 0.427 (0.266-0.588), 0.493 (0.335-0.651), and 0.359 (0.176-0.544), and for the second, 0.418 (0.251-0.585), and 0.451 (0.284-0.620), respectively. Conclusion We propose a supplementary tool, namely PPM that allows for possible alternative classification of pertrochanteric fractures into A1 (stable) and A2 (unstable) using plain radiograph images under the revised AO/OTA classification system. In this study, a PPM threshold value of 0.4 demonstrated a moderate inter- and intra-observer agreement. It is noteworthy to mention that there was a satisfactory consistency of fracture classification using PPM derived from plain radiograph images when compared to classification using CT scan images. In addition, the PPM method provides a numerical score.

Mortality and functional consequences after revision osteosynthesis for peritrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nail: A retrospective study of 312 patients

INTRODUCTION

Osteosynthesis of peritrochanteric fractures by intramedullary nail is associated with a 3 to 15% rate of complications requiring revision surgery. The objective of our study was to compare mortality and autonomy between patients who required revision surgery after osteosynthesis, and patients without revision surgery.

HYPOTHESES

Patients who underwent revision surgery after osteosynthesis of a peritrochanteric fracture by intramedullary nail did not exhibit excess mortality or loss of autonomy compared to those who did not undergo revision surgery.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and October 2019, 312 consecutive patients were operated on for a peritrochanteric fracture by intramedullary nail. Among them, 23 patients (7.4%) required revision surgery (change, nail removal, total hip arthroplasty). Mortality at 90 days and at one year was evaluated and compared between the group of "revision" patients and "no revision" patients. The level of autonomy was assessed by the Parker and Palmer score, one year postoperatively and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The patients requiring revision surgery were younger: 73 years old vs. 86 years old (p<0.011). The overall mortality was 7.25% at 90 days after surgery and 15% at one year. Mortality was zero at 90 days, and at 1 year, postoperatively for patients requiring revision surgery. There was no significant difference for the mortality at 90 days (p=0.39) between the 2 groups, however at 1 year, it was significantly less for the revision patients (0% vs. 17%, p=0.032). There was no significant difference for the Parker score between the "revision" group; 5 (4-9) and the "no revision" group; 4 (3-7), at one year postoperatively (p=0.24).

CONCLUSION

This study did not show any excess mortality, nor loss of autonomy at 1 year postoperatively, for patients who required osteosynthesis for a trochanteric fracture, and who presented with a complication requiring revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, comparative retrospective study.

A sophisticated fracture classification system of the proximal femur trochanteric region (AO/OTA-31A) based on 3D-CT images

OBJECTIVE

Fracture classification evolves dynamically with new and enhanced imaging modalities. This paper aims to introduce a novel hypothesis of a sophisticated fracture classification system for the proximal femur trochanteric region (AO/OTA-31A) based on 3D-CT images and accommodate the clinical requirement of the worldwide outbreak of geriatric hip fractures with large amounts of surgical operations.

METHODS

In the current practice of widely preoperative 3D-CT application and cephalomedullary nailing, we attempt to propose a new comprehensive classification system to describe the fracture characteristics in a more detailed and sophisticated architecture, and pay the most important concern to the parameters that contribute to fracture stability reconstruction in osteosynthesis.

RESULTS

The new four-by-four comprehensive classification system, followed the structure of the AO/OTA system, incorporates many fracture characteristics as dividing indexes into multiple grade levels, such as fracture line direction, the number of fragments, the lesser trochanter fragment and its distal extension (>2 cm), the posterior coronal fragment and its anterior expansion (to the entry portal of head-neck implant at the lateral cortex), the lateral wall and anterior cortex fracture, and the anteromedial inferior corner comminution. From a panoramic perspective, there are four types and each type has four subtypes. A1 is simple two-part fractures (20%), A2 is characterized by lesser trochanter fragment and posterior coronal fractures (62.5%), A3 is reverse obliquity and transverse fractures with complete lateral wall broken (15.5%), and A4 is medial wall comminution which further lacks anteromedial cortex transmission of compression force (2%). For subtypes, A2.2 is with a banana-like posterior coronal fragment, A2.4 is with distal cortex extension >2 cm of the lesser trochanter and anterior expansion of the posterior coronal fragment(s) to the entry portal of head-neck implants, A3.4 is a primary pantrochanteric fracture, and A4.4 is a concomitant ipsilateral segmental fracture of the neck and trochanter region.

