Minimally invasive video-assisted versus conventional open thyroidectomy: a systematic review of available data

Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive and remote surgical approaches for thyroid tumors have been developed primarily for cosmetic benefit. However, conventional meta-analysis could not provide comparative data between new techniques. This network meta-analysis would be able to provide data for clinicians and patients to compare cosmetic satisfaction and morbidity by comparing surgical methods.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Cochrane Trials, and Google Scholar.

REVIEW METHODS

The nine interventions included minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVA), endoscopic and robotic bilateral axillo-breast-approach thyroidectomy (EBAB and RBAB, respectively), endoscopic and robotic retro-auricular thyroidectomy (EPA and RPA, respectively), endoscopic or robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy (EAx and RAx, respectively), endoscopic and robotic transoral approaches (EO and RO, respectively), and a conventional thyroidectomy. We recorded the operative outcomes and perioperative complications; pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

EO, RBAB, and RO were associated with good patient cosmetic satisfaction. EAx, EBAB, EO, RAx, and RBAB were associated with significantly more postoperative drainage than the other methods. Postoperatively, more flap problems and wound infections were found in the RO than control group, and more transient vocal cord palsy was found in the EAx and EBAB groups. MIVA ranked first in terms of operative time, postoperative drainage amount, postoperative pain, and hospitalization, but cosmetic satisfaction was low. EAx, RAx, and MIVA ranked higher than the other approaches in terms of operative bleeding.

CONCLUSION

It was confirmed that minimally invasive thyroidectomy achieves high cosmetic satisfaction and is not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy in terms of surgical results or perioperative complications. Laryngoscope, 133:2470-2479, 2023.

Surgical completeness and safety of minimally invasive thyroidectomy in patients with thyroid cancer: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To assess the surgical outcomes of various minimally invasive and remote-access surgical approaches for thyroid cancer patients.

METHODS

We collected studies from January 2020 to July 2022 in 6 databases. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed for outcomes and complications of 9 minimally invasive interventions (minimally invasive video-assisted, endoscopic or robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach, endoscopic or robotic postauricular, endoscopic or robot transaxillary approach, transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach or robotic thyroidectomy) and conventional thyroidectomy (control).

RESULTS

Multiplicity and bilaterality of cancer, lymph node metastasis, and coincidence of thyroiditis showed no significant difference between minimally invasive interventions and control. However, larger tumor size (robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach standardized mean difference -1.3989, 95% confidence interval [-2.1717 to -0.6262]), higher body mass index (robot transaxillary approach standardized mean difference -0.5350, 95% confidence interval [-0.9557 to -0.1144], robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach standardized mean difference -0.2301, 95% confidence interval [-0.4389 to -0.0214]), and frequent extrathyroidal extension (robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach standardized mean difference 0.7435, 95% confidence interval [0.5602-0.9869]) were observed in control. In surgical outcomes and adverse effects, there was no significant difference in hospitalization or retrieved lymph node number between minimally invasive interventions and control. However, longer operative time was observed in the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach(standardized mean difference 6.5393, 95% confidence interval [5.0476-8.0309]) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (standardized mean difference 5.4946, 95% confidence interval [2.9984-7.9907]) groups than in control. In surgical completion, the rate of low postoperative serum thyroglobulin, postoperative thyroglobulin level, and postoperative radioactive iodine ablation dose showed no significant difference between minimally invasive interventions and control.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive thyroidectomy did not show inferior results compared to conventional thyroidectomy despite the longer operative time. Surgeons need to prudently consider all aspects of patients to determine the proper surgical approach for thyroid cancer.

Comparison of endoscopic thyroidectomy by complete areola approach and conventional open surgery in the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A retrospective study and meta-analysis

Background

The feasibility of endoscopic thyroidectomy by complete areola approach (ETCA) remains controversial. This study was conducted by combining our clinical data with the data obtained from a systematic review literature search to examine the effectiveness and safety of ETCA compared with conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).

