Fixation method for treatment of unstable distal clavicle fracture: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Analysis of the efficacy of Endobutton plate combined with high-strength suture Nice knot fixation in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular ligament injuries

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of Endobutton plate combined with high-strength suture Nice knot fixation in the treatment of distal clavicular fractures with coracoclavicular ligament injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 43 patients who sustained distal clavicular fractures along with injuries to the coracoclavicular ligament. These patients were treated between January 2017 and December 2023. The fractures were classified according to the fixation method: high-strength Nice knot suture fixation (experimental group, n = 23) and acromioclavicular Kirschner wire fixation (control group, n = 20). The basic information of the two groups of patients, including age, gender, cause of injury, fracture classification, hospitalization duration, fracture healing time and complications, was collected and analyzed. The increase rate of coracoclavicular space on the affected side was collected and analyzed. The pain level of the affected shoulder was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). The shoulder joint function was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and Constant-Murley scores before and after surgery.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the general demographic data, including age, gender, injury etiology, Craig classification, and hospitalization duration between the two groups (p > 0.05). Both groups were followed for a period ranging from 12 to 33 months, with an average follow-up of 20.53 ± 5.16 months. The bone healing time in the experimental group was significantly shorter than in the control group (12.82 ± 1.12 weeks vs. 17.25 ± 1.71 weeks, p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, The increase rate of coracoclavicular space was (9.25 ± 2.53) % in the experimental group and (8.10 ± 2.53) % in the control group, which was not significantly different (p > 0.05). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS scores, Constant-Murley scores, and ASES scores post-operatively compared to pre-operative values (p < 0.05). One month after surgery, the Constant-Murley and ASES scores were significantly superior in the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). However, no statistical difference was observed three months post-surgery or during the final follow-up (p > 0.05). The control group reported one case of infection related to the Kirschner wire and one case of Kirschner wire displacement postoperatively. Conversely, no significant complications were reported in the experimental group.

CONCLUSION

In the management of distal clavicle fractures accompanied by coracoclavicular ligament injuries, particularly oblique fractures or those with butterfly-shaped fragments, the application of a high-strength Nice knot suture in conjunction with Endobutton plate fixation can effectively stabilize the fracture site. This approach not only mitigates complications associated with Kirschner wire fixation but also enhances fracture healing, leading to favorable postoperative outcomes.

Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of the coracoclavicular stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction in comparison to two established techniques for highly unstable distal clavicle fractures (Neer type V)

Background

Treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures with bony avulsion of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments often warrants surgical fixation, yet a gold standard surgical technique is to be defined. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical fixation strength of a new fixation technique, the CC stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction, and to compare this technique with a clavicle hook plate and a lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction.

Methods

Simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures of the clavicle were created in 18 cadaveric shoulders, which were matched by age and gender in 3 groups: (1) clavicle hook plate (group HP), (2) lateral locking plate fixation with CC suture reconstruction (group LPCC), and (3) CC stand-alone suture reconstruction using the cow-hitch technique (group CH). After preconditioning with 25 N for 10 cycles, the specimens were cycled in the coronal plane for 500 cycles from 10N to 70N. Displacement and ultimate load to failure were documented and analyzed with the data acquisition system.

Results

There was a significant difference in the fracture displacement during cyclic loading between the LPCC group and the HP group (0.6 vs. 1.7 mm; P = .02) and between the CH and HP groups (0.5 vs. 1.7 mm; P = .004). Fracture displacement was not different between the LPCC and the CH groups (P = .544). The CH group and the LPCC group showed a significantly higher stiffness compared to the HP group (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). The CH group showed a significantly higher ultimate load to failure compared with the HP group (429 vs. 172 N; P = .005) and showed a tendency toward higher ultimate load to failure when compared with the LPCC group (429 vs. 258 N; P = .071).

Conclusion

The CC stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction and the locking plate with CC reconstruction showed higher fixation strength compared with the hook plate for simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. There was a tendency of higher ultimate load to failure with the cow-hitch technique compared with the lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction, and given the potential advantages of less soft tissue stripping, metal-free fixation, low costs, and simple surgical technique, clinical application of the all-suture CC reconstruction using the cow-hitch for Neer type V distal clavicle fractures appears warranted.

Evidence on treatment of clavicle fractures

Depending on the severity of the injury and the involvement of the soft tissue envelope, clavicle fractures can be treated operatively or non-operatively. In the past, displaced fractures of the clavicle shaft in adults have been treated non-operatively. However, the rate of nonunion following non-operative treatment seems to be higher than previously reported. In addition, publications reporting better functional outcomes following operative treatment are increasing. In recent years this has led to a paradigm shift towards an increase of operative fracture treatment. The aim of this review article was to summarize the currently available evidence on the treatment of clavicle fractures. Classifications, indications, and treatment options for different fracture patterns of the medial, midshaft, and lateral clavicles are presented and discussed.

A Novel and Open Classification Emphasizing on Osteoligamentous Complex for Distal Clavicle Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Current X-ray-based classification methods cannot describe all distal clavicle fracture (DCF) patterns, especially the osteoligamentous injury pattern of DCFs. We aimed to develop a novel classification based on the osteoligamentous injury pattern of the DCFs and investigated its reliability.

METHODS

All DCFs from January 2017 to January 2022 were respectively screened and 45 cases (mean age 20-78; male 31, female 14) met the including criteria and were enrolled. Based on their Zanca view X-ray radiograph and three-dimensional CT construction images, we analyzed the osteoligamentous injury pattern of each case, particularly the acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular ligaments and their bone attachment. Then we developed a novel classification method, five types in total, sorting all DCFs according to their lesion manifestations of osteoligamentous complex. Also, we investigated the inter- and intra-observer reliability using kappa value.

RESULTS

A novel classification method for DCF was developed, manifesting the avulsion or rupture of conoid and trapezoid ligaments, and involvement of AC joint. Forty-five cases of DCFs were included in this study. Among them, 11 (24.4%) were Type 1 fracture, three (6.7%) cases were Type 2, six cases (13.3%) were Type 3, 21 (46.7%) were Type 4, four (8.9%) were Type 5. Kappa values for inter-observer agreement were 0.57 after first evaluation and 0.61 after second evaluation. Intra-observer agreement was 0.72 for experienced shoulder specialist and 0.63 for radiologist.

CONCLUSION

This new classification method is reliable to use, supplementary to current classification systems, and emphasizes on the osteoligamentous complex injury when opting for the treatment.

Open coraco-clavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR) in treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures has low complication rate and excellent union rate: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is well established that non-operative treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures (DDCF) leads to a high non-union rate. A number of open surgical treatments in the past have shown good to excellent outcomes including shoulder function and union rate. Despite this there is no consensus on the outcome of open coraco-clavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR). The aim of this systematic review was to assess the union rate, complications and shoulder function of open CCLR techniques in the treatment of DDCF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted on 1 January 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies reporting union rate, complications and shoulder function were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 18 studies eligible for inclusion with a total of 330 patients. These included 12 retrospective case series and 5 nonrandomized retrospective comparative studies and one RCT. All but one study reported on shoulder function, while all the studies reported on union rate and complications. The overall shoulder function was good to excellent using Constant-Murley score. The overall union rate was 97.6% and complication rate was 7.6%.

CONCLUSION

Open CCLR for displaced distal clavicle fractures that have a disruption of CC ligament, is a reliable treatment with excellent union rate and good to excellent shoulder functional scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Systematic review.

Dual plate has better biomechanical stability than hook plate or superior single plate for the fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures: a finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION

A variety of surgical techniques have been addressed for distal clavicle fractures, while none of these is considered to be gold standard fixation. Currently, dual plate fixation has been proposed and achieved satisfying clinical results. However, the biomechanical study about dual plate technique in treating unstable distal clavicle fractures is limited. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of this technique by finite element analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A geometry model of distal clavicle fractures was combined with hook plate, superior single plate and dual plate, respectively, to simulate the implant fixation process. Two loading conditions and two boundary conditions were applied in the finite element models following a mesh convergence test. The stress distribution was observed, and peak von Mises stress and maximum displacement were used as indexes for analysis.

