Prognostic impact of treatment modalities on patients with single nodular recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma

Repeat hepatectomy versus thermal ablation therapy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the survival benefits of repeat hepatectomy (RH) and thermal ablation therapy (TAT) in managing recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, SinoMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science databases using relevant keywords to identify all studies published on this specific topic. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a fixed-effects model.

Results

This meta-analysis included a total of 21 studies, comprising 2580 patients with recurrent HCC, among whom 1189 underwent RH and 1394 underwent TAT. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that the RH group exhibited superior overall survival (OS) (HR=0.85, 95%CI 0.76∼0.95, P=0.004) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=0.79, 95%CI 0.7∼0.9, P<0.01) compared to the TAT group. Regarding postoperative complications, the TAT group experienced fewer complications than the RH group (OR=3.23, 95%CI 1.48∼7.07, P=0.003), while no significant difference in perioperative mortality was observed between the two groups (OR=2.11, 95%CI 0.54∼8.19, P=0.28).

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that, in comparison to TAT, RH may confer superior survival benefits for patients with recurrent HCC.

Effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Background

Both transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are effective methods for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC). Thus far, it is unclear which method is more satisfactory in short- and long-term survival benefits.

Purpose

To compare the overall survival (OS) and complications of TACE and RFA used for the management of RHCC.

Material and Methods

A literature search was carried out using PubMed, the Cochrane Library and, Embase databases, and Google Scholar, keywords including “RHCC,” “TACEC,” and “RFA” with a cutoff date of 30 April 2021. Used Review Manager software was to calculate short- and long-term OS. The clinical outcomes are major complications and complete response (CR).

Results

Finally, nine clinical trials met the research standard, including 1326 subjects, of which 518 received RFA and 808 received TACE. The analysis showed that patients who underwent RFA had significantly higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS (OR_1-year = 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.27–2.91, p = .002; OR_3-year = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.30–2.08, p <.0001; OR_5-year = 3.22, 95% CI = 1.34–7.72, p=.009). Besides, the patients who chose RFA had an obvious higher rate of CR than those receiving TACE (OR = 33.75, 95% CI = 1.73–658.24, p = .002). However, the major complications were consistency between these two groups.

Conclusion

Our study discovered that RFA had greater CR and incidence in both the short-term and long-term OS than TACE. In addition, obvious difference was not found in major complications in these two methods.

Long-term Effects of Repeat Hepatectomy vs Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Among Patients With Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Repeat hepatectomy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) are most commonly used to treat early-stage recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after initial resection, but previous studies comparing the effectiveness of the 2 treatments have reported conflicting results.

Objective

To compare the long-term survival outcomes after repeat hepatectomy with those after PRFA among patients with early-stage RHCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and the National Center for Liver Cancer of China. A total of 240 patients with RHCC (with a solitary nodule diameter of ≤5 cm; 3 or fewer nodules, each ≤3 cm in diameter; and no macroscopic vascular invasion or distant metastasis) were randomized 1:1 to receive repeat hepatectomy or PRFA between June 3, 2010, and January 15, 2013. The median (range) follow-up time was 44.3 (4.3-90.6) months (last follow-up, January 15, 2018). Data analysis was conducted from June 15, 2018, to September 28, 2018.

Interventions

Repeat hepatectomy (n = 120) or PRFA (n = 120).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included repeat recurrence-free survival (rRFS), patterns of repeat recurrence, and therapeutic safety.

Results

Among the 240 randomized patients (216 men [90.0%]; median [range] age, 53.0 [24.0-59.0] years), 217 completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were 92.5% (95% CI, 87.9%-97.3%), 65.8% (95% CI, 57.8%-74.8%), and 43.6% (95% CI, 35.5%-53.5%), respectively, for the repeat hepatectomy group and 87.5% (95% CI, 81.8%-93.6%), 52.5% (95% CI, 44.2%-62.2%), and 38.5% (95% CI, 30.6%-48.4%), respectively, for the PRFA group (P = .17). The corresponding 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rRFS rates were 85.0% (95% CI, 78.8%-91.6%), 52.4% (95% CI, 44.2%-62.2%), and 36.2% (95% CI, 28.5%-46.0%), respectively, for the repeat hepatectomy group and 74.2% (95% CI, 66.7%-82.4%), 41.7% (95% CI, 33.7%-51.5%), and 30.2% (95% CI, 22.9%-39.8%), respectively, for the PRFA group (P = .09). Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was associated with a higher incidence of local repeat recurrence (37.8% vs 21.7%, P = .04) and early repeat recurrence than repeat hepatectomy (40.3% vs 23.3%, P = .04). In subgroup analyses, PRFA was associated with worse OS vs repeat hepatectomy among patients with an RHCC nodule diameter greater than 3 cm (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.05-2.84) or an α fetoprotein level greater than 200 ng/mL (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.15-2.96). Surgery had a higher complication rate than did ablation (22.4% vs 7.3%, P = .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