CONCLUSION

Classification represents diversity under consistency. The four-by-four sophisticated classification system delineates fracture characteristics in more detail. It is applicable in the time of rapid outbreak of trochanteric fractures in the older population, the large amounts of surgical operations, and incorporates various rare and/or more complicated subtypes which is unclassifiable before.

A comprehensive 3D CT based classification of intertrochanteric fracture

Introduction

Despite advancements in surgical techniques complications like implant failure is very common after the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Classifying these complex fractures based on plain radiographs underestimates the complexity of these fractures which in turn leads to complications. We propose a comprehensive classification of the intertrochanteric fractures based on 3D Non Contrast Computed Tomography (3D NCCT) scan.

Material and methods

A total of 102 patients (51 males and 51 females) with intertrochanteric fractures were included in this study conducted over a time period of 22 months in a Tertiary care center in North India. NCCT proximal femur of the intertrochanteric fracture patients was done to formulate a new CT classification system and classify all fractures. Intra and inter-observer reliability was tested using kappa variance.

Results

New classification system was proposed which included 3 main and a total of 6 groups. All the fractures were classifiable into the new system. Kappa variance of the study showed a good intra and interobserver reliability (0.95 and 0.90) proving clinical agreement of the classification.

Conclusion

This new 3D-CT based classification has the advantages of being easy, comprehensible with high intra and inter-observer reliability. This 3DCT based classification can prove to be useful to detect occult intertrochanteric fractures undetectable in plain radiographs as well as choosing the optimum treatment plan.

Fracture fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

There are three common types of operative options for unstable intertrochanteric fracture (ITF), i.e. dynamic hip screw (DHS), proximal femoral nail (PFN), and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA). Results of these operations are still inconclusive. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was therefore conducted to compare the efficacy among those operative strategies.

HYPOTHESIS

These three operative techniques (i.e., DHS, PFN, and BHA) were not different in operative failure, reoperation, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) for unstable ITF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes among DHS, PFN, and BHA in patients with unstable ITFs were searched from Medline and Scopus databases. Primary outcomes included operative failure, reoperation, and HHS. Direct meta-analysis (DMA) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed to compare among three operative techniques. Qualitative and quantitative evidences of all included studies were tested for heterogeneity, transitivity, and consistency in NMA. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate the probability of being the best in lowering poor clinical outcomes, but high HHS.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs (n=528) were eligible. DMA showed that DHS and PFN were significantly higher risk of operative failure compared with BHA with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval of 7.98 (1.35, 47.06) and 3.08 (1.00, 9.51), respectively. Compared with BHA, PFN was 4.47 (1.04, 21.60) times significantly higher risk of reoperation, and lower HHS at 3-6months [mean difference (MD)=-5.41 (-15.91, 5.10)], but higher HHS at>6-12months [MD 11.67 (2.98, 20.36)], although these HHSs were not significant. NMA and SUCRA demonstrated the highest ranks for operative failure and reoperation were DHS and PFN, whereas the highest HHS was BHA.

DISCUSSION

In specific group of unstable ITF, BHA might be the best operative technique in term of lower operative failure and reoperation, and highest HHS during short to intermediate period comparing with PFN and DHS. However, PFN had higher long-term HHS than BHA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I, meta-analysis of RCTs.

Addition of 3D-CT evaluation to radiographic images and effect on diagnostic reliability of current 2018 AO/OTA classification of femoral trochanteric fractures

INTRODUCTION

The AO/OTA classification for diagnosing femoral trochanteric fractures (31A fractures) was revised in 2018. No studies have investigated whether the addition of CT to radiographic diagnosis improves the inter-rater reliability of classifying 31A fractures with the current AO/OTA criteria. The study aimed to test the hypothesis that the addition of three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) to radiographic diagnosis would improve diagnostic reliability.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to assess the diagnostic reliability of classification of 31A fractures with current AO/OTA criteria. Radiographs and 3D-CT images from 89 cases were assessed. Major fracture types (A1, A2, and A3) and subgroups were diagnosed by nine orthopedic surgeons who were classified into three groups (high-, intermediate-, and low-experience) according to their clinical experience. Anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were provided to diagnose fracture type (first assessment). After a 6-week interval, radiographs and 3D-CT images of all cases were evaluated by each rater (second assessment). Fleiss's Kappa was used to determine inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

