Low conversion rates toward total hip arthroplasty after hemiarthroplasty in patients under 75 years of age

The outcomes of conversion of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acetabular erosion is an important complication in hemiarthroplasty and may lead to total hip arthroplasty as a conversion. The results of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion with primary total hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were used and Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane libraries were searched. Both, studies comparing the outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion with the outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty and the outcome of cohort studies limited to total hip arthroplasty as a conversion, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non Randomized Studies checklist. Meta-analysis was performed concerning pooled annual revision, dislocation and infection rates.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies were available for analysis; four comparative studies and 23 cohort studies. Comparative studies were defined as high quality and cohort studies as medium quality. Analysis revealed a significantly higher overall revision risk (Hazard Ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.14) after total hip arthroplasty as a conversion compared to primary total hip arthroplasty. The annual revision rate of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion was 1.63% (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.33) in the comparative studies and 1.40% (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.66) in the cohort studies. A pooled infection rate of 4.34% (95% confidence interval 2.66 to 7.01) and dislocation rate of 4.79% (95% confidence interval 3.02 to 7.53), was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature concerning the results of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion is limited. The risk of revision after conversion of hemiarthroplasty is higher compared to primary total hip arthroplasty.

Controversies around hip fracture treatment: clinical evidence versus trends from national registries

PURPOSE

Several controversies in the optimal treatment of femoral neck fractures persist, together with large variations in clinical practice.

METHODS

A narrative literature review covering 4 current controversies in the surgical management of femoral neck fractures (total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus hemiarthroplasty (HA), cemented versus uncemented HA, internal fixation versus arthroplasty, operative versus non-operative) was performed. Available literature was balanced against annual trends in the management of femoral neck fractures from the public domain of several national registries (Sweden, Norway, The Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand).

RESULTS

For most controversies, the literature provides stronger evidence than is reflected by variations encountered in daily practice. Implementation of clinical evidence tends to lag behind and important differences exist between countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Trends of clinical practice from national registries indicate that implementation of available clinical evidence needs to be improved.

Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement for Failed Hemiarthroplasty

Aim

Our study aims to analyze the outcomes of conversion total hip replacement (THR) done for failed hemiarthroplasty.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 104 consecutive patients who underwent conversion THR for failed hemiarthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2018. The patient's records were analyzed for demographic information, index surgery details, preoperative functional status, and perioperative complications. Patients were analyzed according to the various modes of failure of hemiarthroplasty. The radiographs were analyzed for any progressive osteolysis, cup migration and stem subsidence. All the patients were evaluated using the modified Harris hip score (HHS) for clinical outcome. Complications, revision or reoperation in the follow-up period was recorded.

Results

A total of 73 patients were included in the study for final analysis after exclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 48.2 ± 29.6 months. There was a significant improvement in mean HHS from 38.5 ± 9.1 preoperatively to 80.9 ± 4.3 at the last follow-up (p < 0.05). The different modes of failure had no statistically significant difference in the postoperative Harris hip score (p = 0.393). None of the patients had progressive radiolucent lines more than 2 mm or significant subsidence in the final follow-up compared to the initial postoperative radiograph. There was one deep infection, one patient had grade 2 heterotopic ossification, intraoperative calcar fracture was fixed with cerclage wiring in 11 patients, and postoperative periprosthetic fracture in two patients was treated with plate osteosynthesis. There were no neurovascular complications or dislocation during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Conversion THR for failed hemiarthroplasty is a challenging procedure and results in good functional outcome and provides reliable pain relief. Conversion THA for septic loosening by two stage revision have comparable postoperative outcomes like THA for aseptic loosening. Caution is required owing to high incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture during conversion THA. Dislocation rate is negligible even with smaller head provided the prosthesis is implanted in the proper orientation and adequate soft tissue balancing is achieved.

