Laparoscopic and robotic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer

Management of internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes in mid-low rectal cancer

In rectal cancer treatment, the diagnosis and management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LLN) are critical for preventing local recurrence. Over time, scholars have reached a consensus: when imaging suggests LLN metastasis, combining neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with selective LLN dissection (LLND) can mitigate the risk of recurrence. Selective LLND typically encompasses lymph nodes in the internal iliac and obturator regions. Recent studies emphasize distinctions between internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes regarding prognosis and treatment outcomes, prompting the need for differentiated diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lateral pelvic node dissection (LPND) poses significant technical challenges. Despite the advent of robotic surgery, determining the optimal minimally invasive approach remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between robotic total mesorectal excision with LPND (R-LPND) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with LPND (L-LPND).

METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) guidelines. Utilizing the RevMan 5.3.5 statistical package from the Cochrane Collaboration, a random-effects model was employed.

RESULTS

Six eligible studies involving 652 patients (316 and 336 in the R-LPND and L-LPND groups, respectively) were retrieved. The robotic approach demonstrated favourable outcomes compared with the laparoscopic approach, manifesting in lower morbidity rates, reduced urinary complications, shorter hospital stays, and a higher number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes. However, longer operative time was associated with the robotic approach. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding major complications, anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal infection, neurological complications, LPND time, overall recurrence, and local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the robotic approach is a safe and feasible alternative for Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) with LPND in advanced rectal cancer. Notably, it is associated with lower morbidity, particularly a reduction in urinary complications, a shorter hospital stay and increased number of harvested lateral pelvic nodes. The trade-off for these benefits is a longer operative time.

Two cases of strangulated bowel obstruction due to exposed vessel and nerve after laparoscopic and robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The majority of small bowel obstructions (SBO) are caused by adhesion due to abdominal surgery. Internal hernias, a very rare cause of SBO, can arise from exposed blood vessels and nerves during pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL). In this report, we present two cases of SBO following laparoscopic and robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer, one case each, of which obstructions were attributed to the exposure of blood vessels and nerves during the procedures.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1: A 68-year-old man underwent laparoscopic perineal rectal amputation and LLND for rectal cancer. Four years and three months after surgery, he visited to the emergency room with a chief complaint of left groin pain. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a closed-loop in the left pelvic cavity. We performed an open surgery to find that the small intestine was fitted into the gap between the left obturator nerve and the left pelvic wall, which was exposed by LLND. The intestine was not resected because coloration and peristalsis of the intestine improved after the hernia was released. The obturator nerve was preserved. Case 2: A 57-year-old man underwent a robot-assisted rectal amputation with LLND for rectal cancer. Eight months after surgery, he presented to the emergency room with a complaint of abdominal pain. CT revealed a closed-loop in the right pelvic cavity, and he underwent a laparoscopic surgery with a diagnosis of strangulated SBO. The small intestine was strangulated by an internal hernia caused by the right umbilical arterial cord, which was exposed by LLND. The incarcerated small intestine was released from the gap between the umbilical arterial cord and the pelvic wall. No bowel resection was performed. The umbilical arterial cord causing the internal hernia was resected.

CONCLUSION

Although strangulated SBO due to an exposed intestinal cord after PL has been a rare condition to date, it is crucial for surgeons to keep this condition in mind.

Learning process analysis of robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for local advanced rectal cancer: the CUSUM curve of 78 consecutive patients

PURPOSE

Robotic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) has been described as a safe and feasible procedure for local advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve for robotic-assisted LLND.

METHODS

We collected data on 78 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-LLND at our hospital. The learning curve was analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to assess changes in the unilateral LLND operative times across the case sequence.

RESULTS

Among the 78 patients, 52 underwent bilateral LLND and 26 underwent unilateral LLND. A total of 130 consecutive data were recorded. We arranged unilateral robotic-LLND operative times and calculated cumulative sum values, allowing the differentiation of three phases: phase I (learning period, cases 1-51); phase II (proficiency period, cases 52-83); and phase III (mastery period, cases 84-130). As the learning curve accumulated, the operation time and estimated blood loss of unilateral robotic-LLND decreased significantly with each phase (P < 0.05). By 12 months after surgery, the International Prostatic Symptom Score of patients at phase III was significantly lower than at phase I (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The CUSUM curve shows three phases in the learning of robotic-LLND. The estimated learning curve for robotic-assisted rectal-LLND is achieved after 51 cases.