Methods

A total of 136 patients with a diagnosis of DTC who underwent unilateral thyroidectomy with central neck dissection from August 2020 to June 2021 were enrolled. The enrolled patients were divided into the ETCA group (n = 73) and the COT group (n = 63). The operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, number of removed lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, postoperative drainage volume, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, and complications were analyzed. Then, a systemic review and comprehensive literature search were conducted by using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP database up to June 2022. Review Manager software version 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

The results of clinical data showed that there were significant differences between the two groups in the operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, removed lymph nodes, and postoperative drainage volume. There were no statistical differences in the length of postoperative hospital stay, number of metastatic lymph nodes, postoperative PTH level, and complications. In the systematic review and meta-analysis, 2,153 patients from fourteen studies (including our data) were ultimately included. The results of the meta-analysis found that ETCA had a longer operative time, larger postoperative drainage volume, and lower intraoperative bleeding volume. In terms of the length of postoperative hospital stay, the number of removed lymph nodes, and surgical complications, there was no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion

ETCA poses lower surgical bleeding and better cosmetic appearance compared with COT, while the length of operation and postoperative drainage in ETCA is less favorable compared with COT. In addition, ETCA is not inferior to COT in terms of the postoperative hospitalization stay, the number of removed lymph nodes, and surgical complications. Given its overall advantages and risks, ETCA is an effective and safe alternative for patients with cosmetic concerns.

Safety and Efficacy of Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy for Thyroid Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

This systemic review and meta-analysis compared and analyzed the safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic thyroidectomy on the thyroid tumor with other thyroid approaches. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy showed similar results to other robotic-assisted thyroid surgeries. Compared to a conventional open thyroidectomy, transoral robotic thyroidectomy had longer operational times and hospitalization days, and worse postoperative pain, but a higher cosmetic satiation score. However, more randomized controlled studies need to be included and analyzed.

Abstract

Background: To assess the safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) in thyroid tumor. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar up to June 2022. Studies comparing outcomes and complications between TORT and control groups (robotic bilateral axillo-breast, trans-axillary, postauricular approach, conventional open thyroidectomy (OT), and transoral endoscopic approach) were analyzed. Results: Ten studies of 1420 individuals. The operative time (SMD 1.15, 95%CI [0.48; 1.89]) was significantly longer and the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) (SMD −0.27, 95%CI [−0.39; −0.16]) was fewer in TORT than in the control group. The postoperative cosmetic satisfaction score (SMD 0.60, 95%CI [0.28; 0.92]) was statistically higher in TORT than in the control group. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference between robotic surgeries. However, TORT had significantly longer operative times (SMD 2.08, 95%CI [0.95; 3.20]) and fewer retrieved LNs (SMD −0.32, 95%CI [−0.46; −0.17]) than OT. TORT satisfied significantly more patients in cosmetic view. However, it increased hospitalization days and postoperative pain on the operation day and first day compared to OT. Conclusions: TORT is not inferior to other robotic-assisted approaches. Its operation time and hospitalization days are longer and postoperative pain is greater than OT, although its cosmetic satisfaction is high.

Remote Access Thyroid Surgery: A Review of Literature

Since the first description of endoscopic thyroid lobectomy in 1997, a variety of techniques have been developed to avoid the visible cervical scar conventionally been associated with thyroidectomy. These "remote access" approaches, which typically use either endoscopic or robotic instrumentation, have successfully avoided the anterior neck scar, which has a measurable impact on the patient's quality of life (Graves and Suh Surgery 168(5):845-850, 2020; Sakorafas World J Surg 34(8):1793-1804, 2010). The main advantage of these techniques is better cosmesis compared to conventional transcervical approaches (Graves and Suh Surgery 168(5):845-850, 2020) However, these techniques have failed to gain widespread acceptance in the surgical community because of the technical challenges, scepticism about oncological safety and cost factors. This review presents an overview of the various methods of remote access thyroid surgery (RATS) and also evaluates the selection criteria, oncological efficacy, training requirements and key advantages of this technique.