Outcomes of Osteosynthesis Versus Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients With Arbeitsgemeinschaft Fur Osteosynthesefragen-Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) 31A2 Hip Fractures

Background Intertrochanteric femur fractures account for more than half of the cases of hip fractures. These injuries are among the most common fractures in elderly individuals. Elderly patients suffer from other comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus or hypertension and are prone to low surgical tolerance with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although the ideal choice of treatment for intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly remains debatable, the use of hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients provides an early mobilization and decreased postoperative morbidity. In this study, we aimed to assess the functional outcomes of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and osteosynthesis in Arbeitsgemeinschaft Fur Osteosynthesefragen-Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) 31A2 hip fractures using the Harris Hip Score. Methodology A total of 60 elderly patients with AO/OTA 31A2 hip fractures were divided into two groups and treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty and osteosynthesis using proximal femoral nail (PFN). Functional scores were assessed at two months, four months, and six months postoperatively using the Harris Hip Score. Results The mean age of the patients was 73.03 ± 7.57 years in the study. The majority of the patients were females, 38 (63.33%), with 18 females in the osteosynthesis group and 20 females in the hemiarthroplasty group. The average operative time was 144.93 ± 9.76 minutes in the hemiarthroplasty group and 86.07 ± 11 minutes in the osteosynthesis group. Blood loss was 263.67 ± 42.95 mL in the hemiarthroplasty group and 84.5 ± 15.05 mL in the osteosynthesis group. The average Harris Hip Score at two months, four months, and six months was 64.77 ± 4.33, 72.67 ± 3.54, and 79.72 ± 2.53, respectively, for the hemiarthroplasty group and 57.83 ± 2.83, 64.13 ± 3.89, and 72.83± 3.89, respectively, for the osteosynthesis group (p < 0.001 for all follow-up scores). One death was encountered in the hemiarthroplasty group. Other complications included superficial infection noted in two (6.67%) patients in both groups. There was one episode of hip dislocation in the hemiarthroplasty group. Conclusions The use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty in intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients can prove to be better in comparison to osteosynthesis, but the use of osteosynthesis can be effective for patients who cannot tolerate major blood loss and longer surgical times.

Excellent Long-Term Results of an Austin Moore Hemiarthroplasty After Half a Century: A Case Report

CASE

We present the unique case of a 73-year-old man who was treated 50 years ago with a hemiarthroplasty (HA) for avascular necrosis after a femoral neck fracture (FNF) of his left hip and who has developed only mild osteoarthritis since and has reported satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes with no acetabular erosion.

CONCLUSION

HA for FNFs can provide durable long-term results and can, therefore, be considered as an option in the treatment of FNFs in younger patients. We describe a case with good results after 50 years, which, to our knowledge, is the longest reported follow-up of HA.

Dislocation rate, revisions and other complications of primary cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a single-center cohort study of 743 unselected hips with a mean 2.7-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of whether to use hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is still widely debated, especially when taking ambulatory status, age, and patient cognitive status into account. The current study aims to report the rates of dislocations, revisions and other complications for primary cemented HA in patients with displaced FNF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective follow-up study of an unselected historic cohort. 743 consecutive hips (551 W and 192 M) at mean (SD) age of 83.6 (8.4) years received primary cemented HA for displaced FNF by posterolateral surgical approach between January 2012 and December 2019. Patient files and radiographs were evaluated for dislocations, revisions, and other complications until death or end of the follow-up period, and the educational level of the surgeon was noted.

RESULTS

During a mean (SD) follow-up period of 2.7 (2.2) years, there were 6.1% (n = 45) dislocations, in which 82% (first dislocation) appeared within the first 30 postoperative days, and 51% (n = 23) of the dislocations requiring subsequent surgery. At the time of the last available follow-up, 57% (n = 421) of the patients were dead. A non-dislocation related revision was needed in 3.4% (n = 25) of the patients [in which infection accounted for 40% (n = 10) and traumatic periprosthetic fracture for 32% (n = 8)]. Thirty-day mortality was 9.2% and 1-year mortality 25.8%. There were no differences in patient's age, gender, or educational level of the surgeon between the dislocation and the no dislocation groups. Patients aged < 70 years presented with a higher dislocation rate (p < 0.001) than the patients aged > 70 years.

