1
|
Passanisi S, Berg AK, Chobot A, Dos Santos TJ, Piona CA, Messer L, Lombardo F. First International Survey on Diabetes Providers' Assessment of Skin Reactions in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Using Technological Devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231206155. [PMID: 37846755 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231206155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in diabetes technological devices led to optimization of diabetes care; however, long-lasting skin exposure to devices may be accompanied by an increasing occurrence of cutaneous reactions. METHODS We used an open-link web-based survey to evaluate diabetes-care providers' viewpoint on prevalence, management practices, and knowledge related to skin reactions with the use of diabetes technological devices. A post hoc analysis was applied to investigate differences in the level of awareness on this topic in relation to the experience in diabetes technology. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five responses from 39 different countries were collected. Most respondents (69%) routinely examine patients' skin at each visit. All the preventive measures are not clear and, mainly, homogenously put into clinical practice. Contact dermatitis was the most frequently reported cutaneous complication due to diabetes devices, and its most common provocative causes are not yet fully known by diabetes-care providers. Almost half of the respondents (42%) had discussed the presence of harmful allergens contained in adhesives with device manufacturers. There is general agreement on the need to strengthen knowledge on dermatological complications. CONCLUSIONS Although diabetes-care providers are quite aware of the chance to develop skin reactions in people with diabetes using technological devices, there are still some unmet needs. Large follow-up studies and further dissemination tools are awaited to address the gaps revealed by our survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi," University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Anna Korsgaard Berg
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Agata Chobot
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
| | | | - Claudia Anita Piona
- Pediatric Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Unit, Regional Center for Pediatric Diabetes, University City Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laurel Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Fortunato Lombardo
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi," University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Genève P, Adam T, Delawoevre A, Jellimann S, Legagneur C, DiPatrizio M, Renard E. High incidence of skin reactions secondary to the use of adhesives in glucose sensors or insulin pumps for the treatment of children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2023; 204:110922. [PMID: 37769906 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the incidence of the skin reactions secondary to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), sensors and the characteristics of affected children with type 1 diabetes. METHODS An observational, retrospective, single-centre study included 198 children with type 1 diabetes, (46% girls, mean age 11.75 years). A standardised questionnaire was completed with the patient during current care to evaluate the skin reactions (mean and percentage), the type of reaction, their impact and the treatment) and the characteristics of affected children with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Sixty-seven children (33.8%) reported active skin reactions: 45 children with CSII (30.4%) and 46 with CGM (23.5%). Children with skin reactions were younger (mean age 10.6 yo versus 12.34 yo, p < 0.05), with a younger age at the diagnosis of diabetes (5.59 yo versus 7.08 yo, p < 0.05). Atopy was more frequent in the group with skin reactions (76.1% versus 54.1% p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, only the personal history of atopy was associated with skin reactions: OR 2.56 [1.16-5.97] (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION This study confirms the high incidence of skin reactions to adhesive devices used in the treatment of type 1 diabetes in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Genève
- Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, France
| | - T Adam
- Department of Allergology, Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, France
| | - A Delawoevre
- Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, France
| | - S Jellimann
- Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, France
| | - C Legagneur
- Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, France
| | - M DiPatrizio
- Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, France
| | - E Renard
- Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, France; INSERM UMR_S 1256, Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure (NGERE), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Elbarbary NS, Simmons K, Buckingham B, Humayun KN, Johannsen J, Holl RW, Betz S, Mahmud FH. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2022; 23:1451-1467. [PMID: 36537532 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Kimber Simmons
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Bruce Buckingham
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Khadija N Humayun
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Jesper Johannsen
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Reinhard W Holl
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Shana Betz
- Parent/Advocate for people with diabetes, Markham, Canada
| | - Farid H Mahmud
- Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Passanisi S, Salzano G, Galletta F, Aramnejad S, Caminiti L, Pajno GB, Lombardo F. Technologies for Type 1 Diabetes and Contact Dermatitis: Therapeutic Tools and Clinical Outcomes in a Cohort of Pediatric Patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:846137. [PMID: 35370980 PMCID: PMC8965381 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.846137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The increasing use of technological devices for the management of diabetes is related to the prolonged exposure of patients' skin to chemical and mechanical agents and, consequently, to the increased risk of developing dermatological complications. Among these, contact dermatitis is the most insidious skin disorder. Despite the magnitude of the issue, no universally accepted recommendations on the management of this common complication are currently available. Our observational study aimed to describe all the solutions adopted by patients and their caregivers to treat and prevent the appearance of contact dermatitis and to describe the clinical impact of this cutaneous complication. Twenty-one pediatric patients (mean age 12.1 ± 3.7 years) with type 1 diabetes were recruited in the study. The most common treatment used to treat acute skin lesions was the application of topical corticosteroids, sometimes associated with topical antibiotics (9.5%). In order to prevent the further appearance of dermatitis, the most frequently adopted measure was the use of hydrocolloid and/or silicone-based adhesives, followed by the application of protective barrier films. One patient reported benefit from the off-label use of fluticasone propionate nasal spray. However, only 52.4% of the study participants achieved a definitive resolution of the skin issue, and 38.1% of patients were forced to discontinue insulin pump therapy and/or continuous glucose monitoring. No differences were observed in glycated hemoglobin values between the period before and after the onset of contact dermatitis. Our study confirms the severity of this dermatological complication that may hinder the spread of new technologies for the management of diabetes. Finally, our findings highlight the importance of establishing close collaboration both with pediatric allergy specialists to prescribe the most suitable treatment and with manufacturing companies to ensure that adhesives of technological devices are free of harmful well-known sensitizers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- *Correspondence: Stefano Passanisi,
