Impact of the preoperative bone mineral density on the outcomes after resection of pancreatic cancer

Predictive value of osteopenia as prognostic marker for survival and recurrence in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Early detection, systematic prevention, and personalized therapy are crucial to reduce mortality in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the predictive value of osteopenia and osteosarcopenia as prognostic markers of survival and recurrence in patients with GI cancers.

Methods

Medline, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases were searched for English-language studies that included patients who underwent surgical resection following a pathologically diagnosed GI cancer and reported the association between osteopenia and osteosarcopenia on the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Meta-analysis was done using STATA 14.2, and the results were reported as pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and the Chi-square test. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results

A comprehensive literature search yielded 23 eligible studies, primarily from Japan. Osteopenia emerged as a significant risk factor for both OS (pooled HR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.74-2.79) and RFS (pooled HR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.60-2.89). Patients with osteosarcopenia exhibited threefold higher mortality rates (pooled HR 2.96, 95% CI: 1.99-4.40) and heightened risk of recurrence (pooled HR 2.75, 95% CI: 1.79-4.24). Subgroup analyses underscored the consistency of these associations across diverse contexts.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis establishes osteopenia and osteosarcopenia as robust prognostic indicators for survival and recurrence in GI cancers. Integrating musculoskeletal assessments into routine oncological care is imperative for timely interventions and optimized patient outcomes.

Bone mineral density as potential individual prognostic biomarker in patients with neurosurgically treated spinal metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Bone mineral density (BMD) plays a crucial role in diagnosing and treating various systemic chronic diseases. Patients with multiple or singular spinal metastasis (SM) are typically in advanced stages of systemic cancer, often leading to significant alterations in BMD. The present study investigated the prognostic value of perioperative Hounsfield units (HU) as a surrogate independent marker for estimated BMD in patients with SM after surgical treatment (ST).

METHODS

HU values, serving as a surrogate for estimated BMD, were measured from circular regions of interest (ROIs) in the spine -first lumbar vertebra (L1)- from routine preoperative staging computed tomography (CT) scans in 187 patients after ST. The estimated BMD was stratified into pathologic and physiologic values and correlated with survival parameters in our cohorts.

RESULTS

Median L1 BMD of 92 patients (49%) with pathologic BMD was 79.5 HU (IQR 67.25-93.5) compared to 145 HU (IQR 123-166) for 95 patients (51%) with physiologic BMD (p ≤ 0.001). Patients with pathological BMD exhibited a median overall survival of 8 months compared to 12.2 months in patients with physiologic BMD (p = 0.006). Multivariable analysis revealed pathologic BMD as an independent negative prognostic predictor for increased 1 year mortality (AUC: 0.637, 95% CI: 0.556-0.718; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that decreased perioperative BMD values, as derived from HU measurements, may represent a previously unrecognized negative prognostic factor in patients of SM after ST. The estimated perioperative BMD could emerge as an individualized, readily available potential biomarker for prognostic, treatment, and discussion of affected patients with SM.

Temporal Trends in Body Composition and Metabolic Markers Prior to Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Changes in body composition and metabolic factors may serve as biomarkers for the early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to capture the longitudinal changes in body composition and metabolic factors before diagnosis of PDAC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in which all patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with PDAC from 2002 to 2021 were identified. We collected all abdominal computed tomography scans and 10 different blood-based biomarkers up to 36 months before diagnosis. We applied a fully automated abdominal segmentation algorithm previously developed by our group for 3-dimensional quantification of body composition on computed tomography scans. Longitudinal trends of body composition and blood-based biomarkers before PDAC diagnosis were estimated using linear mixed models, compared across different time windows, and visualized using spline regression.

