How often do we ask about erectile dysfunction in the diabetes review clinic? Development of a neuropathy screening tool

Gaps in the management of diabetes in Asia: A need for improved awareness and strategies in men's sexual health

Sexual dysfunction, which is defined as 'difficulty during any stage of the sexual encounter that prevents or impairs the individual or couple from enjoying sexual activity', is globally prevalent in males with prediabetes and diabetes. It is an early harbinger of cardiovascular diseases and has a profound impact on one's physical, mental, and social health. Among patients with either prediabetes or diabetes, the most common male sexual dysfunctions are hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction, and premature ejaculation. In Asia, although sexual health is an important factor of men's health, it is rarely discussed freely in real-life practice. Addressing sexual health in Asian males has always been challenging with multiple barriers at the levels of patients and health care providers. Therefore, the assessment and management of sexual dysfunction in routine clinical practice should involve a holistic approach with effective patient-provider communication. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and the management of hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction, and premature ejaculation among males with either prediabetes or diabetes (type 1 and type 2), as well as the evidence gaps across Asia.

Small fibre pathology is associated with erectile dysfunction in men with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of small and large fibre neuropathy to erectile dysfunction (ED) in men with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

Measures of small and large fibre neuropathy were evaluated in 49 participants with T2D and 20 age-matched controls.

RESULTS

ED was present in 59% of participants with T2D. There was no difference in age, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, lipid profile, vibration perception threshold (V) (14.3 ± 7.8 vs 11.2 ± 6.6, P = .429), peroneal (41.4 ± 8.2 vs 44.8 ± 4.4, P = .10) and sural (45.4 ± 5.6 vs 47.1 ± 5.8) nerve conduction velocities (m/s), cold (25.1 ± 3.8 vs 26.2 ± 2.9, P = .815) and warm (43.2 ± 4.0 vs 41.0 ± 3.8) perception thresholds (°C), and deep breathing heart rate variability (18 ± 8 vs 18 ± 8) between participants with and without ED. However, intraepidermal nerve fibre density (no./mm² ) (4.6 ± 2.8 vs 13.7 ± 2.7, P < .001), corneal nerve fibre density (no./mm² ) (23.5 ± 6.8 vs 31.3 ± 8.2, P < .001), corneal nerve fibre branch density (no./mm² ) (55.4 ± 35.3 vs 97.7 ± 46.4, P = .004), corneal nerve fibre length (mm/mm² ) (17.6 ± 6.8 vs 27.3 ± 6.8, P < .001), and sural (7.7 ± 6.1 vs 14.6 ± 6.7, P = .003) and peroneal (2.5 ± 2.0 vs 4.7 ± 2.0, P = .003) nerve amplitudes were significantly lower in participants with ED compared with those without ED.

CONCLUSION

ED affects almost 2/3 of men with T2D and is associated with small nerve fibre damage but preserved nerve conduction and cardiac autonomic function. Corneal confocal microscopy may serve as a useful non-invasive imaging method to identify small fibre damage in patients with T2D and ED.

What is the best biological parameter to predict erectile dysfunction in men aged >55 years with type 2 diabetes?

To date, there is no evidence regarding the best biological marker to predict erectile dysfunction (ED) in men aged >55 years with type 2 diabetes. This prospective study included data from men aged >55 years with type 2 diabetes. ED was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function 15-item survey. Total testosterone (TT) levels and bioavailable testosterone were measured; the free testosterone index was calculated. Data from 155 men (aged 64 ± 7 years) were explored. The prevalence of ED and testosterone deficiency was 78.7% and 34.8%, respectively. After univariate analysis, TT and bioavailable testosterone were associated with ED (P = 0.01). After multivariate analysis, and adjustment for age, body mass index, tobacco, alcohol, duration of diabetes, TT, bioavailable testosterone, vitamin D and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, we found that only high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was significantly predictive of ED. TT could predict ED, but it lacks specificity. We found a potential role of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a predictive marker of ED in this targeted population.

