Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Transcoccygeal resection for a presacral GIST of the distal rectum

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) of the rectum are rare and comprise about 5% of all GISTs. Workup includes biopsy with immunohistochemistry analysis. Surgical excision is the standard treatment, although tyrosine kinase inhibitors, particularly imatinib, are known to be useful in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. We present a case of a woman in her 70s who was diagnosed with distal rectal GIST. MRI revealed the tumour to be located within the presacral space. She underwent core needle biopsy with immunohistochemistry confirming KIT-positive GIST. The patient received neoadjuvant imatinib therapy, followed by surgical excision via the transcoccygeal approach (Kraske procedure). She recovered appropriately and went on to receive adjuvant imatinib therapy. We describe the progression of this patient's care and review various pertinent therapies for distal rectal GIST, highlighting the transcoccygeal resection as a safe and effective approach.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): British Sarcoma Group clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

British Sarcoma Group guidelines for the management of GIST were initially informed by those published by the European Society of Clinical Oncology. This update was written by a group of experts to includes a discussion of the highlight improvements in our knowledge of the disease and recent treatment developments. The guidelines include sections on Incidence, Aetiology, Diagnosis, including risk assessment, Treatment and Follow-up.

METHODS

A careful review of the literature was performed to ensure that wherever possible recommendations are supported by the results of clinical trials or substantive retrospective reports. Areas of uncertainty are indicated appropriately.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines represent a consensus view of current best clinical practice. Where appropriate, key recommendations are given and the levels of evidence and strength of recommendation gradings are those used by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Resection With the Transanal Approach for Massive Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are often asymptomatic and may be detected as giant tumors. This may require highly invasive surgery for radical resection. Here, we describe a 74-year-old man with a locally advanced non-metastatic GIST in the right anterolateral wall of the lower rectum. The tumor was giant (128 × 93 mm), and invasion into adjacent organs (right seminal vesicle and prostate gland) was suspected. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with imatinib reduced the tumor size, it was still giant, 80 mm in diameter. Therefore, we performed super-low anterior resection using a robot-assisted laparoscopic approach with the transanal approach. The bi-directional approach enabled safe and precise surgery, is expected to increase the rate of anorectal preservation as well as R0 resection, and may prevent a decline in quality of life.

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in a patient with Crohn's disease: a rare coincidence case report and brief literature review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common type of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors. The most common site for developing these neoplasms is the stomach and small intestine. In contrast, anorectal GISTs are very rare. Population-based studies have shown an increased risk of colorectal cancers (CRC) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). As in sporadic CRC, adenocarcinomas are the most commonly observed tumor. Accordingly, it is expected that rectal mass in CD patients to be an adenocarcinoma. Some reports have presented CD cases with GISTs along the gastrointestinal tract; however, to the best of our knowledge, a rectal GIST has not been reported in CD. Herein, we report a 41-year-old woman with CD who presented with 8 weeks of constipation and was diagnosed with rectal GIST and briefly review existing reports regarding GIST in IBD.

The Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy in a Giant Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is a rare disease with an annual incidence of 10 cases per million. Herein, we present the case of a 45-year-old man who visited our clinic with complaints of weight loss and anorexia, without changes in bowel habits or vomiting, for four months. On physical examination, all vital signs were normal. The abdomen was distended without tenderness and had a giant upper abdominal mass. Tumour marker investigation revealed high levels of cancer antigen 125 with normal levels of alpha-1-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a mass measuring 35 × 25 × 20 cm, likely originating from the fundus of the stomach. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy indicated external compression of the stomach and a fundal submucosal mass. Ultrasound-guided biopsy demonstrated the presence of a GIST. There was a severe danger of both the tumour rupturing during surgery and the combined excision of adjacent organs if the surgery was performed with the massive tumour. Therefore, daily neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib 400 mg was administered for three months. Post-therapeutic CT indicated a significant reduction in the size of the mass, which now measured 17 × 14 × 21 cm. The patient underwent surgical resection a month after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy, and the post-operative period was uneventful. He was followed up regularly at the general surgery department for 24 months without recurrence. This case asserts the benefit of neoadjuvant therapy in reducing the tumour size pre-operatively, which enhances the complete resection rate, prevents the need for multi-organ resection, and lowers the risk of surgery.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GIST) of the Rectum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) have many treatment options, but uncertainty remains regarding the best treatment regimen for this rare pathology. The aim of this review is to assess the optimal management approach including timing of chemotherapy. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles comparing the impact of radical vs. local excision, and neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant therapy had on outcomes in the management of rectal GISTs. We specifically evaluated the influence that the aforementioned factors had on margins, recurrence, overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and hospital length of stay. Results: Twenty-eight studies met our predefined criteria and were included in our study, twelve of which were included in the quantitative synthesis. When comparing neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy, our meta-analysis noted no significance in terms of margin negativity (R0) (odds ratio [OR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7−5.79, p = 0.20) or recurrence rates (OR 0.22, 95% CI, 0.02−1.91, p = 0.17). However, there was a difference in overall 5-year survival in favour of neoadjuvant therapy (OR 3.19, 95% CI, 1.37−7.40, * p = 0.007). Comparing local excision versus radical excision, our meta-analysis observed no significance in terms of overall 5-year survival (OR1.31, 95% CI, 0.81−2.12, p = 0.26), recurrence (OR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.40−1.13, p = 0.12), or 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.10, 95% CI, 0.55−2.19, p = 0.80). There was a difference in length of hospital stay with a reduced mean length of stay in local excision group (mean difference [MD] 6.74 days less in the LE group; 95% CI, −6.92−−6.56, * p =< 0.00001) as well as a difference in R0 rates in favour of radical resection (OR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.47−0.99, * p = 0.05). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall 5-year survival, while local excision is associated with reduced mean length of hospital stay. Further large-volume, prospective studies are required to further define the optimal treatment regimen in this complex pathology.

Comparison of prognosis between neoadjuvant imatinib and upfront surgery for GIST: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Significant survival benefit of adjuvant imatinib therapy has been observed in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, the impact of neoadjuvant imatinib on prognosis of GIST remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognostic impact between upfront surgery and neoadjuvant imatinib plus surgery on GIST.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify eligible studies up to 30 Sep 2021, through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Studies compared the impact of upfront surgery and neoadjuvant imatinib plus surgery on disease-free (DFS) or overall survival (OS) in patients with GIST were selected.

Results: Seven eligible studies with 17,171 patients were included. The reduction rates of tumor size in rectal and mixed site GIST were 33% and 29.8%, respectively. Neoadjuvant imatinib was not significantly associated with DFS compared with no-neoadjuvant therapy in rectal GIST (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.35–1.41). The OS of rectal GIST was significantly improved by neoadjuvant imatinib compared with no-neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17–0.75).

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy contributed to tumor shrinkage and R0 resection of rectal GIST. Neoadjuvant imatinib plus surgery significantly improved overall survival of rectal GIST in comparison with upfront surgery.

Effect of skeletal muscle loss during neoadjuvant imatinib therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced GIST

BACKGROUND

Currently, the effect of skeletal muscle loss during neoadjuvant imatinib therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (LA-GIST) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the relationship between changes in skeletal muscle and postoperative complications, survival and tumor response in patients with LA-GIST during neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pre- and post-treatment computed tomography images of 57 GIST patients who underwent radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib from January 2013 to March 2019. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured at the L3 vertebral level in all patients. A cut-off value (SMI < 52.3 cm²/m² and < 38.6 cm²/m² for men and women, respectively) published in a previous study was used to define sarcopenia. Based on gender, we defined ΔSMI (%)/250 days above 9.69% for men and ΔSMI (%)/250 days above 7.63% for women as significant muscle loss (SML). Factors associated with postoperative complications and tumor response were analyzed using logistic regression, and predictors affecting patient prognosis were analyzed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of the 57 patients, sarcopenia was present before and after neoadjuvant therapy in 20 (35.09%) and 28 (49.12%) patients, respectively. It was not associated with immediate or long-term clinical outcomes. However, patients with SML during neoadjuvant therapy had a higher incidence of postoperative complications (60.00% vs. 25.00%, p = 0.008), worse pathological regression (44.00% vs. 75.00%, p = 0.017) and worse 3-year survival (Male, 68.75% vs. 95.45%, p = 0.027; Female, 66.67% vs. 100.00%, p = 0.046) than patients without SML.