Current practice of thyroid surgery in Germany: a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Due to the lack of perioperative standards in thyroid surgery, this study aimed to evaluate the perioperative management and wound closure techniques used in a nationwide survey.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire evaluating preferred technique in thyroid resection, postoperative management, and the occurrence of complications was sent to all hospitals in Germany performing more than 50 thyroid operations p.a. (n=362, response rate 78% (n=283)). Subsequently, hospitals were subdivided into university and maximum care hospitals (Category A, n=54) and tertiary hospitals and basic care hospitals (Category B, n=229).

RESULTS

10.6% of the hospitals were certified as a center for thyroid surgery, with a significantly higher percentage in Category A (20.4% vs. 8.3%; p<0.01). Concerning the surgical techniques, Kocher´s incision was the favored cervical approach in 96% of the hospitals. A minimally invasive approach was performed in 30.1%, with a significantly more common description in category A. 97.8% of all clinics stated that they perform a platysma muscle suture, primarily as a single stitch interrupted. Skin closure was predominantly performed via intracutaneous suture in 84.5% using absorbable suture material in 63.1%. There was no difference in the technology used in terms of hospital size. The mean in-hospital stay was significantly shorter in Category A hospitals (p=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The suture technique used in thyroid surgery in Germany is a simple interrupted suture technique for platysma and a continuous suture with absorbable skin closure material. Maximum care hospitals are characterized by shorter in-hospital stays and improved quality assurance.

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Conventional thyroidectomy has been standard of care for surgical thyroid nodules. For cosmetic purposes different minimally invasive and remote-access surgical approaches have been developed. At present, the most used robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy approaches are minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), bilateral axillo-breast approach endoscopic thyroidectomy (BABA-ET), bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA-RT), transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach (TOETVA), retro-auricular endoscopic thyroidectomy (RA-ET), retro-auricular robotic thyroidectomy (RA-RT), gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GTET) and robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate whether minimally invasive techniques are not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Web of Science to identify original articles investigating operating time, length of hospital stay and complication rates regarding recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia, of the different minimally invasive techniques.

RESULTS

Out of 569 identified manuscripts, 98 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective in nature. The results of the systematic review varied. Thirty-one articles were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to the standard of care, the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in length of hospital stay, except a longer stay after BABA-ET. No significant difference in incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia was seen. As expected, operating time was significantly longer for most minimally invasive techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the eight most commonly used minimally invasive thyroid surgeries individually with standard of care. It can be concluded that minimally invasive techniques do not lead to more complications or longer hospital stay and are, therefore, not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy.

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy in Asian patients: experience from Singapore

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) although well established in Europe has not yet gained widespread acceptance in Asia. We describe our learning experience in the first reported series of 105 cases from Singapore.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of outcomes in 105 patients who underwent MIVAT from April 2011 to 2018 was performed. The inclusion criteria were - symptomatic benign thyroid pathologies and follicular lesions or neoplasms needing a hemi-thyroidectomy. A thyroid lobe volume less than 35 mL was used as cut-off. Patients underwent surgeon-performed thyroid ultrasound with biopsy of solid nodules. All cases were operated by one surgeon using standard Miccoli technique with energy device used in all cases.

RESULTS

From a total of 424 patients with nodular goitres undergoing thyroidectomy, 105 (24%) symptomatic eligible patients underwent the MIVAT procedure (M:F - 23:82). The mean incision lengths at start and completion were 1.7 cm (range 1.5-2 cm) and 2.4 cm (range 2-2.7 cm), respectively. Mean operating time was 97 min (range 59-160 min). There were four conversions (3.8%) in the first 25 cases and four patients (3.8%) experienced transient hoarseness with full recovery. Visual analogue pain scores at 6 and 24 h post-operatively were 2.7 and 1.1, respectively. Scar satisfaction was reported as excellent (75%), satisfactory (23%) and poor (2%).

CONCLUSION

Although technically more demanding, MIVAT is a safe and useful operation in a thyroid surgeon's armamentarium. The limitation of goitre size, however, allows only a small percentage of symptomatic patients to undergo this procedure.