Management of erectile dysfunction after prostate cancer treatment: cross-sectional surveys of the perceptions and experiences of patients and healthcare professionals in the UK

OBJECTIVES

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is known to be a common consequence of radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) but is often under-reported and undertreated. This study aimed to explore how ED in patients with PCa is managed in real-life clinical practice, from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

DESIGN AND SETTING

This is a UK-wide cross-sectional survey of men with ED after treatment for PCa which covered assessment and discussion of erectile function, provision of supportive care and satisfaction with management. Parallel surveys of primary and secondary HCPs were also conducted.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 546 men with ED after PCa treatment, 167 primary (general practitioners and practice nurses) and 94 secondary care HCPs (urologists and urology clinical nurse specialists). Survey findings revealed inadequate management of ED in primary care, particularly underprescribing of effective management options. A fifth of men (21%) were not offered any ED management, and a similar proportion (23%) were not satisfied with the way HCPs addressed their ED concerns. There was poor communication between HCPs and men, including failure to initiate discussions about ED and/or involve partners, with 12% of men not told that ED was a risk factor of PCa treatment. These issues seemed to reflect poor access to effective ED management or services and lack of primary HCP confidence in managing ED, as well as confusion over the roles and responsibilities among both HCPs and men.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the need for better support for men from HCPs and more tailored and timely access to effective ED management after treatment for PCa. A clearly defined pathway is required for the discussion and management of ED, starting from the planning stage of PCa treatment. Improved adherence to ED management guidelines and better education and training for primary care HCPs are areas of priority.

The willingness of Saudi men with type 2 diabetes to discuss erectile dysfunction with their physicians and the factors that influence this

OBJECTIVES

The study's objectives were to find out the proportion of Saudi men with type 2 diabetes who have been asked by their physicians about erectile dysfunction (ED) in the last year, to determine the willingness of Saudi men with type 2 diabetes to discuss ED, and to explore the factors that may be related to their willingness to discuss ED with their physicians.

METHODS

This study employed a cross-sectional survey design using a quantitative self-administered questionnaire among 309 Saudi men with type 2 diabetes. The study was conducted in hospital-based primary care clinics at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the period from July to September 2015.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 60.2 years with the mean duration of diabetes approximately 12.5 years. Few of the patients (9.7%) had been asked by their physicians about ED within the last year of attending the clinics although most patients (84.8%) were willing to discuss this issue. The presence of ED among the respondents was 89%. Two participants' characteristics were associated with a willingness to discuss ED with the physicians. These characteristics were age above 60 (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.11-0.55), and having severe ED (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.85). The respondents' main barriers to discussing ED with their physicians were embarrassing the doctor, ED is a personal issue, too old or too sick to address ED issues now, no effective treatment available, and the doctor is too young to discuss ED with.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who have type 2 diabetes are not asked about ED within the last year of attendance even though most are willing to discuss it with their physicians. Being older and suffering more severe ED will result in being less willing to discuss ED with their doctor. Further research is needed to explore the barriers which prevent physicians from discussing ED with their patients who have diabetes.

Prevalence, correlates, attitude and treatment seeking of erectile dysfunction among type 2 diabetic Chinese men attending primary care outpatient clinics

To investigate the prevalence, correlates, attitude and treatment seeking behavior of erectile dysfunction (ED) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the primary care setting, a multi-center cross-sectional survey using a structured anonymous self-administered questionnaire was performed in 10 general outpatient clinics. Of the 603 subjects (91% response rate), the prevalence of ED men, as defined by the International Index of Erectile Function, was 79.1%. Most subjects had mild ED (28.9%), followed by mild-to-moderate ED (27.9%), then moderate ED (13.4%) and severe ED (9%). Nearly 55% of those with ED did not consider themselves as having ED. Less than 10% of them had ever sought medical treatment, although 76.1% of them wished to receive management from doctor(s) should they be diagnosed with ED. They considered the most important management from doctors to be clinical assessment (41.7%), followed by management of potential underlying cause (37.8%), referral to specialist (27.5%), education (23.9%), prescription of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (16.9%) and referral to counseling service (6.7%). The prevalence of ED was strongly associated with subjects who thought they had ED (odds ratio (OR) = 90.49 (20.00–409.48, P< 0.001)) and were from the older age group (OR = 1.043 (1.011–1.076, P = 0.008)). In conclusion, ED is highly prevalent among T2DM men. The majority of them wanted management from doctors should they have ED, but only a minority would actually voice out the request. Screening of ED among T2DM men using structural questionnaire allowed the diagnosis of more than half of the ED cases, which otherwise would have gone undiagnosed.

