Binding characteristics and crossreactivity of insulin autoantibodies and insulin antibodies directed to three different insulin molecules

A gut microbial peptide and molecular mimicry in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of pancreatic β-cells. One of the earliest aspects of this process is the development of autoantibodies and T cells directed at an epitope in the B-chain of insulin (insB:9-23). Analysis of microbial protein sequences with homology to the insB:9-23 sequence revealed 17 peptides showing >50% identity to insB:9-23. Of these 17 peptides, the hprt4-18 peptide, found in the normal human gut commensal Parabacteroides distasonis, activated both human T cell clones from T1D patients and T cell hybridomas from nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice specific to insB:9-23. Immunization of NOD mice with P. distasonis insB:9-23 peptide mimic or insB:9-23 peptide verified immune cross-reactivity. Colonization of female NOD mice with P. distasonis accelerated the development of T1D, increasing macrophages, dendritic cells, and destructive CD8⁺ T cells, while decreasing FoxP3⁺ regulatory T cells. Western blot analysis identified P. distasonis-reacting antibodies in sera of NOD mice colonized with P. distasonis and human T1D patients. Furthermore, adoptive transfer of splenocytes from P. distasonis-treated mice to NOD/SCID mice enhanced disease phenotype in the recipients. Finally, analysis of human children gut microbiome data from a longitudinal DIABIMMUNE study revealed that seroconversion rates (i.e., the proportion of individuals developing two or more autoantibodies) were consistently higher in children whose microbiome harbored sequences capable of producing the hprt4-18 peptide compared to individuals who did not harbor it. Taken together, these data demonstrate the potential role of a gut microbiota-derived insB:9-23-mimic peptide as a molecular trigger of T1D pathogenesis.

Targeting Anti-Insulin B Cell Receptors Improves Receptor Editing in Type 1 Diabetes-Prone Mice

Autoreactive B lymphocytes that commonly arise in the developing repertoire can be salvaged by receptor editing, a central tolerance mechanism that alters BCR specificity through continued L chain rearrangement. It is unknown whether autoantigens with weak cross-linking potential, such as insulin, elicit receptor editing, or whether this process is dysregulated in related autoimmunity. To resolve these issues, we developed an editing-competent model in which anti-insulin Vκ125 was targeted to the Igκ locus and paired with anti-insulin VH125Tg. Physiologic, circulating insulin increased RAG-2 expression and was associated with BCR replacement that eliminated autoantigen recognition in a proportion of developing anti-insulin B lymphocytes. The proportion of anti-insulin B cells that underwent receptor editing was reduced in the type 1 diabetes-prone NOD strain relative to a nonautoimmune strain. Resistance to editing was associated with increased surface IgM expression on immature (but not transitional or mature) anti-insulin B cells in the NOD strain. The actions of mAb123 on central tolerance were also investigated, because selective targeting of insulin-occupied BCR by mAb123 eliminates anti-insulin B lymphocytes and prevents type 1 diabetes. Autoantigen targeting by mAb123 increased RAG-2 expression and dramatically enhanced BCR replacement in newly developed B lymphocytes. Administering F(ab')2123 induced IgM downregulation and reduced the frequency of anti-insulin B lymphocytes within the polyclonal repertoire of VH125Tg/NOD mice, suggesting enhanced central tolerance by direct BCR interaction. These findings indicate that weak or faulty checkpoints for central tolerance can be overcome by autoantigen-specific immunomodulatory therapy.

Direct comparison of radioimmunoassay and LC–MS/MS for PK assessment of insulin glargine in clinical development

Background: A direct comparison of radioimmunoassay (RIA) and LC–MS/MS for insulin glargine quantification in human plasma is provided. Results: Compared with the RIA, the LC–MS/MS assay exhibited comparable/improved sensitivity (LLOQ at 0.1 ng/ml [˜16.7 pM or 2.8 μU/ml] for glargine and its metabolites M1 and M2, respectively) and ruggedness. Most importantly, it demonstrated a superior specificity advantage against the interference from endogenous insulin, exogenous insulin analogs (e.g., Novolog®, Humalog® or Levemir®, routine treatment for diabetes mellitus) and potentially pre-existing anti-insulin antibodies in patient samples. The data obtained from diabetic patients suggested the LC–MS/MS assay substantially improved pharmacokinetic characterization of glargine. Conclusion: LC–MS/MS overcame common limitations of RIA, and provided critically needed specificity to support glargine clinical development, without sacrificing assay sensitivity and ruggedness.

Approach to the patient with spontaneous hypoglycemia

Hypoglycemia is common in daily clinical practice and often occurs during the treatment of diabetes mellitus. However, a small minority of hypoglycemia encountered in clinical practice is spontaneous and thus not induced by glycemic lowering agents. These spontaneous hypoglycemic events confront the clinician with a diagnostic enigma. Although the trained clinician can recognize the autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms of hypoglycemia even in a patient not on insulin, it remains challenging to decipher the etiology of a spontaneous hypoglycemic event. A logical and stepwise approach to the spontaneous hypoglycemic event allows for a conclusive diagnosis. This diagnostic process consists of adequately diagnosing hypoglycemia by fulfilling Whipple's triad, stratifying patients according to their clinical status and analyzing a full hypoglycemic blood panel. A complete hypoglycemic blood panel should include the analysis of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, pro-insulin, insulin antibodies and the presence of oral hypoglycemic agents. For patients with episodes of hypoglycemia induced by excessive endogenous insulin, additional imaging is often required to detect the presence of an underlying insulinoma. By diagnosing the underlying cause of the spontaneous hypoglycemia, the physician also diagnosis the mechanism by which the hypoglycemic event occurs. Allowing for a problem orientated therapeutic approach.