No statistically significant difference was observed in survival outcomes after repeat hepatectomy vs PRFA for patients with early-stage RHCC. Repeat hepatectomy may be associated with better local disease control and long-term survival in patients with an RHCC diameter greater than 3 cm or an AFP level greater than 200 ng/mL.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00822562.

Prognostic Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Hepatitis C Virus Infection Using Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Gene Profiles

BACKGROUND

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition genes have prognostic influence on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previously, the following four epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related genes were considered to be significantly influential: E-cadherin (CDH1), inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (ID2), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), and transcription factor 3 (TCF3). A prognostic prediction model, NRISK4 = (-0.333 × [CDH1] - 0.400 × [ID2] + 0.339 × [MMP9] + 0.387 × [TCF3]) was constructed, but from patients with HCC with predominantly hepatitis B virus infection. We therefore aim to validate if this model also fits patients with HCC and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

METHODS

We collected HCC tissue samples from 67 patients with HCV infection. Discrimination of the NRISK4 was re-estimated using receiver operating curve analysis and we redefined the appropriate cutoff value. Using this cutoff value, patients were divided into two groups (high/low risk patients) and we compared their clinicopathological factors and prognosis.

RESULTS

Area under the curve of NRISK4 prediction was 0.70 and an appropriate cutoff value was 3.19 in this cohort. Patients were divided into high- (n = 25) and low-risk (n = 42) patients for prognosis. There were no significant differences in tumor factors between the two groups. Cancer-specific survival rates at 5 y after surgery on high- and low-risk patients were 45% and 68%, respectively (P = 0.02). At 2 y after surgery, recurrence rates were 68% and 37% among high- and low-risk patients, respectively (P = 0.01). Aggressive recurrences were highly observed in the high-risk patients (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

NRISK4 model could also successfully validate prognosis of patients with HCC with HCV infection similarly to in the previous report of patients with hepatitis B virus infection, especially in the early period after surgery.

Meta-analysis of determinants of survival following treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following resection is common. However, no current consensus guidelines exist to inform management decisions in these patients. Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival following different treatment modalities may allow improved treatment selection. This review aimed to identify the optimum treatment strategies for HCC recurrence.

Methods

A systematic review, up to September 2016, was conducted in accordance with MOOSE guidelines. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio for overall survival of different treatment modalities. Meta-analysis of different treatment modalities was carried out using a random-effects model, with further assessment of additional prognostic factors for survival.

Results

Nineteen cohort studies (2764 patients) were included in final data analysis. The median 5-year survival rates after repeat hepatectomy (525 patients), ablation (658) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (855) were 35·2, 48·3 and 15·5 per cent respectively. Pooled analysis of ten studies demonstrated no significant difference between overall survival after ablation versus repeat hepatectomy (hazard ratio 1·03, 95 per cent c.i. 0·68 to 1·55; P = 0·897). Pooled analysis of seven studies comparing TACE with repeat hepatectomy showed no statistically significant difference in survival (hazard ratio 1·61, 0·99 to 2·63; P = 0·056).

Conclusion

Based on these limited data, there does not appear to be a significant difference in survival between patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy or ablation for recurrent HCC. The results also identify important negative prognostic factors (short disease-free interval, multiple hepatic metastases and large hepatic metastases), which may influence choice of treatment.

Appropriate treatment strategies for intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma initially within the Milan criteria: according to the recurrence pattern

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate appropriate treatment strategies for recurrent intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who fulfilled the Milan criteria at primary hepatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 124 patients who underwent curative-intent resection of HCC at our center between January 2007 and March 2014 were retrospectively enrolled; patients had initially fulfilled the Milan criteria, but developed intrahepatic recurrence. Seventy-four patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and another 50 patients underwent repeat resection (RR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The recurrent HCCs were classified into intrahepatic metastasis and multicentric occurrence by pathologic analysis. Demographic and clinical data and overall survival rates were compared between the RR/RFA and the TACE groups. Subgroup analysis on the basis of the recurrence pattern (early recurrence or late recurrence) was carried out, and prognostic factors for survival were investigated.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates for the 124 patients after retreatment were 88.3, 55.4, and 44.3%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates after retreatment were not significantly different between the RR/RFA and the TACE groups (P=0.140). Subgroup analysis showed that for late recurrence, survival in the RR/RFA group was better than those of patients in the TACE group (P=0.045).