RESULTS

The dual plate model showed the highest clavicle stress (13.1 MPa), but lowest fixation stress (18.9 MPa) compared to the hook plate and superior single model. In regarded to stability, dual plate model exhibited a minimum displacement with only 0.099 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual plate fixation has better biomechanical stability with lower risk of implant failure. Thus, dual plate fixation is an alternative technique for unstable distal clavicle fracture. The complication of peri-implant fracture of dual plate technique should also be cautious in clinical practice, and more clinical evidence is needed.

Outcomes, Union Rate, and Complications After Operative and Nonoperative Treatments of Neer Type II Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 2284 Patients

BACKGROUND

As nonoperative treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures is associated with nonunion rates up to 33%, operative treatment is frequently advocated. However, evidence is lacking regarding which operative treatment to perform and whether this is superior to nonoperative treatment in terms of functional outcome and complication rate.

PURPOSE

(1) To evaluate which surgical technique in the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures is optimal with regard to patient-reported outcomes and union and complication rates. (2) To review nonoperatively treated patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were performed on January 27, 2021, in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL/EBSCO, Web of Science/Clarivate Analytics, and SPORTDiscus/EBSCO. The search included all studies regarding nonoperative and operative treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures with a minimum of 20 patients and follow-up of 12 months. The primary and secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures at 12 months and union, complication, and revision rates.

RESULTS

A total of 59 articles were included involving 2284 patients. Coracoclavicular fixation, hook plate, transacromial pins, alternative plate, tension band wire/K-wire, a combination of surgical techniques, and a nonoperative group were described. Hook plates showed lower Constant-Murley scores as compared with coracoclavicular fixation (standard mean difference, -0.77; 95% CI, -1.26 to -0.28; P = .002). However, no significant difference was seen when the hook plate was compared with the locking plate and tension band wire/K-wire groups, and no significant difference in union rate was seen among all operative treatment groups. Operatively treated patients had significantly higher union rates than patients treated nonoperatively (standard mean difference: 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.37; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with hook plates showed significantly lower Constant-Murley scores and higher complication and revision rates as compared with those treated with coracoclavicular fixation, without differences in union rate. Higher Constant-Murley scores were seen in those patients with supplemental coracoclavicular fixation when using locking. Nonoperatively treated patients showed good functional outcome despite the 31% nonunion rate, although future studies are necessary to substantiate this conclusion. When using a locking plate, additional craniocaudal fixation showed significant better functional outcome.

Radiological and Long-Term Functional Outcomes of Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To investigate radiological and long-term functional outcomes in modified Neer 2a, 2b, and 5 distal clavicle fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred fifteen patients sustaining displaced distal clavicle fractures between January 01, 2010 and December 12, 2017.

INTERVENTION

Operative versus nonoperative management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Radiographs were reviewed for fracture management and union. A customised questionnaire consisting of QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), work, sports/performing arts, global satisfaction, and complication modules was used to determine functional outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients were included [mean age of 49 (18-89) years]. Thirty-three (29%) underwent early fixation (<6 weeks from injury) and were younger (37 vs. 53 years, P < 0.0001). Radiographs were available for 96 patients. Nonunion rate was 55% (53/96), and majority had undergone initial nonoperative management (49 vs. 4, P < 0.00001). Eleven patients with symptomatic nonunion were deemed appropriate for delayed fixation with all cases uniting. Of the operatively managed patients, 27% (12/44) underwent metalwork removal. There were no differences in functional outcome between operative versus nonoperative and union versus nonunion patient groups at a mean follow-up of 79 months ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Functional outcome and patient satisfaction at long-term follow-up were similar regardless of operative fixation or radiological union. Nonunion in displaced distal clavicle fractures seemed to cause minimal functional deficit in most elderly sedentary individuals, or the outcome measures were not sensitive enough to capture these differences. An individualized approach should be adopted, with less active, comorbid, and elderly patients counseled regarding the minimal functional improvement of surgery and risk of reoperation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Operative management of lateral third clavicle fractures: a comparison of internal fixation methods

PURPOSE

Clavicle fractures in the lateral third are associated with more complications. Various methods of internal fixation exist; however, there is no consensus which should be employed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these various methods in our regional trauma unit.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent internal fixation of a lateral clavicle fracture in our unit between 1 August 2014 and 31 July 2019. Demographic and outcome data were extracted from electronic care records and imaging systems.

RESULTS

In total, 44 patients were included, with the following demographics: mean age 26 years, 63.6% male, 65.9% high-energy injury, 68.2% Neer II fracture. The following operations were performed: hook plate fixation (HPF) = 10, locking plate fixation (LPF) = 16, coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR) = 12, and LPF + CCLR = 6. Patients having LPF had a significantly larger post-operative coracoclavicular distance (7.6 mm vs 13.5 mm, p < 0.01), and trends towards a lesser decrease in CCD (9.9 mm vs 12.6 mm, p = 0.37) and incomplete ACJ reduction (50.0% vs 89.3%, p = 0.11). There was a significantly higher re-operation rate after HPF (100% vs 23.5%, p < 0.01). There were no differences in time to union or duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In our unit there is no clearly favoured method of internal fixation of lateral clavicle fractures. When LPF is used, there should be consideration of concomitant CCLR. The high rate of re-operation after HPF is concordant with previous research.

What are the long-term patient-reported and clinical outcomes after lateral clavicle fractures? A cross-sectional study of 619 patients

BACKGROUND

Lateral clavicle fractures account for 17% of all clavicle fractures and large studies comparing nonoperative and operative treatment are lacking. Therefore, patients cannot be properly informed about different treatment options and prognosis. We assessed long-term patient-reported and clinical outcomes in patients with lateral clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed in patients treated for lateral clavicle fractures between 2007 and 2016. Primary outcome included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (DASH, EQ-5D, return to work, sports, cosmetics and satisfaction). Questionnaires were sent to 619 eligible patients, of which 353 (57%) responded after a mean follow-up of 7.4 ± 2.8 years. Secondary outcome included adverse events and secondary interventions. Outcomes after nonoperative vs. operative treatment (stratified by nondisplaced vs. displaced fractures) were compared using Student t tests and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Nondisplaced lateral clavicle fractures were treated nonoperatively and resulted in excellent PROMs. Six patients (3%) developed a nonunion. For displaced lateral clavicle fractures, no differences were found between nonoperative and operative treatment with regard to DASH score (7.8 ± 12.5 vs 5.4 ± 8.6), EQ-5D (0.91 ± 0.13 vs 0.91 ± 0.09), pain (0.9 ± 1.7 vs. 0.8 ± 1.6), patient satisfaction (90.1 ± 25.5 vs. 86.3 ± 20.4), return to work (96.4% vs. 100%) and sports (61.4% vs. 62.3%). The absolute risk of nonunion in patients with a displaced fracture was higher after nonoperative than operative treatment (20.2% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.002), with six patients needing treatment to avoid one nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Nondisplaced lateral clavicle fractures should be treated nonoperatively and result in good functional outcomes and high union rates. For displaced fractures, neither nonoperative nor operative treatment seems superior. Patients opting for nonoperative treatment should be informed that nonunion occurs in 20% of patients, but only half of these need additional operative treatment. Patients who opt for surgery should be told that nonunion occurs in only 3%; however, most patients (56%) will require secondary intervention for elective implant removal. Regardless of the type of treatment, no differences in functional outcome and PROMs should be expected at long-term follow-up.