In the first assessment, the Kappa value indicated fair inter-rater reliability in all groups (high-experience group: κ = 0.296, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.239-0.352; intermediate-experience group: κ = 0.367, 95% CI 0.305-0.428; low-experience group: κ = 0.304, 95% CI 0.246-0.362). With the addition of 3D-CT (second assessment), reliability improved from fair to moderate in the high- and intermediate-experience groups (κ = 0.483, 95% CI 0.428-0.539 and κ = 0.409, 95% CI 0.352-0.466, respectively). By contrast, reliability remained fair in the low-experience group (κ = 0.322, 95% CI 0.322-0.431). The inter-rater reliability of diagnosing subgroup fracture types improved for A2.3 and A3.1 in all three groups and for A3.2 and A3.3 in the intermediate- and low-experience groups.

CONCLUSION

The current AO/OTA classification revised in 2018 provided fair reliability in diagnosing femoral trochanteric fractures in all three surgeon groups. The addition of 3D-CT to radiographic image evaluation improved reliability in high- and middle-expertise groups. The addition of 3D-CT to radiographic evaluation often improved the diagnostic reliability for unstable fractures, although there was some variation among fracture subgroups.

Assessment of Usefulness of CT Scan in AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

The sliding hip screw (SHS) is the gold standard for the management of stable intertrochanteric (IT) fractures. However, intramedullary implants are now being increasingly used for management of unstable IT fractures especially those with a compromised or vulnerable lateral wall. Therefore, accurate classification of fracture is important to ensure proper surgical planning and choice of implant. The AO classification for IT fractures is based on plain radiographs alone and many authors have reported it to have poor inter- and intra-observer agreement. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to assess the improvement in inter- and intra-observer agreement of the AO classification after addition of CT scan to plain radiographs, to assess the change in pattern of AO classification on addition of CT scan to plain radiographs and to assess percentage of times, stable lateral wall seen on plain radiographs is classified as unstable or broken on CT scans.

METHOD

Fifty-four patients of intertrochanteric fracture were included in study. Plain radiographs of patients were shown to three orthopedic surgeons. They were asked to document the AO classification of the fracture, and comment on the integrity of the lateral wall. Then, CT scans with 3D reconstructions of the same patients were provided along with the radiographs and they were asked to classify the fracture again. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of the AO classification based on plain radiographs alone and once CT scan with 3D reconstruction was added to the plain radiographs was determined using Kappa coefficients. Pattern of change in classification on addition of CT scan to plain radiographs was also assessed.

RESULT

The mean kappa value for inter- and intra-observer agreement for AO classification on plain radiographs alone were 0.58 (moderate) and 0.66 (substantial), respectively. Upon addition of CT scan to plain radiographs, both improved to 0.70 (substantial) and 0.77 (substantial), respectively. The AO classification of the fracture changed 28.70% times (93 of 324 observations) upon addition of CT scan to plain radiographs. 96.77% times (90 of 93 observations) the classification was upgraded to higher group, while it was downgraded in only 3.22% times (3 of 93). 55.91% times this change was observed in AO 31 A 2 group (52 of 93 observations). In 17.59% cases (57 of 324 observations), fractures which were classified as stable (A1.1-A2.1) on radiographs alone, were reclassified as unstable (A2.2-3.3) upon addition of CT scan to plain radiographs. In 11.4% cases (37 of 324 observations), the lateral wall was classified as vulnerable or broken on CT scans where it was classified intact on plain radiographs.

CONCLUSION

Addition of CT scans with 3D reconstructions to plain radiographs improves the intra- and inter-observer agreement of the AO classification. Addition of CT scan results in change in classification of the fracture in about one out of three cases. This most commonly happens in the AO 31 A 2 group. Most of the times, this results in the classification of fracture being upgraded. Many fractures which are initially classified as stable (A1.1-A2.1) on radiographs are reclassified as unstable (A2.2-3.3) on addition of CT scans. The lateral wall is also classified as vulnerable or broken more number of times on CT scans than plain radiographs alone. Therefore, we conclude that CT scan with 3 D reconstructions definitely helps in better pre-operative classification of intertrochanteric fractures especially in select group of fractures (AO 31 A 2) where stability and integrity of lateral wall is difficult to assess.

Diagnostic imaging concordance study: Are traction radiographs necessary in a hip fracture?