CONCLUSION

TACE may be as effective as RR or RFA for early intrahepatic recurrence, whereas RR/RFA is the preferred option for patients with late recurrence after curative resection of HCC who initially fulfilled the Milan criteria. Prognosis was determined by the number of recurrent tumors and the Child-Pugh class at the time of recurrence.

Chemoembolization of recurrent hepatoma after curative resection: prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE

The long-term prognosis after hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been disappointing because of the high recurrence rates in the remnant liver, which constitutes the major cause of death. The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors for overall survival after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in recurrent HCC after the initial curative surgical resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2003 through October 2012, 362 patients who developed recurrent HCC after initial surgical resection and underwent TACE as the first-line therapy were retrospectively studied at a single institution in our hospital. Patients who met our inclusion criteria were followed until December 2012. Prognostic factors for overall survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 287 patients were enrolled. The median overall survival period was 747 days. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates after TACE were 72.9%, 51.8%, and 31.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that the number of resected HCCs (≥ 2, p < 0.001), the number (≥ 2, p < 0.001) and size (> 5 cm, p = 0.022) of the recurrent HCCs, and the number of TACE sessions (≤ 3, p < 0.001) are independent risk factors for poor survival after TACE for recurrent HCC after HCC resection.

CONCLUSION

TACE appears to be an effective treatment of patients who experienced a recurrence after curative HCC resection. An initial solitary HCC, a solitary recurrence, and recurrent tumor mass 5 cm or smaller are statistically significant independent prognostic factors for survival.

Clinical efficacy and predictors of outcomes of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatectomy is an accepted treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with good long-term survival, but high rates of recurrence. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent HCC after initial hepatectomy.

METHODS

Electronic searches identified 22 eligible studies comprising of 1125 patients for systematic review. Studies with >10 patients, adopting repeat hepatectomy treatment for recurrent HCC initially treated with hepatectomy were selected for inclusion. A predetermined set of data comprising demographic details, morbidity and mortality indices and survival outcomes were collected for every study and tabulated.

RESULTS

Majority of patients selected for repeat hepatectomy had Child-Pugh A (median 94%, range 40-100). Intrahepatic recurrence occurred at a median of 22.4 (range 12-48) months in this patient cohort with single nodule recurrences comprising of 70% of cases. The median mortality rate was 0% (range 0-6%). Prolonged ascites was observed in a median of 4% (range 0-32%), bleeding in 1% (range 0-9%), bile leak in 1% (range 0-6%) and liver failure in 1% (range 0-2%). The median disease-free survival was 15 (range 7-32) months and median overall survival was 52 (range 22-66) months. Median 3-year and 5-year survival was 69% (range 41-88%) and 52% (range 22-83%) respectively. Recurrences occurring 12-18 months after initial hepatectomy was consistently associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSION

Synthesized data from observational studies of repeat hepatectomy suggests that this treatment approach for recurrent HCC is safe and achieves long-term survival. Standardization of criteria for repeat hepatectomy and a randomized trial are warranted.

Percutaneous ablative therapies of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: proposal of a prognostic model

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous ablative therapies (PAT) are valuable modalities for posthepatectomy recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC), but its impact on long-term outcome and prognosis prediction have not been well documented. The present study aimed to analyze prognostic factors and to propose a prognosis-predicting model for RHCC treated with PAT.

METHODS

A total of 288 patients with posthepatectomy RHCC treated with percutaneous ethanol ablation, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, or ethanol ablation combined with radiofrequency ablation were included. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. A prognosis-predicting model was created by quantifying and integrating all prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Three-, 5-, and 7-year postablation survival rates were 37.8, 20.7, and 14.2 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that interval between recurrence and initial hepatectomy, tumor number, largest diameter of tumor, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage at hepatectomy were independent prognostic factors for survival. A scoring system for prognostic factors was proposed, and summation of 4 prognostic factors (prognostic score) was ranged from 4 to 10. Prognostic score was classified into three strata, designated as prognostic classes A (score 4 and 5), B (score 6 and 7), and C (≥8). Three-, 5-, and 7-year postablation survival rates were 62.8, 39.4, and 26.9 % in class A, 36.9, 15.5, and 7.2 % in B, and 5.5, 0, and 0 % in class C, respectively (p = 0.00). Three-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year survival rates after initial hepatectomy were 82.4, 66.3, 52.1, and 36.4 % in class A, 51.6, 34.8, 20.7, and 6.6 % in class B, and 11.9, 7.8, 0, and 0 % in class C, respectively (p = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic model developed in the study could clearly predict different long-term outcomes for patients with posthepatectomy RHCC and thus help decide appropriate therapeutic strategy.