RESULTS

We included 1690 patients in body composition analysis, of whom 516 (30.5%) had ≥2 prediagnostic computed tomography scans. For analysis of longitudinal trends of blood-based biomarkers, 3332 individuals were included. As an early manifestation of PDAC, we observed a significant decrease in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (β = -1.94 [95% confidence interval (CI), -2.39 to -1.48] and β = -2.59 [95% CI, -3.17 to -2.02]) in area (cm2)/height (m2) per 6 months closer to diagnosis, accompanied by a decrease in serum lipids (eg, low-density lipoprotein [β = -2.83; 95% CI, -3.31 to -2.34], total cholesterol [β = -2.69; 95% CI, -3.18 to -2.20], and triglycerides [β = -1.86; 95% CI, -2.61 to -1.11]), and an increase in blood glucose levels. Loss of muscle tissue and bone volume was predominantly observed in the last 6 months before diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified significant alterations in a variety of soft tissue and metabolic markers that occur in the development of PDAC. Early recognition of these metabolic changes may provide an opportunity for early detection.

Impact of osteopenia and osteosarcopenia on the outcomes after surgery of hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancers

Objective

The purpose of this study is to investigate potential associations between osteopenia, osteosarcopenia, and postoperative outcomes in patients with hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer (HBPC).

Methods

Three online databases, including Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, were thoroughly searched for literature describing the relationship between osteopenia, osteosarcopenia, and outcomes of surgical treatment of HBPC patients from the start of each database to September 29, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to rate the quality of the studies.

Results

This analysis included a total of 16 articles with a combined patient cohort of 2,599 individuals. The results demonstrated that HBPC patients with osteopenia had significantly inferior OS (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.70-3.03, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.42-2.71, p < 0.001) compared to those without osteopenia. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that these findings were consistent across univariate and multivariate analyses, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancer, and pancreatic cancer. The risk of postoperative major complications was significantly higher in patients with osteopenia compared to those without osteopenia (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.19-2.33, p < 0.001). Besides, we also found that the presence of osteosarcopenia in HBPC patients was significantly related to poorer OS (HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 2.00-5.48, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.62-3.84, p < 0.001) in comparison to those without osteosarcopenia.

Conclusion

Preoperative osteopenia and osteosarcopenia can predict poorer OS and RFS with HBPC after surgery.

Prognostic impact of osteosarcopenia in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

We investigated the prognostic impact of osteosarcopenia, defined as the combination of osteopenia and sarcopenia, in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

The relationship of osteosarcopenia with disease-free survival and overall survival was analyzed in 183 patients who underwent elective pancreatic resection for PDAC. Computed tomography was used to measure the pixel density in the midvertebral core of the 11th thoracic vertebra for evaluation of osteopenia and in the psoas muscle area of the 3rd lumbar vertebra for evaluation of sarcopenia. Osteosarcopenia was defined as the simultaneous presence of both osteopenia and sarcopenia. The study employed a retrospective design to examine the relationship between osteosarcopenia and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Osteosarcopenia was identified in 61 (33%) patients. In the univariate analysis, disease-free survival was significantly worse in patients with male sex (p = 0.031), pathological stage ≥ III PDAC (p = 0.001), NLR, ≥ 2.71 (p = 0.041), sarcopenia (p = 0.027), osteopenia (p = 0.001), and osteosarcopenia (p < 0.001), and overall survival was significantly worse in patients with male sex (p = 0.001), pathological stage ≥ III PDAC (p = 0.001), distal pancreatectomy (p = 0.025), sarcopenia (p = 0.003), osteopenia (p < 0.001), and osteosarcopenia (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of disease-free survival were osteosarcopenia (p < 0.001) and pathological stage ≥ III PDAC (p = 0.002), and the independent predictors of overall survival were osteosarcopenia (p < 0.001), male sex (p = 0.006) and pathological stage ≥ III PDAC (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Osteosarcopenia has an adverse prognostic impact on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for PDAC.