Contemporary management of rectal cancer

The management of rectal cancer has undergone significant changes over the past 50 years, and this has been associated with major improvements in overall outcomes and quality of life. From standardization of total mesorectal excision to refinements in radiation delivery and shifting of chemoradiotherapy treatment to favor a neoadjuvant approach, as well as the development of targeted chemotherapeutics, these management strategies have continually aimed to achieve locoregional and systemic control while limiting adverse effects and enhance overall survival. This article highlights evolving aspects of rectal cancer therapy including improved staging modalities, total neoadjuvant therapy, the role of short-course and more selective radiotherapy strategies, as well as organ preservation. We also discuss the evolving role of minimally invasive surgery and comment on lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

Key message

Rectal cancer management is constantly evolving through refinements in radiation timing and delivery, modification of chemoradiotherapy treatment schedules, and increasing utilization of minimally invasive surgical techniques and organ preservation strategies. This manuscript aims to provide a synopsis of recent changes in the management of rectal cancer, highlighting contemporary modifications in neoadjuvant approaches and surgical management to enhance the knowledge of surgeons who care for this challenging population.

Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: A Feasibility Study from a European Centre

INTRODUCTION

The role of robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) for lateral pelvic nodal disease (LPND) in rectal cancer has yet to be investigated in the Western hemisphere. This study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of robotic LPLND by utilising a well-established totally robotic TME protocol.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 17 consecutive patients who underwent robotic LPLND for LPND ± TME for rectal cancer between 2015 and 2021. A single docking totally robotic approach from the left hip with full splenic mobilisation was performed using the X/Xi da Vinci platform. All patients underwent a tri-compartmental robotic en bloc excision of LPND with preservation of the obturator nerve and pelvic nerve plexus, leaving a well-skeletonised internal iliac vessel and its branches.

RESULTS

The median operative time was 280 min, which was 40 min longer than our standard robotic TME. The median BMI was 26, and there were no conversions. The median inpatient stay was 7 days with no Clavien-Dindo > 3 complications. One patient (6%) developed local recurrence and metastatic disease within 5 months. The proportion of histologically confirmed LPND was 41%, of which 94% were well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Median pre-operative lateral pelvic node size was significantly higher in positive nodes (14 mm vs. 8 mm (p = 0.01)). All patients had clear resection margins on histology.

DISCUSSION

Robotic LPLND is safe and feasible with good peri-operative and short-term outcomes, with the ergonomic advantages of a robotic TME docking protocol readily transferrable in LPLND.

Long-term outcomes of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for clinical stage II/III middle-lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI)-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) was able to increase the total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes without impairing functional preservation. However, the long-term outcomes of ICG-FI-guided laparoscopic LPLND have not been evaluated. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term outcomes of ICG-FI-guided laparoscopic LPLND to conventional laparoscopic LPLND without ICG-FI.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multi-institutional study with propensity score matching. The study population included consecutive patients with middle-low rectal cancer (clinical stage II to III) who underwent laparoscopic LPLND between January 2013 and February 2018. The main evaluation items in this study were the 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), local recurrence rate, and lateral local recurrence (LLR) rate.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic LPLND were included in this study. After propensity score matching, 58 patients were matched in each of the ICG-FI and non-ICG-FI groups. There were no substantial differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The ICG-FI group and non-ICG-FI group included 40 and 38 women and had a median age of 65 (IQR 60-72) and 66 (IQR 60-73) years, respectively. The median follow-up for all patients was 63.7 (IQR 51.3-76.8) months. The estimated respective 3-year overall survival, RFS, and local recurrence rates were 93.1%, 70.7%, and 5.2% in the ICG-FI group and 85.9%, 71.7%, and 12.8% in the non-ICG-FI group (p = 0.201, 0.653, 0.391). The 3-year cumulative LLR rate was 0% in the ICG-FI group and 9.3% in the non-ICG-FI group (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that laparoscopic LPLND combined with ICG-FI was able to decrease the LLR rate. It appears that ICG-FI could contribute to improving the quality of laparoscopic LPLND and strengthening local control of the lateral pelvis.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000041372 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ).

Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement occurs in 10%-25% of rectal cancer cases. Total mesorectal excision (TME) with routine LPLN dissection (LPLND) is predominantly applied in Japan whereas TME with neoadjuvant treatment are used in the West. LPLND is a morbid procedure and minimally invasive techniques may help reduce its morbidity. Selective lateral pelvic node dissection with TME following neoadjuvant treatment achieves acceptable disease-free and overall survival.

Lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence navigation: can it be a powerful supplement tool for predicting the status of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in advanced lower rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

An innovative instrument for laparoscopy using indocyanine green (ICG) allows easy detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs). Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of lateral pelvic SLN biopsy (SLNB) using ICG fluorescence navigation in advanced lower rectal cancer and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of this technique to predict the status of LPLN.

METHODS

From April 1, 2017 to December 1, 2020, we conducted lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) in 23 patients with advanced low rectal cancer who presented with LPLN but without LPLN enlargement. Data regarding clinical characteristics, surgical and pathological outcomes, lymph node findings, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

We successfully performed the surgery using fluorescence navigation. One patient underwent bilateral LLND and 22 patients underwent unilateral LLND. The lateral pelvic SLN were clearly fluorescent before dissection in 21 patients. Lateral pelvic SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 3 patients and negative in 18 patients by frozen pathological examination. Among the 21 patients in whom lateral pelvic SLN was detected, the dissected lateral pelvic non-SLNs were all negative. All dissected LPLNs were negative in two patients without fluorescent lateral pelvic SLN.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation shows promise as a safe and feasible procedure for advanced lower rectal cancer with good accuracy, and no false-negative cases were found. No metastasis in SLNB seemed to reflect all negative LPLN metastases, and this technique can replace preventive LLND for advanced lower rectal cancer.

Robotic and laparoscopic salvage lateral pelvic node dissection for the treatment of recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The lateral pelvic sidewall is a major site of local recurrence after radical resection of rectal cancer. Salvage lateral pelvic node dissection (LPND) may be the only way to eliminate recurrent lateral pelvic nodes (LPNs). This study aimed to describe the technical details of robotic and laparoscopic salvage LPND and assess the short-term clinical and oncological outcomes in patients with recurrent LPNs who underwent salvage LPND by a minimally invasive approach for curative intent.

METHODS

Between September 2010 and 2019, 36 patients who underwent salvage surgery for LPN recurrence were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Patients' characteristics, index operation, MRI findings, and perioperative and pathological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven and 14 patients underwent robotic and laparoscopic salvage LPND, respectively. Eight patients (32.0%) underwent a combined salvage operation for resectable extra-pelvic sidewall metastases. There were four cases of open-conversion during the laparoscopic approach due to uncontrolled bleeding of iliac vessels. In these patients, metastatic LPNs were suspected of iliac vessel invasion and were found to be larger in size (median 15 mm; range 12-20) than that in patients who underwent successful LPND using the minimally invasive approach (median 10 mm; range 5-20). The median number of metastatic LPNs and harvested LPNs was 1 (range 0-3) and 6 (range 1-16), respectively. Six patients (24.0%) experienced postoperative complications including lymphoceles and voiding difficulties. During the follow-up (median 44.6 months; range 24.0-87.7), eight patients developed recurrences, mainly the lung and para-aortic lymph nodes, and one patient developed pelvic sidewall recurrence after laparoscopic salvage LPND. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival after salvage LPND were 66.4% and 79.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic and laparoscopic salvage LPND for recurrent LPNs are safe and feasible with favorable short-term surgical outcomes. However, the surgical approach should be carefully chosen in patients with large-sized and invasive recurrent LPNs.

The Middle Rectal Artery: Revisited Anatomy and Surgical Implications of a Neglected Blood Vessel

BACKGROUND

Although the middle rectal artery is a relevant anatomical landmark for rectal resection and lateral lymph node dissection, descriptions of this entity are highly divergent.

OBJECTIVE

Dissection, visualization, morphometry, and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the middle rectal artery to facilitate its management in surgery.