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy: Analysis of Complications From a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is considered a safe and effective option. However, its complication rate has not been specifically discussed yet. The aim of this systematic review was enrolling a large number of studies to estimate early and late complications (transient and definitive, uni- and bilateral laryngeal nerve palsy; transient and definitive hypocalcemia; cervical hematoma; hypertrophic or keloid scar) of MIVAT compared with conventional technique.

METHODS

The review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria in PubMed and Embase. Search terms were "minimally invasive," "video-assisted," and "thyroidectomy." We enrolled randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized trials, and noncontrolled trials.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles were considered suitable. Complication rate of MIVAT was quite similar to conventional technique: only one randomized trial found a significant difference concerning overall skin complication, and a single trial highlighted hypocalcemia significantly increased in MIVAT, concerning serologic value only. No difference concerning symptomatic nor definitive hypocalcemia was found.

CONCLUSIONS

We can confirm that MIVAT is a safe technique. It should be adopted in mean-high-volume surgery centers for thyroidectomy, if a strict compliance with indication was applied.

The advantages of extended subplatysmal dissection in thyroid surgery-the "mobile window" technique

PURPOSE

Minimal access thyroidectomy, using various techniques, is widely known, but respective data on thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer with lymphadenectomy is scarce. The present study aims to evaluate the feasability of extended subplatysmal dissection in combination with a small incision ("mobile window" technique).

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed analysing data from 93 patients. All patients suffered from thyroid carcinoma and underwent (total) thyroidectomy, bilateral cervico-central (levels VI and VII) and functional lateral neck dissection (levels II to V) on the side of the malignancy. In group A, consisting of 47 patients, the operation was performed by a traditional Kocher incision (minimal range 6-7 cm), in 46 patients (group B) a mini-incision (≤4 cm) was made. Intra- and postoperative morbidity as well as oncological accuracy were assessed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups comparing postoperative pathological diagnosis, intra- and postoperative complications and the number of removed lymph nodes. However, operating time was slightly longer in group A and thyroid weight was heavier in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended subplatymsal dissection allows thyroidectomy and even lateral lymphadenectomy for thyroid carcinoma via "mobile" mini-incision. The procedure is safe, of equivalent oncological accuracy compared to traditional incision and the cosmetic results are excellent.

A paired comparison analysis of third-party rater thyroidectomy scar preference

OBJECTIVE

To determine the length and position of a thyroidectomy scar that is cosmetically most appealing to naïve raters.

METHODS

Images of thyroidectomy scars were reproduced on male and female necks using digital imaging software. Surgical variables studied were scar position and length. Fifteen raters were presented with 56 scar pairings and asked to identify which was preferred cosmetically. Twenty duplicate pairings were included to assess rater reliability. Analysis of variance was used to determine preference.

RESULTS

Raters preferred low, short scars, followed by high, short scars, with long scars in either position being less desirable (p < 0.05). Twelve of 15 raters had acceptable intra-rater and inter-rater reliability.

CONCLUSION

Naïve raters preferred low, short scars over the alternatives. High, short scars were the next most favourably rated. If other factors influencing incision choice are considered equal, surgeons should consider these preferences in scar position and length when planning their thyroidectomy approach.

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy: Almost a Decade of Experience at an Academic Center

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has gained acceptance as an alternative to conventional thyroidectomy. This technique results in less bleeding, postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, and better cosmetic results without increasing morbidity. We retrospectively assessed outcomes in 583 patients having MIVAT from May 2005 to September 2014. The study population was divided into groups according to periods: 2005 to 2009 and 2010 to 2014. Operative data, complications, and length of stay were collected and compared. Total thyroidectomy was undertaken in 185, completion thyroidectomy in 49, and hemithyroidectomy in 349. Malignancy was present in 127 (21.8%). Mean incision was 3.4 ± 0.7 cm and estimated blood loss was 23.7 ± 21.7 mL. Mean operative time was 86.5 ± 39.3 minutes for all operations, 78.5 ± 37.0 minutes for hemithyroidectomy, 70.9 ± 30.1 minutes for completion thyroidectomy, and 106.8 ± 41.3 minutes for total thyroidectomy. Postoperatively, 56 (9.6%) had unilateral vocal cord dysfunction, which resolved except for one case (0.17%). Fifty-nine patients (10.1%) developed hypocalcemia, but only three cases (0.51%) became permanent. Only one patient required readmission. In conclusion, MIVAT results in short operative times, minimal blood loss, and few complications and is safely performed in an academic institution.