Comparing the Efficacy of Anatomical Locked Plate Fixation with Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation to Hook Plate Fixation in Treating Distal Clavicle Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Hook plate fixation is the traditional method for treating distal clavicle fractures. However, in recent years, locked plate applications have emerged as a promising treatment method. This study aimed to compare the short- and mid-term clinical efficacy of anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using anchor nails to that of hook plate fixation in treating distal clavicle fractures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study investigating patients with distal clavicle fractures treated between January 2016 and February 2019 in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. Fifty-nine eligible patients who underwent either anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using anchor nails (LPF&CLA group; 20 patients) or clavicle hook plate fixation (CHPF group; 39 patients) were included. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley shoulder scores were used to assess shoulder function. In addition, the coracoclavicular distance between the affected and unaffected shoulders (ΔCC distance) was measured to assess the reduction. Patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The comparisons between the two groups were made using Student's t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, if appropriate.

RESULTS

Preoperative VAS scores were similar in both groups. At 3- and 6-month follow-up, the VAS score was significantly higher in the CHPF group than in the LPF&CLA group. In contrast, the Constant-Murley shoulder score was significantly lower in the CHPF group than in the LPF&CLA group. When the hook plates were removed, there was no statistical difference in both VAS (0.2 ± 0.4 in LPF&CLA group vs. 0.5 ± 0.5 in CHPF group, p = 0.05) and Constant-Murley shoulder (96.1 ± 3.1 in LPF&CLA group vs. 93.8 ± 5.2 in CHPF group, p = 0.08) scores at the last follow-up. Postoperatively, the ΔCC distance was 2.37 ± 1.93 mm in the LPF&CLA group and -1.56 ± 1.34 mm in the CHPF group. One year after surgery, ΔCC distance increased to 3.96 ± 1.17 mm in the LPF&CLA group and to -0.89 ± 1.39 mm in the CHPF group.

CONCLUSION

For distal clavicle fractures in which the coracoclavicular ligament is disrupted, anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation achieved better functional recovery and less pain than hook plate fixation at the 6-month follow-up. However, the hook plate provided better reduction throughout the follow-up period and shoulder pain could be relieved using removal surgery. Therefore, locked plates with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation favors post-surgery pain relief while harvesting similar functional outcomes to hook plate fixation.

Hook Plate Versus Distal Locking Plate for the Fixation of Unstable Distal Clavicle Injuries, Outcomes and Complications: A Meta-Analysis

Numerous interventions are advised for the surgical management of distal clavicle fractures. Hook plate (HP) and distal locking plate (DLP) are among the commonly used techniques; nonetheless, no single procedure is deemed to be the benchmark treatment. Thus, the aim of the study is to conduct a comparative analysis, hopefully, to recommend the superior method between the two operations.

PubMed, Embase via Ovid and Web of science were electronically searched between January 2000 and to date for studies directly comparing HP to DLP. Comparative retrospective/prospective and randomized studies were incorporated. Constant-Murley score “CMS” at a minimum of 12 months, pain visual analogue scale “VAS”, coracoclavicular distance “CCD” and reported complications were analysed. Review manager software was used for the statistical analyses.

The total number of patients was 523; 274 (52.3%) with HP and 249 (47.6%) with DLP, 81 of which were associated with CC reconstruction. The mean follow up was 38.7 and 37.03 months for HP and DLP, respectively. CMS leaned towards the DLP group with no statistically significant difference (P=0.06). VAS was in favour of the DLP with again no statistically significant difference (P=0.12). In terms of CCD, the comparison favoured the HP with a lesser CCD postoperatively and a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Complications were significantly higher in the HP group (P<0.0001).

Contrary to our hypothesis, though HP did show a better radiological outcome; nonetheless, DLP did demonstrate a better functional result with a lesser rate of complications and the ability to retain the implant avoiding a second surgery.

Comparison of functional outcome and complications of locking plate versus coracoclavicular fixation in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures: the multicenter, propensity-matched TRON study

PURPOSE

This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and complications between locking plate fixation and new coracoclavicular (CC) fixation for patients with unstable distal clavicle fracture.

METHODS

We included 142 patients in this TRON study. The mean follow-up was 15.5 (6-31) months. The patients were divided into two groups: the locking plate group (Group L) and CC fixation group (Group C). To adjust for baseline differences between the groups, a propensity score algorithm was used to match two groups in a 1:1 ratio. After matching, we compared operation time and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and at last follow-up as clinical outcomes and the rate of complications.

RESULTS

After matching, 20 cases from each group remained. Operation time was shorter in Group C (75 [22, 111] vs. 100 [38, 120] min; P = 0.023). At 3 months postoperatively, UCLA score in Group C was better, but no significant differences between the groups were found at 6 months and last follow-up after surgery. The rate of complications was not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

CC fixation might be equivalent to locking plate fixation in clinical outcome, and the operation time is shorter than that required for locking plate fixation.

Regional Anesthetic and Analgesic Techniques for Clavicle Fractures and Clavicle Surgeries: Part 1-A Scoping Review

Objective. Clavicle fractures are common injuries potentially associated with significant perioperative pain. However, this region's complex sensory innervation poses a challenge for regional anesthetic or analgesic (RA) techniques. We conducted this scoping review to summarize the current literature, particularly with regards to motor-sparing techniques. Methods. A scoping review was carried out in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute's framework. All articles describing the use of RA for clavicle fractures or surgery were included. PubMed®, Ovid MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, Scopus®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane database were searched without language restrictions. Results. Database searches identified 845 articles, 44 of which were included in this review, with a combined patient total of 3161. We included all peer-reviewed publications containing clinical data and summarized the findings. Conclusions. Current evidence of RA techniques in clavicle surgery is heterogeneous, with different approaches used to overcome the overlapping sensory innervation. The literature largely comprises case reports/series, with several randomized controlled trials. Intermediate cervical plexus block is the regional technique of choice for clavicle surgery, and can provide reliable surgical anesthesia when combined with an interscalene block. Cervical plexus block can provide motor-sparing analgesia following clavicle surgery. Promising alternatives include the clavipectoral block, which is a novel motor-sparing regional technique. Further studies are required to determine the efficacy and safety of various techniques.

Open reduction and tunneled suspensory fixation for lateral end of clavicle fractures: surgical technique

Unstable distal end clavicle fractures are associated with significant rates of nonunion and poor functional outcomes. Surgical treatment is paramount for unstable fracture patterns; however, treatment options are various, with each having its advantages and drawbacks. Recently, suture-based coracoclavicular fixation techniques using suture buttons have been implemented with high union rates, satisfactory shoulder function, and low rates of complications. In this report, we demonstrate a modified fixation of unstable lateral clavicle fractures. Our technique entails open reduction and suspensory coracoclavicular fixation using suture anchors and suture button devices with supplemental acromioclavicular suspensory fixation.

Comparison of hook plate versus T-plate in the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures: a prospective matched comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of distal clavicle fracture fixation with a hook plate versus the standard non-locking T-plate for unstable Neer type II fractures.

METHODS

A prospective matched cohort study including two groups of hook plates and T-plates fixation was conducted in our two tertiary trauma centers. Patients with distal clavicle fractures Neer type II were assessed for union and the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Inadequate radiographic consolidation > 6 months after surgery was defined as non-union. Subscales of CMSpain, CMSactivities of daily living, CMSrange of motion (ROM), and CMSstrength were also compared between groups. According to recommendations, the implant was removed after union confirmation in the hook plate at a planned second surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty consecutive patients were enrolled: 30 in the T-plate group and 30 in the hook plate group. CMS showed similar functional outcomes for T-plates and hook plates at all follow-ups (Month 6: 92.0 vs. 91.7, P = 0.45). However, on the month 1 follow-up, the T-plate group scored higher than the hook plate group for ROM and pain (CMSpain = 13.0 vs. 12.3, P = 0.03; CMSROM = 35.2 vs. 33.2, P = 0.002). Despite this, Pain, ROM, and other CMS domains were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). The mean time to union was 2.5 + 1.4 months for the T-plate group and 2.3 + 1.6 months for the hook plate group (P = 0.44). There was one fixation failure in each group and one periprosthetic fracture in the hook plate group (two revisions for the hook plates and one for T-plates, P = 1.00). Non-union and other complications were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Both surgical approaches resulted in full recovery and good function. However, in the hook plate group ROM and pain scores were lower at 1 month. Standard non-locking T-plates are a viable alternative to hook plates with low cost and promising outcomes for treating displaced distal clavicle fractures.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Closed-Loop, Double Button, Coracoclavicular Fixation for Extralateral (Neer Type IIC) Fractures of the Distal Clavicle

Background: The distal end of the clavicle accounts for 10-28% of all clavicle fractures of which 52.8% are considered displaced and require internal fixation due to their high percentage of non-union. Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the well-known Neer types IIA, IIB, and V. Still, the literature is scarce for the rare “extralateral” (type IIC) fracture where the fracture line is located lateral to the completely torn coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments; such small fractures are sometimes not amenable for standard locking plate fixation.

