Tourniquet use in lower limb fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Appropriate tourniquet use in surgery: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Tourniquet use is ubiquitous in the operating theatre. However, optimal tourniquet usage is unclear, including type, pressure, inflation time, or whether a tourniquet should be used at all. This study reports a literature review of tourniquet use, comparing type, pressure, duration, effectiveness, and the spectrum of complications in an adult surgical population.

RESULTS

Data regarding population size, surgery performed, tourniquet type, tourniquet location, total tourniquet inflation time, timing of inflation and deflation, pressure, and complications were recorded. Postoperative tourniquet-related pain was the commonest adverse event. Other complications included venous thromboembolism, wound healing issues, neuropathy, and abrasions. Findings suggest that most surgeons use standardised pressures.

CONCLUSION

Tourniquets are associated with a spectrum of complications. It is unclear whether tourniquet use provides better surgical outcomes. If tourniquets are used, surgeons should minimise the application pressure and duration. This may be achieved through a patient-centred approach and careful use of padding.

Comparing the risk of reoperation between pneumatic tourniquet and non-tourniquet use in surgical treatment of ankle fractures

Aims

Pneumatic tourniquets are often used during the surgical treatment of unstable traumatic ankle fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of reoperation after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures with and without the use of pneumatic tourniquets.

Methods

This was a population-based cohort study using data from the Danish Fracture Database with a follow-up period of 24 months. Data were linked to the Danish National Patient Registry to ensure complete information regarding reoperations due to complications, which were divided into major and minor. The relative risk of reoperations for the tourniquet group compared with the non-tourniquet group was estimated using Cox proportional hazards modelling.

Results

A total of 4,050 ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation between 15 March 2012 and 31 December 2016 were included, with 669 (16.5%) undergoing surgery with a tourniquet and 3,381 (83.5%) without a tourniquet. The overall reoperation risk was 28.2% with an adjusted relative risk of 1.46 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.32) for group comparison. The reoperation risk due to major complications was 3.1% with a tourniquet and 4.4% without a tourniquet, resulting in an adjusted relative risk of 1.45 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.32). For minor complications, there were 24.7% and 23.9% reoperations, resulting in an adjusted relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.17).

Conclusion

We found no significant difference in the reoperation rate when comparing ankle fractures treated surgically with and without the use of pneumatic tourniquets.

The effect of tourniquet use on postoperative opioid consumption after ankle fracture surgery - a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

A pneumatic tourniquet is often used during ankle fracture surgery to reduce bleeding and enhance the visibility of the surgical field. Tourniquet use causes both mechanical and ischemic pain. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of tourniquet time on postoperative opioid consumption after ankle fracture surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the files of 586 adult patients with surgically treated ankle fractures during the years 2014-2016. We evaluated post hoc the effect of tourniquet time on postoperative opioid consumption during the first 24 h after surgery. The patients were divided into quartiles by the tourniquet time (4-43 min; 44-58 min; 59-82 min; and ≥83 min). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the results.

RESULTS

Tourniquets were used in 486 patients. The use of a tourniquet was associated with an increase in the total postoperative opioid consumption by 5.1 mg (95 % CI 1.6-8.5; p=0.004) during the first 24 postoperative hours. The tourniquet time over 83 min was associated with an increase in the mean postoperative oxycodone consumption by 5.4 mg (95 % CI 1.2 to 9.7; p=0.012) compared to patients with tourniquet time of 4-43 min.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a tourniquet and prolonged tourniquet time were associated with higher postoperative opioid consumption during the 24 h postoperative follow-up after surgical ankle fracture fixation. The need for ethical approval and informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Northern Ostrobothnia Health District because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Silicone ring tourniquet could be a substitute for a conventional tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty with a longer surgical field: a prospective comparative study in simultaneous total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of silicon ring tourniquets and conventional pneumatic tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study compared the operation time, total bleeding amount, length from the tourniquet distal end to the patella superior pole (L_TP), and complications related to the two tourniquet application methods and attempted to determine whether the silicon ring tourniquet has advantages over conventional pneumatic tourniquets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective comparative study included 30 patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous TKA for degenerative osteoarthritis in August to December 2021. All patients underwent TKA on one side with a conventional pneumatic tourniquet, while TKA on the other side with a silicon ring tourniquet. The primary outcomes were the L_TP, operation time, tourniquet time, total bleeding amount, total drainage amount, and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score of the tourniquet applied site at 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcome was tourniquet-related complications in both groups.

