The influence of intraoperative microelectrode recordings and clinical testing on the location of final stimulation sites in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

Surgical Advances in Parkinson's Disease

While symptomatic pharmacological therapy remains the main therapeutic strategy for Parkinson's disease (PD), over the last two decades, surgical approaches have become more commonly used to control levodopa-induced motor complications and dopamine-resistant and non-motor symptoms of PD. In this paper, we discuss old and new surgical treatments for PD and the many technological innovations in this field. We have initially reviewed the relevant surgical anatomy as well as the pathological signaling considered to be the underlying cause of specific symptoms of PD. Subsequently, early attempts at surgical symptom control will be briefly reviewed. As the most well-known surgical intervention for PD is deep brain stimulation, this subject is discussed at length. As deciding on whether a patient stands to benefit from DBS can be quite difficult, the different proposed paradigms for precisely this are covered. Following this, the evidence regarding different targets, especially the subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus, is reviewed as well as the evidence for newer proposed targets for specific symptoms. Due to the rapidly expanding nature of knowledge and technological capabilities, some of these new and potential future capabilities are given consideration in terms of their current and future use. Following this, we have reviewed newer treatment modalities, especially magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound and other potential surgical therapies, such as spinal cord stimulation for gait symptoms and others. As mentioned, the field of surgical alleviation of symptoms of PD is undergoing a rapid expansion, and this review provides a general overview of the current status and future directions in the field.

Clinical neurophysiology of Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism

•

This review is part of the series on the clinical neurophysiology of movement disorders and focuses on Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism.

•

The pathophysiology of cardinal parkinsonian motor symptoms and myoclonus are reviewed.

•

The recordings from microelectrode and deep brain stimulation electrodes are reported in detail.

This review is part of the series on the clinical neurophysiology of movement disorders. It focuses on Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism. The topics covered include the pathophysiology of tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia, balance and gait disturbance and myoclonus in Parkinson’s disease. The use of electroencephalography, electromyography, long latency reflexes, cutaneous silent period, studies of cortical excitability with single and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation, studies of plasticity, intraoperative microelectrode recordings and recording of local field potentials from deep brain stimulation, and electrocorticography are also reviewed. In addition to advancing knowledge of pathophysiology, neurophysiological studies can be useful in refining the diagnosis, localization of surgical targets, and help to develop novel therapies for Parkinson’s disease.

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Assessment in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery and its Impact on Lead Placement

OBJECTIVES

 While the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat various neurological disorders is undisputed, the surgical methods differ widely and the importance of intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) or macrostimulation (MS) remains controversially debated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of MER and MS on intraoperative lead placement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 We included 101 patients who underwent awake bilateral implantation of electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus with MER and MS for Parkinson's disease from 2009 to 2017 in a retrospective observational study. We analyzed intraoperative motor outcomes between anatomically planned stimulation point (PSP) and definite stimulation point (DSP), lead adjustments and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Item III (UPDRS-III), levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and adverse events (AE) after 6 months.

RESULTS

 We adjusted 65/202 leads in 47/101 patients. In adjusted leads, MS results improved significantly when comparing PSP and DSP (p < 0.001), resulting in a number needed to treat of 9.6. After DBS, UPDRS-III and LEDD improved significantly after 6 months in adjusted and nonadjusted patients (p < 0.001). In 87% of leads, the active contact at 6 months still covered the optimal stimulation point during surgery. In total, 15 AE occurred.

CONCLUSION

 MER and MS have a relevant impact on the intraoperative decision of final lead placement and prevent from a substantial rate of poor stimulation outcome. The optimal stimulation points during surgery and chronic stimulation strongly overlap. Follow-up UPDRS-III results, LEDD reductions, and DBS-related AE correspond well to previously published data.

Localization of motor and verbal fluency effects in subthalamic DBS for Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) improves cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but can worsen verbal fluency (VF). An optimal site of stimulation for overall motor improvement has been previously identified using an atlas-independent, fully individualized, field-modeling approach. This study examines if cardinal motor components (bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity) share this identified optimal improvement site and if there is co-localization with a site that worsens VF.

METHODS

An atlas-independent, field-modeling approach was used to identify sites of maximal STN DBS effect on overall and cardinal motor symptoms and VF in 60 patients. Anatomic coordinates were referenced to the STN midpoint. Symptom severity was assessed with the MDS-UPDRS part III and established VF scales.

RESULTS

Sites for improved bradykinesia and rigidity co-localized with each other and the overall part III site (0.09 mm lateral, 0.93 mm posterior, 1.75 mm dorsal). The optimal site for tremor was posterior to this site (0.10 mm lateral, 1.40 mm posterior, 1.93 mm dorsal). Semantic and phonemic VF sites were indistinguishable and co-localized medial to the motor sites (0.32 mm medial, 1.18 mm posterior, 1.74 mm dorsal).