Methods: We present a series of seven patients treated surgically with closed-looped double button CC stabilization via an open approach. There were four males and three females with a mean age of 31 years (range: 19-46 years). The mechanism of injury was a motor vehicle accident in four cases and a fall from height in three cases. The average time from injury to surgery was 2.7 ± 1.3 days and the average follow-up period was 25.7 months (range: 16-48 months). A custom-made, closed-looped, double button device was made using the ProCinch Adjustable Cortical Fixation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan) and another standard or slotted button. The fracture was reduced anatomically and the device was tightened and secured with five to six knots. In two cases, additional interfragmentary sutures were used for extra stability. Postoperatively, the arm was immobilized in a simple sling for four weeks; passive assisted elevation up to 90 degrees was allowed from the second postoperative week, followed by active elevation after the sixth postoperative week. Radiological outcomes (bony union, loss of reduction, implant mispositioning, or subsidence of buttons) were assessed using serial plain radiographs. The Constant score (CS) and the Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score (AJIS) were used for the final clinical evaluation, at least one year postoperatively.

Results: Bony union was achieved in all patients at a mean time of 2.7 months (range: 2.5-3.6 months). No cases of delayed union, loss of reduction, button migration, or subsidence were noted. The mean CS was 96.6 ± 3.4 and the mean AJIS score was 94.1 ± 4.7 in a mean follow-up period of 25.7 months (range: 16-48 months). One patient developed a hypertrophic scar and another had mild skin irritation by the suture knots; no other complications were noted except for one patient who developed an early superficial skin infection managed with antibiotics and debridement under local anesthesia. Four patients who participated in sports before injury were able to regain almost full activity seven to nine months after the operation. All were satisfied with the final result. Two patients showed ossification of the CC ligaments with no significant clinical implications.

Conclusions: Although we retrospectively reviewed a small series of patients, we were able to demonstrate a complete rate of fracture union and excellent clinical outcomes with no major complications. Type IIC distal clavicle fractures are rare and require special attention in terms of reduction and optimal fixation. Open CC fixation with closed-looped double buttons is a relatively easy and reproducible technique. We advocate the readjustment of Neer’s classification, including “extralateral” fractures as a IIC subtype.

All-suture technique for fixation of unstable displaced distal clavicle fracture

Background

Displaced Neer type II and V clavicle fractures are usually treated surgically in active patients. However, distal fragment fixation remains a challenge, and no consensus has been established regarding the optimal surgical treatment. Osteosuture techniques have been popularized over the last decade, and multiple different techniques have been described. The aim of this study was to describe an all-suture technique in patients with displaced type II and V clavicle fractures and report its outcome in a prospective case series.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2020, 15 patients with displaced acute distal clavicle fractures were treated with an all-suture open technique performed by one shoulder specialized surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Osteosuture repair consisted in a coracoclavicular cerclage with 4 no6 Ethibonds and a figure-of-0 and figure-of-8 fracture cerclage with 2 no2 SutureTapes. Single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) and adjusted Constant score were recorded at 6 months and 1 year. The radiologic union was assessed on plain radiographs.

Results

At 12 months, all patients reported excellent clinical results, with a mean SANE of 98.2 [± 5.2, range 80 to 100] and a mean adjusted Constant score of 99.0 [± 1.9, range 94 to 100]. One patient developed shoulder stiffness that resolved before the final follow-up. Fractures consolidated in 93% of the cases, with union happening between 3 and 6 months [range 3 to 12 months]. One patient developed an asymptomatic malunion.

Conclusion

Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes can be achieved with this minimally invasive all-suture fixation technique for displaced distal clavicle fractures, which allows for an anatomic reduction and stable fixation. This pilot study showed low complications and a high level of union after a follow-up of 1 year. Among the numerous advantages are a smaller exposure than for plate fixation, avoidance of hardware-related complications such as screw failure, coracoid fracture from drilling, or rotator cuff damage caused by hook-plates. Furthermore, it avoids a reoperation to remove symptomatic hardware.

Hook plate fixation with versus without coracoclavicular reconstruction for distal clavicular fractures

PURPOSE

Hook plate fixation is one of the most frequently used methods for unstable distal clavicular fractures, but it is still unknown if there is a need for coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of hook plate fixation with versus without CC reconstruction for distal clavicular fractures.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients who underwent hook plate fixation (HP group, n = 45) or hook plate fixation plus suture anchor reconstruction (HPA group, n = 36) for Neer type II or V clavicular fractures were enrolled. Demographics, fracture characteristics, and surgical data were recorded. Union time, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), post-operative complications, Constant score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were compared between HPA and HP groups.

RESULTS

Constant score in the HPA group was higher than that in the HP group (91.8 ± 3.6 vs 88.8 ± 6.0, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences in union time, DASH score, CCD, and post-operative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Hook plate fixation combined with CC reconstruction costed more (3023.7 ± 202.6 vs 2416.2 ± 167.6 EUR, P < 0.001) and prolonged operative duration (78.2 ± 9.2 vs 73.7 ± 8.3 min, P = 0.023) compared with hook plate fixation alone.

CONCLUSION

Hook plate fixation with or without suture anchor reconstruction achieved satisfactory outcomes for Neer type II or V clavicular fractures. However, hook plate fixation plus CC reconstruction showed better functional outcomes compared with hook plate fixation alone.

What is the optimal surgical treatment for Neer type IIB (IIC) distal clavicle fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of the present study was to systematically review the current treatment strategies for the treatment of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures in terms of functional outcome and complication rates and to examine the most appropriate surgical method by comparing all the available surgical techniques and implants.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of the existing literature (2000–2021) in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Research Gate and Google Scholar using the general terms ‘distal AND clavicle AND fracture’ to capture as many reports as possible. The MINORS tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the nonrandomized studies. We categorized the reported surgical techniques into four main types: open or arthroscopic coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization, locking plate fixation with or without CC augmentation, hook plate fixation and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) transfixation. We reported findings for two main outcomes: clinical results and complication rates categorized into major and minor.

Results

Our database search yielded a total of 630 records; 34 studies were appropriate for qualitative analysis. There were 790 patients, with a mean age of 40.1 years, a female percentage of 37% and a mean follow-up period of 29.3 months. In total, 132 patients received a hook plate, 252 received a locking plate, 368 received CC stabilization and 41 received transacromial transfixation. All studies were retrospective and had fair MINORS scores. Locking plate, CC stabilization and ACJ transfixation showed similar clinical results but were much better than hook plate fixation; CC augmentation did not significantly improve the outcome of locking plate fixation. The rate of major complications was similar among groups; hook plate and AC joint transfixation had the worst rates of minor complications. Open CC techniques were slightly better than arthroscopic techniques.

Conclusions

The present systematic review for the optimal fixation method for Neer type IIB fractures of the distal clavicle showed similar major complication rates among techniques; the hook plate technique demonstrated inferior clinical results to other techniques. Open CC stabilization and locking plate fixation without CC augmentation seem to be the best available treatment options.