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are a pathology that have emerged as a major subject over the years, due to increased prevalence and the multiple surgical treatments involved. The characterization and classification of the lesion is essential for proper surgical planning, with anteroposterior (AP), lateral and traction radiograph of the hip, paramount for decision-making.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective concordance study of 64 patients with hip fracture who consulted the hospital between January and July 2017. Four radiographs were taken of each: AP, AP with traction, lateral and lateral with traction. This set of images was evaluated by 9 observers, with different levels of experience, to answer questions regarding the classification, emphasize in potential instability and requirement of other images. A statistical analysis of concordance between and within observers was performed using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Of the 64 patients, 70.6% were women; the average age was 69.5 years. 82.8% presented a secondary fracture from falling from their own height. As the observer's experience increases, the need for traction radiograph decreases; interobserver kappa goes from 0.98 in experts to 0.01 in students. Traction radiograph is important in the diagnosis of potentially unstable fractures. Of the 1,503 radiographs with traction, 636 (42.38%) were classified as potentially unstable. And of the 708 without traction, 560 (79.1%) were classified as potentially unstable.

CONCLUSIONS

Traction hip radiograph continues to be a useful tool in training environments to adequately classify an intertrochanteric fracture, considering it is a low-cost, minimal morbidity intervention, and is easily accessible. In similar studies, we found similar findings regarding the usefulness of traction to perform an adequate classification in people in training or in young orthopedists. It also influences to determine the potential instability, and this would modify the choice of the implant.

The Role of Preoperative Computed Tomography on the Quality of Reduction and Outcomes in Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Controlled Trial

Purpose

The study is aimed at assessing the role of preoperative computerised tomography (CT) examination in the quality of reduction and outcomes in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture.

Methods

The elderly patients with an intertrochanteric fracture who were treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation were included. The patients were divided into the CT group and the no-CT group according to the presence of preoperative CT examination. Patients' baseline characteristics, quality of reduction, and function were recorded at follow-up. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip scores (HHS).

Results

Totally, the study included 182 patients with intertrochanteric fractures, with 85 in the CT group and 97 in the no-CT group, admitted between January 2018 and June 2019. There was no difference in the quality of reduction, HHS, the fracture healing, or postoperative complications between the CT group and the no-CT group. However, the CT group experienced the shorter mean operative time and blood transfusion, compared to the no-CT group.

Conclusions

The preoperative CT examination seems to be excessive for elderly patients with an intertrochanteric fracture.

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography (CT) Mapping of Intertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients

Background

The complex anatomy of the trochanter and the diversity in mechanisms of injury to it complicate intertrochanteric fracture patterns. Using digital technology, we created three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) mapping to show the relevant characteristics of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

Material/Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of a case series of closed intertrochanteric fractures in patients older than age 60 years who had sustained single-sided injuries less than 1 week previously. High-quality CT scans of the cases were used to create a 3D reconstruction fracture model, and fracture maps of the proximal femur were created by overlapping the fracture lines.

Results

A total of 115 patients were enrolled in this study, with mean age of 78 years (SD 7.98 years; range, 60 to 96 years). The essential features of the fracture lines were recorded in each case. Fracture maps revealed that the fracture lines were mainly concentrated in the area of the lesser and greater trochanter, intertrochanteric line, and intertrochanteric crest. As for fracture subtypes, results between patients were similar for Types A1 and A2 fractures, and differed for Type A3 fractures.

Conclusions

Detailed analysis of essential features of fracture lines revealed fracture fragments, some of which may be difficult to see using traditional imaging methods. Fracture maps composed of interindividual fracture lines revealed the relevant characteristics of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. The resulting information about characteristics of distribution of fracture lines may be helpful in clinical practice.

Morphology Specific Lateral Wall Reconstruction Techniques Using Cerclage Wires in Unstable Trochanteric Fractures

