National trends following decompression, discectomy, and fusion in octogenarians and nonagenarians

In-hospital medical complication in older people after spine surgery: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Worldwide, older people are suffering from lumbar degenerative disease at an annual rate of 266 million. Although spine surgeries restore mobility, reduce pain and resolve neurological damage, these procedures can place older persons at high-risk for medical complications due to multiple comorbid conditions that are often present in this population. However, the prevalence of complications occurring in older people prior to discharge is unknown. Postoperative medical complications lead to increased healthcare costs as well as pain and potential harm for the patient. Hence, this scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the current knowledge state regarding in-hospital medical postoperative complications in older people (≥65 years) after elective spine surgery.

METHOD

A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and CINAHL) were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were medical complication(s) after elective spine surgery prior to discharge, age ≥65 years and English language. Co-occurrence analysis was used to examine how often each complication was examined in the literature and how often the complications co-occur.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. The most frequently examined postoperative medical complications after spine surgery are delirium and urinary tract infection, followed by gastrointestinal and pulmonary embolus. Despite the list of in-hospital medical complications, definitions or criteria for measurement of any identified complication were sparse and inconsistent. There is a lack of definition or instruments to comprehensively assess medical complications incurred by older people following spine surgery, including characteristics, classification methodology and temporality. To date, no research has been conducted on how older people experience or perceive a medical complication after elective spine surgery.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the importance to develop comprehensive instruments to assess co-occurrence of postoperative medical complications and design interventions to mitigate the negative impacts of medical complications incurred by older people after spine surgery.

[The joint management of Geriatrics-Neurosurgery of patients older than 75 years reduces the average stay, morbidity, hospital readmissions and mortality per year]

OBJECTIVE

Population ageing is a reality for which national health systems are not adapted. The World Health Organisation has already raised awareness about the implementation of specific measures, from undergraduate training to dedicated elderly care units, to tackle this situation. In this article, the aim is to analyse the potential benefits of geriatric monitoring on elderly neurosurgical patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A descriptive analysis was performed in this medical centre, comparing the information collected from elderly patients (over 75 years of age) admitted into the neurosurgical department during 2periods: June 2015 to February 2017, in which a shared geriatric monitoring was implemented, and between October 2013 and May 2015, equivalent period, in which only the geriatrician performed the evaluation of the patients' general condition, before referring them to other social-healthcare units. A number of factors were considered, including mean age, gender, the neurosurgical condition that led to admission, mean stay, infectious complications, acute confusional syndrome, admission into an intensive care unit, need for support from other medical departments, reoperations, mortality during hospitalisation, referral to social-health units, readmission within a month, and mortality within a year.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients on shared monitoring were compared to 189 patients from the previous period. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. During the analysis, a significant reduction was observed in shared monitoring as regards, mean hospitalisation, infectious complications, admissions into an intensive care unit, the need for support from other medical departments, readmissions within a month, and mortality within a year.

CONCLUSIONS

On patients of over 75 years of age, shared geriatric-neurosurgical monitoring reduces mean hospitalisation, morbidity, the need for support from other medical departments, early readmission, and mortality within a year. This strategy prioritises patient care, reduces costs, and rationalises resources.

Clinical outcomes of lumbar spinal surgery in patients 80 years or older with lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis of all available evidence was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of surgery for lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis in patients 80 years or older versus those younger than 80 years.

METHODS

A search of the literature was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library. Relevant studies comparing the clinical outcomes of lumbar surgery in octogenarians and younger patients were selected according to the eligibility criteria. The predefined endpoints were extracted and meta-analysed from the identified studies.

RESULTS

Data from 16 observational studies including 374,197 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled data revealed that patients 80 years or older had a significantly higher incidence of overall complication, mortality, readmission and longer length of hospital stay than younger patients. There was a similar improvement in the clinical symptoms (Oswestry Disability Index and pain) of patients in the two groups. No significant differences in overall wound complication, reoperation rate, operative time and intraoperative blood loss were found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that the clinical improvement in pain and disability did not significantly differ according to age, although the patients aged 80 years or older had increased incidences of mortality and complication than younger patients. Age alone is not a contraindication for lumbar surgery in very old patients. A careful preoperative evaluation, proper patient selection and appropriate surgical approach are important to achieve successful surgical outcomes. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Predictors of nonroutine discharge among patients undergoing surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database

