Sliding hip screws versus cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Investigation of Novel Radiological Parameters to Predict Treatment Failure and Ideal Surgical Interventions in Young Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Triple Cannulated Screw: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

Treatment failure remains a challenge in young femoral neck fractures treated with triple cannulated screws (TCS). This study aims to identify novel radiological parameters that can predict treatment failure and propose surgical techniques to enhance the success of TCS or aid in selecting alternative methods.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 87 patients who underwent surgery for femoral neck fractures between February 2014 and June 2022, meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients achieving union were categorized as Non-Fail (Group 1), while those experiencing nonunion were categorized as Fail (Group 2). Various demographic and clinical factors were assessed, including age, gender, fracture side, and fracture classification (Garden and Pauwels). Radiological parameters such as fragmentation in the medial cortex, postoperative fracture displacement in the calcar region, collo-diaphyseal angle (CDA) difference (varus/valgus alignment), and several newly defined parameters (modified tip apex distance (m-TAD), tip cortex distance (TCD), upper-lower screw-cortex distance/neck diameter, the calcar screw-cortex distance/neck diameter (Buyukdogan index), and sub-capital area/basocervical area (Dogan index) were evaluated. Patients developing nonunion were studied to establish potential cut-off values based on radiological parameters.

Results

Of the patients, 61 were classified as Non-Fail (Group 1) and 26 as Fail (Group 2). Both groups exhibited similar distributions in terms of gender, fracture side, Pauwels classification, and follow-up times (p > 0.05). However, Group 2 had a higher mean age than Group 1 (p = 0.006). There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of Garden classification (p = 0.0003). Furthermore, postoperative calcar displacement, varus alignment, m-TAD, TCD, upper-lower screw-cortex distance/neck diameter ratio, Buyukdogan index, and Dogan index showed significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). Conversely, medial calcar fragmentation did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The Dogan index (≤ 0.5) can serve as an independent preoperative predictor of treatment failure, aiding in the selection of more effective surgical interventions than TCS. Varus alignment (> 10 degrees), the upper-lower screw-cortex distance to the neck diameter (> 0.45) and Buyukdogan index (> 0.2) are influenced by the surgical technique of TCS application and should be considered to decrease the success of TCS.

Proximal Femur Fractures - How Decisive are Reduction and the Chosen Implant?

Proximal femoral fractures are frequent and complex injuries requiring prompt and targeted care. Numerous treatment strategies have been described, some of which have been assessed and clinically implemented clinically. The aim of surgical is always the restoration of a pain-free and stable extremity. Mostly elderly patients are affected and treatment is associated with high postoperative complications and mortality rates. With increasing numbers of patients, the topic is of great medical and economic relevance. In this work, the choice of implants for the osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures - as depending on the fracture type - will be examined, as based on a review of current literature. Standard care includes cannulated screws, sliding hips screws and cephalomedullary nails. In addition, the influence of implant positioning, fracture reduction and additional measures such as cement augmentation are evaluated and discussed. Careful fracture reduction and the quality of implant positioning are paramount in order to avoid complications.

Fixation of femoral neck fracture with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients

BACKGROUNDS

This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNF) in patients treated with a femoral neck system (FNS, DePuy Synthes), which is a recently introduced device.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of 43 patients who underwent osteosynthesis using FNS for FNF between July 2019 and June 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The researchers examined the patients' demographic factors and radiologically evaluated the fracture type and fixation status, bone union, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of 43 patients, 25 were female, and the patients' mean age and body mass index were 62.1 years and 22.5 kg/m2, respectively. According to the Association of Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, the most common fracture types were 31B1.1 and B1.2 (13 cases each), followed by B2.3, B2.1, and B2.2 (seven, five, and four cases, respectively). Radiological bone union was confirmed in 39 patients (90.7%), and the mean time to union was 3.6 months. Two cases of nonunion, one case of lag screw cut-out, and one case of osteonecrosis were confirmed; all four cases later underwent arthroplasty. The mean time to reoperation was 4.5 months. Meanwhile, five patients underwent implant removal after the bone union, and distal locking screw stripping was noted in three patients. All three patients required metal plate cutting to remove the implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteosynthesis of FNF using the newly introduced FNS showed favorable clinical outcomes and no specific hardware-related complications were reported during the follow-up. However, attention must be paid to the issue regarding distal locking screw failure during hardware removal.

What is the best method of fixation for minimally displaced subcapital neck of femur fractures? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the community. Minimally displaced subcapital necks of femoral fractures are usually managed with internal fixation, although there is debate as to which method is superior. This systematic review aimed to compare the outcomes of different fixation methods in the management of this common fracture.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA statement guidelines. The databases searched were MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE (Ovid). The study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and relevant data were extracted and synthesised.