The impact of pulmonary artery to ascending aorta diameter ratio progression on the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Immunotherapy, represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is a major breakthrough in cancer treatment. Studies have reported that the use of ICIs is associated with an increase in the pulmonary artery to ascending aorta diameter (PAD/AoD) ratio. However, the impact of PAD/AoD ratio progression on the prognosis of patients is unclear.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients with stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICIs at the Wuhan Union Hospital between March 1, 2020, and September 1, 2022. The baseline and post-treatment PAD/AoD ratios of patients were evaluated through chest CT scans. The primary outcome of this study was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

The PAD/AoD ratio increased after the initiation of ICIs (from 0.75 to 0.78; P < 0.001). A total of 441 patients were divided into severe group (n=221) and non-severe group (n=220) according to the median increase of PAD/AoD ratio (1.06). Compared with the non-severe group, the severe group had a lower DCR (87.8% vs. 96.0%, P = 0.005) and ORR (87.5% vs. 96.0%, P = 0.063). Over the entire duration of follow-up (median 22.0 months), 85 (38.5%) patients in the severe group and 30 (7.3%) patients in the non-severe group died. An increased PAD/AoD ratio was associated with shorter PFS (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.48 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.93]; P = 0.003) and OS (HR: 3.50 [95% CI, 2.30 to 5.30]; P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained across subgroups.

Conclusions

ICI treatment exacerbates an increase in the PAD/AoD ratio in patients with cancer, and greater increase in the PAD/AoD ratio was associated with a worse prognosis. PAD/AoD ratio could be a biomarker to stratify prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

High intramuscular adipose tissue content associated with prognosis and postoperative complications of cancers

Sarcopenia has been considered an adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients. Intramuscular adipose tissue content, as a new marker of sarcopenia, can effectively reflect skeletal muscle quality. The aim of this study was performed to evaluate the association between high intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) and survival outcomes and postoperative complications in cancer patients. Specific databases, including the Web of Science, Embase and Web of Science, were systematically searched to identify relevant articles evaluating the prognostic value of IMAC in cancer patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized for comprehensive analysis. All data analyses were performed using STATA 12.0 software. A total of 25 studies from 24 articles including 5663 patients were enrolled in the study. Meta-analysis showed that high IMAC was associated with unfavourable overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.70-2.86, P < 0.001), relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.30-1.75, P < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.19-2.28, P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed that high IMAC remained an adverse prognostic factor when stratified by different country, treatment methods, cancer type or analysis type. High IMAC had better predictive value for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) (HR: 3.50, 95% CI: 1.98-6.17, P < 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.45-2.33, P < 0.001), pancreatic cancer (PC) (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.67-2.66, P < 0.001) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.27-5.10, P = 0.009). High IMAC was also identified as a significant risk factor for postoperative complications (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.22-3.46, P = 0.007). High IMAC was associated with an adverse prognosis and an increased risk of postoperative complications in cancer patients. IMAC may be a good indicator of sarcopenia.

