Effect on patellar kinematics of the different patellar component designs in total knee arthroplasty: intraoperative measurement of dome type versus anatomic type

Anatomic Patellar Design Has No Clinical Superiority Over Dome Patellar Design in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Various patellar designs are used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for optimal management of patellofemoral pain. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative 2-year clinical outcomes of 3 patellar designs: medialized anatomic (MA), medialized dome (MD), and Gaussian dome (GD).

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 153 patients undergoing primary TKA from 2015 to 2019 were enrolled. Patients were allocated to 3 groups (MA, MD, and GD). Demographic characteristics, clinical variables including knee flexion angle and patient-reported outcome measures (Kujala score, Knee Society Scores, the Hospital for Special Surgery score, and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index), and complications were collected. Radiologic parameters including Blackburne-Peel ratio and patellar tilt angle (PTA) were measured. A total of 139 patients who completed postoperative follow-up for 2 years were analyzed.

RESULTS

Knee flexion angle and patient-reported outcome measures did not statistically differ among the 3 groups (MA, MD, and GD). There were no extensor mechanism-related complications at any group. Group MA showed significantly higher mean values of postoperative PTA than group GD (0.1 ± 3.2 versus -1.8 ± 3.4, P = .011). Group GD (20.8%) had a tendency to have more outliers (over 5 degrees) in PTA than groups MA (10.6%) and MD (4.5%), although the differences were not statistically significant (P = .092).

CONCLUSION

Anatomic patellar design was not clinically superior over dome design in TKA, showing comparable results in terms of clinical scores, complications, and radiographic indices.

The Design of the Patellar Component Does Not Affect the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Prospective Study

This randomized comparative study was conducted to investigate the outcomes of patellar resurfacing with a medialized dome or an anatomical type in patients receiving primary unilateral posterior-stabilized TKA. Between March 2019 and January 2021, 98 knees were randomly assigned to receive patellar resurfacing by a medialized dome type (group D, 49 knees) or an anatomic type (group A, 49 knees). The primary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The secondary outcomes were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Feller’s patella score, the Kujala anterior knee pain score, knee joint range of motion (ROM), and postoperative complications, including periprosthetic patellar fracture, patellar tilt angle, and lateral patellar shift. Patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The ROM of the knee joint was significantly better in group A at six months after surgery (p = 0.021). No complications such as patellar fractures were observed. The anatomic type of patellar component showed a significant improvement of the patellar tilt angle after surgery compared with the medialized dome type of component. However, there were no significant differences in patient-reported clinical outcomes between the two groups during the follow-up period of 12 months.

Difference in patient-reported outcomes of various patellar component designs in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical study

PURPOSE

This study investigated the clinical effects of different patellar components without being affected by the femoral component design in total knee arthritis (TKA) for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

In total, 48 patients with OA who met the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for OA were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups according to the usage of patellar component design for TKA (medialized dome type [dome group] or medialized anatomic type [anatomic group]). To evaluate the clinical outcomes for TKA, knee range of motion (ROM), pain intensity of 0-100 mm visual analog scale (pain VAS), and the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) score were obtained at baseline and year 1.

RESULTS

The difference in knee ROM, pain VAS, or total JKOM score at year 1 was not significant between the dome and anatomic groups (p = 0.398, 0.733 and 0.536, respectively). Moreover, similar results were obtained for changes in knee ROM, pain VAS, or total JKOM scores from baseline. In both groups, the pain VAS and total JKOM scores were significantly improved at year 1.

CONCLUSION

Both dome and anatomic groups in TKA are significantly effective for pain and function using the JKOM score. However, their efficacy did not differ, according to the JKOM score. Results of this study are rare information focusing on the patellar component design and provide one of the insights into the TKA clinical management.

Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty

Patellofemoral (PF) disorders are considered a major clinical complication after total knee replacement (TKR). Malpositioning and design of the patellar component impacts knee joint dynamics, implant fixation and wear propagation. However, only a limited number of studies have addressed the biomechanical impact of the patellar component on PF dynamics and their results have been discussed controversially. To address these issues, we implemented a musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) study for the systematical analysis of the patellar component’s thickness and positioning on PF contact forces and kinematics during dynamic squat motion with virtually implanted unconstrained cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKR. The patellar button thickness clearly increased the contact forces in the PF joint (up to 27%). Similarly, the PF contact forces were affected by superior–inferior positioning (up to 16%) and mediolateral positioning (up to 8%) of the patellar button. PF kinematics was mostly affected by the mediolateral positioning and the thickness of the patellar component. A medialization of 3 mm caused a lateral patellar shift by up to 2.7 mm and lateral patellar tilt by up to 1.6°. However, deviations in the rotational positioning of the patellar button had minor effects on PF dynamics. Aiming at an optimal intraoperative patellar component alignment, the orthopedic surgeon should pay close attention to the patellar component thickness in combination with its mediolateral and superior–inferior positioning on the retropatellar surface. Our generated MMBS model provides systematic and reproducible insight into the effects of patellar component positioning and design on PF dynamics and has the potential to serve as a preoperative analysis tool.