OBJECTIVE

Discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility or another acute-care facility not only constitutes a postoperative challenge for patients and their care team but also contributes significantly to healthcare costs. In this era of changing dynamics of healthcare payment models in which cost overruns are being increasingly shifted to surgeons and hospitals, it is important to better understand outcomes such as discharge disposition. In the current article, the authors sought to develop a predictive model for factors associated with nonroutine discharge after surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

The authors queried the Quality Outcomes Database for patients with grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent a surgical intervention between July 2014 and June 2016. Only those patients enrolled in a multisite study investigating the impact of fusion on clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with grade I spondylolisthesis were evaluated. Nonroutine discharge was defined as those who were discharged to a postacute or nonacute-care setting in the same hospital or transferred to another acute-care facility.

RESULTS

Of the 608 patients eligible for inclusion, 9.4% (n = 57) had a nonroutine discharge (8.7%, n = 53 discharged to inpatient postacute or nonacute care in the same hospital and 0.7%, n = 4 transferred to another acute-care facility). Compared to patients who were discharged to home, patients who had a nonroutine discharge were more likely to have diabetes (26.3%, n = 15 vs 15.7%, n = 86, p = 0.039); impaired ambulation (26.3%, n = 15 vs 10.2%, n = 56, p < 0.001); higher Oswestry Disability Index at baseline (51 [IQR 42-62.12] vs 46 [IQR 34.4-58], p = 0.014); lower EuroQol-5D scores (0.437 [IQR 0.308-0.708] vs 0.597 [IQR 0.358-0.708], p = 0.010); higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (3 or 4: 63.2%, n = 36 vs 36.7%, n = 201, p = 0.002); and longer length of stay (4 days [IQR 3-5] vs 2 days [IQR 1-3], p < 0.001); and were more likely to suffer a complication (14%, n = 8 vs 5.6%, n = 31, p = 0.014). On multivariable logistic regression, factors found to be independently associated with higher odds of nonroutine discharge included older age (interquartile OR 9.14, 95% CI 3.79-22.1, p < 0.001), higher body mass index (interquartile OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.31-3.25, p < 0.001), presence of depression (OR 4.28, 95% CI 1.96-9.35, p < 0.001), fusion surgery compared with decompression alone (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, p < 0.001), and any complication (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-10.9, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multisite study of a defined cohort of patients undergoing surgery for grade I spondylolisthesis, factors associated with higher odds of nonroutine discharge included older age, higher body mass index, presence of depression, and occurrence of any complication.

Demographics and Outcomes of Spine Surgery in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians: A Comparison of the National Inpatient Sample, MarketScan and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Databases

Introduction

Despite the increasing use of national databases to conduct spine research, questions remain regarding their study validity and consistency. This study tested for similarity and inter-database reliability in reported measures between three commonly used national databases.

Methods

International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) codes were used to identify elderly (80-100 years) who underwent spine surgery patients in Truven Health Analytics MarketScan® claims database, National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) discharge database and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2006-2016). Patient baseline characteristics, comorbid status, insurance enrollment, and outcomes were queried and compared. 

Results

We analyzed 15,105 MarketScan, 40,854 NIS, and 7682 NSQIP patients between ages 80 to 100 years (median, 82 years) who underwent spine surgeries during the study period. A majority of patients in both MarketScan and NIS were insured by Medicare (97% vs. 94%). Patients in MarketScan had lower comorbidity scores (comorbidity, 0-2) compared to those in NIS and NSQIP databases. The most common diagnosis was spinal stenosis in MarketScan (54.4%), NIS (54.6%), and NSQIP databases (65.2%). Fusion was the most common procedure performed in MarketScan (48.9%) and NIS databases (46.2%), whereas decompression (laminectomy/laminotomy) was the most common procedure in the NSQIP database (51.84%). In-hospital complications (any) were 6.5% in the MarketScan cohort, 5.3% in the NIS, and 2.02% in the NSQIP cohort. In terms of 30-day complications (any), the MarketScan database reported higher complications rate (12.7%) compared to the NSQIP database (5.08%). In-hospital mortality was slightly higher in the NIS database (0.32%) compared to MarketScan (0.21%) and NSQIP database (0.2%). MarketScan and NIS databases showed an increased risk of complications with increasing age, whereas NIS and NSQIP showed increasing complications with a higher number of comorbidities. Male gender had higher complication at 30-day post-discharge using MarketScan and NSQIP database.