Acromioclavicular Fracture-Dislocation Fixation Technique With Cerclages and Osteosutures: The "Invisible" Repair

Surgical treatment usually is indicated for the management of acromioclavicular fracture-dislocations. These are unstable injuries and have shown a high rate of nonunion when managed conservatively. However, surgical strategies often require a second surgery for hardware removal. We describe an arthroscopic-assisted technique to repair the acromioclavicular fracture-dislocation without implants, using a double cerclage and osteosutures. This technique does not require specific instrumentation, avoids clavicle/coracoid drilling, and minimizes secondary irritation related to hardware. This can be used in different anatomic locations and can theoretically reduce the chances of symptomatic hardware, reoperation rates, and iatrogenic fractures.

[Effectiveness analysis of Endobutton plate combined with high-strength suture Nice knot fixation in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of Endobutton plate coracoclavicular fixation combined with fracture site high-strength suture Nice knot cerclage fixation in the treatment of distal clavicle fracture with coracoclavicular ligament injury.

METHODS

The clinical data of 33 cases of distal clavicular fracture with coracoclavicular ligament injury treated by Endobutton coracoclavicular plate fixation between January 2017 and December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the fixation methods of fracture site, they were divided into two groups: the high-strength suture Nice knot fixation group (study group, 16 cases) and the transacromial Kirschner wire fixation group (control group, 17 cases). There was no significant difference between the two groups in common data such as age, gender, injury side, cause of injury, Craig type, combined injury, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Constant-Murley score ( P>0.05). Postoperative fracture healing and complications were observed, and the increase rate of coracoclavicular space on the affected side was calculated at last follow-up. VAS score was used to evaluate shoulder pain before operation, at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The shoulder function was evaluated according to Constant-Murley shoulder score before operation, at 1 month, 3 months after operation, and at last follow-up.

RESULTS

The operations were successfully completed in both groups without severe complications such as vascular nerve injury and coracoid fracture. In the control group, 1 case (5.9%) had slight pin tract infection and 1 case (5.9%) had Kirschner wire displacement; there was no obvious complication in the study group. The patients in both groups were followed up 9-36 months (mean, 22.9 months). The fracture healing time of the study group and the control group were (12.56±0.73) weeks and (13.59±0.87) weeks, respectively, and the difference was significant ( t=-3.661, P=0.001). At last follow-up, the increase rates of coracoclavicular space on the affected side of the study group and the control group were 8.88%±1.19% and 8.55%±1.07%, respectively, showing no significant difference ( t=0.837, P=0.409). The postoperative VAS score and Constant-Murley score of the two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and the two scores gradually improved with the extension of time after operation ( P<0.05). Except that the VAS score at 1 week and 1 month after operation and the Constant-Murley score at 1 month after operation in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group ( P<0.05), there was no significant difference between the two groups at other time points after operation ( P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

For oblique fracture or combined with butterfly fracture in the distal clavicle fracture with coracoclavicular ligament injury, the fracture site high-strength suture Nice knot fixation is a good supplement to the Endobutton plate coracoclavicular fixation. It can stabilize the fracture end, reduce the complications of Kirschner wire fixation, and is more conducive to fracture healing. The effectiveness is satisfactory.

Arthroscopically Assisted Coraco-Clavicular Ligament Reconstruction in Treatment of Acute Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures Provides Good to Excellent Shoulder Function Despite Low Union Rates and High Complication Rates: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the clinical outcome of arthroscopically assisted coraco-clavicular ligament (AACCL) reconstruction for treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures in terms of union rate, complications, and shoulder function.

METHODS

A review of the online databases Medline and Embase was conducted on January 1, 2021, according to PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies reporting union rate, complications, and shoulder function were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 14 studies eligible for inclusion, 12 retrospective case series and 2 nonrandomized retrospective comparative studies. All studies reported on shoulder function, union rate, and complications. The overall shoulder function was good to excellent according to Constant-Murley score, with mean scores ranging from 81.8 to 96.2 [I² (inconsistency) = 0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0% to 61%)]. The mean union rate ranged from 70% to 100% [I² = 32.6% (95% CI = 0% to 63.4%)], and the mean complication rate ranged from 0 to 28.6% [I² = 43.4% (95% CI = 0% to 68.4%)]. The most common complications were hardware related (3.1%), wound related (2.7%), and postoperative shoulder stiffness (2.2%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review analyzed clinical studies that evaluated the outcome of AACCL reconstruction in displaced distal clavicle fractures. The overall findings of this systematic review are that the union rate can be as low as 70% with this technique and the complication rate as high as 28.6%. Overall shoulder function was good to excellent according to Constant-Murley score. As the literature surrounding this topic is heterogeneous, further comparative clinical studies are required to assess superiority compared with other traditional techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V: systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is advised for unstable distal clavicle fractures (UDCFs). Various kinds of internal fixation methods have been used, but the best fixation is still controversial.

METHODS

We systematically searched all studies comparing postoperative outcomes of coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction (TightRope, EndoButton, Mersilene tape, suture anchor or suture), fracture osteosynthesis (clavicular hook plate (HP), locking compression plate (LCP), Kirschner wire and tension band (KWTB), Kirschner wire (KW)), and a combination of the two methods (LCP + CC or KWTB + CC) for UDCF in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection via Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases up to September 16, 2021, with no language restrictions. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to integrate direct and indirect evidence and assess the relative effects of the internal fixation methods. The probability of being the best treatment was assessed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies were included, involving 1969 patients and seven internal fixation methods. The NMA showed that LCP + CC fixation was associated with better efficacy (odds ratio (OR) 0.60, 95% CI 0.19-1.02, probability rank = 0.93) and fewer complications (odds ratio (OR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.51, probability rank = 0.69) than any other internal fixation method for UDCFs. The SUCRA probabilities of LCP + CC fixation were 98.6% for the Constant-Murley score and 93.9% for total complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that LCP + CC appears to be the best internal fixation method for UDCF. Limited to the quality and quantity of the included studies, much larger and higher-quality RCTs are required to confirm these conclusions.

Concomitant glenohumeral injuries in patients with distal clavicle fractures undergoing arthroscopic-assisted surgery: a systematic review

Background

To determine the incidence of concomitant intra-articular glenohumeral injuries in patients undergoing surgical management from distal clavicle fractures (DCF) with shoulder arthroscopy and their impact on outcome.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies evaluating the surgical management of DCF and using concomitant intra-operatory shoulder arthroscopy were included. Studies that did not specify the concomitant injury type were not eligible. Data from the incidence of intra-articular glenohumeral injuries, injury type, length of the follow-up, and clinical outcomes were retrieved. The quantitative content assessment was performed using the STROBE statement checklist. Evaluation of the publication bias of the included studies was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool for systematic reviews.

Results

Data from five retrospective and five prospective cohort studies were analyzed. Eight of the included studies were conducted on patient cohorts with Neer type II injuries. Data pooling revealed a mean of 17.70% of concomitant glenohumeral injuries, whereas 84.21% of them required additional surgical management (Table 1). Rotator cuff injuries, labral tears, and biceps pulley lesions were the most common concomitant injuries.

Conclusion

Preoperative MRI or diagnostic arthroscopy to evaluate glenohumeral associated injuries to DCF should be recommended.

Os acromiale may be a contraindication of the clavicle hook plate: case reports and literature review

Background

Os acromiale can be potentially missed or misdiagnosed as acromion fracture, and this can affect treatment determination if it is complicated with an ipsilateral shoulder injury. The clavicle hook plate is a widely used technique for distal clavicle injuries, leading to transacromial erosion, particularly when in the presence of os acromiale.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old man and a 78-year-old man who had limited mobility and severe pain in their right shoulders following falls attended the emergency center. Both patients were diagnosed with os acromiale with CT or MRI and acute distal clavicle fracture or acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Following a comprehensive evaluation, os acromiale may limit the application of a clavicle hook plate due to potential transacromial erosion. The distal clavicle fracture with ipsilateral os acromiale received treatment with a volar radius locking T plate, and the acromioclavicular joint dislocation with ipsilateral os acromiale was reconstructed using suture anchors. Both yielded satisfactory outcomes and voided transacromial erosion.