Ultrasound-guided microwave coagulation assists anatomical hepatic resection

PURPOSE

We describe a new technique of ultrasound (US)-guided microwave coagulation (MC) of the Glissonean pedicle, performed before transection to control the inflow and select the resection area. This report introduces our procedure and evaluates the outcomes of patients treated using this technique.

METHODS

The Glissonean pedicles feeding the segment or cone unit were coagulated by US-guided MC, after which transection was performed. We used this US-guided MC technique to perform anatomical resections in 12 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (MC group). We compared the outcomes of this group with those of a historical group of 10 patients who underwent conventional hepatectomy (control group). The two groups were well matched for age, tumor size, location, and type of hepatectomy.

RESULTS

The mean operative times were similar, but the mean blood loss was significantly lower the in MC group than in the control group. Recurrence developed in four patients from the MC group, but local recurrence was not observed. Bile leakage occurred in one patient from the MC group, but the incidences of postoperative complications did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our procedure allows anatomical resection to be performed safely and easily, and helps prevent intrahepatic metastasis via portal flow during the transection.

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma successfully treated with laparoscopic thermal ablation

BACKGROUND

Aggressive treatment of intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) increases patients' survival. This study aimed to evaluate laparoscopic thermal ablation (TA) in the treatment of intrahepatic HCC recurrences.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 88 patients (REC group) who underwent laparoscopic TA after prior TA (66 patients.) or partial hepatic resection (HR) (22 patients) as initial local treatment. Another 170 patients with primary HCC tumors (PRIM group) were regarded as the control group.

RESULTS

The postoperative morbidity rates were similar for the patients with prior TA (18%) and those with prior HR (21%) (nonsignificant difference [NS]). The overall survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (3-year survival rates of 59 and 78%, respectively; P = 0.1662). Moreover, the disease-free survival (DFS) rates did not differ significantly between the patients with prior TA and those with prior HR (3-year DFS of 21 and 8%, respectively; P = 0.1911). The incidences of morbidity in the whole REC (21%) and PRIM (20%) groups were similar (P = NS), and no mortality occurred in either group (0%). The cumulative 3-year survival rate was 63% in the REC group and 59% in the PRIM group (P = 0.5739), whereas the 3-year DFS rate was 17% in the REC group and 22% in the PRIM group (P = 0.5266).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic TA can be performed safely and may be effective for intrahepatic HCC recurrence after prior TA or HR. It leads to survival and DFS rates similar to those obtained using laparoscopic TA for primary HCC without increasing morbidity. Laparoscopic TA could be proposed as first-line treatment of intrahepatic HCC recurrence for selected patients.

Selecting treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma based on the results of hepatic resection and local ablation therapy

BACKGROUND

First-line treatment for <or=3 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) <or=3 cm in size remains controversial. The superiority of survival benefit needs to be clarified between these modalities for such lesions.

METHODS

We examined post-treatment survival of 144 consecutive HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy and of 56 consecutive HCC patients who underwent thermal ablation therapy limited to the HCC (<or=3 cm, <or=3 lesions).

RESULTS

Pretreatment liver function was significantly worse and prevalence of Child-Pugh classification B/C was significantly higher in the ablation group compared to the hepatectomy group. Prevalence of tumor recurrence after treatment did not differ significantly between groups, irrespective of solitary or multiple HCC. In solitary HCC, overall survival rates in both groups did not differ significantly. Even in Child-Pugh B patients, survival was not significantly different between hepatectomy and ablation. In HCC with 2-3 lesions <or=3 cm, overall survival was significantly longer with hepatectomy than with ablation and mean survival periods in the hepatectomy and ablation groups were 4.5 and 1.2 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In cases of multiple small HCCs, hepatic resection is recommended over local ablation therapy as the first-line treatment in cases where liver function has been preserved.