DESIGN

Macroscopic dissection, histologic study, morphometric measurements, and virtual modeling.

SETTING

University laboratory of applied surgical anatomy.

PATIENTS

This study includes formalin-fixed hemipelvis specimens (n=37) obtained from body donors (age, 67-97 y).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures are photo documentation of origin, trajectory, diameter, and branching pattern; immunolabeling of lymphatics; and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the middle rectal artery.

RESULTS

The middle rectal artery was present in 71.4% of body donors (21.4% bilateral, 50% unilateral), originated from the anterior division of the internal iliac artery, and branched either from the internal pudendal artery (45.5%), the inferior gluteal artery (22.7%), the gluteal-pudendal trunk (22.7%), or a trifurcation (9.1%). One to 3 branches of varying diameters (0.5-3.5 mm) entered the mesorectum from the ventrolateral (35.7%), lateral (42.9%), or dorsolateral (21.4%) aspect. The middle rectal artery was accompanied by podoplanin-immunoreactive lymphatic vessels and gave off additional branches (81.8%) to the urogenital pelvic organs. Three-dimensional reconstruction revealed the complex course of the middle rectal artery from the pelvic sidewall through the pelvic nerve plexus and parietal pelvic fascia into the mesorectum.

LIMITATIONS

Findings retrieved from body donors may be prone to age- and fixation-related processes.

CONCLUSIONS

The investigation disclosed the rather high prevalence of the middle rectal artery, its 3-dimensional topographic anatomy, and its proximity to the autonomic pelvic nerves. These features play a role in the surgical management of this blood vessel. The data provide the anatomical rationale for the lateral lymphatic spread of rectal cancer and an anatomical basis for nerve-preserving lateral lymph node dissection.

Surgical outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open low anterior resection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced lower rectal cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the surgical outcomes of robotic low anterior resection (LAR) for lower rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT).

METHODS

A total of 175 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent LAR after pCRT between 2005 and 2020 were stratified into open (OS, n = 65), laparoscopic (LS, n = 64), and robotic surgery (RS, n = 46) groups. We compared the clinical, surgical, and pathological results among the three groups.

RESULTS

The RS and LS groups had less blood loss than the OS group (p < 0.0001). The operating time in the RS group was longer than in the LS and OS groups (p < 0.0001). The RS group had a significantly longer mean distal margin than the LS and OS groups (25.4 mm vs. 20.7 mm and 20.3 mm, respectively; p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate among the groups. The local recurrence rate in the RS group was comparable to those in the LS and OS groups.

CONCLUSION

Robotic LAR after pCRT was performed safely for patients with advanced lower rectal cancer. It provided a longer distal margin and equivalent local control rates.

Near-Infrared Imaging Using Indocyanine Green for Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II/III Middle-Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The examination of the efficacy of near-infrared imaging using indocyanine green in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection remains insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether near-infrared imaging contributed to an increase in the total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, multi-institutional study with propensity score matching.

SETTINGS

We conducted this study within the framework of the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group in Japan.