| | - Giuseppina Salzano
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesca Galletta
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, Allergy Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Sara Aramnejad
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Lucia Caminiti
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, Allergy Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giovanni B. Pajno
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, Allergy Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Fortunato Lombardo
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shang T, Zhang JY, Thomas A, Arnold MA, Vetter BN, Heinemann L, Klonoff DC. Products for Monitoring Glucose Levels in the Human Body With Noninvasive Optical, Noninvasive Fluid Sampling, or Minimally Invasive Technologies. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:168-214. [PMID: 34120487 PMCID: PMC8721558 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211007212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventional home blood glucose measurements require a sample of blood that is obtained by puncturing the skin at the fingertip. To avoid the pain associated with this procedure, there is high demand for medical products that allow glucose monitoring without blood sampling. In this review article, all such products are presented. METHODS In order to identify such products, four different sources were used: (1) PubMed, (2) Google Patents, (3) Diabetes Technology Meeting Startup Showcase participants, and (4) experts in the field of glucose monitoring. The information obtained were filtered by using two inclusion criteria: (1) regulatory clearance, and/or (2) significant coverage in Google News starting in the year 2016, unless the article indicated that the product had been discontinued. The identified bloodless monitoring products were classified into three categories: (1) noninvasive optical, (2) noninvasive fluid sampling, and (3) minimally invasive devices. RESULTS In total, 28 noninvasive optical, 6 noninvasive fluid sampling, and 31 minimally invasive glucose monitoring products were identified. Subsequently, these products were characterized according to their regulatory, technological, and consumer features. Products with regulatory clearance are described in greater detail according to their advantages and disadvantages, and with design images. CONCLUSIONS Based on favorable technological features, consumer features, and other advantages, several bloodless products are commercially available and promise to enhance diabetes management. Paths for future products are discussed with an emphasis on understanding existing barriers related to both technical and non-technical issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha Shang
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, California, USA
| | | | - Andreas Thomas
- AGDT (Working group of Diabetes Technology), Germany, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mark A. Arnold
- University of Iowa, Department of Chemistry, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | | | - David C. Klonoff
- Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, California, USA
- David C. Klonoff, MD, FACP, FRCP (Edin), Fellow AIMBE, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, 100 South San Mateo Drive, Room 5147, San Mateo, California 94401, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Skin involvement is an overlooked aspect in the management of paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. A comprehensive search of published literature using the PubMed database was carried out using the following key terms: "children," "pediatric/paediatric patients," "skin," "skin disorders," "type 1 diabetes." Dermatological side effects are frequently observed among diabetic children and adolescents. Insulin-induced lipodystrophies and allergic contact dermatitis caused by insulin pumps or glycaemic sensors are the most common skin reactions in these patients. Furthermore, several diabetes-associated skin diseases such as necrobiosis lipoidica, granuloma annulare, vitiligo, and bullosis diabeticorum may already be present in paediatric patients. Paediatric diabetes specialists should pay attention to their patients' skin to recognize these disorders, identify the potential causes, and choose the most suitable treatment. Finally, the evaluation of skin concentrations of advanced glycation end-products using non-invasive diagnostic techniques may be used to assess the risk of chronic complications of diabetes as early as adolescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Salzano
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Fortunato Lombardo
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lombardo F, Passanisi S, Tinti D, Messina MF, Salzano G, Rabbone I. High Frequency of Dermatological Complications in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Web-Based Survey. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15:1377-1381. [PMID: 32757778 PMCID: PMC8655296 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820947072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite advances in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), there is an increasing incidence of skin reactions related to diabetes devices such as patch pumps and glucose sensors. Aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of dermatological complications in pediatric patients with T1D using technological devices. METHODS Online survey regarding skin reactions related to the use of patch pumps and/or glucose sensors was administered to families of children and adolescents (0-17 years) with T1D. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, duration of diabetes, and clinical features of dermatological complications if present. RESULTS Our study population consisted of 139 patients (female 51.8%) aged 11.1 ± 3.3 years. More than half (51.1%) experienced skin reactions due to patch pumps or glucose sensors. Dermatological complications were mainly caused by continuous glucose monitoring (56.3% of total). Timing of appearance of dermatological reactions varied from a few days to several months after the introduction of the device. The application of hypoallergenic barrier bandages was the most frequently adopted measure to solve the issue. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirmed high frequency of dermatological complications among pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Well-designed studies are awaited to provide clear recommendations to minimize the burden of skin issues related to technological devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fortunato Lombardo
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult
and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult
and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- Stefano Passanisi, Department of Human
Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Via Consolare
Valeria 1, Messina, 98124, Italy.
