Experienced trauma team leaders save the lives of multiple-trauma patients with severe head injuries

The effect of an on-site trauma surgeon during resuscitations of severely injured patients

BACKGROUND

Although the timely involvement of trauma surgeons is widely accepted as standard care in a trauma center, there is an ongoing debate regarding the value of an on-site attending trauma surgeon compared to an on-call trauma surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of introducing an on-site trauma surgeons and the effect of their presence on the adherence to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) related tasks and resuscitation pace in the trauma bay.

METHODS

The resuscitations of severely injured (ISS > 15) trauma patients 1 month before and 1 month after the introduction of an on-site trauma surgeon were assessed using video analysis. The primary outcome was total resuscitation time. Second, time from trauma bay admission until tasks were performed, and ATLS adherence were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight videos of resuscitations have been analyzed. After the introduction of an on-site trauma surgeon, the mean total resuscitation time was 259 seconds shorter (p = 0.03) and seven ATLS related tasks (breathing assessment, first and second IV access, EKG monitoring and abdominal, pelvic, and long bone examination; were performed significantly earlier during trauma resuscitation (p ≤ 0.05). Further, we found a significant enhancement to the adherence of six ATLS related tasks (Airway assessment, application of a rigid collar, IV access; EKG monitoring, log roll, and pronouncing results of arterial blood gas analysis; p-value ≤0.05).

CONCLUSION

Having a trauma surgeon on-site during trauma resuscitations of severely injured patients resulted in improved processes in the trauma bay. This demonstrates the need of direct involvement of trauma surgeons in institutions treating severely injured patients.

The pace of a trauma resuscitation: experience matters

Purpose

Resuscitation quality and pace depend on effective team coordination, which can be facilitated by adequate leadership. Our primary aim was to assess the influence of trauma team leader experience on resuscitation pace. Second, we investigated the influence of injury severity on resuscitation pace.

Methods

The trauma team leaders were identified (Staff trauma surgeon vs Fellow trauma surgeon) and classified from video analysis during a 1-week period. Resuscitations were assessed for time to the treatment plan, total resuscitation time, and procedure time. Furthermore, patient and resuscitation characteristics were assessed and compared: age, gender, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale < 9, and the number (and duration) of surgical procedures during initial resuscitation. Correlations between total resuscitation time, Injury Severity Score, and time to treatment plan were calculated.

Results

After adjustment for the time needed for procedures, the time to treatment plan and total resuscitation time was significantly shorter in resuscitations led by a Staff trauma surgeon compared to a Fellow trauma surgeon (median 648 s (IQR 472–813) vs 852 s (IQR 694–1256); p 0.01 resp. median 1280 s (IQR 979–1494) vs 1535 s (IQR 1247–1864), p 0.04). Surgical procedures were only performed during resuscitations led by Staff trauma surgeons (4 thorax drains, 1 endotracheal intubation, 1 closed fracture reduction). Moreover, a significant negative correlation (r:  – 0.698, p < 0.01) between Injury Severity Score and resuscitation time was found.

Conclusion

Experienced trauma team leaders may positively influence the pace of the resuscitation. Moreover, we found that the resuscitation pace increases when the patient is more severely injured.

Auswirkung der Implementierung eines Schockraumkoordinators auf Prozessparameter der Polytraumaversorgung im Schockraum eines Maximalversorgers

Hintergrund

In der Altersgruppe bis 40 Jahre stellt das schwere Trauma die häufigste Todesursache in Deutschland dar. Entsprechend der S3-Leitlinie „Polytrauma/Schwerverletztenbehandlung“ ist seit 2011 die Anwesenheit eines Schockraumkoordinators in Erwägung zu ziehen, der durch optimierte Versorgungs- und Behandlungsabläufe das Überleben der Patienten verbessern kann. Ziel der vorliegenden Untersuchung war die Analyse unterschiedlicher Prozessparameter zur Schockraumversorgung polytraumatisierter Patienten vor und nach Implementierung eines Schockraumkoordinators für die Polytraumaversorgung.

Material und Methoden

Um einen ausreichenden zeitlichen Abstand zum Zeitpunkt der Neueinführungen (2011) einzuhalten, wurden die Jahre 2009 und 2012 zum Vergleich herangezogen: Alle eingescannten Schockraumprotokolle der Jahre 2009 (01.01.2009–31.12.2009) und 2012 (01.01.2012–31.12.2012) wurden gesichtet und ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse

Aus dem Jahr 2009 wurden 213 und aus dem Jahr 2012 wurden 420 Schockraumeinsätze in die Auswertung einbezogen. Die durchschnittliche Schockraumanzahl lag im Jahr 2009 bei 17,8/Monat und im Jahr 2012 bei 35/Monat. Die mittlere Anzahl der Schockraumeinsätze hat sich nahezu verdoppelt (p < 0,001). Die mittlere Schockraumdauer lag im Jahr 2012 im Durchschnitt 5,8 min unter der im Jahr 2009 (p = 0,56).

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Patientenversorgung war in Anwesenheit eines Schockraumkoordinators bzw. nach Implementierung der SOP weder statistisch signifikant noch klinisch relevant verkürzt.