CONCLUSION

The development of SML during neoadjuvant therapy in LA-GIST patients, rather than pre- and post-treatment sarcopenia, is a major prognostic factor for the long-term prognosis and is also associated with recent postoperative complication rates and pathological regression.

The role of neoadjuvant imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients - 20 years of experience from a tertial referral center

Surgery is the cornerstone of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treatment, and adjuvant therapy with imatinib has improved survival for high‐risk tumors. The use of imatinib preoperatively has been increasing, but efficacy and impact on patient outcomes have not been formally investigated. This is a retrospective study from a single‐center cohort of patients diagnosed with GIST and treated with neoadjuvant imatinib at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden over a 20‐year period. Eighty‐four patients diagnosed with GIST and treated with neoadjuvant imatinib were identified and included. Tumors were located throughout the whole gastrointestinal tract but most frequently in the stomach (n = 29; 35%) and the small intestine (n = 30; 36%), followed by the rectum (n = 12; 14%) and the gastroesophageal junction (n = 10; 12%). The tumors were large (mean 10.5 cm) and decreased after treatment (mean 7.6 cm). Main indications for neoadjuvant imatinib were tumor size or anatomical location. None of the patients with stomach tumors and four patients with tumors near the gastroesophageal junction underwent gastrectomy. Three patients with tumors in the small intestine underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, whereas seven patients with rectal tumors underwent rectal amputation. After surgery, 94% (n = 79) of the tumors had R0‐resection. About one‐fourth experienced local relapse or distant metastasis. In conclusion, neoadjuvant imatinib can reduce tumor size and prevent high morbidity due to more extensive surgery, or at least reduce the extent of the surgery, especially for tumors in the stomach or small intestine.

A multiscale cell-based model of tumor growth for chemotherapy assessment and tumor-targeted therapy through a 3D computational approach

OBJECTIVES

Computational modeling of biological systems is a powerful tool to clarify diverse processes contributing to cancer. The aim is to clarify the complex biochemical and mechanical interactions between cells, the relevance of intracellular signaling pathways in tumor progression and related events to the cancer treatments, which are largely ignored in previous studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A three-dimensional multiscale cell-based model is developed, covering multiple time and spatial scales, including intracellular, cellular, and extracellular processes. The model generates a realistic representation of the processes involved from an implementation of the signaling transduction network.

RESULTS

Considering a benign tumor development, results are in good agreement with the experimental ones, which identify three different phases in tumor growth. Simulating tumor vascular growth, results predict a highly vascularized tumor morphology in a lobulated form, a consequence of cells' motile behavior. A novel systematic study of chemotherapy intervention, in combination with targeted therapy, is presented to address the capability of the model to evaluate typical clinical protocols. The model also performs a dose comparison study in order to optimize treatment efficacy and surveys the effect of chemotherapy initiation delays and different regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Results not only provide detailed insights into tumor progression, but also support suggestions for clinical implementation. This is a major step toward the goal of predicting the effects of not only traditional chemotherapy but also tumor-targeted therapies.

Prognostic Factors and Management of Colorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Introduction The gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. Even though it can be found in any location of the digestive tract, the colorectal GIST is rare. With this study, we aim to review the current knowledge regarding the prognosis and management of colorectal GIST.

Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, and 717 articles were collected. After analyzing these studies, 60 articles were selected to use in this review.

Results The mitotic index, as well as tumor size and location were identified as good discriminators of prognosis in various studies. Surgery remains the only curative therapy for potentially resectable tumors. However, even after surgical resection, some patients develop disease recurrence and metastasis, especially those with high-risk tumors. Therefore, surgical resection alone might be inadequate for the management of all colorectal GISTs. The discovery of GIST's molecular pathway led to a shift in its therapy, insofar as tyrosine kinase inhibitors became part of the treatment schemes for this tumor, revolutionizing the treatment's outcome and prognosis.

Discussion/Conclusion The controversy concerning colorectal GIST prognosis and treatment can be, in part, attributed to the limited number of studies in the literature. In this review, we gathered the most recent knowledge about the prognosis and management of GIST in this rare location and propose two algorithms for its approach. Lastly, we highlight the importance of an individualized approach in the setting of a multidisciplinary team.

Survival outcome of local vs. radical excision in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a SEER database analysis

Background

The choice of surgical strategy for patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains controversial. This study aims to address whether the surgical procedure [local excision (LE) vs. radical excision (RE)] influences the survival outcomes.

Methods

The information of the patients recruited in this study was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A survival curve was used to evaluate the differences in cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

No significant difference was detected in the CSS between the LE and RE groups. Also, no significant differences were observed in the CSS between the two groups with respect to different T classification, N classification, tumor differentiation, tumor size, regional LN surgery, age, gender, race, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The T classification and age were independent prognostic factors in rectal GIST patients.

Conclusions

LE and RE have similar survival time after surgery, and LE could be considered as an effective surgical approach for rectal GIST.

Clinicopathological features, clinical efficacy on 101 cases of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and the significance of neoadjuvant therapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinicopathological features and clinical efficacy among 101 cases of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to investigate the significance of imatinib mesylate (IM) neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features, treatment methods, perioperative data, and prognosis of the patients were summarized and analysed in 101 patients with rectal GISTs who received treatment in the Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from August 2002 to November 2020 in China.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients, including 64 males and 37 females, were aged from 22 to 79 years (55.4 ± 12.2 years). Among the 70 patients who underwent direct surgery, 8 were very low risk cases, 10 were low risk cases, 7 were intermediate risk cases, and 45 were high risk cases. Cox regression analysis showed that postoperative IM adjuvant treatment improved the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 52 intermediate and high risk patients. Among the 31 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, the objective response rate (ORR) was 83.9% (26/31), and the disease control rate (DCR) reached 96.8% (30/31). Subgroup analysis was also conducted based on the tumour diameter. (1) Among the 36 patients with a diameter ≤ 5 cm, two patients received IM neoadjuvant therapy, while 34 patients received direct surgery. Neither univariate nor Cox regression analysis found that neoadjuvant therapy affected DFS and OS. (2) Among the 65 patients with a diameter > 5 cm, 29 received IM neoadjuvant therapy, and 36 received direct surgery. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had less blood loss (P = 0.022), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.001), increased anal retention rate (93.1% vs. 72.2%, P = 0.031), and decreased enterostomy rate (10.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.037) than those who underwent direct surgery. Cox regression analysis suggested that neoadjuvant therapy and postoperative IM adjuvant therapy improved DFS.

CONCLUSION

Rectal GISTs are relatively rare and highly malignant tumors. Postoperative oral IM therapy can improve the DFS and OS of intermediate and high risk patients. In patients with rectal GISTs with diameters > 5 cm, IM neoadjuvant therapy can improve anal retention rate, preserve the structure and function of the organs, reduce enterostomy rate, and improve prognosis.

Comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant imatinib and upfront surgery in patients with localized rectal GIST: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare outcomes between neoadjuvant imatinib and upfront surgery in patients with localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) patients.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with localized rectal GIST were divided into two groups: upfront surgery ± adjuvant imatinib (Group A, n = 33) and the neoadjuvant imatinib + surgery + adjuvant imatinib (Group B, n = 52). Baseline characteristics between groups were controlled for with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted analysis.