PATIENTS

The study population included consecutive patients with middle-low rectal cancer (clinical stage II to III) who underwent laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection between January 2013 and February 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes was compared in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection with and without near-infrared imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 172 eligible patients were included; 84 of these patients underwent laparoscopic surgery with near-infrared imaging. After propensity score matching, 58 patients were matched in each of the near-infrared and the non-near-infrared groups. The operation time in the near-infrared group was significantly longer than that in the non-near-infrared group (426 vs 369 min), and the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the near-infrared group was significantly smaller than that in the non-near-infrared group (13 vs 110 mL). The total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes in the near-infrared group was significantly higher than that in the non-near-infrared group (14 vs 9). There were no significant differences in the postoperative complication rates of the 2 groups.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of the present study include its retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection combined with near-infrared imaging could increase the total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes without impairing functional preservation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B800.This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000041372 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).IMÁGENES CASI-INFRARROJAS UTILIZANDO VERDE DE INDOCIANINA EN LA DISECCIÓN LAPAROSCÓPICA DE GANGLIOS LINFÁTICOS PÉLVICOS LATERALES EN CASOS DE CÁNCER DE RECTO MEDIO-INFERIOR DE ESTADIO CLÍNICO II / III: ESTUDIO DE COHORTES CON PUNTUACIÓN DE PROPENSIÓNANTECEDENTES:El examen de la eficacia de las imágenes casi-infrarrojas utilizando le verde de indocianina en la disección laparoscópica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales sigue siendo insuficiente.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar si las imágenes casi-infrarrojas contribuyeron a un aumento en el número total de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales recolectados durante su disección laparoscópica.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo, multi-institucional con emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión.AJUSTES:Estudio realizado dentro el marco establecido por el Grupo de Oncología Clínica de Yokohama, Japón.PACIENTES:La población estudiada incluyó pacientes consecutivos con cáncer de recto medio-bajo (estadio clínico II a III) que se sometieron a una disección laparoscópica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales entre enero de 2013 y febrero de 2018.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS MEDIDAS:El número total de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales extraídos se comparó en la disección laparoscópica de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales con y sin imágenes casi-infrarrojas.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 172 pacientes elegibles; 84 de estos pacientes se sometieron a cirugía laparoscópica con imágenes casi-infrarrojas. Después del emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión, 58 pacientes fueron emparejados en cada uno de los grupos de luz casi-infrarroja y los sin luz. El tiempo de operación en el grupo de luz casi-infrarroja fue significativamente más largo que en el grupo sin luz (426 frente a 369 min), y la cantidad de pérdida de sangre intraoperatoria en el grupo de luz casi-infrarroja fue significativamente menor que en el grupo sin luz (13 frente a 110 ml). El número total de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales recolectados en el grupo de luz casi-infrarroja fue significativamente mayor que en el grupo sin luz (14 frente a 9). No hubo diferencias significativas en las tasas de complicaciones posoperatorias de los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones del presente estudio incluyen su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio reveló que la disección laparoscópica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales combinada con imágenes casi-infrarrojas podría aumentar el número total de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales recolectados sin afectar la preservación funcional. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B800. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo)Este estudio se registró en el Registro de Ensayos Clínicos de Japón como UMIN000041372 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Stereotactic navigation using registration based on intra-abdominal landmarks in robotic-assisted lateral pelvic lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

We carried out robot-assisted lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) for rectal cancer with a stereotactic navigation system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of the system.

METHODS

We constructed a navigation system based on the Polaris Spectra optical tracking device (Northern Digital Inc., Canada) and the open-source software 3D Slicer (version 3.8.1; http://www.slicer.org ). We used the landmark-based registration method for patient-to-image registration. Body surface landmarks and intra-abdominal landmarks were used. We evaluated the time required for registration and target registration error (TRE; the distance between corresponding points after registration) for the root of the superior gluteal artery the root of the obturator or superior vesical artery, and the obturator foramen during minimally invasive LPLND for rectal cancer. Five patients who had LPLND for rectal cancer at the University of Tokyo Hospital between September 2020 and May 2021 were enrolled.

RESULTS

The mean time required for registration was 49 s with the body surface landmarks and 88 s with the intra-abdominal landmarks. The mean TRE improved markedly when the registration was performed using intra-abdominal landmarks. The mean TRE of the root of the superior gluteal artery, the root of the obturator or superior vesical artery, and the obturator foramen were 55.8 mm, 53.4 mm, and 55.2 mm with the body surface landmarks and 11.8 mm, 10.0 mm, and 12.6 mm with the intra-abdominal landmarks, respectively. There were no adverse events related to the registration process.

CONCLUSIONS

When stereotactic navigation systems are used for minimally invasive LPLND, the use of intra-abdominal landmarks for registration is feasible and may allow simpler and more accurate navigation than the use of body surface landmarks.

Fascial space priority approach for laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with intent to achieve a pathological R0 resection is now considered as the only chance of a long-term survival for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) invading into adjacent organs. Lately, laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration (LTPE) is performed and achieved in several specialized centers and showed a promising application prospect. Although this is universally realized by surgeons, there are only few specialized centers to perform this complex surgery, due to concerns about the high morbidity and mortality. The techniques associated need to be disclosed and facilitated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to introduce a fascial space priority approach for laparoscopic TPE step by step (with video).