CONCLUSION

This study identifies statistically distinct, maximally effective stimulation sites for tremor improvement, VF worsening, and overall and other cardinal motor improvements in STN DBS. Current electrode sizes and voltage settings stimulate all of these sites simultaneously. However, future targeted lead placement and focused directional stimulation may avoid VF worsening while maintaining motor improvements in STN DBS.

Asleep Surgery May Improve the Therapeutic Window for Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus

OBJECTIVE

The effect of anesthesia type in terms of asleep vs. awake deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery on therapeutic window (TW) has not been investigated so far. The objective of the study was to investigate whether asleep DBS surgery of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves TW for both directional (dDBS) and omnidirectional (oDBS) stimulation in a large single-center population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 104 consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) undergoing STN-DBS surgery (80 asleep and 24 awake) were compared regarding TW, therapeutic threshold, side effect threshold, improvement of Unified PD Rating Scale motor score (UPDRS-III) and degree of levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) reduction.

RESULTS

Asleep DBS surgery led to significantly wider TW compared to awake surgery for both dDBS and oDBS. However, dDBS further increased TW compared to oDBS in the asleep group only and not in the awake group. Clinical efficacy in terms of UPDRS-III improvement and LEDD reduction did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides first evidence for improvement of therapeutic window by asleep surgery compared to awake surgery, which can be strengthened further by dDBS. These results support the notion of preferring asleep over awake surgery but needs to be confirmed by prospective trials.

Is awake physiological confirmation necessary for DBS treatment of Parkinson's disease today? A comparison of intraoperative imaging, physiology, and physiology imaging-guided DBS in the past decade

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). Intraoperative imaging (IMG), intraoperative physiology (PHY) and their combination (COMB) are the three mainstream DBS guidance methods.

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively compare the use of IMG-DBS, PHY-DBS and COMB-DBS in treating PD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and OpenGrey were searched to identify PD-DBS studies reporting guidance techniques published between January 1, 2010, and May 1, 2018. We quantitatively compared the therapeutic effects, surgical time, target error and complication risk and qualitatively compared the patient experience, cost and technical prospects. A meta-regression analysis was also performed. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018105995.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine cohorts were included in the main analysis. The three groups were equivalent in therapeutic effects and infection risks. IMG-DBS (p < 0.001) and COMB-DBS (p < 0.001) had a smaller target error than PHY-DBS. IMG-DBS had a shorter surgical time (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) and a lower intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) risk (p = 0.013 and p = 0.004, respectively) than PHY- and COMB-DBS. The use of intraoperative imaging and microelectrode recording correlated with a higher surgical accuracy (p = 0.018) and a higher risk of ICH (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The comparison of COMB-DBS and PHY-DBS showed intraoperative imaging's superiority (higher surgical accuracy), while the comparison of COMB-DBS and IMG-DBS showed physiological confirmation's inferiority (longer surgical time and higher ICH risk). Combined with previous evidence, the use of intraoperative neuroimaging techniques should become a future trend.

Multiple Microelectrode Recordings in STN-DBS Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Study

Background

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation improves motor symptoms and fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease, but the degree of clinical improvement depends on accurate anatomical electrode placement. Methods used to localize the sensory‐motor part of the nucleus vary substantially. Using microelectrode recordings, at least three inserted microelectrodes are needed to obtain a three‐dimensional map. Therefore, multiple simultaneously inserted microelectrodes should provide better guidance than single sequential microelectrodes. We aimed to compare the use of multiple simultaneous versus single sequential microelectrode recordings on efficacy and safety of subthalamic nucleus stimulation.

Methods

Sixty patients were included in this double‐blind, randomized study, 30 in each group. Primary outcome measures were the difference from baseline to 12 months in the MDS‐UPDRS motor score (part III) in the off‐medication state and quality of life using the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire‐39 (PDQ‐39) scores.

Results

The mean reduction of the MDS‐UPDRS III off score was 35 (SD 12) in the group investigated with multiple simultaneous microelectrodes compared to 26 (SD 10) in the single sequential microelectrode group (p = 0.004). The PDQ‐39 Summary Index did not differ between the groups, but the domain scores activities of daily living and bodily discomfort improved significantly more in the multiple microelectrodes group. The frequency of serious adverse events did not differ significantly.