CONCLUSION

Primary HA presents a safe and robust approach with acceptable complication rates in a genuine unselected cohort of displaced FNF, particularly for patients aged > 70.

Is Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery More Aggressive than Hemiarthroplasty when Treating Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly? A Multicentric Retrospective Study on 302 Hips

Introduction

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are validated treatments for displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNFs). BHA seldomly needs conversion to THA, but the latter has higher dislocation rate in FNFs. Dual Mobility THA offers a reduced dislocation rate and eliminates the risk of conversion. This study looks for differences between BHA and DMTHA in terms of surgical time, blood loss and transfusion, dislocation rate, mortality, and thromboembolic events.

Material and Methods

All patients were ≥75yo. Recorded data included use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs, ASA, operative time, intra-operative complications, pre/post-operative hemoglobin values, transfusions, hospitalization time, DVT/PE, glomerular filtration rate, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), dislocation at 60 days, and mortality at 30 days and 6 months. A secondary analysis compared the subgroups in different age range (75–85 and ≥ 86yo).

Results

In the cohort of 302 DFNF (93 BHA and 209 DMTHA) differences in mean age, CCI, and ASA score were significant. Once divided by age, the subgroups resulted comparable in terms of age and CCI, with no significant difference. A significant difference in surgical times showed DMTHA being an average 12 minutes longer than BHA. Significant was the ΔHB in the DMTHA subgroup which resulted lower compared to the BHA one. Difference in mean number of post-operative transfusion were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

From our data, DMTHA did not lead to an increase in mortality, morbidity, bleeding, or dislocation rate when compared to BHA and could be considered as treatment of choice for DFNFs especially in healthy and active patients.

High conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty after hemiarthroplasty in young patients with a minimum 10 years follow-up

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the follow-up results of bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) for more than 10 years in patients aged < 60 years and to analyze the risk factors for acetabular erosion after BHA.

Methods

This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent BHA were followed-up for at least 10 years. The mean age was 54.1 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 13.8 years. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of acetabular erosion, and the preoperative parameters were compared between the two groups. Moreover, the risk factors related to acetabular erosion after BHA were analyzed using statistical comparisons.

Results

Reoperation was performed in 44 of the 114 patients (38.6 %). The survival rate when the end point was reoperation related to acetabular erosion was found to be significantly time-dependent: 73.2 % at 5 years, 48.8 % at 10 years, and 25.9 % at 15 years. The acetabular erosion group showed significantly younger age at the time of surgery, higher body mass index (BMI), more avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and smaller prosthetic femoral head. The final multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that young age at the time of surgery were independent risk factors for acetabular erosion after BHA in patients aged < 60 years.

Conclusions

The minimum 10-year follow-up outcomes of BHA in patients aged < 60 years showed a relatively high conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty. When considering BHA in younger patients, more careful decisions should be made with respect to patient’s choice, keeping in mind that long-term survival cannot be guaranteed.

Treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck with total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty

AIMS

Despite few good-quality studies on the subject, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly being performed for displaced intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur. We compared outcomes of all patients with displacement of these fractures treated surgically over a ten-year period in one institution.

METHODS

A total of 2,721 patients with intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck treated with either a cemented hemiarthroplasty or a THA at a single centre were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes analyzed were readmission for any reason and revision surgery. We secondarily looked at mortality rates.

RESULTS

We found no difference in the overall revision rate or rate of infection. However, the rates of readmission due to dislocation, pain, and trochanteric bursitis were significantly higher in the THA group (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study, comparing the outcomes of neck of femur fractures treated with a cemented hemiarthroplasty and THA, revealed the perceived superiority of THA was not borne out by our results. This should be carefully considered before any radical change in practice regarding the use of THA for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):693-698.