Utility of the periareolar incision technique for breast reconstructive surgery in patients with breast cancer

A New Convenient Incision Model of the Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Lateralized Parabolic Multiplanar Incision

BACKGROUND

In this study, a lateralized parabolic multiplanar incision was defined. It was aimed to reduce necrosis in the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and, in the long run, to prevent the scar from pulling the areola laterally by maintaining healthy skin tissue between the scar and the areola and preserving the natural round appearance of the areola. Moreover, we purposed the scar not to be visible from the anterior view.

METHODS

The study included 243 patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. The incision was made 4-5 cm away from the lateral border of the NAC. The incision was completed after passing the anterior axillary line by drawing a parabolic curve in superolateral axis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 24.6 months, and the mean age of the patients was 42.3 years. Full-thickness necrosis of the NAC occurred in 3.6% of breasts. In long-term follow-ups, the incision scar measured an average length of 8.6 cm. None of the patients had lateral displacement of the NAC. The NAC preserved its round appearance, except for 12 breasts that had full-thickness NAC necrosis. Ten breasts had an unnatural breast appearance.

CONCLUSION

The lateralized parabolic multiplanar incision is an ideal incision model for nipple-sparing mastectomy, as it allows for the exposure and reconstruction of all breast quadrants. We maintain areolar circulation; there are no visible scars when viewed anteriorly. Furthermore, it prevents lateral displacement of the NAC, ensuring that the natural round form of the NAC is not distorted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Considerable Long-Term Aesthetic Outcomes and Oncologic Safety of Breast-Conserving Surgery Via a Periareolar Incision: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the application effect of periareolar incision breast-conserving surgery in patients with early breast cancer.

METHODS

From January 2017 to November 2021, a clinician in our research center performed a total of 533 breast-conserving surgery. After screening, we collected the information of 209 patients through telephone, online questionnaires, and outpatient follow-up. One hundred seventeen patients with early breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery under the periareolar incision, while 92 patients underwent surgery through the tumor surface incision. We compared the differences between the 2 groups in the length of stay, postoperative complications, adjuvant therapy, and other clinical indicators, as well as the subjective and objective evaluation of the long-term postoperative breast aesthetic outcome, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 3.9 years, patients in the periareolar incision group (PAIG) and tumor surface incision group (TSIG) had no significant differences in clinical indicators, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival. However, PAIG patients had better subjective satisfaction with postoperative breast appearance. In the evaluation of objective aesthetic outcomes, PAIG was significantly better than TSIG in texture and elasticity, symmetry, sunken degree of the operative side, skin color, surgical scar, and breast compliance difference.

CONCLUSION

By observing and comparing the clinical indicators, postoperative recurrence, and metastasis of the enrolled patients, this study found that periareolar incision surgery could achieve radical therapeutic effects similar to those achieved through tumor surface incision, and had advantages in improving postoperative aesthetic outcomes, which could provide certain references for clinical practice.

Epidemiology and Prevention of Breast Prosthesis Capsular Contracture Recurrence

INTRODUCTION

Baker grade III and IV breast prosthesis capsular contractures represent a major problem for patients undergoing mammoplasties. The risk factors involved in recurrence are debated, and the best surgical approach for their prevention is not established. The objective was to identify these.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study of patients operated on for capsular contracture at the Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris from 2012 to 2014. The characteristics at inclusion were compared so as to determine the risk factors of recurrence. The surgical approaches were compared between the patients with recurrence and those without at 5 years.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients included, 24 had a recurrence. The minimal follow-up was 5 years. No risk factors of recurrence of capsular contracture were identified. The surgical approach associated with the lowest rate of recurrence was anterior capsulectomy [OR total capsulectomy = 2.36 (0.73; 8.037) OR capsulotomy = 4.33 (1.37; 14.81)] (p < 0.040) with alteration of the volume of the implant, whether greater or less than initially [OR greater volume = 0.30 (0.096; 0.83); OR smaller volume = 0.14 (0.008; 0.85)] (p < 0.018).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of capsular contracture is a major problem with prosthetic breast surgery. The main risk factors identified to date are essentially in regard to the occurrence of a first episode. No significant risk factors for recurrence were identified. The best prevention appears to be an anterior capsulectomy with reducing the volume of the implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . IV.