RESULTS

L_TP was significantly longer in the silicon ring tourniquet group compared with that in the pneumatic tourniquet group (20.22 ± 2.74 cm versus 15.12 ± 2.40, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in other results. The tourniquet applied site pain was less in the silicon ring tourniquet group (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Silicon ring tourniquet application resulted in better clinical outcomes than conventional pneumatic tourniquets in TKA. Because we can obtain a wider surgical field using silicon ring tourniquets without complications, silicon ring tourniquets could be a substitute for conventional pneumatic tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty or distal femoral surgeries.

Anterior Ankle Incision Healing Complications With and Without Tourniquet Use: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study

Anterior ankle incisions and tourniquet use in foot and ankle surgery have both been associated with increased incidence of incisional healing complications. Although a tourniquet is commonly used for procedures such as total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis that utilize an anterior ankle incision, it is possible to avoid tourniquet use while preserving adequate visualization with atraumatic layered dissection and closure, appropriate use of electrocautery, and ligation of vessels as needed. The primary aim of this study is to report rates of anterior ankle incisional healing complications both with and without tourniquet use. A retrospective chart review was performed on consecutive patients undergoing total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis through a multi-provider foot and ankle surgery practice between 2013 and 2018. A total of 121 patients, 58 (47.9%) in the tourniquet group and 63 (52.1%) in the no-tourniquet group, were included in this study with a median follow-up period of 36 (range 2-96) months. There was a higher rate of incisional healing complications for the tourniquet group (5.2%) compared to the no-tourniquet group (3.2%), however this did not reach statistical significance (p = .670). There was no significant difference in operative time between the tourniquet and no-tourniquet group (p = .405). The overall incisional healing complication rate was 4.1%. Although avoiding tourniquet use alone does not appear to significantly reduce anterior ankle incisional healing complications, the described technique has yielded an overall lower rate of incisional complications compared to those commonly reported in the literature.

Blood flow restriction added to usual care exercise in patients with early weight bearing restrictions after cartilage or meniscus repair in the knee joint: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

Blood flow restriction - low load strength training (BFR-LLST) is theoretically superior to traditional heavy strength training when rehabilitating patients who cannot heavily load tissues following surgery. The main purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of BFR-LLST added to usual care exercise early after cartilage or meniscus repair in the knee joint.

METHODS

We included 42 patients with cartilage (n = 21) or meniscus repair (n = 21) of the knee joint. They attended 9 weeks of BFR-LLST added to a usual care exercise program at an outpatient rehabilitation center. Outcome measures were assessed at different time points from four (baseline) to 26 weeks postoperatively and included adherence, harms, knee joint and thigh pain, perceived exertion, thigh circumference (muscle size proxy), isometric knee-extension strength, self-reported disability and quality of life.

RESULTS

On average, patients with cartilage or meniscus repair completed > 84% of the total BFR-LLST supervised sessions. Thirty-eight patients reported 146 adverse events of which none were considered serious. No decrease in thigh circumference or exacerbation of knee joint or quadriceps muscle pain of the operated leg was found in either group during the intervention period.

CONCLUSIONS

BFR-LLST added to usual care exercise initiated early after cartilage or meniscus repair seems feasible and may prevent disuse thigh muscle atrophy during a period of weight bearing restrictions. Harms were reported, but no serious adverse events were found. Our findings are promising but need replication using a RCT-design.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03371901 , preprint (open access):  https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.31.22272398v1.

Preoperative Optimization and Tips to Avoiding Surgical Complications Before the Incision

In preparation for surgery, it is important for surgeons to have a detailed discussion with patients about the risks, benefits, and alternatives to surgery. Patient optimization, ensuring the patient is in the best medical condition before surgery, is also an important aspect of patient care that the surgeon must consider. Although complications cannot be eliminated, there are often opportunities to optimize patients, so these risks can be minimized based on current evidence-based medicine. To minimize the risk of complications, the surgeon should take an active role in each step of the patient's care beginning with the history and physical examination, obtaining the correct preoperative labs, and continuing through positioning, draping, and prepping before making an incision.

Incidence and factors influencing tourniquet pain

PURPOSE

The use of tourniquet in orthopedic surgery facilitates operation by establishing a bloodless surgical field. However, many complications following the use of tourniquets have been reported. Tourniquet pain is the most common complication. This study aimed to find the actual incidence of pain associated with tourniquet use in orthopedic surgery and the various factors.