Short and long-term cosmesis of cervical thyroidectomy scars

Introduction Multiple surgical approaches to the thyroid gland have been described via cervical or extracervical routes. Improved cosmesis, patient satisfaction, reduced pain (procedure dependent) and early discharge have all been reported for minimally invasive approaches with similar safety profiles and long-term outcomes to conventional surgery. This review summarises the current evidence base for improved cosmesis with minimally invasive cervical approaches to the thyroid gland compared with conventional surgery. Methods A systematic review was undertaken. The MEDLINE(®), Embase™ and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles. Results A total of 57 papers thyroid papers were identified. Of those, 20 reported some form of cosmetic outcome assessment. There were 6 randomised controlled trials with 412 patients (evidence level 2B), 7 cohort studies with 3,073 patients (level 3B) and 7 non-comparative case series with 1,575 patients (level 4). There was significant heterogeneity between studies in terms of wound closure technique, timing of scar assessment and scar assessment scales (validated and non-validated). Most studies performed early scar assessments, some using non-validated scar assessment tools. Conclusions Assessment of cosmesis is complex and requires rigorous methodology. Evidence from healing/remodelling studies suggests scar maturation is a long-term process. This calls into question the value of early scar assessment. Current evidence does not support minimally invasive surgical approaches to the thyroid gland if improved long-term cosmesis is the goal.

Total endoscopic versus conventional open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of total endoscopic thyroidectomy (TET) versus conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma with regard to short-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library between January 1996 and July 2014 were searched to identify relevant comparative studies. Pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using either fixed or random-effects models. The perioperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five eligible nonrandomized studies were included, involving 1004 patients: 475 were TET and 529 were COT. Meta-analysis results revealed that TET group had a significantly longer operative time (WMD, 48.15; 95% CI, 27.54-68.75; P < 0.00001), compared with the COT group. While analyzing the number of removed lymph nodes, 4 studies were included. The TET group had a less number of removed lymph nodes (WMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.20 to -0.15; P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in terms of hospital stay, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, transient hypocalcemia, and permanent hypocalcemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Total endoscopic thyroidectomy appears to be a much feasible safe surgical procedure for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in selected patients.

Video-assisted surgery for thyroid cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Today is well known that endoscopic thyroidectomy could reach the same level of completeness as a conventional operation. We have been using minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) as our favorite minimally invasive access to thyroid diseases from the late nineties.

METHODS

Our experience with MIVAT is represented by 2,413 cases between 1998 and 2014: in particular 821 patients were operated with a total thyroidectomy for a papillary carcinoma (34.0%). Furthermore 967 patients underwent a MVAT for the presence of an undetermined lesion (40.0%).

RESULTS

The conversion rate was very low: 24 patients (1.0%), mainly due to: unexpected posterior tracheal invasions (nine patients), involvement of lymph nodes not evident at echography (four patients), esophageal infiltration (three patients), strap muscles infiltration (three patients) and finally in five cases the presence of serious thyroiditis that had escaped to ultrasonographic evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimally MIVAT to treat malignant thyroid tumors has today a very clear indication for malignancies.