METHODOLOGY

The present review is based upon a comprehensive PubMed search between 1985 and 2013. This uses search terms of spontaneous hypoglycemia, insulinoma, nesidioblastosis, insulin auto-immunity, noninsulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia syndrome, hormone deficiency, pro-IGF II, and pro-insulin growth factor II, and cross reference searching of pivotal articles in the subject.

Frequent reoccurrence of hypoglycemia in a type 2 diabetic patient with insulin antibodies

BACKGROUND

Insulin antibody (IAb) may be produced in patients receiving long-term, animal-derived insulin, leading to insulin resistance or hypoglycemia. There have been very few reports of hypoglycemia caused by IAb in patients taking recombinant human insulin.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of an 82-year-old male patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus who suffered repeated episodes of severe hypoglycemia-related symptoms (including coma) prior to admission. The patient had been taking Novolin 30R, a premixed human insulin. The patient's IAb level was markedly elevated, and hypoglycemia caused by recombinant human insulin treatment-induced IAb production was diagnosed. Acarbose and metformin were prescribed, and the patient recovered uneventfully. The patient ceased taking these medications, and he was subsequently treated with recombinant human insulin to combat hyperglycemia. This was followed by reoccurrence of hypoglycemic coma. The patient was advised to avoid taking recombinant human insulin for the rest of his life and to control hyperglycemia with acarbose and metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, hypoglycemia caused by recombinant human insulin-induced IAb production should be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes who experience repeated episodes of hypoglycemia.

The importance of anti-insulin antibody in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or multiple daily insulin injections therapy

To investigate the influence of two insulin administration modalities, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) therapy with insulin analogues, on the development of insulin antibodies (IAs) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and to assess the impact of IAs on glucose control and hypoglycaemia. 96 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with CSII (n = 48) or MDI (n = 48) were included in the study. Age, duration of diabetes, A1c, preprandial and postprandial blood glucose and hypoglycaemic events were compared between IA positive and negative patients. IA levels were higher in the CSII group (% 24.6 ± 14.2) than the MDI group (% 13.2 ± 9.9). Duration of diabetes and age were not associated with IA positiveness. While A1c, preprandial blood glucose and the frequency of hypoglycaemic events were similar in two groups, postprandial blood glucose was lower in IA positive group (P = 0.03). Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with CSII with insulin analogues had higher IA levels when compared to MDI therapy. However, the development of IAs did not impair the glycaemic control.

Animal insulin therapy induces a biased insulin antibody response that persists for years after introduction of human insulin

Administration of exogenous insulin for the treatment of diabetes is often accompanied by the development of insulin antibodies (IA). These antibodies may affect the patient's requirement for insulin by acting as an insulin binding reservoir. The improvement of insulin purification in the 1970s and the development of human recombinant insulin both reduced the incidence of IA and their binding levels. This study investigates the parameters affecting IA frequency and binding levels in a cohort of type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients. All patients were treated with human recombinant insulin. About half of the patients had received animal insulin prior to the introduction of human recombinant insulin. We tested the IA frequency and binding level for all serum samples. IA were further analyzed for their epitope specificity comparing human and porcine insulin binding. We found that T1D patients who received animal insulin in the past show significantly higher IA binding levels as compared to patients treated exclusively with human recombinant insulin (IA binding level of 0.9 and 0.25 index, respectively, P = 0.005). T1D patients who received animal insulin in the past showed a relative bias towards porcine insulin, as compared to T1D patients who were treated with human recombinant insulin exclusively (P < 0.0001). We conclude that IA binding level and epitope specificity are biased by treatment with animal insulin. This bias remains for over 20 years after animal insulin treatment is terminated.

B-1 cells and naturally occurring antibodies: influencing the immunogenicity of recombinant human therapeutic proteins?

Recombinant human therapeutic proteins are increasingly being used to treat serious and life-threatening diseases like multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, and cancer. An important side effect of these proteins is the development of antidrug antibodies, which can be neutralizing and thus interfere with the efficacy and safety of the drug. Some biophysical properties, for example, aggregation, also can initiate the immunogenic response to human therapeutics. Many other factors including patients' characteristics may influence this response. Besides induced antibodies, autoantibodies (i.e. naturally occurring antibodies [NAs]) against therapeutic relevant proteins in naïve patients are increasingly being identified. The role of autoreactive B cells and their escape from deletion, production of NAs and their pivotal function in the immune system, the dualistic role of B-1 cells in autoimmunity, and the influence of NAs on disease outcome and their possible impact on the efficacy of human therapeutics will be presented and discussed.

Circulating insulin antibodies: influence of continuous subcutaneous or intraperitoneal insulin infusion, and impact on glucose control

The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence, but not completely suppressed, the development of anti-insulin antibodies (IAs). Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous peritoneal insulin infusion (CPII) and more recently inhaled insulin administration, appear to significantly increase circulating levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-IAs in diabetic patients. However, the increase is usually moderate and mostly transient as compared to previous observations with poorly purified animal insulin preparations. The clinical impact of these circulating anti-IAs remains unclear. Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that antibodies could retard insulin action, leading to a worsening of postprandial hyperglycaemia and/or serve as a carrier, thus leading to unexpected hypoglycaemia. CPII may be associated with more marked and sustained increase in IAs levels, possibly related to the use of an unstable insulin and the formation of immunogenic aggregates of insulin. The possible clinical consequences of these high levels of IAs remain to be evaluated because a low-glucose morning syndrome or severe insulin resistance with ketone bodies production have been reported in some cases. In conclusion, even if CSII and CPII may promote the development of circulating IAs, this increase does not lead to immunological insulin resistance, compared to that previously described with animal non-purified insulin preparations, and seems to have only marginal influence on blood glucose control or complications in most diabetic patients.