Conclusions

Ipsilateral os acromiale may be a relative contraindication to the clavicle hook plate. An axillary lateral radiograph is recommended to detect potential os acromiale in patients using a hook plate.

Revising the modified Neer classification for distal clavicle fractures: Description and reliability

BACKGROUND

The modified Neer classification is the most widely used classification system for distal clavicle fractures. However, it provides limited information for treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to revise the modified Neer classification to make it more suitable for treatment decision-making.

HYPOTHESIS

The revised version of the modified Neer classification has good intra- and interobserver agreements and provides an instructive treating algorithm.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study METHODS: Six observers, including three experienced shoulder specialists and three junior orthopaedic residents, independently reviewed plain radiographs of 52 patients with distal clavicle fractures. They were asked to classify the fracture types according to the modified Neer classification and our revised new classification separately to determine treatment approaches for each patient. Images were mirrored and randomized to verify the intraobserver agreement. Reliabilities were measured using the Fleiss kappa values.

RESULTS

Both the modified Neer classification and our revised version had near perfect intraobserver agreement (κ values: 0.87-1.00), whereas our revised Neer classification had a better interobserver agreement (κ values: 0.78 vs. 0.70, z = 4.70, p < 0.01) and stronger relevance to treatment decisions (coefficient of contingency: 0.70 vs. 0.44).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated a near-perfect intraobserver and substantial interobserver agreement of the revised new classification, indicating that our revised new classification was better than the modified Neer classification. Meanwhile, our revised classification brought few disputes in treatment selection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The modified Neer classification was revised to make it more accurate and suitable for guiding treatment.

TYPE OF STUDY

Study of diagnostic test LEVEL OF STUDY: Level II.

Good to Excellent Functional Outcome and High Return to Sports Rate after Operative Treatment of Unstable Lateral Clavicle Fractures: Comparison of Two Coracoclavicular Button Fixation Techniques

Purpose: Operative therapy for unstable lateral clavicle fractures is necessary to reduce the risk of bony non-union. Irritation and restriction during sportive activities due to the implanted materials are a common reason for impaired function and implant removal. The aim of this study was to gain information on functional outcome and time until return to sport (RTS) after surgical treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures, comparing two coracoclavicular button techniques. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who were consecutively treated for unstable lateral clavicle fractures at our level one trauma center from 2014 to 2018 was conducted. Two different surgical techniques were evaluated and compared. Group 1 was treated using a locking compression plate and knotted DogBone™ Button, while group 2 received an LCP and knotless DogBone™ Button. Functional outcome (ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Score), Constant-Score, DASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), MSQ (Munich Shoulder Questionnaire) and SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) and time until RTS were investigated and compared between both groups, 1 year postoperatively. Results: A total of 56 patients (n = 35 group 1, n = 21 group 2) with a mean age of 45.1 ± 14.6 years met the inclusion criteria. Functional outcome reached good to excellent results (ASES 94.7 ± 9.8, Constant Score 85.1 ± 8.1, DASH 5.5 ± 8.4, MSQ 90.9 ± 7.2, SPADI 96.1 ± 5.7). Implant removal rates were higher in group 1 (48.3% vs. 35.3%) yet without statistical significance (p = 0.122). All patients returned to sports postoperatively with a mean time period until return to sport of 4.6 (3–9) months. Conclusion: Locking compression plating and coracoclavicular fixation using a knotless Dogbone™ technique provides good to excellent functional outcomes, a high and fast rate of return to sport and lower irritation rates compared to the knotted DogBone™ technique.

The Management of Distal Clavicle Fractures - A Survey of UK Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons

Background

Distal clavicle fractures (DCF) are a management challenge frequently encountered by shoulder surgeons. Despite an array of surgical fixation strategies, the indications and role of surgery are unclear, with there being no gold standard or consensus regarding their management. The aim of this study was to identify current United Kingdom (UK) clinical practices relating to DCFs and to inform a future randomised control trial (RCT).

Methods

An online survey was sent to the consultant surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS). Questions covered respondent indications for surgical fixation, important factors considered for management of DCFs, fixation strategies, the volume of patients treated, and willingness to participate in the conduct of a randomized trial.

Results

The response rate was 84/327 (26%). 64-67% of respondents reported surgically managing DCFs classified as Neer type 2A, 2B and 5. The most important factors considered by surgeons when deciding between operative and nonoperative intervention were degree of displacement (90%), clinical assessment of impending open fracture (87%), and age of the patient (74%). For conservatively managed DCFs, the preferred length of complete immobilization was 2-4 weeks (46%), followed by 4-8 weeks (17%). 30% reported not immobilizing their patients at all. For operative intervention, the locking plate was the preferred fixation method by most respondents (68%), although there was no clear consensus regarding other fixation methods. Most surgeons (52%) reported treating a low volume of patients with DCFs (0-10) per year. 58% of respondents were willing to randomize patients to non-operative treatment in a multi-centre RCT, with a further 22% undecided. Finally, 68% (n=79) of respondents would consider being co-investigators in such a trial.

Conclusion

There is considerable heterogeneity in the management of patients with DCFs in the UK. The indications for surgery and the optimal surgical fixation method remain uncertain. There is a clear need for pragmatic multi-centre clinical research in this area.

Arthroscopic coracoclavicular button fixation versus anatomic locking plate fixation for unstable distal clavicular fractures

Hypothesis

Neer type II distal clavicle fractures are unstable and associated with high nonunion rates. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anatomic locking plate fixation and arthroscopic coracoclavicular button fixation for unstable distal clavicle fractures.

Methods

Forty-seven patients with Neer type II distal clavicle fractures were treated surgically using either anatomic locking plate fixation (group 1, n = 20) or all arthroscopic coracoclavicular button fixation (group 2, n = 27) between 2012 and 2019 in 2 centers. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after an average follow-up period of 49 months for group 1 and 32 months for group 2 were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score, Constant-Murley score, visual analog scale score and X-rays.

Results

At the final follow-up, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score, Constant-Murley score, and visual analog scale score for group 1 and group 2 were 92.5 ± 3.9 (range 88.3-98.3), 93.6 ± 4.0 (range 90-100), and 0.6 ± 0.6 (range 0-2) and 95 ± 3.3 (range 86.6-100), 96.2 ± 3.0 (range 88-100), and 0.4 ± 0.5 (range 0-1), respectively (P = .32, P = .15, and P = .59, respectively). At the final follow-up, acceptable reduction and bone healing were achieved in all patients. All patients in both groups were able to resume work as well as sports activities. Postoperative complications included 1 case of acromioclavicular joint arthritis and 1 case of screw penetration in group 1 and 2 cases of coracoid process fracture that did not require additional surgery in group 2. Five patients underwent hardware removal owing to skin irritation and dissatisfaction with the cosmetic appearance in group 1.

Conclusion

Both distal anatomic locking plate fixation and arthroscopic coracoclavicular button fixation provide satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes. Both procedures can be used to treat distal clavicle fractures because they have a minimal risk of complications and present similar, high union rates.

[Clavicular hook plate with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation by suture anchor in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures]

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of a clavicular hook plate with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation by suture anchor in the treatment of Neer types Ⅱ and Ⅴ distal clavicle fractures.

Methods

Between January 2010 and June 2016, 16 patients with Neer types Ⅱ and Ⅴ distal clavicle fractures were treated with clavicle hook plates and coracoclavicular ligament augmentation by suture anchor. There were 12 males and 4 females with an average age of 45.6 years (range, 14-81 years). The injury mechanism included falling in 10 cases, traffic accident injury in 2 cases, falling from height in 2 cases, and heavy object injury in 2 cases. The Neer classification of clavicle fractures included 2 cases of type Ⅱa, 13 cases of type Ⅱb, and 1 case of type Ⅴ. The injury severity score (ISS) was 6-29, with an average of 11.2. The time from injury to operation was 1-18 days, with an average of 6.4 days. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization stay, fracture healing, and postoperative complications were recorded; the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, the shoulder joint Constant score, and the Oxford shoulder score (OSS) were used to evaluate the shoulder joint at last follow-up.