Osteopenia is associated with inferior survival in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Osteopenia is known to be associated with clinical frailty which is linked to inferior outcomes in various clinical scenarios. However, the exact prognostic value of osteopenia in patients undergoing curative intent-surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not completely understood. This retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of 151 patients who underwent partial hepatectomy for HCC in curative intent at a German university medical center (05/2008-12/2019). Preoperative computed tomography-based segmentation was used to assess osteopenia, and the prognostic impact of pathological changes in bone mineral density (BMD) on perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term oncological outcome was analyzed. Five-year overall survival of osteopenic patients was significantly worse compared to those with normal BMD (29% vs. 65%, p = 0.014). In line with this, the probability of disease-free survival at 5 years was significantly worse for patients with osteopenia (21% vs. 64%, p = 0.005). In our multivariable model, osteopenia was confirmed as an independent risk-factor for inferior overall survival (Hazard-ratio 7.743, p = 0.002). Concerning perioperative complications, osteopenic patients performed slightly worse, even though no statistical difference was detected (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b; 21% vs. 9%, p = 0.139). The present study confirms osteopenia as an independent risk-factor for inferior survival in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for HCC in a European cohort. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Bone Mineral Density as an Individual Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Surgically-Treated Brain Metastasis from Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Patients with BM are in advanced stages of systemic cancer, which may translate into significant alterations of body composition biomarkers, such as BMD. The present study investigated the prognostic value of BMD on overall survival (OS) of 95 patients with surgically-treated BM related to NSCLC. All patients were treated in a large tertiary care neuro-oncological center between 2013 and 2018. Preoperative BMD was determined from the first lumbar vertebrae (L1) from routine preoperative staging computed tomography (CT) scans. Results were stratified into pathologic and physiologic values according to recently published normative reference ranges and correlated with survival parameters. Median preoperative L1-BMD was 99 Hounsfield units (HU) (IQR 74-195) compared to 140 HU (IQR 113-159) for patients with pathological and physiologic BMD (p = 0.03), with a median OS of 6 versus 15 months (p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed pathologic BMD as an independent prognostic predictor for increased 1-year mortality (p = 0.03, OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.0). The present study suggests that decreased preoperative BMD values may represent a previously unrecognized negative prognostic factor in patients of BM requiring surgery for NSCLC. Based on guideline-adherent preoperative staging, BMD may prove to be a highly individualized, readily available biomarker for prognostic assessment and treatment guidance in affected patients.

Who could complete and benefit from the adjuvant chemotherapy regarding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A multivariate-adjusted analysis at the pre-adjuvant chemotherapy timing

BACKGROUND

The pre-adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) status of postoperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients has not been studied and elaborated well previously.

METHOD

The association of PAC variables and prognoses was explored using a multivariable Cox model, restricted cubic spline analysis, and correlation analysis. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcome was chemotherapy completeness (CHC).

RESULTS

A total of 401 eligible patients were enrolled in sequential surgery and chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen, PAC fasting blood glucose (FBG), and elevated fasting blood glucose (eFBG) status were associated with CHC (regimen types: p = 0.005, continuous FBG: p = 0.014, eFBG status: p = 0.012). Early administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (<34 days) was a risk factor for the limited OS and PFS (OS: aHR: 1.61 [1.09-2.38], p = 0.016; PFS: aHR: 1.91 [1.29-2.82], p = 0.001). Patients with higher PAC body mass index (BMI), receiving Gemcap regimen, and with lower PAC tumor marker value were observed with better survival prognoses (PAC BMI: OS: 0.927 [0.875-0.983], p = 0.011; Gemcap: OS: 0.533 [0.312-0.913], p = 0.022; Gemcap: PFS: 0.560 [0.341-0.922], p = 0.023; PAC CA125: OS: 1.004 [1.002-1.006], p < 0.001; PAC CA125: PFS: 1.003 [1.000-1.005], p = 0.031; PAC CEA: OS: 1.050 [1.026-1.074], p < 0.001). The BMI decrease was mainly concentrated in the first 3 months of chemotherapy courses (first 3 months: p < 0.001; latter 3 months: p = 0.097). And CEA, compared to CA125 and CA199, was a better prognostic indicator (CEA: first 3 months: PFS p = 0.011, OS p < 0.001; latter 3 months: PFS p = 0.024, OS p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

PDAC patients should be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy over 34 postoperative days. PAC sarcopenia was a risk factor for OS, but not PFS and limited CHC. Those with higher PAC FBG levels were more likely to finish chemotherapy. CEA, compared to CA125 and CA199, was a better prognostic indicator.

Prognostic value of preoperative low bone mineral density in patients with digestive cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Osteopenia typically presents low bone mineral density (BMD) and has recently been reported as a prognostic factor in various cancers. However, the prognostic value of osteopenia in digestive tract cancers remains to be defined. We aimed to review the prognostic value of preoperative osteopenia in patients with digestive cancers.