Conclusions

After 12 months of subthalamic nucleus stimulation, the multiple microelectrodes group had a significantly greater improvement both in MDS‐UPDRS III off score and in two PDQ‐39 domains. Our results may support the use of multiple simultaneous microelectrode recordings.

Trial registration

http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00855621 (first received March 3, 2009).

Comparison of Awake vs. Asleep Surgery for Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD) is usually performed as awake surgery allowing sufficient intraoperative testing. Recently, outcomes after asleep surgery have been assumed comparable. However, direct comparisons between awake and asleep surgery are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the difference between awake and asleep surgery comparing motor and nonmotor outcome after subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS in a large single center PD population.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients were retrospectively matched pairwise (48 asleep and 48 awake) and compared regarding improvement of Unified PD Rating Scale Motor Score (UPDRS-III), cognitive function, Levodopa-equivalent-daily-dose (LEDD), stimulation amplitudes, side effects, surgery duration, and complication rates. Routine testing took place at three months and one year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Chronic DBS effects (UPDRS-III without medication and with stimulation on [OFF/ON]) significantly improved UPDRS-III only after awake surgery at three months and in both groups one year postoperatively. Acute effects (percentage UPDRS-III reduction after activation of stimulation) were also significantly better after awake surgery at three months but not at one year compared to asleep surgery. UPDRS-III subitems "freezing" and "speech" were significantly worse after asleep surgery at three months and one year, respectively. LEDD was significantly lower after awake surgery only one week postoperatively. The other measures did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall motor function improved faster in the awake surgery group, but the difference ceased after one year. However, axial subitems were worse in the asleep surgery group suggesting that worsening of axial symptoms was risked improving overall motor function. Awake surgery still seems advantageous for STN-DBS in PD, although asleep surgery may be considered with lower threshold in patients not suitable for awake surgery.

Borders of STN determined by MRI versus the electrophysiological STN. A comparison using intraoperative CT

Background

It is unclear which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence most accurately corresponds with the electrophysiological subthalamic nucleus (STN) obtained during microelectrode recording (MER, MER-STN). CT/MRI fusion allows for comparison between MER-STN and the STN visualized on preoperative MRI (MRI-STN).

Objective

To compare dorsal and ventral STN borders as seen on 3-Tesla T2-weighted (T2) and susceptibility weighted images (SWI) with electrophysiological STN borders in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Methods

Intraoperative CT (iCT) was performed after each MER track. iCT images were merged with preoperative images using planning software. Dorsal and ventral borders of each track were determined and compared to MRI-STN borders. Differences between borders were calculated.

Results

A total of 125 tracks were evaluated in 45 patients. MER-STN started and ended more dorsally than respective dorsal and ventral MRI-STN borders. For dorsal borders, differences were 1.9 ± 1.4 mm (T2) and 2.5 ± 1.8 mm (SWI). For ventral borders, differences were 1.9 ± 1.6 mm (T2) and 2.1 ± 1.8 mm (SWI).

Conclusions

Discrepancies were found comparing borders on T2 and SWI to the electrophysiological STN. The largest border differences were found using SWI. Border differences were considerably larger than errors associated with iCT and fusion techniques. A cautious approach should be taken when relying solely on MR imaging for delineation of both clinically relevant STN borders.

Intraoperative clinical testing overestimates the therapeutic window of the permanent DBS electrode in the subthalamic nucleus

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative test stimulation is established to optimize target localization in STN DBS, but requires a time-consuming awake surgery in off-medication state. The aim of this study was to compare the thresholds of stimulation-induced effects of test stimulation and the permanent electrode.

METHODS

Fifty-nine PD patients receiving bilateral STN DBS were clinically examined with stepwise increasing monopolar stimulation during surgery and DBS programming at matched stimulation depths. Thresholds of therapeutic and side effects were obtained from standardized examination protocols.

RESULTS

Postoperative stimulation via the permanent electrode caused side effects at a significantly lower threshold than predicted during intraoperative test stimulation (P < 0.001); whereas sufficient therapeutic effects were achieved at significantly higher thresholds (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative testing may lead to an overestimation of the therapeutic window. The two different electrodes lead to distinct spreading of the electric field in the STN and surrounding tissues that causes different volume of tissue activated (VTA). Clinicians involved in DBS surgery and programming should be aware of the differences in both stimulation settings, concerning electrodes geometry, stimulation modes as well as the impact of time. Therapeutic and side effects of permanent stimulation are not predictable by intraoperative test stimulation. Test stimulation may be an orientating test for very low thresholds of side effects instead.

The effect of dopaminergic therapy on intraoperative microelectrode recordings for subthalamic deep brain stimulation under GA: can we operate on patients 'on medications'?