RESULTS

Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 819 patients were included in this study. Eight of the nine studies were case series, and one was a randomised control trial. The mean risk of bias was 7.4/9 for non-randomised articles. The fixation methods used in the included studies were dynamic hip screw (DHS), cannulated screws, Smith-Peterson nail, hooknail, Moore's pins, and Knowle's pins. DHS was found to be a superior method of fixation and was supported by a clinical trial. It has high rates of union (99 %), low rates of avascular necrosis (<1 %), and low rates of fixation failure (<1 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available data, DHS appears to be the superior method of fixation for the minimally displaced subcapital neck of femoral fractures. Given the general low level of evidence currently available, additional clinical trials are needed in this area.

Biomechanical performance of talon cannulated compression device in pauwels type III fractures: a comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Pauwels Type III fractures are unstable and frequently treated with cannulated screws (CS) or dynamic hip screws (DHS). The newly developed talon-cannulated compression devices (TCCD) have the potential to provide rotational stability, mainly through their talon. The study investigates whether TCCD has mechanical advantages over conventional screws or can be as stable as DHS in a reverse triangle configuration for an unstable femoral neck fracture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After creating a standard Pauwels Type III unstable femoral neck fracture in 36 synthetic femur bones in cortical/hard cancellous bone density, 18 were reserved for dynamic-static tests, and 18 were used for torsional tests. Each group containing 18 synthetic bones was divided into three groups to apply three different fixation materials (CS, DHS, and TCCD), with six models in each group. The displacement amounts after dynamic-static tests were measured using the AutoCAD program according to the reference measurement criteria. During the dynamic tests, a series of photographs were taken. During the static tests, the beginning and post-test photographs were taken. Finally, torsional tests were performed until implant failure occurred in the synthetic femur.

RESULTS

In static axial loading tests, TCDD was found to be statistically superior to conventional CS in AL-BL distance (p = 0,014) and CL distance (p = 0,013) measurements, and there was no significant difference between the other groups. There was no significant difference between all groups in dynamic axial compression tests in any points of interest. In torsional tests, TCCD outperformed cannulated screws in stiffness (p = 0,001) and maximum torque (p = 0,001) categories, and they provided statistically significant superiority to DHS in yield torque (p<0,001) category.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanically, TCCD predominates conventional cannulated screws in femoral neck fractures. TCCD also has superior torsional properties than DHS in the yield torque category. Therefore, TCCD could be the implant of choice for unstable femoral neck fractures.

Does intramedullary nail have advantages over dynamic hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA31A1-A3? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are still unsolved problems nowadays. We evaluated the functional outcomes and complications in the treatment of hip fractures (AO/OTA31A1-A3) to find potential difference and risk between intramedullary nail (IMN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS).

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library up to 19 June 2023 and retrieved any studies comparing IMN and DHS in treatment of Hip fractures. The main outcomes and complications were extracted from the included studies. The fixed-effect model was selected to pool the data for homogeneous studies (I² < 50%). Otherwise, the random effects model was selected (heterogeneity, I² > 50%). The analysis of sensitivity and subgroup was performed to explore the homogeneous studies among studies. The p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

30 RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant difference of in the items of blood loss, screening time, femoral neck shortening, non-union, and femoral fractures (p < 0.05). Significant difference was found in the parameter of open reduction of fracture after sensitive analysis (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the parameter of Mobility Score at the last follow-up after sensitive analysis (p ≥ 0.05). There was no significant difference in the parameters of open reduction of fracture, required blood transfusion, mean surgical time, hospital stays, time to healing, mean Harris Hip Score, infection, cut out, poor reduction, breakage of implant, failure of fixation, reoperation, and systemic complications of chest infection, decubital ulcer, urinary tract infection and persistent pain in the hip (p ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis revealed that hip fractures treated with IMN have merits with lower rate of blood loss, femoral neck shortening and non-union; shortcoming of increased risk of femoral fractures. It is suggested that special attention should be paid to the risk of femoral fracture when intramedullary nail was inserted in the intraoperative.

Risk of Contralateral Hip Fracture Following Initial Hip Fracture Among Geriatric Fragility Fracture Patients

BACKGROUND

Geriatric hip fractures are common and associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, timing, and risk factors of contralateral hip fracture after initial hip fracture.

METHODS

Initial hip fractures in patients older than 65 years were abstracted from the national, administrative M91Ortho PearlDiver data set. Incidence and timing of contralateral hip fractures in the following 10 years were identified. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis until contralateral hip fracture was conducted. To account for patient mortality over the later years, 2-year univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors predictive of contralateral hip fracture.