Trochanteric lateral wall fracture (LWF) indicates instability and is found to be an important predictor of reoperations following trochanteric fracture fixation. A single unified technique for lateral wall reconstruction may not adequately stabilize all the fracture patterns. We have presented morphology specific lateral wall reconstruction techniques using cerclage wire around proximal femoral nails. Various LWF patterns have been simplified into three types. Type-specific lateral wall reconstruction techniques using cerclage wire were adopted in 49 consecutive unstable trochanteric fractures presented to our institute between 2016 and 2018. We analyzed the fracture pattern, fixation method used, union time, and complications. The functional outcome was analyzed using the Harris hip score (HSS). The mean follow-up period was 13 months (range 10-36 months). The mean age of the population was 66 years (range 36-91 years). There were 15 patients with type 1 LWF pattern, 26 patients with type 2, and 8 were of type 3 pattern. The mean operating time was 66 min. The mean union time was 14 weeks (10-24 weeks). HSS was excellent in 9 patients, good in 33 patients, fair in 4 patients, and poor in 5 patients. Complications include one patient with avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head, varus collapse with non-union in one patient, screws back out in one patient, superficial infection in 4 patients, and distal screw breakage in one patient. Type 2 is the most common LWF type in our study. In unstable trochanteric fractures, morphology specific lateral wall reconstruction using cerclage wire loops around the proximal femoral nail is a simple technique with promising results with minimal complications.

Effect of lesser trochanter posteromedial wall defect on the stability of femoral intertrochanteric fracture using 3D simulation

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the effects of posteromedial fracture fragments on the postoperative stability of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur by analyzing the quantity and range of fragments in CT 3D reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with femoral lesser trochanter fractures were collected from September 2015 to February 2018. CT 3D reconstruction was applied to evaluate the quantity and extension of posteromedial fragments and the presence of isolated medial fragments. The stability of postoperative fracture was evaluated by comparing the changes of "neck-shaft angle" and "telescoping" from 1 week to 1 year after operation.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients were finally confirmed, in which 63 patients contained isolated fragments on the medial side, and the average number of fragments in the posteromedial side was 1.93 ± 0.34, which accounted for an average of about 86.11% ± 8.20% in the whole posteromedial wall. When the number of posteromedial fragments was > 2 and the range of posteromedial fragments was > 75%, then the changes in the neck-shaft angle and "telescoping" showed statistical significance (12.27 ± 4.18 mm and 10.13 ± 6.17°, respectively), and when there were isolated medial isolated fragments, then the change in the neck-shaft angle was 10.66 ± 4.27°, showing statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings revealed a certain correlation between the quantity and the range of posteromedial fragments and the postoperative "shortening" and "collapse" of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Three-dimensional mapping of intertrochanteric fracture lines

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Background:

Available research about the anatomic patterns of intertrochanteric fractures is lacking, and fracture mapping has not previously been performed on intertrochanteric fractures. This study aimed to determine the major trajectories of intertrochanteric fracture lines using computed tomography data from a series of surgically treated patients.

Methods:

In this study, 504 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Fracture patterns were graded according to Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification. Fracture lines were transcribed onto proximal femoral templates and graphically superimposed to create a compilation of fracture maps that were subsequently divided into anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial fracture maps to create a three-dimensional (3D) pattern by reducing fragments in the 3D models. The fracture maps were then converted into frequency spectra. The major fracture patterns were assessed by focusing on the lateral femoral wall, lesser trochanter, intertrochanteric crest, and inner cortical buttress.

Results:

Anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial fracture maps were created. The majority of fracture lines (85.9%, 433/504) on the anterior maps were along the intertrochanteric line where the iliofemoral ligament was attached. In the medial plane, the majority of fracture lines (49.0%, 247/504) shown on the frequency spectrum included the turning point involving the third quadrant. In the posterior plane, the majority of fracture lines (52.0%, 262/504) involved the intertrochanteric crest from the greater to the lesser trochanter. In the lateral plane, the majority of fracture lines (62.7%, 316/504) involved the greater trochanter at the gluteus medius attachment.

Conclusions:

The fracture patterns observed in the present study might be used to describe morphologic characteristics and aid with management strategies. Further classifications or modifications that incorporate the fracture patterns identified in this study may be used in future research.

Medial wall fragment involving large posterior cortex in pertrochanteric femur fractures: a notable preoperative risk factor for implant failure

INTRODUCTION

To introduce a classification for medial wall fragments in pertrochanteric femur fractures and investigate potential preoperative predictors of implant failure following fixation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records of 324 adult patients receiving routine operative treatment using intramedullary devices for pertrochanteric femur fractures with medial wall fragments between August 2008 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Potential predictors including age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, AO/OTA classification of fractures were noted. The medial wall fractures were categorized into three types: 1) Type I: avulsion of the lesser trochanter; fracture line does not exceed the base of the lesser trochanter; 2) Type II: fragment involving the posterior cortex near the base of the lesser trochanter; fracture line does not reach the midline of the posterior wall; 3) Type III: fragment involving the large posterior cortex; fracture line reaches or exceeds the midline of the posterior wall.