OBJECTIVES

Microelectrode recording (MER) plays an important role in target refinement in deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, patients were operated on in the 'off-medication' state to allow intraoperative assessment of the patient response to direct STN stimulation. The development of intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) has facilitated the introduction of general anaesthesia (GA). However, the routine withdrawal of dopaminergic medications has remained as standard practice. This retrospective review examines the effect of continuing these medications on intraoperative MER for subthalamic DBS insertion under GA and discusses the clinical implication of this approach.

METHODS

Retrospective review of PD patients who had bilateral STN DBS insertion was conducted. A cohort of seven patients (14 STN microelectrodes) between 2012 and 2013, who inadvertently underwent the procedure while 'on medication', was identified. This 'on-medication' group was compared to all other patients who underwent the same procedure between 2012 and 2013 and had their medications withdrawn preoperatively, the 'off-medication' group, n = 26 (52 STN DBS). The primary endpoint was defined as the number of microelectrode tracks required to obtain adequate STN recordings. A second endpoint was the length of MERs that was finally used to guide the DBS lead insertion. The Reduction of the levo-dopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was also examined as a surrogate marker for clinical outcome 12 months postoperatively for both groups. For the on-medication group further analysis of the clinical outcome was done relying on the change in the motor examination at 12 months following STN DBS using the following parameters (Hoehn and Yahr scale, the number of waking hours spent in the OFF state as well as the duration of dyskinesia during the ON periods).

RESULTS

The on-medication group was statistically comparable in all baseline characteristics to the off-medication group, including age at operation 57 ± 9.9 years vs. 61.5 ± 9.2 years, p = 0.34 (mean ± SD); duration of disease (11.6 ± 5 years vs. 11.3 ± 4 years, p = 0.68); gender F:M ratio (1:6 vs. 9:17, p = 0.40). Both groups had similar PD medication regimes preoperatively expressed as levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) 916 mg (558-1850) vs. 744 mg (525-3591), respectively, p = 0.77. In the on-medication group, all seven patients (14 STN electrodes) had satisfactory STN recording from a single brain track versus 15 out of 26 patients (57.7 %) in the off-medication group, p = 0.06. The length of MER was 4.5 mm (3.0-5.5) in the on-medication group compared to 3.5 mm (3.0-4.5) in the off-medication group, p = 0.16. The percentage of reduction in LEDD postoperatively for the on-medication group was comparable to that in the off-medication group, 62 % versus 58 %, respectively, p > 0.05. All patients in the on-medication group had clinically significant improvement in their PD motor symptoms as assessed by the Hoehn and Yahr scale; the number of hours (of the waking day) spent in the OFF state dropped from 6.9 (±2.3) h to 0.9 (±1.6) h; the duration of dyskinesia during the ON state dropped from 64 % (±13 %) of the ON period to only 7 % (±12 %) at 12 months following STN DBS insertion.

CONCLUSION

STN DBS insertion under GA can be performed without the need to withdraw dompaminergic treatment preoperatively. In this review the inadvertent continuation of medications did not affect the physiological localisation of the STN or the clinical effectiveness of the procedure. The continuation of dopamine therapy is likely to improve the perioperative experience for PD patients, avoid dopamine-withdrawal complications and improve recovery. A prospective study is needed to verify the results of this review.

Anesthesiologic regimen and intraoperative delirium in deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

In many centers the standard anesthesiological care for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery in Parkinson's disease patients is an asleep-awake-asleep procedure. However, sedative drugs and anesthetics can compromise ventilation and hemodynamic stability during the operation and some patients develop a delirious mental state after the initial asleep phase. Further, these drugs interfere with the patient's alertness and cooperativeness, the quality of microelectrode recordings, and the recognition of undesired stimulation effects. In this study, we correlated the incidence of intraoperative delirium with the amount of anesthetics used intraoperatively.

METHODS

The anesthesiologic approach is based on continuous presence and care, avoidance of negative suggestions, use of positive suggestions, and utilization of the patient's own resources. Clinical data from the operations were analyzed retrospectively, the occurrence of intraoperative delirium was extracted from patients' charts. The last 16 patients undergoing the standard conscious sedation procedure (group I) were compared to the first 22 (group II) psychologically-guided patients.

RESULTS

The median amount of propofol decreased from 146 mg (group I) to 0mg (group II), remifentanyl from 0.70 mg to 0.00 mg, respectively (P<0.001 for propofol and remifentanyl). Using the new procedure, 12 of 22 patients (55%) in group II required no anesthetics. Intraoperative delirium was significantly less frequent in group II (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of intraoperative delirium correlates with the amount of intraoperative sedative and anesthetic drugs. Sedation and powerful analgesia are not prerequisites for patients' comfort during awake-DBS-surgery.