Six-Year Experience With Endoscopic Thyroidectomy: Outcomes and Safety Profile

BACKGROUND

Though minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) offers many advantages over traditional thyroid surgery, its adoption in North America has been limited. This study analyzes the largest series of MIVAT in North America to explore its safety.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing thyroid surgery by a single surgeon from 2003 to 2011 at an academic tertiary care medical center was evaluated. Demographic information, surgical and pathologic data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Beginning in 2005, a total of 260 MIVATs were performed during the study period. Outpatient surgery was accomplished in 234 MIVATs (90%). MIVAT patients were predominantly young (46.8±14.8 years vs 52.4±14.6 years for conventional thyroidectomy) and female (88.5% vs 75.5% for conventional thyroidectomy). There were no cases of permanent hypoparathyroidism or permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve dysfunction. Observed complications included transient recurrent laryngeal nerve dysfunction (n=10; 3.8%), cellulitis (n=1; 0.4%), and temporary hypocalcemia (n=6; 2.3%). The overall complication rate for MIVAT (6.5%) was lower than the overall complication rate in conventional thyroidectomy (18.5%, P<.0001).

CONCLUSION

MIVAT can be performed safely with a low complication profile in a high-volume practice. The safety of MIVAT represented by this experience supports broader adoption across surgical practices.

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer: a prospective 5-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) was initially introduced for the treatment of selected patients who met certain thyroid volume, nodule size and pathological criteria. Recent studies indicate that the completeness of resection of malignant nodules is comparable to that obtained with conventional thyroidectomy.

AIMS

To compare the 5-year outcomes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) treated with MIVAT versus conventional thyroidectomy.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study conducted over 2 years (July 2005-June 2007), 172 patients with node-negative, nonmetastatic PTC underwent either MIVAT (n = 67) or conventional thyroidectomy (n = 105). Study outcomes were 1) the cumulative dose of radioactive iodine (RAI) to achieve a disease-free state, defined as a stimulated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level &lt;2 ng/mL with negative Tg antibody and no tumor on a whole-body scan or cross-sectional imaging, and 2) the 5-year serum Tg level.

RESULTS

The clinical parameters of the MIVAT and conventional thyroidectomy groups were comparable except for age (mean 43 ± 12 vs. 59 ± 17 years, respectively; p = 0.03) and operative time (mean 69 ± 24 vs. 53 ± 16 minutes, p = 0.02); the mean tumor size was similar between groups (1.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.9 cm, p = 0.14). Surgical morbidity was similar in both groups. Median follow-up was 5 years. RAI dose (mean 72 ± 38 vs. 96 ± 47 mCu, p = 0.34) and serum Tg at 5 years (mean 0.3 ± 0.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3 ng/mL, p = 0.30) were not significantly different between the MIVAT and conventional thyroidectomy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MIVAT can be safely utilized in patients with localized PTC, providing comparable completeness of resection and oncological outcome to conventional thyroidectomy.

[Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: establishment in a thyroid center]

BACKGROUND

This study retrospectively evaluated a series of patients who underwent minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) during the introduction stage of this surgical technique at the Martha-Maria Hospital in Nuremberg.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The eligibility criteria for MIVAT were a thyroid volume < 25 ml, nodules < 30 mm, no thyroiditis, no preoperative evidence of carcinoma and no previous neck surgery. A retrospective evaluation was performed together with a control group of patients who underwent conventional thyroid surgery during the same time period and included a follow-up for general patient satisfaction and cosmetic results.

RESULTS

Between August 2008 and July 2009 a total of 55 patients underwent MIVAT including 8 conversions to open surgery and 45 patients who underwent conventional surgery served as matched controls. No significant differences in terms of perioperative complication rates were found (e.g. recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, hypocalcemia or secondary hemorrhage). The mean operating time was significantly longer in the MIVAT group (96.8 ± 3.7 min vs. 69.8 ± 2.3 min, p = 0.001) whereas a significant decrease in the mean operating time for hemithyroidectomy after 5 months was observed (98.1 ± 3.77 min vs. 76.0 ± 4.98 min, p = 0.013). Patients in the MIVAT group were more satisfied with the cosmetic outcome (8.5 ± 0.3 vs. 8.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.05) as well as with the overall surgical procedure (9.0 ± 0.3 vs. 8.6 ± 0.2, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

During introduction of the MIVAT procedure a learning effect can be observed which is hallmarked by a decrease in operating time and conversion rate to open surgery. Moreover, no significant differences in terms of main postoperative complications were found so that MIVAT can be considered a safe and feasible technique under the conditions of correct eligibility criteria.