METHODS

It is a prospective observational study conducted on 132 consecutive cases. Patients aged 18-70 years with musculoskeletal problems of the forearm and leg requiring surgery were included in the study. Patients with open injuries or contraindications such as diabetes mellitus, compromised circulatory states, neurological deficit, compartment syndrome and unable to give informed consent were excluded. The parameters assessed included duration of tourniquet use, tourniquet pressure, type of anesthesia, any interval release of the tourniquet and reapplication after a reperfusion period, whether upper or lower limb surgery, severity of tourniquet pain, timing of tourniquet release and complications. Chi-square and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

In upper limb surgeries, if duration of surgery was less than 60 min, 14 (51.8%) cases experienced tourniquet pain and 13 (48.1%) had no pain, and if duration of surgery was more than 60 min, 24 (60.0%) had pain and 16 (40.0%) experienced no pain. In lower limb surgeries if duration of surgery was less than 60 min, 2 (7.7%) experienced pain and 24 (92.3%) had no pain, and if duration of surgery was more than 60 min, 14 (35.8%) experienced pain and 25 (64.8%) had no pain. Degree of tourniquet pain increases with the duration of surgery. Statistically, there was significant association between tourniquet inflation time and tourniquet pain in both upper and lower limbs (p = 0.034 and 0.024, respectively) CONCLUSION: Incidence of tourniquet pain was in direct proportion to the duration of tourniquet use and was higher in cases with regional anesthesia. Other risk factors assessed including tourniquet pressure, upper or lower limb surgery, tourniquet release time and interval had no significant contribution to the incidence or severity of tourniquet pain.

Effect of Tourniquet Use During Surgical Treatment of Open Fractures

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate whether tourniquet use, with the resultant ischemia and reperfusion, during surgical treatment of an open lower-extremity fracture was associated with an increased risk of complications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 1,351 patients who had an open lower-extremity fracture at or distal to the proximal aspect of the tibia and who participated in the FLOW (Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds) trial. The independent variable was intraoperative tourniquet use, and the primary outcome measures were adjudicated unplanned reoperation within 1 year of the injury and adjudicated nonoperative wound complications.

RESULTS

Unplanned reoperation and nonoperative wound complications were roughly even between the no-tourniquet (18.7% and 19.1%, respectively) and tourniquet groups (17.8% and 20.8%) (p = 0.78 and p = 0.52). Following matching, as determined by model interactions, tourniquet use was a significant predictor of unplanned reoperation in Gustilo Type-IIIA (odds ratio, 3.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 11.78) and IIIB fractures (odds ratio, 16.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.15 to 355.40).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that tourniquet use did not influence the likelihood of complications following surgical treatment of an open lower-extremity fracture. However, in cases of severe open fractures, tourniquet use was associated with increased odds of unplanned reoperation; surgeons should be cautious with regard to tourniquet use in this setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tourniquet use in lower limb trauma and fracture surgery

The use of tourniquets in lower limb trauma surgery to control bleeding and improve the surgical field is a long established practice. In this article, we review the evidence relating to harms and benefits of tourniquet use in lower limb fracture fixation surgery and report the results of a survey on current tourniquet practice among trauma surgeons in the UK.

Tourniquets as a haemorrhage control measure in military and civilian care settings: An integrative review

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of review was to describe and synthesise the evidence on the use of tourniquets to control haemorrhages, summarising both civilian and military use.

BACKGROUND

Trauma-related haemorrhage constitutes one of the most preventable deaths among injured patients, particularly in multi-casualty incidents and disasters. In this context, safe instruments such as tourniquets are essential to help healthcare professionals to minimise loss of life and maximise patient recovery.

DESIGN AND METHODS

An integrative review was conducted in Medline, Nursing & Allied Health Premium, and Health & Medical Collection, using published data until March 2021 and following the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 25 articles were included. Evidence has been synthesised to understand the use of different types of tourniquets, environment of application, indication for their placement and potential complications associated with tourniquet placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Commercial tourniquets such as Combat Application Tourniquet or Emergency Tourniquet models are a valuable and safe instrument for haemorrhage control in both military and civilian out-of-hospital care settings. Nurses, as part of emergency teams, and other professionals should be aware that there is a possibility of adverse complications, but they are directly proportional to the time of tourniquet placement and generally temporary. In addition, national and international guidelines ensure the need for all civilian emergency services to be equipped with these devices, as well as for the training of healthcare professionals and first responders in their use.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Despite the lack of complications in the use of tourniquets in these cases, their use has been a matter of debate for decades. In this sense, this review yields up-to-date guidelines in the use of tourniquets, their recommendations and their significance among professionals to manage complicated situations.