RESULTS

The 8 (2.5%) implant failures comprised 1 in 186 Type I fractures, 1 in 76 Type II fractures and 6 in 62 Type III fractures. The failure rates of each fracture type were 0.5% in Type I, 1.3% in Type II and significantly increased to 9.7% in Type III (odds ratio [OR], 19.821; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.337-168.135; p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Type III fractures had a significantly increased failure rate. It is important for orthopedists to identify Type III fractures presurgically, reduction of the medial wall fragment and fixation should be considered during surgery using intramedullary nails.

A novel three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fractures based on computed tomography findings

A novel three-dimensional fragment-based classification system based on computed tomography findings was established to characterize femoral intertrochanteric fractures. The intertrochanteric bone fragments were defined as follows : neck, posterior portion of the greater trochanter, anterior portion of the greater trochanter, lesser trochanter, and shaft. Each type of fracture was classified as 2-, 3-, 4-, or 5-fragment according to the number of floating bone fragments. Following the description of the fracture type, each floating bone fragment was appended, with the exception of a fragment involving the shaft. Ninety-five intertrochanteric fractures were classified by the same surgeon. The fractures occurred in 14 men and 81 women with a mean age of 84.7 years. The frequency of each type of fracture was investigated. Thirty-one fractures (32.6%) were 2-fragment and 64 (67.4%) were ≥ 3-fragment. A fragment of the anterior portion of the greater trochanter, which cannot be classified using conventional systems, was included in 29 cases (30.5%). A 5-fragment fracture was detected in two cases (2.1%). Using this fragment-based classification system, intertrochanteric fractures can be evaluated in more detail than is possible using conventional classification systems. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 362-366, August, 2019.

Does Computed Tomography Improve Reproducibility in the Classification of Transtrochanteric Fractures?

With the aging of the population, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of hip fractures, with high mortality rates, sequelae and expenses. Understanding the fracture profile and classifying it correctly is critical to define the appropriate treatment. Several radiographic classifications have been developed for transtrochanteric fractures, such as Tronzo, Evans-Jensen, AO and Boyd-Griffin, but their reproducibility is not always satisfactory. The present review aimed to elucidate whether the addition of computed tomography (CT) implies a greater reproducibility than simple radiography in the classification of transtrochanteric fractures, and whether this is a better examination to identify the fracture trait. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane databases between July 2016 and June 2017, limited to the last 15 years. All retrospective, prospective and systematic reviews articles published in the English language, with evaluation of men and/or women, were considered for review. We have excluded case reports, studies that evaluated tomography or radiographs in isolation, and duplicate studies. The research presented 112 articles, of which 5 contemplated the proposed criteria. Reproducibility for the classification of transtrochanteric fractures presented variable results and was influenced by factors such as the type of classification, the use of the simplified or complete classification, the specialty of the evaluator, his experience, and the methodology proposed by the works. There are indications that there is benefit for the use of CT, especially for fractures considered unstable, but its use as a tool to ensure better reproducibility (intra- and interobserver) remains controversial and needs further studies.

Clustering of morphological fracture lines for identifying intertrochanteric fracture classification with Hausdorff distance-based K-means approach

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a systematic three-dimensional (3D) classification of intertrochanteric fractures by clustering the morphological features of fracture lines using the Hausdorff distance-based K-means approach and assess the usefulness of it in the clinical setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 504 patients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary internal fixation. The morphological fracture lines of all patients extracted from computed tomography were transcribed freehand onto the template. All fracture lines were then clustered into five distinct types using the Hausdorff distance-based K-means clustering method. Five radiographic parameters and four functional parameters were used to evaluate the postoperative functional states and mobilization levels. Postoperative complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Intertrochanteric fractures were classified into five types: type I (108/504, 21.4%), simple fracture with intact lateral femoral wall and greater trochanter fragment; type II (85/504, 16.9%), simple fracture with intact lateral femoral wall with/without lesser trochanter detachment; type III (147/504, 29.2%), fractures with intertrochanteric crest detachment involving the lesser trochanter and greater trochanter with an intact lateral femoral wall; type IV (113/504, 22.4%), fractures with large intertrochanteric crest detachment and large lesser trochanter and greater trochanter detachment partially involving the lateral femoral wall and less medial cortical support; type V (51/504, 10.1%), a combination of pertrochanteric and lateral fracture line involving the entire lateral femoral wall and lesser trochanter detachment. Parameters of femoral neck-shaft angle and sliding distance of the cephalic nail were significantly different among types. The complication rate generally increased from type I to type V (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The unsupervised clustering can achieve identification of the type of intertrochanteric fractures with clinical significance. The Tang classification can be used to describe fracture morphology, predict the possibility of achieving stable reduction and the risk of complications following intramedullary fixation.

