Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year

Influence of Preoperative Disability on Outcomes Following Primary Surgical Treatment of Cervical Disc Herniation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how preoperative disability influences patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following primary surgical intervention for cervical herniated disc.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The effect of baseline disability has been evaluated for various spinal surgeries, but not specifically for primary cervical herniated disc.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained single surgeon database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary cervical spine surgery for herniated nucleus pulposus. Demographics, perioperative data, and baseline/postoperative PROs were collected including Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale-Arm/Neck (VAS-A/N), 12-Item Short Form Mental/Physical Component Scores (SF-12 MCS/PCS), Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and 9-Item Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Baseline NDI <50/≥50 defined 2 cohorts. ΔPROs were determined at 6-week postoperatively/final follow-up (average 11.8±7.7 postoperative months). Overall rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement were determined for each PRO. Perioperative characteristics/demographics/baseline PROs were compared with χ 2 tests (categorical variables)/the Student t test (continuous variables). Intercohort postoperative PROs/ΔPROs/MCID attainment rates were compared with multivariate linear regression (continuous variables)/multivariate logistic regression (categorical variables) accounting for differences in insurance type.

RESULTS

Of 190 patients, there were 69 in the NDI ≥50 group. Patients with NDI ≥50 were more likely to have workers' compensation, or Medicare/Medicaid insurance ( P <0.001) and report worse baseline PROs ( P ≤0.001, all). After controlling for insurance type, NDI ≥50 patients continued to report worse PROs at 6 weeks/final follow-up ( P ≤0.037, all), except PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks postoperatively. NDI ≥50 patients reported greater NDI improvements at 6 weeks ( P =0.007) and final follow-up ( P <0.001). NDI ≥50 patients experienced higher overall MCID achievement rates for PHQ-9/NDI ( P ≤0.015, both).

CONCLUSIONS

NDI ≥50 patients reported worse baseline mental/physical health and neck/arm pain and continued to report inferior postoperative outcomes including disability. Despite inferior absolute outcomes, NDI ≥50 patients reported greater improvements/achievement of clinically significant differences in disability through final follow-up. Further, these patients were more likely to experience clinically significant improvements in depressive burden.

Restoration of Range of Motion in the Cervical Spine through Single-Segment Artificial Disc Replacement Using the Baguera®C Prosthesis

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for degenerative diseases of the cervical spine, providing nerve decompression and spinal stabilization. However, it limits cervical spine motility, restricts fused segment activity, and may lead to adjacent degeneration. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an accepted alternative that preserves the structure and flexibility of the cervical spine. This study aimed to explore the dynamic changes in the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine after CDA using a viscoelastic artificial disc, as well as the factors affecting mobility restoration. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 132 patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and CDA from January 2015 to June 2022. Result: Analysis of data from 132 patients revealed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes. The mean ROM of C2-C7 and functional spinal unit (FSU) segments significantly increased from 2 to 36 months post-operatively. Cervical spine flexibility was preserved and enhanced after prosthesis implantation. However, it took six months for the cervical spine motility to stabilize. In addition, sex and age were found to impact motility restoration, with female and younger patients exhibiting larger ROMs post-surgery. Additionally, CDA at the C5-C6 level resulted in the greatest increase in ROM, potentially improving overall kinematic ability. Conclusions: Single-segment artificial disc arthroplasty effectively restores the ROM in degenerative cervical spine conditions.

[Translated article] Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91° was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.

Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc

INTRODUCTION

A recent study reported a 34% mid-term revision rate after M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) for wear-related osteolysis. Here, we aim to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and radiographic characteristics of periprosthetic bony changes and implant failure of the M6-C™ artificial disc.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed radiographic (conventional X-ray, CT scan) and clinical outcomes (EQ-5D-5L, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain) data collected during routine follow-up of patients who underwent CTDR with the M6-C™ between 2011 and 2015.

RESULTS

In total, 85 patients underwent CTDR with the M6-C™. Follow-up data were available for 43 patients (54% female, mean age 44 years) with 50 implants and a mean follow-up of 8.1 years (6.5-11 years). Implant failure with the presence of severe osteolysis was identified in 5 (12%) patients who were all male (p = 0.016) and implanted at the C5/6 level (p = 0.11). All failed implants required revision surgery. The overall prevalence of osteolysis was 44% (22/50 implants) and 34% (17/50 implants) for significant heterotopic ossification. Patients with high-grade osteolysis showed higher VAS arm pain (p = 0.05) and lower EQ-5D-VAS health VAS (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

We report a lower reoperation rate for failed M6-C™ implants than previously published, but confirmed that osteolysis and heterotopic ossification are common following CTDR with the M6-C™ and may be asymptomatic. Therefore, we strongly recommend ongoing clinical and radiographic monitoring after CTDR with the M6-C™, particularly for male patients implanted at the C5/6 level.

Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91 degrees was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.

Comparison of discover cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety between Discover cervical disc arthroplasty (DCDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in Cervical degenerative disc diseases.

Methods

Two researchers independently conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following the Cochrane methodology guidelines. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was applied based on different heterogeneity. Review Manager (Version 5.4.1) software was used to perform data analysis.

Results

A total of 8 RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicate that the DCDA group had a higher incidence of reoperation (P = 0.03) and a lower incidence of ASD (P = 0.04) than the CDA group. There was no significant difference between two groups regarding NDI score (P = 0.36), VAS ARM score (P = 0.73), VAS NECK score (P = 0.63), EQ-5D score (P = 0.61) and dysphagia incidence (0.18).

Conclusion

DCDA and ACDF have similar results in terms of NDI scores, VAS scores, EQ-5D scores, and dysphagia. In addition, DCDA can reduce the risk of ASD but increases the risk of reoperation.