METHODS

We describe here a fascial space priority approach for LTPE in highly selected patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The main principle of this approach is that all of the pelvic organs are considered as a whole, the non-vascular spaces surrounding it are separated in the first place, the vascular pedicle and nerve pedicle of pelvic organs can be isolated and then transected precisely. Meanwhile, the associated key landmarks of this approach are disclosed (see the video).

RESULTS

The ureterohypogastric nerve fascia (UHGNF) and the vesicohypogastric fascia (VHGF) are two vital embryological planes on the lateral compartment of pelvis. The spaces on either side of them together with the retrorectal space, the space of Retzius, are all non-vascular spaces, and dissection of these spaces in LTPE surgery can be achieved simply and practicably. The ureter, the umbilical artery, the arcus tendinous fasciae pelvis (ATFP), piriformis and the puboprostatic ligament (PPL) are all important landmarks during surgery. Step-by-step illustration with precise anatomical landmarks in the present video may lead to less intraoperative blood loss and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

LTPE with fascial space priority approach might be a standard surgical procedure for total pelvic exenteration with clear anatomy and reduced blood loss.

Laparoscopic repair of sciatic hernia recognizing the ureterohypogastric nerve fascia and vesicohypogastric fascia: a case report

Background

Sciatic hernias are rare pelvic floor hernias that occur through the sciatic foramen and often present as abdominal or pelvic pain, particularly in women. Historically, they were repaired using an open approach, with limited reports on their laparoscopic treatment.

Case presentation

Here we present the case of an 85-year-old woman who had repeated abdominal pain and was referred to our hospital for sciatic hernia surgery after conservative treatment. We laparoscopically observed the deep pelvis and identified the right sciatic hernia. When an extraperitoneal space was dissected, an ureterohypogastric nerve fascia (UNF) and a vesicohypogastric fascia (VF) were identified. Moreover, the maneuver to mobilize the fasciae inside from the pelvic wall made it possible to separate the ureter and urinary bladder, which might have otherwise incarcerated in the hernia. We repaired the defect of the sciatic foramen with a mesh plug and patch. The patient had an uneventful recovery, and the absence of sciatic herniation recurrence was confirmed 1 year after surgery.

Conclusion

A laparoscopic repair of a sciatic hernia could permit detailed non-invasive observations of the deep pelvis and be performed effectively by recognizing an UNF and a VF located near the sciatic foramen.

Lateral lymph node recurrence of rectal cancer with a pathological complete response to chemotherapy confirmed by laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection: A case report

Lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis is one of the forms of local recurrence after surgery for lower rectal cancer. We here present a case of LLN recurrence of rectal cancer that was shown by laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) to have a complete pathological response to chemotherapy. A 58-year-old man underwent open low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer. After detection of right LLN recurrence 43 months after the operation, 11 cycles of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab chemotherapy were administered. Laparoscopic right LLND was performed 55 months after the first operation. Pathological examination revealed no viable tumor cells in the dissected lymph nodes. The patient remains alive without recurrence 61 months after the first surgery and 6 months after laparoscopic LLND. Laparoscopic LLND for LLN recurrence of rectal cancer is feasible and should be considered a valid treatment option.

Two-Team Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Assisted By the Transanal Approach

INTRODUCTION

Although lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is considered as a treatment option for advanced rectal cancer, it is technically demanding. Recently, the transanal approach for total mesorectal excision has become increasingly used. In this Technical Note, we describe lateral pelvic lymph node dissection using a 2-team method that was assisted by the transanal approach.

TECHNIQUE

First, the lateral pelvic area was entered from the anal side by dissection between the S4 sacral splanchnic nerve and levator ani muscle. Then, the fatty tissues including the obturator compartment and the distal part of the internal iliac compartment were separated from the inferior and superior vesical vessels and the bladder wall. Next, the fatty tissues were separated from the lateral pelvic wall. The obturator nerve was isolated and preserved, whereas the obturator vessels were resected at their peripheral end. Then, the fatty tissues were dissected from the bottom plane. Finally, the fatty tissues were dissected from the ventral bladder wall and were completely isolated from the obturator nerve in cooperation with the transabdominal team.