Three-dimensional CT Improves the Reproducibility of Stability Evaluation for Intertrochanteric Fractures

OBJECTIVES

Femoral intertrochanteric fractures are among the most common fractures in the elderly. There are various classification systems in intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of these classification systems is to help surgeons choose an appropriate treatment. The treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures depends on the results of a stability evaluation using imaging studies. However, it is difficult to evaluate the true fracture line using plain X-ray films, especially on the sagittal plane and for intertrochanteric fractures with complex morphologies. The aim of the current study was to determine whether three-dimensional CT (3DCT) improves the reproducibility of stability evaluation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

This was a single-center observational study of intertrochanteric fractures. We retrospectively collected patients in our hospital with intertrochanteric fractures that underwent plain X-ray (anteroposterior, lateral view) CT scans with axial images (2DCT) and 3DCT for an injured hip between 1 December 2011 and 30 November 2015. The exclusion criteria were pathological fractures (due to metastasis or primary bone tumors) and previous intertrochanteric surgery. During this period, 61 patients were enrolled. Two patients were excluded because lateral view X-rays were not available. A total of 59 patients (27 women, 32 men) with an average age of 77 years (range, 55-96 years) were included in our final analysis. The stability evaluation (i.e. stable or unstable) and implant choices (i.e. dynamic hip screws or Gamma nail) were recorded independently by four observers (two attending physicians and two residents). All images were reviewed and classified using the AO/OTA and Evans modified by Jensen (EVJE) classification systems. The session was repeated after a 3-month wash-out period. The inter-observer agreement was evaluated using the Kappa test.

RESULTS

The inter-observer agreements, measured by the mean weighted kappa values (expressed as X-ray vs 3DCT) were as follows: For stability evaluation, the mean kappa values for attending physicians and residents were 0.68 versus 0.76 and 0.55 versus 0.56. For implant choices, the mean kappa values for attending physicians and residents were 0.68 versus 0.76 and 0.57 versus 0.65. For AO/OTA classification, the values for attending physicians and residents were 0.67 versus 0.65 and 0.70 versus 0.81. For EVJE classification, the values for attending physicians and residents were 0.66 versus 0.63 and 0.56 versus 0.55.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional CT improved the reproducibility of stability evaluation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Preoperative CT scanning may provide a diagnostic benefit for evaluating the stability of intertrochanteric fractures.

Morphology of the posteromedial fragment in pertrochanteric fractures: A three-dimensional computed tomography analysis

BACKGROUND

In this study we describe the morphology of the posteromedial fragment in pertrochanteric fractures using 3D CT scans and answer two questions 1) Do differences exist between the 3D CT appearances of posteromedial fragments and the depictions made in the AO classification 2) Does the posteromedial fragment affect stability in pertrochanteric fractures, in terms of fracture collapse?

METHODS

Preoperative CT scans of eight 31-A1 and fifty 31-A2 fractures were analysed. The presence of PM fragment, its fragmentation, greater trochanter (GT) involvement, lesser trochanter (LT) fragment size (in terms of its posterior and medial extent as well as LT length), LT fragment displacement (in terms of medial displacement and rotation) were determined. All fractures were treated with a DHS. Fracture collapse was determined on postoperative radiographs. The relationship between fracture collapse and patient factors including age, gender, fracture type (A1 versus A2), characteristics of the posteromedial fragment, and the presence of a lateral wall fracture were determined.