The risks associated with tourniquet use in lower limb trauma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Tourniquet use in lower limb fracture surgery may reduce intra-operative bleeding, improve surgical field of view and reduce length of procedure. However, tourniquets may result in pain and the production of harmful metabolites cause complications or affect functional outcomes. This systematic review aimed to compare outcomes following lower limb fracture surgery performed with or without tourniquet.

Methods

We searched databases for RCTs comparing lower limb fracture surgery performed with versus without tourniquet reporting on outcomes pain, physical function, health-related quality of life, complications, cognitive function, blood loss, length of stay, length of procedure, swelling, time to union, surgical field of view, volume of anaesthetic agent, biochemical markers of inflammation and injury, and electrolyte and acid–base balance. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. PROSPERO ID CRD42020209310.

Results

Six RCTs enabled inclusion of 552 procedures. Pooled analysis demonstrated that tourniquet use reduced length of procedure by 6 minutes (95% CI −10.12 to −1.87; p < 0.010). We were unable to exclude increased harms from tourniquet use. Pooled analysis showed post-operative pain score was higher in tourniquet group by 12.88 on 100-point scale (95% CI −1.25–27.02; p = 0.070). Risk differences for wound infection, deep venous thrombosis and re-operation were 0.06 (95% CI −0.00–0.12; p = 0.070), 0.05 (95% CI −0.02–0.11; p = 0.150) and 0.03 (95% CI -0.03–0.09; p = 0.340).

Conclusion

Tourniquet use was associated with a reduced length of procedure. It is possible that tourniquets also increase incidence of important complications, but the data are too sparse to draw firm conclusions. Methodological weaknesses of the included RCTs prevent any solid conclusions being drawn for outcomes investigated. Further studies are required to address these limitations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00590-021-02957-7.

A Review of Orthopaedic Surgical Set-Up and Introduction of the TULIPS Mnemonic - Six Simple Steps for Optimising Set-Up in Orthopaedic Surgery

Conducting a thorough check to ensure that all equipment and personnel are positioned correctly at the start of any operation is essential for both the safety of the surgical team and the patient outcome. Orthopaedic surgery in particular carries a high risk of occupational injury and this group could benefit greatly from ergonomic improvements. This review highlights multiple factors that can influence safety of surgeons, surgical efficiency and patient outcomes. "TULIPS" is a mnemonic that lists six key steps in optimising the surgical procedure through effective positioning of equipment and personnel pre-operatively. This was trialled by distribution amongst orthopaedic registrars regionally and it received excellent feedback, with the majority changing their current practice. Here we report that using this simple and memorable checklist can assist orthopaedic surgeons in setting up the operating theatre, facilitating ergonomic improvements that can reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injury and radiation exposure.

Effect of Tourniquet Use During Ankle Fracture Fixation on Wound Healing and Infectious Complications

BACKGROUND

Tourniquets are common during extremity surgery; however, effects of tourniquets on complications following ankle fracture surgery have not been well described. The purpose was to evaluate effects of tourniquet usage on wound complications and infections after ankle fracture fixation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (N = 903) treated operatively for torsional ankle injury were identified. Patients for whom a tourniquet was used intraoperatively (n = 523) were compared to those without (n = 380). Subgroup analysis included patients possibly sensitive to tissue ischemia (diabetes, obesity, tobacco, age >65 years, and open fracture). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A tourniquet was used in 523 (57.9%) of cases. Overall, 22.9% of patients had open fractures in the group with no tourniquet, vs 11.3% (P < .001), with no differences in fracture pattern or medical comorbidities, except tobacco use was more frequent in the no tourniquet group (51.9% vs 44.4%, P = .032). No significant differences in complications were noted, including superficial infection (4.2% [no tourniquet] vs 5.2%), deep infection (2.1% vs 2.3%), and wound healing problems (6.3% vs 4.0%). Similarly, subgroup analysis failed to reveal any differences in complications based on diabetes, obesity, tobacco use, age, or open fracture. However, patients with open fractures or diabetes were more likely to experience deep infection (OR 3.73, P = .014, and OR 4.01, P = .021, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Tourniquet use did not affect rates of wound healing problems or infections. However, patients with open fractures or diabetes were at higher risk. Tissue ischemia produced by a tourniquet did not appear to result in more wound healing or infectious complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic, comparative study.