RESULTS

Of the initial 104,311 hip fractures identified, contralateral hip fracture in the 10 years that followed was identified for 7,186 (6.9%), of which 68.4% occurred in the first 2 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis until contralateral fracture revealed the 10-year incidence to be 12.9% when controlling for those lost from the data set during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression revealed independent predictors of contralateral hip fracture in the 2 years after index hip fracture, when the incidence was greatest, to be female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.15), body mass index < 20 (OR 1.30), and percutaneous pinning surgery for initial hip fracture fixation (OR 1.58) (P < 0.0001 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

In a national cohort of 104,311 geriatric hip fractures, Kaplan-Meier analysis for contralateral hip fracture found the 10-year incidence to be 12.9%, of which nearly 70% were in the first 2 years, and predisposing factors were defined. As such, future research should aim to identify the cause and mitigate the risk of secondary contralateral hip fractures in geriatric patients.

Clinical performance of the Femoral Neck System within 1 year in 125 patients with acute femoral neck fractures, a prospective observational case series

INTRODUCTION

Osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is an important treatment option, especially for younger patients. We aimed to assess the rate of early implant-related complications in FNF osteosynthesis using the Femoral Neck System (FNS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with displaced or nondisplaced FNFs were treated with FNS in this prospective, observational, multicenter investigation. Patients were followed up for minimally 3 months and up to 12 months if radiologic bone union and no pain was not achieved beforehand. Predefined treatment-related adverse events (AEs, defined as implant failure, loss of reduction, iatrogenic fractures, deep infection, and surgical revision), radiologic bone union, and patient-reported Harris hip score (HHS) and EQ-5D-5L index score were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the study. Thirty-eight (30.4%) fractures were displaced (Garden III and IV), and 37 (29.6%) were vertical fractures (Pauwels type III). Predefined treatment-related AE rate at 3 months was 8 patients, 6.4% (95% CI, 2.8-12.2), and at 12 months, 11 patients, 8.8% (95% CI, 4.5-15.2). Cumulative incidences of bone union were 68% at 3 months, 90% at 6 months, and 98% at 12 months. The mean changes of HHS and EQ-5D-5L index score between preinjury and at 12 months were -7.5 (95% CI, [ - 21.1] to [6.2]) and  - 0.03 (95% CI, [ - 0.21] to [0.15]), respectively; neither were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The current study on osteosynthesis of FNFs with the FNS resulted in treatment-related complication rates of 6.4% (95% CI, 2.8-12.2) at 3 months and 8.8% (95% CI, 4.5-15.2) at 12 months. On average, patients returned to preinjury function and quality of life. The current study may also indicate that the conventional wisdom of treating stable FNF in patients aged between 60 and 80 years with osteosynthesis may need to be reconsidered.

REGISTRATION

The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT02422355).

The oblique triangle configuration of three parallel screws for femoral neck fracture fixation using computer-aided design modules

Closed reduction and internal fixation with three cannulated compression screws is a common method for treating femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Protocols including the inverted triangle configuration and dispersion of the screws still needed further supports. The purpose of this study was to explore a novel oblique triangle configuration (OTC) of three screws in fixing femoral neck fractures based on the morphology of the femoral neck isthmus (FNI). The computer-aided design modules were used to explore the ideal spatial configuration with largest triangle by three parallel screws. A univariate evaluation model was established based on the oval-like cross-section of the FNI. When the three screws were positioned by the OTC, Inverted Equilateral Triangle Configuration (IETC), and the Maximum Area Inverted Isosceles Triangle Configuration (MA-IITC) respectively, the proportion of area and circumference in the cross-section of FNI and the changing trend of proportion were compared under various torsion angles, eccentricity, and cross-sectional area of FNI. The area and circumference ratios of the parallel screws using the OTC method were significantly higher than in the IETC and MA-IITC groups. In the univariate evaluation model, the OTC area ratio and circumference ratio remained stable under the different femoral neck torsion angles, FNI cross-sectional area, and eccentricity. The OTC method provided an ideal spatial configuration for the FNA fixation with the largest area using three parallel screws. The position of the posterior screw was also away from the metaphyseal artery, potentially reducing the possibility of vascular injury and screw penetrating.

Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Patients and the Factors Associated With Complications: A Multicenter Study From Malaysia

Background and objective Femoral neck fractures are relatively rare in young adults, but they result in prolonged loss of function in these patients, thereby placing a huge burden on a country's healthcare and economy. Femoral neck fractures in young adults are normally treated with head salvage surgery. However, primary head replacement surgeries have been gaining traction recently to expedite the recovery of these patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes in young patients with femoral neck fractures and factors associated with their complications. Patients and methods Patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent surgery in three tertiary hospitals [Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA), Hospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah (HOSHAS), and Hospital Kuala Lipis] in Pahang state in Malaysia were reviewed and included in this study. The demographic profile of the patients, injury patterns, intervention details, functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed. The comparison between the sociodemographics, clinical assessment, and complication outcomes was analyzed using statistical software. Results The complications were associated with the mechanism of injury, capsulotomy, and type of fixation. A total of 46 patients were included in the study. Most of the patients were found to have severe displacement based on Garden and Pauwels classification. The majority of the patients underwent femoral head salvage surgeries. Almost half of the patients sustained complications and were unable to achieve weight-bearing status at six months postoperatively. Conclusion Despite a relatively short follow-up period in our study, femoral neck fractures in young adults were found to be associated with a high rate of complications. Primary head replacement surgeries should be considered in high-risk patients with femoral neck fractures.

Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH-2): The Exploratory Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes of a Multi-Centre 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial in Young Femoral Neck Fracture Patients

PURPOSE

Femoral neck fractures in young patients are typically managed with internal fixation using either cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw (SHS). Although fixation preserves the hip joint, patients are still at risk of complications and poor clinical outcomes which lead to diminished function and health related quality of life (HRQL). The Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH-2) pilot randomized controlled factorial trial evaluated the effect of surgical fixation (cancellous screws vs. SHS) and vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo on patient-reported function and HRQL.

METHODS

Patients between the ages of 18-60 years with a femoral neck fracture requiring surgical fixation were eligible. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either a sliding hip screw or cancellous screws for fracture fixation AND vitamin D₃ 4,000 IU or placebo daily for 6 months. Patient-reported function (Hip Outcome Score) and HRQL (Short Form-12) were assessed at standardized time points in the 12 months following their fixation surgery. Patient-reported function and HRQL were summarized using means, SD, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or percentages and counts. Longitudinal data analysis with mixed models was used to explore the effect of treatment group and time on the patient-reported function and HRQL.

RESULTS

86 of the 91 patients randomized into the FAITH-2 pilot study were deemed eligible. There were no significant differences in patient-reported function or HRQL between the treatment groups at 12 months post-fracture. At the 6- and 9-month assessments, a potential benefit in hip function was seen in the cancellous screw group. In all treatment groups, participants reported lower function and HRQL at 12 months post-fracture as compared to their pre-injury assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Few differences were found in function and HRQL among the treatment groups in the FAITH-2 pilot study. Despite modern implants and vitamin D supplementation, neither function nor HRQL returns to baseline in this population. Additional efforts to improve the outcomes of these challenging injuries are still needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II.

Femoral neck fractures: Key points to consider for fixation or replacement a narrative review of recent literature

INTRODUCTION

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are frequent injuries and not rarely complicated by non-union, implant failure, and avascular necrosis. Some of these fractures represent a dilemma for trauma surgeons. Which fracture should be fixed? Which replaced with a prosthesis? How? The aim of this narrative review is to investigate the literature in order to provide the most updated and evidence-based knowledge about FNF' treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature research has been performed to find the essential key points to consider when dealing with FNF and their treatment. The most representative papers and the new meta-analysis were matched with authors' experience to give a concise but comprehensive view of the problem. Timing, age, comorbidities, vascularization of the femoral head, displacement, instability, comminution of the fracture, bone quality, and surgeon experience seem to be the major topics to consider in the decision making. We then focus on the optimal fixation or replacement as suggested by the literature.

RESULTS

Age is the main independent factor to consider. Timing seems essential in the elderly population to reduce mortality and important in the younger patients to reduce complications. Vascular supply should be always considered. Displacement, instability, and comminution of the fracture are negative prognostic factors for fixation as well as, theoretically, bone quality. In the elderly hip replacement is mostly indicated. A stable and solid fixation is mandatory to allow early mobilization. Sliding Hip Screws (SHS) seem preferable to cannulated screws for displaced/unstable (Pauwels II-III, posterior comminution) and basicervical fracture patterns or in smokers. There is a tendency toward Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) also in the elderly if the patient is an indipendent ambulator without severe comorbidities. Dual mobility cups are gaining popularity in THA for FNF.

CONCLUSIONS

FNF are frequent injuries and represent, in some cases, a dilemma for the trauma surgeon. Age, timing, comorbidities, bone quality, femoral head vascularization, fracture displacement, intrinsic instability, and comminution as surgeon experience should be carefully evaluated before surgery. A case-to-case analysis of the patient-related factors helps the surgeon to make the right choice and reduce the well-known complications.

