A comparison of the surgical invasiveness and short-term outcomes between thoracoscopic and pneumatic mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Comparison of mediastinoscopy and thoracoscope minimally invasive esophagectomy in the treatment of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis and system review

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of transcervical inflatable mediastinoscopic esophagectomy (TIME) in the treatment of esophageal cancer are unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TIME treatment for esophageal cancer and to compare it with thoracoscopic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (TAMIE) for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to retrieve articles published up to January 2024 to comparatively assess studies of TIME and TAMIE. Meta-analysis was performed using randomized/fixed-effects models and heterogeneity was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 819 patients were included in the nine studies herein. Among them, 409 patients with esophageal cancer underwent mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy, and 410 patients with esophageal cancer underwent thoracolaparoscopy-assisted esophagectomy. There was no statistical difference between the TIME and TAMIE groups in intraoperative bleeding, incidence of anastomotic fistula, chylothorax, postoperative bleeding, arrhythmia, postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. In addition, the operative time in the TIME group, 3-day postoperative induced flux, postoperative hospitalization time, number of lymph node dissection, and incidence of pulmonary complications were smaller than those in the TAMIE group, and the differences were all statistically significant. However, in terms of the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (including hoarseness), the TIME group was higher than the TAMIE group.

CONCLUSION

TIME is a safe and feasible alternative to TAMIE for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer, but further randomized studies are needed to better assess the long-term benefits of TIME compared with TAMIE.

Robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy with simultaneous transhiatal abdominal procedure for thoracic esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy has been sporadically reported as a novel thoracic esophagectomy technique for patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Most reports indicate that the abdominal component of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy is performed sequentially after the cervical phase. However, if the cervical and abdominal phases are performed simultaneously using a nerve integrity monitoring system with no administration of muscle relaxants, there are two major advantages: a reduced risk of recurrent nerve palsy and a shorter operative time. We herein report our experience performing novel robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a simultaneous transhiatal abdominal approach using a nerve integrity monitoring system.

METHODS

Thirty cases of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy performed from 2023 to April 2024 were reviewed. The operative and short-term surgical outcomes of this procedure were compared with those of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy using a sequential abdominal approach, and the feasibility and efficacy of the simultaneous procedure were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients successfully underwent robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy with no intraoperative adverse events. There were no differences in the patients' demographic or operative data between the two groups. There was no difference in the mean operation time for the cervical procedure (p = 0.23). However, there was a significant difference in the total time for the whole procedure (sequential group: 453.8 ± 26.8 min, simultaneous group: 291.2 ± 36.1 min; p < 0.01). There were no differences in postoperative surgical complications between the groups. There was also no difference in the total number of surgically harvested mediastinal lymph nodes (p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy, a new technique for thoracic esophageal cancer, was safe and feasible under intraoperative management using nerve integrity monitoring without muscle relaxants. This procedure facilitates intraoperative monitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve activity, significantly shortening the total operative time.

Substitute or coexistence? Mediastinoscopy-assisted versus thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival

BACKGROUND

Currently, mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy (MAE) and thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy (TAE) represent two prevalent forms of minimally invasive esophagectomy extensively employed in the management of esophageal cancer (EC). The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess and compare these two surgical approaches concerning perioperative outcomes and long-term survival, offering valuable insights for refining surgical strategies and enhancing patient outcomes in this field.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CNKI databases until 1 March 2024, for studies comparing MAE and TAE. Outcomes of interest included perioperative outcomes (intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications) and survival rates. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, with heterogeneity dictating the use of fixed or random-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 21 relevant studies were finally included. MAE was associated with significantly shorter operation times [mean difference (MD)=-59.58 min, 95% CI: -82.90 to -36.26] and less intraoperative blood loss (MD=-68.34 ml, 95% CI: -130.45 to -6.23). However, MAE resulted in fewer lymph nodes being dissected (MD=-3.50, 95% CI: -6.23 to -0.78). Postoperative recovery was enhanced following MAE, as evidenced by reduced hospital stays and tube times. MAE significantly reduced pulmonary complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.59, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81] but increased the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.60). No significant differences were observed in anastomotic leakage, chylothorax, cardiac complications, wound infections, and gastric retention between MAE and TAE. The long-term survival outcomes showed no statistical difference [hazard ratio (HR)=1.05, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.54].

