Comparison and analyses of therapeutic effects between metabolic management center (MMC) and conventional management modes

Supernatural Beliefs-Based Intervention to Improve Type-2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial from China

China has over 100 million people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Interventions framed around pre-existing personal beliefs in the supernatural may improve T2DM self-management, but such interventions are lacking in China. This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessed the feasibility of a full-scale RCT to evaluate the efficacy of a supernatural beliefs-based intervention on T2DM management self-efficacy in China. In 2019, 62 T2DM patients were enrolled at two hospitals in Suzhou, China. Participants were randomly assigned to view a 30-s control or intervention video at baseline. The control video showed general diabetes self-management information. The intervention video showed identical information, but also indicated that some diabetics with supernatural beliefs (chao ziran xinnian) have lower glycemic levels, because their beliefs enhance their confidence in diabetes self-management. Development of the intervention was guided by the theory of planned behavior and literature on spiritual framing health interventions. Baseline and follow-up measures after two weeks were assessed by interviewer administered surveys in-person and by telephone, respectively. Diabetes management self-efficacy was assessed with the diabetes management self-efficacy scale. Randomization of intervention allocation appeared to be successful. However, follow-up retention was low, especially for the intervention group (3% vs. 31%). A full-size efficacy RCT using the current study design is unlikely to succeed. T2DM patients shown the supernatural beliefs-based intervention had significantly higher loss to follow-up that was insurmountable. T2DM patients in Suzhou, China may not be receptive to brief, non-tailored supernatural beliefs-based interventions delivered to a general population in clinical settings.

A health economic analysis of an integrated diabetes care program in China: based on real-world evidence

Introduction

An integrated care program was set up in China to improve the collaboration between primary healthcare centers and hospitals on diabetes management. This study aims to evaluate the economic value of this program with real-world data and to examine whether it can be promoted in primary healthcare settings in China.

Methods

This integrated diabetes care program was implemented in Yuhuan City, China, to coordinate primary care and specialty care, treatment and prevention services, as well as the responsibilities of doctors and nurses. Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to compare the short-term economic value of this program (intervention group) versus usual diabetes management (control group). The cost data were collected from a societal perspective, while the effectiveness indicators pointed to the improvement of control rates of fasting blood glucose (FBG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels after the 1 year intervention. In addition, cost-utility analysis was applied to evaluate the long-term value of the two groups. Patients' long-term diabetes management costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were simulated by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2.

Results

The results showed that for 1% FBG, SPB, and DBP control rate improvement, the costs for the intervention group were 290.53, 124.39, and 249.15 Chinese Yuan (CNY), respectively, while the corresponding costs for the control group were 655.19, 610.43, and 1460.25 CNY. Thus, the intervention group's cost-effectiveness ratios were lower than those of the control group. In addition, compared to the control group, the intervention group's incremental costs per QALY improvement were 102.67 thousand CNY, which means that the intervention was cost-effective according to the World Health Organization's standards.

Discussion

In conclusion, this study suggested that this integrated diabetes care program created short-term and long-term economic values through patient self-management support, primary care strengthening, and care coordination. As this program followed the principles of integrated care reform, it can be promoted in China. Also, its elements can provide valuable experience for other researchers to build customized integrated care models.

Metabolic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after metabolic management center

The Chinese Medical Doctor Association has initiated metabolic management center (MMC) program for 6 years since 2016 nationwide. It is worth investigating the level of control metabolic outcomes in patients with type2 diabetes (T2DM) after MMC model in Yan'an, northwest China. Patients with T2DM was admitted to MMC in Yan'an University Affiliated Hospital from November 2018 to July 2021. They were asked to revisit hospital every 3 months. Blood glucose, blood pressure and blood lipids at baseline were compared to its counterparts after 1 year MMC management. Glycosylated hemoglobin and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level in T2DM patients after 1 year management were lower than their baseline level (glycosylated hemoglobin 7.74 ± 1.94% vs 8.63 ± 2.26%, P < .001; LDL-C 1.81 ± 0.73mmol/L vs 2.18 ± 1.49mmol/L, P < .001). Mean HOMA-β increased after management (65.89 ± 90.81% vs 128.38 ± 293.93%, P < .05). After 1 year of management, patients in high school or above group achieved higher control rate of body mass index than those in middle school or below group (71.82% vs 28.18%, P = .043). high density lipoprotein cholesterol control rate was higher in high income group (42.86% vs 34.97%, 16.28%, P = .012), while LDL-C control rate was higher in low-income group (97.67% vs 78.57%, 84.51%, P = .018). fasting plasma glucose control rate in new diagnosis group was higher than that of the middle and long course groups (71.43% vs 52.38%, 42.44%, P = .002). The comprehensive control rate increased from 9.83% at baseline to 26.15% after 1 year MMC management. The metabolic outcomes and their control rate in T2DM patients were improved after 1 year MMC management. It indicated that patients may achieve more benefits with MMC management.