[Short- and medium-term effectiveness of percutaneous compression plate internal fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly]

Objective

To investigate the short- and medium-term effectiveness of percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) internal fixation for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Methods

The clinical data of 32 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture treated with PCCP internal fixation between January 2012 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were traumatic fractures. The causes of injury were falling in 20 cases, traffic accident in 7 cases, and falling from height in 5 cases. According to Garden classification, there were 7 cases of type Ⅱ, 15 cases of type Ⅲ, and 10 cases of type Ⅳ; there were 12 cases with Singh index level Ⅳ, 14 cases with level Ⅴ, and 6 cases with level Ⅵ; the bone mineral density of femoral neck was 0.610-0.860 g/cm ² (mean, 0.713 g/cm ²). The time from injury to operation was 3-14 days, with an average of 5.8 days. Patients began to weight-bear gradually within 3 days postoperatively. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization stay, fracture reduction (Garden alignment index), fracture healing, failure of internal fixation, femoral neck shortening, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head were observed; hip function recovery was evaluated by Harris score.

Results

The operation time was 35-135 minutes (mean, 73.4 minutes), the intraoperative blood loss was 75-385 mL (mean, 116.4 mL), the hospitalization stay was 3-15 days (mean, 8.3 days). At 1 week after operation, the Garden alignment index of fracture reduction was grade Ⅰ in 25 cases, grade Ⅱ in 6 cases, and grade Ⅲ in 1 case. One case of superficial infection of the incision occurred after operation, and no early complications such as deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities, pulmonary embolism, or bedsores occurred. All the patients were followed up 2.1-4.0 years, with an average of 2.7 years. Except for 2 cases of delayed union (displaced trans-neck and subhead fractures), no nonunion of fracture and failure of internal fixation occurred, the fracture healing time was 4-8 months, with an average of 4.9 months. Femoral neck shortening occurred in 12 cases (37.5%); osteonecrosis of the femoral head occurred in 3 cases (9.4%), all of which were displaced trans-neck and subhead fractures, of which 2 cases received total hip arthroplasty and the other received conservative treatment. The Harris scores of the hip joint at 3 months, 2 years after operation and at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between each time point after operation ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, the hip joint function was evaluated according to Harris score, the results were excellent in 15 cases, good in 12 cases, and fair in 5 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.4%. There was no significant difference in postoperative hip function composition among patients with different ages, Garden classification, Singh index, and Garden alignment index ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

For elderly patients with femoral neck fractures without severe osteoporosis and with relatively good physical conditions, PCCP internal fixation can achieve satisfactory short- and medium-term effectiveness, but there is a certain risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a huge challenge and burden to patients, healthcare systems and society. The increased proportion of older adults in the world population means that the absolute number of hip fractures is rising rapidly across the globe. The majority of hip fractures are treated surgically. This review evaluates evidence for types of internal fixation implants used in joint-preserving surgery for intracapsular hip fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative effects (benefits and harms) of different implants for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, and National Technical Information Service in July 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, reference lists of retrieved articles and conducted backward-citation searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing implants used for internal fixation of fragility intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in older adults. Types of implants were smooth pins (these include pins with fold-out hooks), screws, or fixed angle plates. We excluded studies in which all or most fractures were caused by specific pathologies other than osteoporosis or were the result of a high energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. One review author extracted data and assessed risk of bias which was checked by a second review author. We collected data for seven outcomes: activities of daily living (ADL), delirium, functional status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mobility, mortality (reported within four months of surgery as early mortality, and at 12 months since surgery), and unplanned return to theatre for treating a complication resulting directly or indirectly from the primary procedure (such as deep infection or non-union). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for these outcomes using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 38 studies (32 RCTs, six quasi-RCTs) with 8585 participants with 8590 intracapsular fractures. The mean ages of participants in the studies ranged from 60 to 84 years; 73% were women, and 38% of fractures were undisplaced. We report here the findings of the four main comparisons, which were between different categories of implants. We downgraded the certainty of the outcomes for imprecision (when data were available from insufficient numbers of participants or the confidence interval (CI) was wide), study limitations (e.g. high or unclear risks of bias), and inconsistency (when we noted substantial levels of statistical heterogeneity). Smooth pins versus fixed angle plate (four studies, 1313 participants) We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in independent mobility with no more than one walking stick (1 study, 112 participants), early mortality (1 study, 383 participants), mortality at 12 months (2 studies, 661 participants), and unplanned return to theatre (3 studies, 736 participants). No studies reported on ADL, delirium, functional status, or HRQoL. Screws versus fixed angle plates (11 studies, 2471 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of no clinically important differences between the two implant types in functional status using WOMAC (MD -3.18, 95% CI -6.35 to -0.01; 2 studies, 498 participants; range of scores from 0 to 96, lower values indicate better function), and HRQoL using EQ-5D (MD 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.06; 2 studies, 521 participants; range -0.654 (worst), 0 (dead), 1 (best)). We also found low-certainty evidence showing little or no difference between the two implant types in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.31; 7 studies, 1690 participants), and unplanned return to theatre (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.26; 11 studies, 2321 participants). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in independent mobility (1 study, 70 participants), and early mortality (3 studies, 467 participants). No studies reported on ADL or delirium. Screws versus smooth pins (seven studies, 1119 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of no or little difference between the two implant types in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.35; 6 studies, 1005 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in early mortality (3 studies, 584 participants) and unplanned return to theatre (5 studies, 862 participants). No studies reported on ADL, delirium, functional status, HRQoL, or mobility. Screws or smooth pins versus fixed angle plates (15 studies, 3784 participants) In this comparison, we combined data from the first two comparison groups. We found low-certainty evidence of no or little difference between the two groups of implants in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.04, 95% CI.083 to 1.31; 7 studies, 1690 participants) and unplanned return to theatre (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.18; 14 studies, 3057 participants). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two groups of implants in independent mobility (2 studies, 182 participants), and early mortality (4 studies, 850 participants). We found no additional evidence to support the findings for functional status or HRQoL as reported in 'Screws versus fixed angle plates'. No studies reported ADL or delirium.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-certainty evidence that there may be little or no difference between screws and fixed angle plates in functional status, HRQoL, mortality at 12 months, or unplanned return to theatre; and between screws and pins in mortality at 12 months. The limited and very low-certainty evidence for the outcomes for which data were available for the smooth pins versus fixed angle plates comparison, as well as the other outcomes for which data were available for the screws and fixed angle plates, and screws and pins comparisons means we have very little confidence in the estimates of effect for these outcomes. Additional RCTs would increase the certainty of the evidence. We encourage such studies to report outcomes consistent with the core outcome set for hip fracture, including long-term quality of life indicators such as ADL and mobility.