The role of surgery in the current management of differentiated thyroid cancer

In the last decades, a surprising increased incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), along with a precocious diagnosis of "small" tumors and microcarcinomas have been observed. In these cases, better oncological outcomes are expected, and a "tailored" and "less aggressive" multimodal therapeutic protocol should be considered, avoiding an unfavorable even if minimal morbidity following an "overtreatment." In order to better define the most suitable surgical approach, its benefits and risks, we discuss the role of surgery in the current management of DTCs in the light of data appeared in the literature. Even if lymph node metastases are commonly observed, and in up to 90 % of DTC cases micrometastases are reported, the impact of lymphatic involvement on long-term survival is still argument of intensive research, and indications and extension of lymph node dissection (LD) are still under debate. In particular, endocrine and neck surgeons are still divided between proponents and opponents of routine central LD (RCLD). Considering the available evidence, there is agreement about total thyroidectomy, therapeutic LD in clinically node-positive DTC patients, and RCLD in "high risk" cases. Nevertheless, indications to the best surgical treatment of clinically node-negative "low risk" patients are still subject of research. Considering on the one hand, the recent trend toward routine central lymphadenectomy, avoiding radioactive treatment, and on the other hand, the satisfactory results obtained reserving prophylactic LD to "high risk" patients, we think that further prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate the best choice between the different surgical approaches.

Minimally invasive compared with conventional thyroidectomy for nodular goitre

Since minimally invasive thyroidectomy was introduced in 1997, different surgical approaches to the thyroid have been described: the minimal neck incision and the anterior chest, areolar breast or axillary access. Whereas conventional open thyroidectomy is suitable for any thyroid disease, minimal neck incision thyroidectomy or extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy are limited to small-volume disease. In 11 prospective randomized studies and six systematic reviews, minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy via a central or lateral neck approach afforded better cosmesis in the first 3 months than conventional open thyroidectomy, with less postoperative pain for the first 48 h. Surgical morbidity did not differ in these limited studies. No head-to-head comparison is available for extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy. Extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy caused more postoperative pain and gave rise to complications not seen with minimal neck incision thyroidectomy or conventional open thyroidectomy. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, conventional open thyroidectomy continues to remain the gold standard for any nodular goitre.

Systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and conventional thyroidectomy (CT)

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has gained acceptance among surgeons as its feasibility has been well documented. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis has been to assess and validate the safety and feasibility of MIVAT when compared to conventional thyroidectomy (CT) and to verify other potential benefits and drawbacks.

METHODS

A literature search for prospective randomized trials comparing MIVAT and CT was performed. Trials were reviewed for the primary outcome measures: overall morbidity, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, postoperative hypocalcemia, and postoperative hematoma; and for the secondary outcome measures: operative time, conversion to standard procedure, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative drain insertion, nodule size and thyroid weight, postoperative pain evaluation, length of hospital stay, patient satisfactory score, and cosmetics results. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for continuous variables and odds ratio for qualitative variables.

RESULTS

Nine prospective randomized studies comparing MIVAT and CT were analyzed. Overall, 581 patients were randomized to either MIVAT (289, 49.7 %) or CT (292, 50.3 %). The primary outcome measures of MIVAT were comparable with those of CT without statistically significant difference. Patients who underwent MIVAT experienced significantly less pain than those operated on conventionally during the whole postoperative period. Patient satisfactory score significantly favored MIVAT (9.0 vs. 6.8, SMD = -3.388, 95 % CI = -5.720 to -1.057). Operative time was significantly longer in MIVAT (75.2 vs. 59.2 min, SMD = 1.246, 95 % CI = 0.227-2.266).

CONCLUSIONS

MIVAT is a safe and feasible alternative for the removal of small-volume benign thyroid disease and low-risk papillary thyroid carcinomas showing better cosmetics results and less postoperative pain but significantly longer operative time when compared to CT. New multicenter randomized studies are needed to evaluate the technique in more complex circumstances such as intermediate-risk thyroid cancer, lymph node removal, thyroiditis, and Graves' disease.