Results

All operations were successfully completed. The operation time was 50-100 minutes, with an average of 75.6 minutes; intraoperative blood loss was 30-100 mL, with an average of 52.8 mL; hospitalization stay was 4-47 days, with an average of 13.7 days. All patients were followed up 1.2-7.5 years, with an average of 3.5 years. All clavicle fractures healed, and the healing time was 9.4-13.6 weeks, with an average of 11.9 weeks. No fracture nonunion, fracture displacement, failure of internal fixation, or incision infection, etc. occurred. Fifteen patients took out the hook plate after fracture healing and functional recovery, and 1 case refused to remove the hook plate from the second operation because of no obvious discomfort. At last follow-up, the DASH score was 0-13, with an average of 2.2; the shoulder joint Constant score was 90-100, with an average of 96.8; the OSS score was 12-14, with an average of 12.3.

Conclusion

Clavicular hook plate with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation by suture anchor can help achieve good effectiveness with less postoperative complication in the treatment of Neer types Ⅱ and Ⅴ distal clavicular fractures.

Operative management of an extra-lateral distal clavicle fracture pattern: a study of 48 patients and a proposed update to the modified Neer classification

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of operative management for the treatment of patients with an extra-lateral distal clavicle fracture pattern. This fracture pattern is not currently included in the modified Neer classification.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an acute extra-lateral distal clavicle fracture pattern between August 2005 and March 2019. The postoperative clinical outcomes were time to union; active shoulder range of motion; scar size; patient sensation of a "normal" shoulder; and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, all patients achieved union at an average of 7.9 weeks (range, 4-20 weeks). All patients regained full active shoulder range of motion at an average of 10.1 weeks (range, 5-44 weeks) and had a scar size of 3-4 cm; 93.8% of patients reported that their shoulder felt normal again after union. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 1.7 (range, 0-28) at 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The patients had very good clinical outcomes following operative management of an extra-lateral distal clavicle fracture pattern. We recommend that this fracture pattern be added to the current modified Neer classification as a type IIC fracture.

Distal clavicle fractures with "superior intact cortical bone": minimally invasive surgery

Introduction

Distal clavicle fractures represent 12%-26% of all clavicle fractures. For unstable cases, surgical fixation is the preferred method of treatment. To date, there is still controversy regarding the best fixation method with a high reoperation and complication rate reported. The purpose of this article is to describe a minimally invasive method for reduction and stabilization of displaced distal clavicle fractures, using cortical buttons.

Surgical technique

After standard preoperative preparation, a 3-cm incision is made at the coracoclavicular area. Using both coracoid and clavicle tunnels, fracture reduction and fixation is obtained using a cortical fixation button. Standard postoperative care is given.

Results

A total of 21 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 34.7 years were treated using this technique. The follow-up was between 6 and 41 months, with an average of 23.4 months. The mean simple shoulder test score was 79.4 (range 66-91.7), and the QuickDASH score was 11 (range 6.8-15.9). Consolidation of the fracture was confirmed at the 12-week follow-up radiography, with no cases of nonunion or malunion identified. No patients presented infection or complications at the surgical site. Implant removal was not needed in this series. All the patients returned to work.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive button fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures is a safe and reliable alternative treatment. The initial outcome report is promising with excellent clinical and radiological results and no complications or implant removals.

Clinical outcomes of doubled-suture Nice knot augmented plate fixation in the treatment of comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture

Background

Free bone fragments were difficult to be fixed in many comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures, and the absence of cortical alignment in comminuted fractures had direct influence on the stability of fixation. This survey was performed to assess the efficacy of doubled-suture Nice knot augmented plate fixation in the treatment of comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures.

Methods

Between 2013 and 2018, all patients with comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures treated with doubled-suture Nice knot augmented plate fixation were retrospectively reviewed and included in this research. Demographic data of the patients, characteristics of the fractures, intraoperative parameters and follow-up data of the patients were evaluated and summarized.

Results

A total of 56 patients were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 25.6 months (range, 12–60 months). The number of male patients was 38 (67.9 %) and of the female patients was 18 (32.1 %). The average age of all patients was 47.89 ± 16.5 years. The mean time of surgery was 85.6 ± 24.0 min. The average length of incision was 9.2 ± 1.9 cm. The number of doubled-suture Nice knot applied ranged from 1 to 5 knots. All the patients reached bone union after the treatment. There was no implant failure or neurovascular injury observed. And most of the patients showed good functional outcome.

Conclusions

The doubled-suture Nice knot could provide reliable fixation for small bone fragments in comminuted clavicle fractures. Combination of the doubled-suture Nice knot and plate screws fixation was a safe and effective method in comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures treatment.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Fixation of Unstable Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review

Background:

Surgical management of unstable distal clavicle fractures (DCFs) remains controversial. Traditional open techniques result in acceptable union rates but are fraught with complications. In response to these limitations, arthroscopic techniques have been developed; however, clinical outcome data are limited.

Purpose:

The primary purpose was to systematically evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic fixation of unstable DCFs. The secondary purpose was to characterize the overall complication rate, focusing on major complications and subsequent reoperations.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and included a search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. English-language studies between 2008 and 2019 that reported on outcomes of patients with DCFs who underwent operative fixation using an arthroscopic or arthroscopically assisted surgical technique were included. Data consisted of patient characteristics, fracture type, surgical technique, concomitant injuries, union rates, functional outcomes, and complications.

Results:

A total of 15 studies consisting of 226 DCFs treated using an arthroscopically based technique were included in the systematic review. The majority of fractures were classified as Neer type II. Most (97%) of the fractures underwent arthroscopic fixation using a cortical button coracoclavicular stabilization surgical technique. Bony union was reported in 94.1% of the fractures. Good to excellent outcomes were recorded in most patients at the final follow-up. The Constant-Murley score was the most widely used functional outcome score; the pooled mean Constant score was 93.06 (95% CI, 91.48-94.64). Complications were reported in 14 of the 15 studies, and the overall complication rate was 27.4%. However, only 12% of these were considered major complications, and only 6% required a reoperation for hardware-related complications.

Conclusion:

Arthroscopic fixation of DCFs resulted in good functional outcomes with union rates comparable to those of traditional open techniques. While the overall complication profile was similar to that of other described techniques, there was a much lower incidence of major complications, including hardware-related complications and reoperations.

Comparative analysis of a locking plate with an all-suture anchor versus hook plate fixation of Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures

BACKGROUND

The coracoclavicular fixation with suture anchors adds stability to type IIb distal clavicle fractures fixed with a plate and screws when loaded to failure. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between the use of a locking compression plate (LCP) with all-suture anchor fixation and hook LCP fixation of Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A total of 82 consecutive patients who underwent plate fixation for Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures were included. The subjects were divided into two groups: an LCP with all-suture anchor fixation group and hook LCP fixation group. For clinical assessments, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Korean shoulder score (KSS), and Constant score were recorded. A percentage of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD%) was used to evaluate fracture reduction. Typical reported complications, such as secondary dislocation, implant failure or loosening, peri-implant fracture, acromion osteolysis, stiffness, peri-anchor osteolysis, postoperative acromioclavicular joint arthrosis, nonunion, or delayed union, were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up between the two groups. The period for bone union and CCD% showed no significant differences between groups. Stiffness at 3 months after surgery of LCP with all-suture anchor fixation (n = 3, 10.7%) was less than that of hook LCP fixation (n = 17, 31.5%). The complication rate also showed no significant differences between groups. However, LCP with all-suture anchor fixation had anchor-related complications, although it can reduce hook-related complications.