Radiographic Quantification of Safe Zones for Screw Placement in the Femoral Neck: A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to design a radiographic map of the femoral neck showing proportion-based locations of the safe zones for screw placement with widest bony extents in anteroposterior and lateral radiographs using normal computed tomography-based data.

METHODS

We analyzed computed tomography-based studies of 50 intact normal proximal femora equally from male and female subjects. Using software-developed radiographs, the proportionate locations of the maximal anteroposterior and cephalocaudal extents in both constricted zones were measured. The width of the femoral neck in the measurement zone was taken as the reference for calculation of proportions.

RESULTS

For anteroposterior radiographs, the anteroposterior safe zones in the femoral neck are located at the gradients of 34.21% and 34.33% from the superior border in midcervical and basicervical regions, respectively. In lateral radiographs, they correlate with the visible anterior extent of femoral neck and lie at a gradient of 7.16% and 11.79% from the visible posterior border in midcervical and basicervical regions, respectively. In lateral radiographs, the calcar-based cephalocaudal safe zone was located at the gradients of 43.49% and 39.53% from the visible posterior border in midcervical and basicervical regions, respectively. In anteroposterior radiographs, cephalic limit of the calcar-based safe zone is located at the gradients of 9.63% and 17.82% from the superior border in midcervical and basicervical regions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic margins cannot be reliably trusted for screw fixation of femoral neck fractures. The proportionate locations of the anteroposterior and calcar-based cephalocaudal safe zones with widest bone stock in anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic projections can help in the safe placement of screws for fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Current Trends in the Evaluation and Management of Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Nondisplaced (Garden I and II) femoral neck (FN) fractures are commonly encountered by the practicing orthopaedic surgeon. Although these fractures are primarily classified based on the AP radiograph, the lateral radiograph should be closely scrutinized as well because posterior tilt has emerged as a consistent predictor of fixation failure. Internal fixation has for many years been the standard of care, with both cannulated screws and the sliding hip screw representing acceptable options. However, the outcomes after fixation of Garden I and II FN fractures have not been uniformly positive, with the rates of revision surgery ranging from 8% to 27%. Complications after fixation of nondisplaced FN fractures include nonunion, fixation failure, osteonecrosis, and femoral shortening causing inferior hip function. For these reasons, arthroplasty is increasingly considered a viable option in the treatment of these fractures, especially in the presence of factors that predispose to failure after fixation. Novel devices for FN fixation have recently been developed, although clinical data supporting their use are sparse at the present time.

The Oval-like Cross-section of Femoral Neck Isthmus in Three-dimensional Morphological Analysis

Objectives

To investigate the cross‐section shape of the femoral neck isthmus (FNI) in three‐dimensional reconstruction model of the femoral neck.