METHODS

Cohort studies evaluating the prognostic value of preoperative osteopenia in digestive cancers (colorectal, esophageal, hepatic, bile duct, and pancreatic cancer) were searched using electronic databases and trial registries. The exposure was defined as low BMD estimated by computed tomography at 11^th thoracic vertebra, while comparator was normal BMD. The primary outcomes were overall survival and recurrence-free survival for osteopenia. Random effect meta-analyses were performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies (2230 patients) were included. Osteopenia was an independent risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.47 to 2.78; I² = 74%), along with sarcopenia. Osteopenia also predicted poor recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.36 to 2.81; I² = 85%). In subgroup analyses, osteopenia predicted prognosis in colorectal, esophageal, hepatic, and bile duct cancers, but not in pancreatic cancer. The certainty of the evidence was low due to inconsistency and publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Osteopenia may be independently associated with poor prognosis in patients with digestive tract cancer. Further studies are needed to establish the relevance of osteopenia in the operative prognosis of these patients.

Impact of osteopenia on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

Osteopenia, which is defined as a decrease in bone mineral density, has been recently recognized as a metabolic and an oncological biomarker for surgery in patients with malignancy. We aimed to study the prognostic impact of osteopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) after resection.

METHODS

A total of 56 patients who underwent curative resection of PC were retrospectively investigated. The skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar spine and bone mineral density at the 11th thoracic vertebra were measured using computed tomography.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia and osteopenia were identified in 24 (43%) and 27 (48%) patients, respectively. The overall and disease-free survival rates were significantly lower in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively) and in the osteopenia group than in the non-osteopenia group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). In multivariate analysis, sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR] 4.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-13.38; p = 0.02) was a significant independent predictor of 1-year disease-free survival. Further, sarcopenia (OR 6.00; 95% CI 1.46-24.6; p = 0.01) and osteopenia (OR 4.66; 95% CI 1.15-18.82; p = 0.03) were significant independent predictors of 2-year overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Osteopenia is a significant negative factor for 2-year overall survival after curative resection of PC.

Visceral adiposity is an independent risk factor for high intra-operative blood loss during living-donor liver transplantation; could preoperative rehabilitation and nutritional therapy mitigate that risk?

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Blood loss during liver transplantation (LT) is one of the major concerns of the transplant team, given the potential negative post-transplant outcomes related to it. Blood loss was reported to be higher in certain body compositions, such as obese patients, undergoing LT. Therefore, we aimed to study the risk factors for high blood loss (HBL) during adult living donor liver transplant (ALDLT) including the body composition markers; visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR), skeletal muscle index and intramuscular adipose tissue content. In June 2015, an aggressive perioperative rehabilitation and nutritional therapy (APRNT) program was prescribed in our institute for the patients with abnormal body composition.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 394 patients who had undergone their first ALDLT between 2006 and 2019. Risk factors for HBL were analyzed in the total cohort. Differences in blood loss and risk factors were analyzed in relation to the APRNT.

RESULTS

Multivariate risk factor analysis in the total cohort showed that a high VSR (odds ratio (OR): 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-3.29, P = 0.009), was an independent risk factor for HBL during ALDLT, as well as a history of upper abdominal surgery, simultaneous splenectomy and the presence of a large amount of ascites. After the introduction of the APRNT, a significantly lower blood loss was observed during the ALDLT recipient operation (P = 0.003). Moreover, the significant difference in blood loss observed between normal and high VSR groups before the application of the APRNT (P < 0.001), was not observed with the APRNT (P = 0.85). Likewise, before the APRNT, only high VSR was a risk factor for HBL by multivariate analysis (OR: 2.34, CI: 1.33-4.09, P = 0.003). Whereas with the APRNT, high VSR was no longer a significant risk factor for HBL even by univariate analysis (OR: 0.89, CI: 0.26-3.12, P = 0.86).

CONCLUSION

Increased visceral adiposity was an independent risk factor for high intraoperative blood loss during ALDLT recipient operation. With APRNT, high VSR was not associated with high blood loss. Therefore, APRNT might have mitigated the risk of high blood loss related to high visceral adiposity.