Reduced melanocortin production causes sexual dysfunction in male mice with POMC neuronal insulin and leptin insensitivity

Proopiomelanocortin (POMC)-derived peptides like α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) substantially improve hepatic insulin sensitivity and regulate energy expenditure. Melanocortinergic agents are also powerful inducers of sexual arousal that are being investigated for a possible therapeutic role in erectile dysfunction. It is currently unclear whether reduced melanocortin (MC) activity may contribute to the sexual dysfunction accompanying obesity and type 2 diabetes. Male rodents with leptin and insulin resistance targeted to POMC neurons (leptin receptor [LepR]/insulin receptor [IR]POMC mice) exhibit obesity, hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and systemic insulin resistance. In this study, we demonstrate that LepR/IRPOMC males are also subfertile due to dramatic alterations in sexual behavior. Remarkably, these reproductive changes are accompanied by decreased α-MSH production not present when a single receptor type is deleted. Unexpectedly, behavioral sensitivity to α-MSH and MC receptor expression are also reduced in LepR/IRPOMC males, a potential adaptation of the MC system to altered α-MSH production. Together, these results suggest that concurrent insulin and leptin resistance in POMC neurons in individuals with obesity or type 2 diabetes can reduce endogenous α-MSH levels and impair sexual function.

A pilot randomised controlled trial of a preconsultation web-based intervention to improve the care quality and clinical outcomes of diabetes outpatients (DIAT)

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is a chronic condition associated with many long-term complications. People with diabetes need to actively manage their condition, which can be complex. In consultations with healthcare professionals, patients receive advice about their diabetes but do not always discuss things which concern them, perhaps because of the perceived limited time or embarrassment. We want to test a 'preconsultation' intervention in which the patient is supported by a healthcare assistant to complete a web-based intervention aimed at producing an agenda to help them identify important areas for discussion in the consultation. Use of this agenda may enable the patient to play a more active role in that consultation and consequently become more confident, and hence more successful, in managing their condition.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this pilot randomised controlled trial, 120 people with diabetes will be randomised with equal allocation to receive the intervention or usual clinical care. The primary outcome is reduction in glycosylated haemoglobin(HbA1c). Secondary outcomes are patient-reported communication, enablement, self-care activity, diabetes-dependent quality of life, empowerment, satisfaction, health-related quality of life and resource use. The aim of the pilot study was to estimate parameters to inform the design of the definitive trial. Follow-up on quantitative outcomes will be at 3 and 6 months. A nested qualitative study will collect data on the patients' experiences of producing an agenda. Resource use data and medication use will also be collected via a review of medical records for a sample of participants.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval was granted by the NHS Research Ethics Committee North West-Preston (13/NW/0123). Dissemination will include publication of quantitative and qualitative findings, and experience of public involvement in peer-reviewed journals. Results will also be disseminated to trial participants via workshops led by lay coapplicants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN75070242.

Erectile dysfunction in general medicine

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects millions of men worldwide with implications that go far beyond sexual activity. ED is now recognised as an early marker of cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus (DM) and depression. The risk factors that are associated with ED (sedentary lifestyle, obesity, smoking, hypercholesterolaemia and the metabolic syndrome) are very similar to those for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Arguably, the awareness of ED as a symptomatic entity in the post-Viagra™ age is on the rise. Nevertheless, ED is commonly missed when evaluating patients in the hospital setting, either because of lack of consideration or awareness, or through simple embarrassment (of both clinician and patient). This article provides an overview of the aetiology, assessment and importance of ED and hopes to promote its consideration in day-to-day clinical practice.

How often do we ask about pregnancy in the diabetes review clinic?

BACKGROUND

Sub-optimal control of diabetes is a significant cause of complications during pregnancy. One of the aims of diabetes management should be to ensure that all women of child-bearing age with diabetes should be regularly screened with regard to their plans for pregnancy to ensure that their overall diabetic control and fitness for pregnancy can be maximized.

METHODS

We analysed the electronic patient records of a target population of young women of child-bearing age (16-45) with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes who were attending the diabetes review clinic over a period of three years from 2007 to 2010. The Diabeta 3 software program which is commonly used has a query builder function which allows immediate recall and analysis of data.

RESULTS

Of 1808 patients within the fertile range, only a small number appeared to have had information accurately documented with regard to any of the following: pregnancy plans, preconception counselling, contraception and also the recording of whether patients with diabetes were pregnant or not and enrolled in the ante-natal diabetes clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

The main inference from the data is its paucity and inaccuracy. It would appear that we are failing to enquire and/or record the fertility intentions of young female patients with diabetes. This is important because it means that we subsequently then miss those patients who need to be targeted for preconception counselling/optimization, which has implications for the morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes in pregnancy.