Methods

From December 2009 to December 2012, computed tomography (CT) data of bilateral hip joint from 200 consecutive patients (137 males and 63 females, 69.41 ± 9.21 years old, ranged from 50–85 years old) who underwent surgical treatments for proximal femoral fracture were retrospectively reviewed. The 3D model of the proximal femur was reconstructed, and the “inertia axis” method, which was applied to measure the long and short axes of the cross‐section of the FNI, was established. The cross‐sectional area and perimeter were calculated by a formula using the length of the long and short axes and then compared with the actual measured values by the software. Correlation between the descriptive parameters of the FNI cross‐section (area, perimeter, and eccentricity) and patients' demographics (age, height, and weight) was analyzed. Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to determine the main relevant factors.

Results

The ICC results showed excellent data reproducibility ranged from 0.989 to 0.996. There was no significant difference in the cross‐sectional area of the FNI between the actual measured values and the predicted values using the formula (732.83 ± 126.74 mm²vs 731.62 ± 128.15 mm², P = 0.322). The perimeter using the two methods showed narrow while significant difference (97.86 ± 8.60 mm vs 92.84 ± 8.65 mm, P < 0.001), the actual measured values were about 5 mm greater than the predicted values. The parameters (area, perimeter, and eccentricity) were significantly larger in male than female (P < 0.001). A positive correlation between the cross‐sectional area, perimeter, height, and weight was observed. The stepwise linear regression analysis showed that the regression equation of the FNI area was as follows: Y = −1083.75 + 1033.86 × HEIGHT + 1.92 × WEIGHT, R² = 0.489.

Conclusion

The cross‐section shape of the FNI appears to be oval‐like in the 3D model, which is separated according to the inertia axis, and the findings proposed an anatomical basis for the further study of the spatial configuration of cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Standardizing statistics and data reporting in orthopaedic research

As the demand for research within orthopaedic surgery continues to grow, it is important to emphasize appropriate data reporting. Insufficient statistical reporting confounds data interpretation and makes it difficult to compare results. Currently, there are no guidelines for reporting results within the orthopaedic literature. This article discusses the importance of appropriate data reporting and proposes guidelines for presenting orthopaedic data to highlight clinical relevance rather than statistical significance.

Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

It remains controversial regarding the optimal type of fixation implant for the treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Biomechanical rational for implant choices can benefit from the integration of finite element analysis (FEA) in device evaluation and design improvement. In this study, we aim to evaluate biomechanical performance of several internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III FNFs under physiological loading conditions using FEA, as well as to assess the biomechanical contribution of medial buttress plate (MBP) augmentation.

METHODS

Several fixation styles for FNFs have been analyzed numerically by the finite element method. Five groups of models were developed with different FNFs fixation implants, including dynamic hip screw (DHS), cannulated screws (CSs), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA), DHS with MBP augmentation (DHS+MBP), and CSs with MBP (CSs+MBP). For each group, four FE models were established to evaluate strain in bone and stress in devices during walking and stair climbing conditions, which simulated the hip contact force using static and dynamic loadings respectively.

RESULTS

No notable differences were observed in peak strain within implanted bone and maximum stress values of the device between DHS and CSs. The implanted femur with PFNA was in a lower state of bone strain and implant stress. Although the buttress plate did not decrease peak bone strain, it alleviated stress concentration on device, especially for CSs under dynamic loadings.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the other fixation styles, the PFNA showed biomechanical advantages of decreasing risk of implant failure and bone yielding. The MBP augmentation provided an additional load path to bridge fracture fragments, which reduced failure risk of DHS and CSs, especially during dynamic loading scenarios. Although further studies are needed for patients with other types of FNFs, our findings may provide valuable references for device design optimization in terms of complex physiological loadings, as well as for clinical decision making in surgical treatment of FNFs.

Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Dynamic hip screw (DHS) and cannulated screws (CS) are widely used for femoral neck fractures. However, there is no definite result as to which surgical method bring less complications. We performed this study to compare the complication (mortality, non-union, avascular necrosis (AVN), and revision) of DHS and CS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures patients.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other relevant studies related the comparison of DHS versus CS for femoral neck fractures from inception to Jan 7, 2020. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Newcastle-Ottawa (NOS), respectively. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.2 software.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs and seven retrospective cohort studies were included for meta-analysis. CS was found to be superior to DHS with respect to AVN rate (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08-1.99; p = 0.01, I² = 0%). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to mortality, non-union, and revision (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DHS and CS have similar complication including mortality, revision rate, and non-union, but CS has superior to DHS on ANV. However, further studies are required to provide more robust evidence owing to some limitations.

Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture-Anterior Approach

Femoral neck fractures are frequently treated with open reduction and internal fixation to achieve anatomical reduction. This video demonstrates open reduction internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture in a 59-year-old man, performed through an anterior approach. This approach provides safe and effective access to the femoral neck, including the subcapital and basicervical regions, with excellent direct visualization of the fracture site.