RESULTS

The 2-team method shortened the operative time dramatically and decreased mental and physical burden on the operators during lateral dissection. Assistance with the transanal approach helped with a secure and effective dissection, especially of the most distal parts, such as around the internal pudendal and inferior vesical arteries, because substantial skill is required for the transabdominal approach alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure is useful for the safe and effective performance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with rectal cancer.

Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer: a Preliminary Vietnamese Study

Background

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) in rectal cancer has been carried out in several major centers. However, there are still many controversial issues regarding this method such as feasibility, safety, and oncological outcome.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes, safety, and feasibility of LPLD.

Methods

This was a retrospective study. A total of 117 patients with lower rectal cancer (clinical stage II/III) below the peritoneal reflection underwent surgery between January 2019 and November 2020 at 108 Military Central Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Results

Total amount of 25 patients underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) plus LPLD and 92 patients underwent laparoscopic TME without LPLD. The rate of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in the LPLD group was 16% (4/25), of which 12% (3/25) were on the left side and 4% (1/25) were on the right side. The rate of intraoperative complications in the LPLD group was significantly higher at 16.0% (4/25) compared with 3.3% (3/92) in the TME only group (p = 0.037). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of postoperative complications between the two groups (24.0% of patients in the LPLD group compared with 26.1% patients in the no LPLD group, p = 0.832).

Conclusion

Pelvic lymphadenectomy has an important role in the treatment of advanced lower rectal cancer. LPLD is a safe and feasible procedure. However, it is necessary to study a larger number of patients with a longer follow-up period to fully evaluate oncological outcomes.

Lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer: State of the art review

Half of the local regional recurrences from rectal cancer are nowadays located in the lateral compartments, most likely due to lateral lymph node (LLN) metastases. There is evidence that a lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) can lower the lateral local recurrence rate. An LLND without neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with or without suspected LLN metastases has been the standard of care in the East, while Western surgeons believed LLN metastases to be cured by neoadjuvant treatment and total mesorectal excision (TME) only. An LLND in patients without enlarged LLNs might result in overtreatment with low rates of pathological LLNs, but in patients with enlarged LLNs who are treated with (C)RT and TME only, the risk of a lateral local recurrence significantly increases to 20%. Certain Eastern and Western centers are increasingly performing a selective LLND after neoadjuvant treatment in the presence of suspicious LLNs due to new scientific insights, but (inter)national consensus on the indication and surgical approach of LLND is lacking. An LLND is an anatomically challenging procedure with intraoperative risks such as bleeding and postoperative morbidity. It is therefore essential to carefully select the patients who will benefit from this procedure and where possible to perform the LLND in a minimally invasive manner to limit these risks. This review gives an overview of the current evidence of the assessment of LLNs, the indications for LLND, the surgical technique, pitfalls in performing this procedure and the future studies are discussed, aiming to contribute to more (inter)national consensus.

Metachronous common iliac lymph node metastasis after rectosigmoid colon cancer resection: A case report

Introduction and importance

Metastases to common iliac lymph nodes from cancer of the rectosigmoid are extremely rare. We report a patient with a right common iliac lymph node metastasis after rectosigmoid cancer resection.

Case presentation

The patient is a 57-year-old woman diagnosed with rectosigmoid cancer (Stage IIIc) who underwent laparoscopic resection followed by 8 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine. Sixteen months after resection, an intra-abdominal mass and a left lung nodule were found on computed tomography scans, which were suspected to be recurrences. Exploratory laparoscopy showed that the abdominal lesion was an enlarged common iliac lymph node, which was completely excised. No other intraabdominal recurrences were found. Subsequently, a left upper lobe lung metastasis was resected thoracoscopically. However, multiple lung metastases developed four months after the lung resection, and systemic therapy was begun.

Clinical discussion

A lower incidence of lateral lymph node metastases from cancer in the rectosigmoid has been reported. Direct lymphatic pathways from the sigmoid colon or rectosigmoid to lateral lymph nodes have been suspected, which may be associated with the poor prognosis in this patient.

Conclusion

A metachronous metastasis to a common iliac lymph node from primary rectosigmoid cancer is reported. Common iliac lymph node metastases from rectosigmoid cancer might have more malignant potential, and should be treated in the same manner as peri-aortic lymph node metastases.