Does Navigated Transcranial Stimulation Increase the Accuracy of Tractography? A Prospective Clinical Trial Based on Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Deep Brain Stimulation

BACKGROUND:

Tractography based on diffusion tensor imaging has become a popular tool for delineating white matter tracts for neurosurgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE:

To explore whether navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) might increase the accuracy of fiber tracking.

METHODS:

Tractography was performed according to both anatomic delineation of the motor cortex (n = 14) and nTMS results (n = 9). After implantation of the definitive electrode, stimulation via the electrode was performed, defining a stimulation threshold for eliciting motor evoked potentials recorded during deep brain stimulation surgery. Others have shown that of arm and leg muscles. This threshold was correlated with the shortest distance between the active electrode contact and both fiber tracks. Results were evaluated by correlation to motor evoked potential monitoring during deep brain stimulation, a surgical procedure causing hardly any brain shift.

RESULTS:

Distances to fiber tracks clearly correlated with motor evoked potential thresholds. Tracks based on nTMS had a higher predictive value than tracks based on anatomic motor cortex definition (P &lt; .001 and P = .005, respectively). However, target site, hemisphere, and active electrode contact did not influence this correlation.

CONCLUSION:

The implementation of tractography based on nTMS increases the accuracy of fiber tracking. Moreover, this combination of methods has the potential to become a supplemental tool for guiding electrode implantation.

Accuracy of subthalamic nucleus targeting by T2, FLAIR and SWI-3-Tesla MRI confirmed by microelectrode recordings

BACKGROUND

Successful deep brain stimulation is mostly dependent on accurate positioning of the leads at the optimal target points. We investigated whether the identification of the subthalamic nucleus in T2-weighted 3-T MRI, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery 3-T MRI and susceptibility-weighted 3-T MRI is confirmed by intraoperative neurological microelectrode recording.

METHODS

We evaluated 182 microelectrode recording leads in 21 patients with bilateral deep brain stimulation, retrospectively. Consequently, 728 electrode contact positions in T2-weighted 3-T MRI, 552 electrode contact positions in fluid-attenuated inversion recovery 3-T MRI and 490 electrode contact positions in susceptibility-weighted 3-T MRI were evaluated for a positive nucleus subthalamicus signal.

RESULTS

The highest sensitivity was measured for fluid-attenuated inversion recovery 3-T MRI with 82.5 %, while the highest specificity was observed for susceptibility-weighted 3-T MRI with 90.6 %. The negative predictive value was nearly equal for susceptibility-weighted MRI and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI with 87.5 % vs. 87.1 %, but the positive predictive value was higher in susceptibility-weighted 3-T MRI (86.0 %) than in the other MRI sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

The susceptibility-weighted 3-T MRI-based subthalamic nucleus localization shows the best accuracy compared with T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery 3-T MRI. Therefore, the susceptibility-weighted 3-T MRI should be preferred for surgical planning when the operation procedure is performed under general anesthesia without microelectrode recordings.

Coordinate-based lead location does not predict Parkinson's disease deep brain stimulation outcome

Background

Effective target regions for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) have been well characterized. We sought to study whether the measured Cartesian coordinates of an implanted DBS lead are predictive of motor outcome(s). We tested the hypothesis that the position and trajectory of the DBS lead relative to the mid-commissural point (MCP) are significant predictors of clinical outcomes. We expected that due to neuroanatomical variation among individuals, a simple measure of the position of the DBS lead relative to MCP (commonly used in clinical practice) may not be a reliable predictor of clinical outcomes when utilized alone.

Methods

55 PD subjects implanted with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS and 41 subjects implanted with globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS were included. Lead locations in AC-PC space (x, y, z coordinates of the active contact and sagittal and coronal entry angles) measured on high-resolution CT-MRI fused images, and motor outcomes (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) were analyzed to confirm or refute a correlation between coordinate-based lead locations and DBS motor outcomes.

Results

Coordinate-based lead locations were not a significant predictor of change in UPDRS III motor scores when comparing pre- versus post-operative values. The only potentially significant individual predictor of change in UPDRS motor scores was the antero-posterior coordinate of the GPi lead (more anterior lead locations resulted in a worse outcome), but this was only a statistical trend (p<.082).

Conclusion

The results of the study showed that a simple measure of the position of the DBS lead relative to the MCP is not significantly correlated with PD motor outcomes, presumably because this method fails to account for individual neuroanatomical variability. However, there is broad agreement that motor outcomes depend strongly on lead location. The results suggest the need for more detailed identification of stimulation location relative to anatomical targets.