A Catastrophic Cascade of Postoperative Complications Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in a Middle-Aged Patient With Schizophrenia

The treatment of a patient with schizophrenia suffering a subcapital hip fracture may be challenging, mainly due to the high risk of postoperative medical and surgical complications. Mechanical complications from the implant are also frequently encountered following hip arthroplasty in patients with schizophrenia. We report the case of a 57-year-old male patient with schizophrenia who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture. During the initial postoperative period, the patient developed a cascade of surgical and mechanical complications, leading to multiple revision procedures and a suboptimal outcome. The ideal type of treatment of patients with schizophrenia with subcapital hip fracture is still missing. It is, therefore, important to highlight the high risk of postoperative complications in patients with schizophrenia who present with subcapital fractures subsequently treated with hemiarthroplasty. 

High incidence of "in-out-in" posterosuperior screws after cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures

INTRODUCTION

Cadaveric models have demonstrated a high incidence of extraosseous "in-out-in" (IOI) posterosuperior screws after cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of IOI screws in vivo and to evaluate their association with osteonecrosis and revision surgery.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients with 107 hips with a pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan after cannulated screw fixation of a femoral neck fractures were included. Screw position was evaluated on postoperative radiographs and CT scan to determine if screws were IOI or all-in. Osteonecrosis and revision surgeries were documented.

RESULTS

IOI posterosuperior screws were identified on CT scan in 58 (54%) hips. On postoperative AP and lateral radiographs, IOI screws were a median (interquartile range) of 10 mm (7-11 mm) and 3 mm (0-4 mm) from the cortex, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of radiographs to detect IOI screws was 39% and 92%, respectively. The incidence of osteonecrosis and revision surgeries in hips, with and without IOI screws, was 6% versus 6% [Odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-5.3] and 10% versus 10% (OR 1.0, CI 0.3-3.1), respectively; a true clinical difference cannot be excluded due to the width of the confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high incidence of IOI posterosuperior screws on CT scans. Postoperative radiographs had a poor sensitivity for detecting IOI screws. A larger sample size is necessary to evaluate the association of IOI screws with osteonecrosis and revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative cohort study.

Sequential fluoroscopic rollover images reliably identify "in-out-in" posterosuperior screws during percutaneous fixation of femoral neck fractures

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous screws placed into the posterosuperior femoral neck are frequently extraosseous or "in-out-in" (IOI). These IOI screws are not readily identifiable on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopic images. The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of surgeons to identify IOI guide pins using sequential fluoroscopic rollover images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3.2-mm guide pin was placed into the posterosuperior quadrant of eleven synthetic femur models. Five samples were "all-in" (AI), and six were IOI. Sequential fluoroscopic rollover images were obtained starting with an AP image, then images at 10-degree rollover intervals ending with a direct lateral image. Images were reviewed in a blinded fashion by five attending orthopedic trauma surgeons and 20 resident surgeons to determine whether guide pins were AI or IOI. Accuracy, interobserver reliability, sensitivity, and specificity were assessed.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy of responses was 86% with no difference between attending trauma surgeons and residents (p = 0.5). The sensitivity and specificity for an IOI guide pin were 98.0% and 71.2%, respectively. Interobserver reliability among surgeons was good (κ = 0.703).

CONCLUSION

The use of the sequential fluoroscopic rollover images after placement of the posterosuperior guide pin into the femoral neck was highly sensitive for detecting an IOI position. The 40-degree rollover image was the best view to evaluate the proximity of the guide pin to the posterior cortex.

Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures are one of the problems in clinical treatment. The prognosis is uncertain. Currently, No internal fixation method is superior to other internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Therefore, the internal fixation system needs to be further explored. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of femoral neck dynamic compression locking system (DCLS) and multiple cannulated compression screws(MCCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A prospective analysis of 54 cases of femoral neck fractures treated with either a DCLS (n = 28) or MCCS (n = 26) was conducted between December 2015 and November 2017 in authors' hospitals. The perioperative and postoperative parameters of the two groups were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were followed up for 24-47 months. The etiology was caused by a fall. There was no significant difference in follow-up time, operation time, incision length, surgical blood loss, the incidence of perioperative and postoperative healing complications, and mobility in the two groups (all P > 0.05). The Harris score, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, partial weight-bearing time and complete weight-bearing time were significantly better in the DCLS group than in the MCCS group (all P < 0.05). The fracture healing rate in the DCLS group was higher than that in the MCCS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The DCLS and MCCS might be equally effective in terms of operation time, incision length, surgical blood loss, the incidence of perioperative and postoperative healing complications, and mobility in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. However, the DCLS is superior to the MCCS in Harris score, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, weight-bearing time and fracture healing rate. So, DCLS deserves further study.