| | - Davide Tinti
- Department of Pediatrics, University of
Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria Francesca Messina
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult
and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Salzano
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult
and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ivana Rabbone
- Department of Pediatrics, University of
Turin, Torino, Italy
- Department of Science of Health, Hub
Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetology, University of Oriental Piemonte, Novara,
Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marsters BL, Boucher SE, Galland BC, de Lange M, Wiltshire EJ, de Bock MI, Elbalshy MM, Tomlinson PA, Rayns J, MacKenzie KE, Chan H, Wheeler BJ. The 'flash' adhesive study: a randomized crossover trial using an additional adhesive patch to prolong freestyle libre sensor life among youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 2020; 57:1307-1314. [PMID: 32519221 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01556-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Although strategies to prevent premature sensor loss for flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems may have substantial benefit, limited data are available. This study among youth with high-risk type 1 diabetes evaluated whether an additional adhesive patch over FGM sensors would reduce premature sensor loss frequency and not cause additional cutaneous adverse events (AEs). METHODS This is a six-month, open-label, randomized crossover trial. Participants were recruited at completion of prior 'Managing Diabetes in a Flash' randomized controlled trial and allocated to three months of Freestyle Libre FGM sensors with either standard adhesive (control) or additional adhesive patches (RockaDex, New Zealand) (intervention), before crossing over to the opposite study arm. Participants self-reported patch use or non-use, premature sensor loss and cutaneous AEs fortnightly via an electronic questionnaire. RESULTS Thirty-four participants were enrolled: mean age (± SD) 17.0 (± 2.2) years; mean HbA1c (± SD) 89 (± 16) mmol/mol (10.3% ± 1.4%). The response rate of questionnaires was 77% (314/408). Premature sensor loss was reported in 18% (58/314) of questionnaires: 20% (32/162) from intervention and 17% (26/152) from control (p = 0.56). Thirty-eight percent (118/314) of questionnaires were non-compliant to protocol allocation. However, per-protocol analysis showed similar findings. No significant difference in AEs was reported between compliant adhesive patch use and non-use (6% [5/78] and 3% [3/118], respectively, p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS The adhesive patch investigated in this study does not appear to prevent premature FGM sensor loss. However, the low risk of AEs and low cost of an adhesive patch suggest an individualized approach to their use may still be warranted. Further research is needed to explore alternative strategies to prevent sensor loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke L Marsters
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Sara E Boucher
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Barbara C Galland
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Michel de Lange
- Centre for Biostatistics, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Esko J Wiltshire
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Martin I de Bock
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Paediatric Department, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Mona M Elbalshy
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Paul A Tomlinson
- Paediatric Department, Southern District Health Board, Invercargill, New Zealand
| | - Jenny Rayns
- Endocrinology Department, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Karen E MacKenzie
- Paediatric Department, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Huan Chan
- Department of Endocrinology and General Medicine, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Benjamin J Wheeler
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Herman A, Montjoye L, Baeck M. Adverse cutaneous reaction to diabetic glucose sensors and insulin pumps: Irritant contact dermatitis or allergic contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:25-30. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laurence Montjoye
- Department of DermatologyCliniques universitaires Saint‐Luc Brussels Belgium
| | - Marie Baeck
- Department of DermatologyCliniques universitaires Saint‐Luc Brussels Belgium
| |
Collapse
|