1
|
Rex DK, Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Day LW, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Ladabaum U, Levin TR, Shaukat A, Achkar JP, Farraye FA, Kane SV, Shaheen NJ. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 100:352-381. [PMID: 39177519 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Medicine/Division of Gastroenterology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Medicine/Division of Gastroenterology, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA; New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco; Chief Medical Officer, University of California San Francisco Health System
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Pleasonton, California, USA
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York Harbor Veterans Affairs Health Care System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jean-Paul Achkar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rex DK, Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Day LW, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Ladabaum U, Levin TR, Shaukat A, Achkar JP, Farraye FA, Kane SV, Shaheen NJ. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01296. [PMID: 39167112 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Chief Medical Officer, University of California San Francisco Health System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Pleasonton, California, USA
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York Harbor Veterans Affairs Health Care System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jean-Paul Achkar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yi JH, Li ZS, Hu LH. Adverse events of pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a literature review. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:360. [PMID: 37853330 PMCID: PMC10585860 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02992-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic stones are the result of pathophysiologic changes in chronic pancreatitis with an incidence of more than 90%. At present, pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (P-ESWL) can be used as the first-line treatment for large or complex stones. Although a large number of studies have proven the safety and effectiveness of P-ESWL, we should also pay attention to postoperative adverse events, mainly due to the scattering of shock waves in the conduction pathway. Adverse events can be classified as either complications or transient adverse events according to the severity. Because the anatomic location of organs along the shock wave conducting pathway differs greatly, adverse events after P-ESWL are varied and difficult to predict. This paper outlines the mechanism, definition, classification, management and risk factors for adverse events related to P-ESWL. It also discusses the technique of P-ESWL, indications and contraindications of P-ESWL, and adverse events in special populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Hui Yi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Zhao-Shen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Liang-Hao Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhong W, Liu C, Fang C, Zhang L, He X, Zhu W, Guan X. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colonoscopic perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34057. [PMID: 37327263 PMCID: PMC10270540 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for the treatment of colonoscopic perforation is still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of LS versus open surgery (OS) for colonoscopic perforation. METHODS All clinical trials that compared laparoscopic with OS for colonoscopic perforation published in English were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library searches. A modified scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. We analyzed the age, sex ratio, aim of colonoscopy, history of abdominopelvic surgery, type of procedure, size of perforation, operation time, postoperative fasting time, hospital stay, postoperative complication morbidity, and postoperative mortality. Meta-analyses were performed using weighted mean differences for continuous variables, and odds ratios for dichotomous variables. RESULTS No eligible randomized trials were identified, but eleven nonrandomized trials were analyzed. In the pooled data of 192 patients who underwent LS and 131 OS, there were no significant differences in age, sex ratio, aim of colonoscopy, history of abdominopelvic surgery, perforation size, and operative time between the groups. LS group had shorter time of hospital stay and postoperative fasting time, less postoperative complication morbidity, but there were no significant difference in postoperative mortality rate between LS group and OS group. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current meta-analysis, we conclude that LS is a safe and efficacious technique for colonoscopic perforation, with fewer postoperative complications, less hospital mortality, and faster recovery compared with OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Zhong
- Department of General Surgery, The Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Chuanyuan Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Chuanfa Fang
- Department of General Surgery, The Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Xianping He
- Department of General Surgery, The Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Weiquan Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, The Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Xueyun Guan
- Department of Pediatric, The Ganzhou People’s Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vissers FL, van Hilst J, Burdío F, Sabnis SC, Busch OR, Dijkgraaf MG, Festen SF, Sanchez-Velázquez P, Senthilnathan P, Palanivelu C, Poves I, Besselink MG. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1592-1599. [PMID: 35641405 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials have compared laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) with conflicting results. An IPDMA may give more insight into the differences between LPD and OPD, and could identify high-risk subgroups. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in the Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases (October 2019). Out of 1410 studies, three randomized trials were identified. Primary outcome was major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III). Subgroup analyses were performed for high-risk subgroups including patients with BMI of ≥25 kg/m2, pancreatic duct <3 mm, age ≥70 years, and malignancy. RESULTS Data from 224 patients were collected. After LPD, major complications occurred in 33/114 (29%) patients compared to 34/110 (31%) patients after OPD (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-1.4, P = 0.257). No differences were seen for major complications and 90-day mortality LPD 8 (7%) vs OPD 4 (4%) (adjusted OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.02-1.3, P = 0.080). With LPD, operative time was longer (420 vs 318 min, p < 0.001) and hospital stay was shorter (mean difference -6.97 days). Outcomes remained stable in the high-risk subgroups. CONCLUSION LPD did not reduce the rate of major postoperative complications as compared to OPD. LPD increased operative time and shortened hospital stay with 7 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederique L Vissers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Sandeep C Sabnis
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Center, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, India
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel G Dijkgraaf
- Clinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Palanisamy Senthilnathan
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Center, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, India
| | - Chinnusamy Palanivelu
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Center, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, India
| | - Ignasi Poves
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|