•

Metastases to common iliac lymph nodes from rectosigmoid cancer are extremely rare.

•

Direct spread from the rectosigmoid to a common iliac lymph node is suspected.

•

The lymph node metastasis was excised laparoscopically.

•

A direct lymphatic pathway may be associated with a poor prognosis.

The feasibility and technical strategy of a fascia space priority approach in laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced middle and low rectal cancer: a retrospective multicentre study

Introduction

Laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is an important treatment for patients with lateral lymph node metastasis.

Aim

To assess the technical feasibility and investigate the surgical outcomes after LLND using the fascia space priority approach for patients with advanced middle and low rectal cancer.

Material and methods

Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic LLND using the fascia space priority approach from June 2017 to June 2020 were identified from 12 medical centres in mainland China. Three anatomic fascia spaces were dissected to establish the boundaries of the LLND, and the obturator and internal iliac lymph nodes were excised in an en bloc manner. Retrospective clinical data including patient characteristics, surgical details, and pathology were analysed.

Results

A total of 112 patients were identified. All surgeries were completed laparoscopically with no conversions. The mean operation time was 343.6 ±103.8 min for the entire procedure. The median blood loss was 100 ml (range: 100-700 ml). The median lymph node yield was 6 (range: 1-41), and lymph nodes were positive in 39.3% (44/112) of the patients. Sixteen (14.3%) patients had Clavien-Dindo I-II complications, no Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications were identified. The incidence of complications between the bilateral dissection group and the unilateral dissection group was not statistically different (p = 0.19). The complication rate between the "nCRT" group and the "no nCRT" group was not significantly different (p = 0.62) either. There were no perioperative deaths.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic LLND using the fascia space priority approach is feasible and safe for patients with lateral lymph node metastasis.

MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion potentiates the risk for pathological metastasis to the lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Multidisciplinary treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer requires an accurate assessment of the risk of metastasis to the lateral lymph nodes (LNs). We herein aimed to stratify the risk of pathological metastasis to lateral LNs based on the preoperatively detected malignant features.

METHODS

All patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery from January 2016 to July 2020 were identified. We recorded the TNM factors; perirectal and lateral LN sizes; and MRI findings, including mesorectal fascia involvement, extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), tumor site, and tumor distance from the anal verge.

RESULTS

101 patients underwent rectal resection with lateral lymph node dissection, of whom 16 (15.8%) exhibited pathological metastases to the lateral LNs. Univariate analyses demonstrated that lateral LN metastasis was significantly correlated with mrEMVI positivity (p = 0.0023) and a baseline lateral LN short-axis length of ≥ 5 mm (p < 0.0001). These significant associations were confirmed by a multivariate analysis (p = 0.0254 and 0.0027, respectively). The lateral LN metastasis rate was as high as 44% in cases bearing both risk factors, compared to 0% in cases lacking both risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The results elucidated in this study may contribute to risk stratification, which can be used when determining the indications for lateral lymph node dissection.

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of locally advanced low rectal cancer: Summary of the current evidence

Lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) are a major site for local recurrence following curative resection for low locally advanced rectal cancer. Ongoing advances in imaging techniques have improved predicting LPLN metastasis (LPLNM) during pre-operative staging. However, there is ongoing debate on optimal management of this subgroup of patients with variation between guidance of different societies. In Japan, LPLNM is considered as local disease and addressed by lateral pelvic node dissection (LPLND) in addition to total mesorectal excision (TME). However, in the west, LPLNM is considered as metastatic disease and those patients are offered neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by TME surgery. The potential surgical risks and morbidity associated with LPLND as well as the uncertainty of the oncological outcome have raised the concern that patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer with LPLNM could be over or under-treated. A comprehensive review of literature was performed, summarizing the current evidence on available modalities for predicting LPLNM, the role of LPLND in the management of advanced low rectal cancer and the available surgical approaches with their impact on surgical and oncological outcomes. LPLND is associated with increased operative time, blood loss and post-operative morbidity. The potential benefits for local disease control and survival still awaits high quality studies. There has been increasing number of reports of the use minimally invasive approaches in LPLND in an attempt to reduce post-operative complications. There is need for high quality evidence to define the role of LPLND in management of patients with advanced low rectal cancer.