RESULTS

The response rate to neoadjuvant imatinib was 65.9%. After the IPTW-adjusted analysis, patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had better distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) compared with those who underwent upfront surgery (5-year DRFS 97.8 vs. 71.9%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87; p = 0.03; 5-year DSS 100 vs. 77.1%; HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.01-0.92; p = 0.04). While no significant association was found between overall survival (OS) and treatment groups (p = 0.07), 5-year OS was higher for the neoadjuvant group than upfront surgery group (97.8% vs. 71.9%; HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.03-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with localized rectal GIST, neoadjuvant imatinib not only shrunk the tumor size but also decreased the risk of metastasis and tumor-related deaths when compared to upfront surgery and adjuvant imatinib alone.

The effect of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy on outcome and survival in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multiinstitutional study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize the efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and the prognostic characteristics of patients after surgery.

METHODS

Patients with rectal GISTs who received neoadjuvant imatinib between 2000 and 2019 were selected from 11 large-scale tertiary hospitals in China. The best response to neoadjuvant imatinib was assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce confounders. Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 75, 18, and 7 had a partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. The median tumor size decreased from 5 cm before treatment to 4 cm after treatment (p < 0.001). A total of 31 patients underwent genetic testing after surgery; 23 of patients with exon 11 mutation had PR and 2 had SD. One of the patients with exon 9 mutation had PR, 2 had SD, and 1 had PD. Two patients with the wild type GIST had PD. A total of 86 patients underwent surgery of which 85 underwent complete resection; 72 underwent anal preservation and 40 underwent local excision (LE). After PSM, patients who received neoadjuvant therapy had higher rates of LE (p = 0.001) and anal preservation (p = 0.033) than those of patients without neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 37 months. Nine patients experienced recurrence and one patient died. The 3-year RFS and OS rates were 95.0% and 100%, respectively. After PSM, we found that there was no significant difference in RFS between patients who received or did not receive neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.623). Univariate analysis showed postneoadjuvant tumor size (p = 0.469) and mitotic count (p = 0.294) were not associated with the RFS in patients who received neoadjuvant imatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant imatinib can shrink rectal GIST size, increasing the possibility of complete resection and anal preservation. Further studies are warranted to understand the long-term outcomes of rectal GISTs in patients receiving neoadjuvant imatinib.

Transanal approach after preoperative imatinib treatment of a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors with external anal sphincter invasion: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, and preserving anorectal function can be challenging. We report the case of a patient with rectal GIST with external anal sphincter invasion, treated via the laparoscopic and transanal approaches.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old man with locally advanced GIST in the right anterolateral wall of the lower rectum was examined. Lower endoscopy revealed a 50-mm submucosal tumor located 4 cm from the anal verge. On immunohistochemistry, the biopsy specimen tested positive for CD34 and C-KIT, and the patient was diagnosed with GIST. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed external anal sphincter infiltration. Because of the large tumor size and proximity to the anal verge, preserving the anus was challenging, and colorectal resection was avoided. Instead, neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib was administered to facilitate local resection of the tumor. Post-treatment MRI showed a reduction in tumor size (30 × 20 × 30 mm), and surgery was performed. We identified an appropriate resection line for diplomatic sphincter resection of the infiltrated area by laparoscopy alone. Thus, we performed a hybrid surgery using the laparoscopic and transanal approaches. The patient had an unremarkable postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day 23.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

No study has reported cases of rectal GIST with external anal sphincter invasion wherein anal function was preserved. Here, imatinib was administered preoperatively, and hybrid surgery was performed using the transanal and laparoscopic approaches.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative treatment and surgery preserved anorectal function in a patient with a massive rectal GIST.