CONCLUSIONS

MAE offers advantages in reducing operation time, blood loss, and specific postoperative complications, particularly pulmonary complications, with a shorter recovery period compared to TAE. However, it poses a higher risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and results in fewer lymph nodes being dissected. No difference in long-term survival was observed, indicating that both techniques have distinct benefits and limitations. These findings underscore the need for personalized surgical approaches in EC treatment, considering individual patient characteristics and tumor specifics.

Robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a bilateral cervical approach for thoracic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Thoracic esophageal cancer resection through the neck approach has recently been reported as mediastinoscopic surgery. We present the first report of a new minimally invasive technique for thoracic esophageal cancer: robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a bilateral cervical approach.

METHODS

Ten cases of robot-assisted bilateral transcervical esophagectomy performed at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan, from February 2023 to August 2023 were reviewed. The short-term surgical outcomes were presented, and the feasibility and efficacy of this procedure were discussed.

RESULTS

The mean operation time for the cervical procedure was 184.2 ± 23.6 min. The total time for the whole procedure was 472.7 ± 28.4 min, and total intraoperative blood loss was 162.2 ± 40.0 ml. Among the 10 cases, one patient developed recurrent nerve paralysis, one patient developed pulmonary complications, and no patients developed postoperative pneumonia. The median postoperative hospital stay was 22 (range: 12-43) days. No patients developed severe postoperative surgical complications, which were graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥ III. The total number of surgically harvested mediastinal lymph nodes was 37.2 ± 11.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted bilateral transcervical esophagectomy, a novel procedure for thoracic esophageal cancer, was safe and feasible. Using this procedure, the incidence of recurrent nerve palsy, which is a problem with transcervical esophagectomy and mediastinoscopic esophagectomy, is expected to decrease.

Application of Inflatable Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopic Transhiatal Esophagectomy in Individualized Treatment of Esophageal Cancer

Surgery is a crucial treatment option for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. The emergence of minimally invasive esophageal techniques has led to the popularity of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy, which has proven to be more advantageous than traditional thoracotomy. However, some patients with esophageal cancer may not benefit from this procedure. Individualized treatment plans may be necessary for patients with varying conditions and tolerances to anesthesia, making conventional surgical methods unsuitable. Inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (IVMTE) has emerged as a promising treatment option for esophageal cancer because it does not require one-lung ventilation, reduces postoperative complications, and expands surgical indications. This technique also provides surgical opportunities for patients with impaired pulmonary function or thoracic lesions. It is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the advancements and limitations of IVMTE to tailor treatment plans and improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Understanding the advantages and limitations of this surgical method will help specific patients with esophageal cancer. We conducted a thorough review of the relevant literature to examine the importance of IVMTE for individualized treatment of this disease.

Novel Mediastinoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery is an expanding field of surgery that has replaced many open surgical techniques. Surgery remains a cornerstone in the treatment of esophageal cancer, yet it is still associated with significant morbidity and technical difficulties. Mediastinoscope-assisted esophagectomy is a promising technique that aims to decrease the surgical burden and enhance recovery.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched for publications on mediastinoscope-assisted esophagectomies for esophageal cancer. The primary endpoint was a postoperative anastomotic leak, while secondary endpoints were assessment of harvested lymph nodes (LNs), blood loss, chyle leak, hospital length of stay (LOS), operative (OR) time, pneumonia, wound infection, mortality, and microscopic positive margin (R1). The pooled event rate (PER) and pooled mean were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-six out of the 2274 searched studies were included. The pooled event rate (PER) for anastomotic leak was 0.145 (0.1144; 0.1828). The PERs for chyle leak, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury/hoarseness, postoperative pneumonia, wound infection, early mortality, postoperative morbidity, and microscopically positive (R1) resection margins were 0.027, 0.185, 0.09, 0.083, 0.020, 0.378, and 0.037 respectively. The pooled means for blood loss, hospital stay, operative time, number of total harvested LNs, and number of harvested thoracic LNs were 159.209, 15.187, 311.116, 23.379, and 15.458 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy is a promising minimally invasive technique, avoiding thoracotomy, patient repositioning, and lung manipulation; thus allowing for shorter surgery, decreased blood loss, and decreased postoperative morbidity. It can also be reliable in terms of oncological safety and LN dissection.