RESULTS

Three out of eight 31-A1 fractures demonstrated a separate GT fragment (three part fracture). Out of the 50 31-A2 fractures, 12 had a single PM fragment, which included the LT and GT in continuity. The more common four part fractures seem to form by further fragmentation of this basic form. In A2 fractures, the GT was almost always broken and the broken fragment comprised a mean 56% of normal GT. The LT fragment involved an average of 74% of the posterior wall, and an average of 36% of the medial wall of the proximal femur. Larger LT fragments were less displaced as compared to smaller fragments. Univariate regression analyses revealed that fracture collapse was significantly correlated with fracture type (A1 versus A2, p 0.036), GT size (p 0.002) and the presence of a lateral wall fracture (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed some important differences between the 3D CT appearances and AO classification of pertrochanteric fractures. Further, neither fragmentation of the posteromedial fragment, nor the size of the lesser trochanter fragment was found to predict stability in pertrochanteric fractures. A perioperative lateral wall fracture is the main determinant of stability in these fractures.

Proposal of new classification of femoral trochanteric fracture by three-dimensional computed tomography and relationship to usual plain X-ray classification

PURPOSE

Classification of femoral trochanteric fractures is usually based on plain X-ray findings using the Evans, Jensen, or AO/OTA classification. However, complications such as nonunion and cut out of the lag screw or blade are seen even in stable fracture. This may be due to the difficulty of exact diagnosis of fracture pattern in plain X-ray. Computed tomography (CT) may provide more information about the fracture pattern, but such data are scarce. In the present study, it was performed to propose a classification system for femoral trochanteric fractures using three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) and investigate the relationship between this classification and conventional plain X-ray classification.

METHODS

Using three-dimensional (3D)-CT, fractures were classified as two, three, or four parts using combinations of the head, greater trochanter, lesser trochanter, and shaft. We identified five subgroups of three-part fractures according to the fracture pattern involving the greater and lesser trochanters. In total, 239 femoral trochanteric fractures (45 men, 194 women; average age, 84.4 years) treated in four hospitals were classified using our 3D-CT classification. The relationship between this 3D-CT classification and the AO/OTA, Evans, and Jensen X-ray classifications was investigated.

RESULTS

In the 3D-CT classification, many fractures exhibited a large oblique fragment of the greater trochanter including the lesser trochanter. This fracture type was recognized as unstable in the 3D-CT classification but was often classified as stable in each X-ray classification.

CONCLUSIONS

It is difficult to evaluate fracture patterns involving the greater trochanter, especially large oblique fragments including the lesser trochanter, using plain X-rays. The 3D-CT shows the fracture line very clearly, making it easy to classify the fracture pattern.

Is arthroplasty preferable to internal fixation for the treatment of extracapsular fracture of the upper femur in the elderly?

INTRODUCTION

Although internal fixation is the reference treatment for extracapsular fracture of the upper femur, indications for arthroplasty are broadening, especially in unstable comminutive fracture in fragile bone. The present study hypothesis was that arthroplasty reduces early mortality and morbidity and provides better recovery of autonomy in over-80 year-old patients than does internal fixation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective multicenter study was conducted on 8 sites. Internal fixation was systematically used in 5 centers; arthroplasty was used systematically in 1 center, and reserved for unstable fracture in 2 centers. A total of 697 patients aged over 80 years (mean age, 85±5 years), presenting with extracapsular fracture, were included; 521 were treated by internal fixation and 176 by arthroplasty. Results were studied on multivariate analysis of ASA score, blood loss, transfusion, and also of treatment modality as an independent factor for early (first 6 months) mortality and morbidity (mechanical, general and nutritional complications) and functional outcome (autonomy and dependence).

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 19.2%. Autonomy deteriorated in 56% of patients alive at 6 months and dependence worsened in 44%. Two percent of those managed by internal fixation underwent revision for disassembly (n=8) or infection (n=1). Eight percent of those managed by arthroplasty underwent revision for dislocation (n=4), implant loosening (n=3) or infection (n=7). On univariate analysis, mortality was higher in the arthroplasty group (25%) than with internal fixation (17%; P=0.002), as were blood loss (425±286mL versus 333±223mL; P<0.0001), transfusion rate (61% versus 32%; P<0.0001) and infection (4% versus 0.2%; P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, however, treatment modality no longer showed impact on mortality or on morbidity and autonomy at 6 months. Nutritional status was better conserved at 6 months following arthroplasty, but dependence worsened. Poor preoperative autonomy, ASA score, and nutritional status and time to treatment were independent factors for mortality. Transfusion, associated with onset of mechanical complications, significantly increased dependence.

CONCLUSION

Type of treatment had little impact on mortality, morbidity or functional outcome. Differences seemed more related to preoperative functional and nutritional status.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prospective case-control study.