Transsacrococcygeal approach in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour resection: 10-year experience at a single centre

Background

The transsacrococcygeal (TSC) approach in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) resection is clinically challenging and controversial, and we evaluated its value in the present study.

Methods

We enrolled patients who underwent rectal GIST resection by the TSC approach during 2008–2018. The clinicopathological index, surgical outcome, and prognosis were analysed. Prognostic information was obtained from medical records and follow-up data. Anal function was evaluated by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score.

Results

Among 88 rectal GIST patients over the 10-year study period, 17 who underwent the TSC approach were analysed. The median age was 55 (range, 26–73) years. In total, 15 patients received preoperative imatinib neoadjuvant therapy for 232 (30–690) days. The tumours were exogenous in 14 patients and intramural in 3 patients. The mean initial tumour size and preoperative tumour size were 6.4±2.2 and 4.2±1.7 cm, respectively. The operative time and blood loss were 130.2±47.4 min and 44.6±36.0 mL, respectively. Of the 17 patients 7 had postoperative complications (within 30 days postoperatively), and the complications of 5 patients were cured by conservative treatment. Only 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and the others had a good oncological prognosis at recent follow-up evaluations. All patients had LARS scores ≤9 points at 1 year after the operation.

Conclusions

The TSC approach can result in a good oncological prognosis, usually does not affect anal function, and is particularly suitable for exogenous middle and low rectal GISTs. However, it might cause some controlled complications. Hence, careful patient selection is necessary for this operation.

Hybrid resection of massive rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor using laparoscopic and transanal approaches

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, and radical surgery such as abdominoperineal resection is necessary for large rectal GISTs to obtain tumor-free resection margins. Here, we describe a 77-year-old man with a locally advanced non-metastatic GIST in the left anterolateral wall of the lower rectum. Tumor size was estimated to be 73 mm, and invasion of the left seminal vesicle and prostate was suspected. Chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate reduced the tumor size, creating a slight gap between the tumor and anterior organs. Therefore, we performed sphincter-sparing partial rectal resection using a hybrid method of laparoscopic and transanal approaches. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient remains disease-free on adjuvant chemotherapy 12 months after surgery. This case suggests that a hybrid method of laparoscopic and transanal surgery allows oncological and function-preserving excision of large rectal GISTs.

Radical excision versus local resection for primary rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare digestive disease that originates in mesenchymal tissues and has malignant tendencies. At present, no standard treatment has been developed, and surgical approaches and the resection scope for rectal GISTs are controversial.

METHODS

The clinical, surgical, pathological and prognosis data of patients with primary rectal GIST in our center from January 2008 to January 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into the radical excision (RE) and local resection (LR) groups.

RESULTS

A total of 537 GIST cases were collected, and 64 patients with primary rectal GIST were included in this study, including 25 cases in the RE group and 39 cases in the LR group. Tumor size (p = 0.013), distance from the anus (p = 0.038), National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria (p = 0.001), preoperative adjuvant therapy (p = 0.016), postoperative adjuvant therapy (p = 0.028), blood loss (p = 0.048), operative time (p = 0.020) and the duration of hospitalization (p = 0.021) were statistically different between these 2 groups. The mean overall follow-up time was 46 months (range, 1-122 months). Disease recurrence was observed in 12 patients. No statistical differences were observed in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (93.3% vs 92.6%, p = 0.952) or overall survival (OS) (90.0% vs 91.6%, p = 0.832) between the RE group and the LR group.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that LR has a similar prognosis to that of RE with respect to DFS and OS. For appropriate cases, LR has the advantages of a short operative time, less bleeding, and a quick recovery. Especially when combined with neoadjuvant therapy, LR can also achieve better perioperative efficacy. Therefore, LR is an effective method for resection of rectal GISTs and warrants clinical endorsement.