CONCLUSION

LCP with all-suture anchor fixation showed satisfactory outcomes in comparison with hook LCP fixation. In Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures, LCP with all-suture anchor fixation is a useful method for the maintenance of reduction, avoiding implant removal, and hook-related complications. However, anchor fixation should be carefully used, especially in osteoporotic patients or patients with underlying diseases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective study.

Treatment of distal clavicle fracture of Neer type II with locking plate in combination with titanium cable under the guide

To observe and compare the curative effect of a locking plate plus titanium cable under the Guide device and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. A prospective cohort study was conducted to analyse the clinical data of 36 patients with distal clavicle fractures from January 2016 to January 2019. The results were analysed. According to the random number method, the patients were divided into two groups: the titanium cable group (fixed with a titanium cable in combination with a locking plate) and hook plate group (fixed with a clavicular hook plate only). Under the guidance of a special device (for which a patent was obtained), in the titanium cable group, the coracoclavicular ligament was fixed with tension reduction, and then the distal clavicular fracture was fixed with a locking plate. In the hook plate group, the distal clavicle fracture was fixed with a hook plate. The incision length, operation time, bleeding volume and VAS score before, 1 week after and 1 year after the operation were compared between the two groups. The effect of the operation was evaluated by the Constant-Murley score before and 1 year after the operation. X-ray films were taken 2 days, 3 months, half a year and 1 year after the operation to observe the reduction and healing of fractures. At the same time, complications were recorded. The amount of bleeding was the same in the two groups. The operation time in the hook plate group was relatively short, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The VAS score in the titanium cable group was significantly lower than that in the hook plate group one year after the operation. The Constant-Murley score in the titanium cable group and hook plate group was significantly higher 1 year after the operation. The number of postoperative complications in the titanium cable group was significantly lower than that in the hook plate group. The treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures with a titanium cable plus a locking plate has a good curative effect, few complications and good postoperative recovery and thus is worth popularizing.

Current Concepts for Classification and Treatment of Distal Clavicle Fractures

Distal clavicle fractures are less common than mid-shaft fractures in adults and there is no consensus on the best classification system or the ideal treatment approach considering that high nonunion rates have been reported. Although there are numerous treatment options for distal clavicle fractures, a gold standard treatment has not yet been established. Each surgical technique has its pros and cons. In this review article, we provide an overview of classification systems and treatment methods for distal clavicle fractures.

An evaluation of treatment options for medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The majority of clavicle fractures are midshaft injuries, although fractures of the distal or medial fragment also occur. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence on these injuries to help inform future treatment plans.

Methods

We searched for studies comparing interventions for medial, midshaft, or distal clavicle fractures; however, we did not identify any comparative studies on medial fractures and performed a secondary search on this topic. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses, although this was not feasible with studies on medial fractures and we described their results qualitatively.

Results

For midshaft fractures, we found statistically significant improvements in function and time to radiographic union with plating, an elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), and the Sonoma CRx intramedullary nail over nonoperative treatments. Both plating and an ESIN also showed significantly lower risks of nonunion and malunion relative to nonoperative methods. For distal fractures, a locking plate (LP) with or without coracoclavicular (CC) suturing yielded significantly better outcomes over K-wires with or without tension bands, CC suturing alone, an LP with a CC screw, a hook plate, and a sling. For medial fractures, plating may result in more favorable functional and union-related outcomes, although implant irritation may occur. In addition, K-wires, tension bands, and a screw with sutures demonstrated success when plating was technically not feasible in a few cases, whereas treatment with a sling may result in reduced function and a higher risk of complications relative to surgery.

Conclusion

This study can provide guidance on the management of medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures. The current evidence suggests that plating, an ESIN, and a CRx intramedullary nail are all good options for midshaft fractures; an LP with or without CC suturing should be preferred for distal fractures; and plating is also acceptable for medial fractures, provided that the patient is deemed suitable for surgery and has the adequate bone stock and sufficiently sized medial fragment necessary to implant the device. Patient preferences for certain outcomes should be considered, which may result in different treatment recommendations.

Coracoclavicular Double-Button Fixation of Displaced Lateral Clavicular Fracture in a Patient without Coracoid Process

Background

Displaced distal clavicular fractures are generally operated on because of the high nonunion rate after nonoperative treatment. Several surgical techniques have been developed to reduce the nonunion rate and improve functional outcomes. One of them is closed reduction and minimally invasive coracoclavicular double-button fixation, which requires the integrity of the coracoid process to be performed.

Case Summary

We present a 35-year-old male patient who had been successfully subjected to a modified Latarjet procedure for glenohumeral instability with bony defect treatment, and 7 months later suffered a distal clavicle fracture in his ipsilateral shoulder. With a CT scan, we analyzed the coracoid remnant size (7 mm), and we consider it enough to perform a minimally invasive double-button technique, using this remnant as a distal fixation.

Postoperative and Follow-Up

Radiographic and clinical fracture union occurred 10 weeks after the procedure. The patient returned to sports at the same level he had before surgery and achieved full strength and range of motion.

Conclusion

Closed reduction and minimally invasive double-button fixation of displaced distal clavicular fractures is a safe, reproducible, and versatile technique, which can even be performed without an intact coracoid process.

Clavicle hook plate versus distal clavicle locking plate for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures

Background

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare clavicle hook plates versus distal clavicle locking plates for the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures.

Methods

PubMed (1996 to January 2019), Embase (1980 to January 2019), Web of Science (1990 to January 2019), the Cochrane Library (January 2019), and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (January 2019) were systematically searched without language restrictions for literature retrieval. The Constant-Murley shoulder joint function score at 3 and 6 months after the operation and the postoperative complications after the operation (shoulder joint pain, abduction restriction, fracture delay healing, subacromial impingement) were the outcomes. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 9 clinical trials involving 446 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the improvement in the Constant-Murley shoulder joint function score in the distal locking plate group was better than that in the clavicle hook plate group at 3 and 6 months after the operation (P < 0.05). There were fewer cases of shoulder joint pain and restricted shoulder abduction range of motion in the distal locking plate group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in fracture delay healing and subacromial impingement between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the clavicular hook plate, the distal clavicle locking plate for the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures is associated with better shoulder function recovery and fewer complications related to pain and abduction restriction.

Open Reduction and Tunneled Suspensory Device Fixation of Displaced Lateral-End Clavicular Fractures: Medium-Term Outcomes and Complications After Treatment

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the lateral aspect of the clavicle with complete displacement have a high nonunion rate and are associated with poor functional outcomes following nonoperative treatment. Various techniques are available to treat these fractures, but preliminary studies of open reduction and tunneled suspensory device (ORTSD) fixation have shown good early functional outcomes with a low rate of complications; our goal was to assess the functional outcomes and complications in the medium term in a larger series of patients treated using this technique.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with displaced lateral-end clavicular fractures were treated with ORTSD fixation. Outcome was assessed with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Oxford shoulder score at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Fifty-five of 64 surviving patients were subsequently contacted at a mean of 69 months (range, 27 to 120 months) postoperatively to complete DASH and Oxford shoulder scores, to evaluate their overall level of satisfaction, and to document any further complications.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, the mean Oxford shoulder score was 46.4 points and the mean DASH score was 2.4 points in 59 of the 67 patients assessed at this time interval. At the later follow-up (mean, 69 months), the mean Oxford shoulder score was 46.5 points and the mean DASH score was 2.2 points in the 55 surviving patients who were able to be contacted. There were no significant differences between the 1-year functional scores and those at the latest follow-up. Two patients developed a symptomatic nonunion requiring reoperation, and 2 patients developed an asymptomatic fibrous union not requiring a surgical procedure. The 5-year survival when considering only obligatory revision for implant-related complications was 97.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

ORTSD fixation for isolated displaced lateral-end clavicular fractures in medically fit patients is associated with good functional outcomes and a low rate of complications in the medium term. Routine implant removal was not necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.