Comprehensive review of targeted therapy for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most lethal and prevalent malignancies in the world and was responsible for nearly 881,000 cancer-related deaths in 2018. Surgery and chemotherapy have long been the first choices for cancer patients. However, the prognosis of CRC has never been satisfying, especially for patients with metastatic lesions. Targeted therapy is a new optional approach that has successfully prolonged overall survival for CRC patients. Following successes with the anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) agent cetuximab and the anti-angiogenesis agent bevacizumab, new agents blocking different critical pathways as well as immune checkpoints are emerging at an unprecedented rate. Guidelines worldwide are currently updating the recommended targeted drugs on the basis of the increasing number of high-quality clinical trials. This review provides an overview of existing CRC-targeted agents and their underlying mechanisms, as well as a discussion of their limitations and future trends.

Transanal versus nontransanal surgery for the treatment of primary rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a 10-year experience in a high-volume center

Background

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare digestive disease that has a distinct malignant tendency compared to that of gastric-derived GIST. At present, there is still no standard, and the surgical approach to rectal GIST is controversial.

Methods

The clinicopathological data and prognosis of rectal GIST patients admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 1998.01.01 to 2018.12.31 were collected retrospectively. All cases were divided into either the transanal (TA) group or the nontransanal (NTA) group.

Results

A total of 537 GIST cases were treated in 10 years, including 82 rectal GIST cases (64 cases underwent surgical resection, including 29 cases in the TA group and 35 cases in the NTA group). Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy (P=0.003), postoperative adjuvant therapy (P=0.017), operative time (P=0.013), blood loss (P=0.038), anus-preserver (P=0.048), 30-day complication rate (P=0.000), time to flatus (P=0.036), hospital stays (P=0.011), distance from the anus (P=0.047), tumor size (P=0.002), mitotic count (P=0.035) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria (P=0.000) were significantly different between these two groups (all P<0.05). The median follow-up time was 41 (range, 1–122) months. Twelve patients had recurrence and metastasis, and 4 patients died. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74.4% and 91.2%, respectively, in the whole group. There were no statistically significant differences between the TA group and the NTA group at 5-year DFS (81.3% vs. 79.0%, P=0.243) and OS (88.7% vs. 93.3%, P=0.308).

Conclusions

In the treatment of rectal GIST, TA resection has a minimally invasive effect, less postoperative complications, high anal sphincter preservation rate, and R0 resection rate and a better prognosis. How to improve the proportion of neoadjuvant therapy and choose the appropriate cases for TA surgery is still a challenge.

Pelvic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With Pulmonary Metastasis

Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) comprise a small portion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Metastasis normally occurs to nearby organs. However, metastasis to the lungs is uncommon in EGISTs. Furthermore, recurrence of the EGIST in a new location years later has not been documented. We present this case to highlight this behavior of EGISTs in hopes to better understand this rare type of neoplasm.

A Population-Based Study of the Incidence and Survival of Anorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common type of primary gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor, but GISTs arising in the anus and rectum are rare. This study aimed to undertake a population-based analysis of the incidence, patient demographics, and survival of patients with anorectal GIST compared with patients with GIST arising from other sites based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database.

Material/Methods

The SEER database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with GIST and patients diagnosed with anorectal GIST from 2000 to 2015. The incidence of GIST, baseline clinical and demographic data, tumor stage, and patient survival data were analyzed, including overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 277 patients with anorectal GIST were identified, with an incidence of 0.018 per 100,000. The incidence of GIST arising from other sites was 0.719 per 100,000. The median age at diagnosis for anorectal GIST was 57.5 years (range, 26–92 years), median tumor size was 6.55 cm (range, 0.6–20 cm), and surgery, but not chemotherapy, improved OS and CSS. Patients with anorectal GIST had a mean 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS of 91.1%, 82.5%, 75.2%, and 58.5%, respectively. Patients with GIST arising at other sites had a mean 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS of 88.3%, 76.4%, 66.5%, and 46.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

Anorectal GIST is a rare tumor that has a better outcome compared with GISTs arising at other sites in the gastrointestinal tract.