Conclusions

Patients in the NSQIP and NIS database have more comorbidities; patients in the MarketScan database had the highest number of perioperative and 30-day post-discharge complications with the highest number of fusion procedures performed. Patients in the NSQIP database had the lowest number of fusion procedures and complication rates. As databases gain popularity in spine surgery, clinicians and reviewers should be cautious in generalizing results to whole populations and pay close attention to the population being represented by the data from which the statistical significance was derived.

Differences in clinical outcomes and health care utilization between octogenarians and nonagenarians following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. A market scan analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in octogenarians and beyond has a significant impact on quality of life requiring surgical decompression and hence impact on health care utilization. Risk of surgical failure and impact on health care resources is always a concern in this patient population (more so in nonagenarians). The aim of our study was to compare clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in patients (80-89 vs.90+) undergoing decompression for LSS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data was extracted using ICD9/10 and CPT codes from MarketScan (2001-2015) in this retrospective study. We defined the comparative groups based on the age groups (80-89 and 90+), in patients with LSS. Outcomes of interest were: length of hospital stay, discharge disposition and utilization in the index hospitalization, 6- months, 12 months following index procedure as well as the associated health care utilization. Patient characteristics and outcomes among cohorts were compared using univariate tests. Outcomes were further compared using adjusted multivariable regression models. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4.

RESULTS

A cohort of 5387 was identified from the database, 96.38% were in the 80-89 age group and 3.62%were in the 90+ age group. The proportion of patients undergoing surgery for LSS among 80-89 (95.7-98.5%) and 90+ age group (1.5-4.3%) remained constant through the years. Interestingly, 13.83% and 16.92% of patients had Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3+ in 80-89 age group and 90+ age groups respectively. Decompression with fusion was performed in 19.4% of patients in 80-89 age group, compared to 9.74% of patients in 90+ age group. There was no difference in median length of hospital stay (3 days, p = 0.19) and complications across the cohorts (80-89: 16.7%; 90+: 18.46% p = 0.51). 70.6% of patients in 80-89 age groups were discharged to home compared to 60.5% in 90+ age group (p = 0.0023). At 6 months follow-up, overall rate of new decompression, new fusion, re-fusion at index level were 2.38%, 0.59% and 0.33% only, with no differences across the cohorts. Interestingly, patients in 80-89 age group incurred higher outpatient services, number of medication refills and related payments at 6-months and 12-months follow-up, compared to patients in 90+ age group. Overall, combined median post-discharge payments at 12 months were similar across the groups [80-89 (median $ 40,257) and 90+ (median$ 36,161), p = 0.14].

CONCLUSION

Using MarketScan database, there has been a gradual decline in the number of decompressions being performed for LSS in elderly patients (>80 years of age), however there is no change in the proportion of octogenarians and nonagenarians undergoing decompression for LSS. There was no difference in rate of reoperations and overall health care utilization among the groups. Surgery for LSS can be offered to nonagenarians (in appropriately selected patients) with no difference in clinical outcomes and health care utilization, compared to octogenarians.

Hispanic and African American adult brain tumor patients treated at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center compared to Los Angeles County and Torrance, California

The objective of this study is to shed light on racial disparities among Hispanic and African American adult brain tumor patients treated at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center compared to the general populations of Los Angeles County (LAC) and Torrance, California (CA). A retrospective review of patients admitted to the neurosurgery service at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center during years 2006 through 2010 was performed. Government census data was queried and pertinent national statistics were retrieved. Brain tumor patients at Harbor-UCLA were compared to the general populations of LAC and Torrance. A total of 271 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 46.9 years. Hispanics comprised the majority of neurosurgical patients (n = 151, 55.7%), followed by African Americans (n = 35, 12.9%). A greater percentage of Hispanic patients were treated at Harbor-UCLA relative to the general Hispanic populations of LAC and Torrance (p < .001). A greater percentage of African American patients were treated at Harbor-UCLA relative to the general African American populations of LAC and Torrance (p = .035 and p < .001, respectively). Our data revealed significant racial disparities amid the Harbor-UCLA Hispanic and African American patient populations compared to the general Angeleno populations of LAC and Torrance.

Pediatric spondylolysis/spinal stenosis and disc herniation: national trends in decompression and discectomy surgery evaluated through the Kids' Inpatient Database

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe national trends in spinal decompression without fusion and discectomy procedures in the US pediatric inpatient population.

METHODS

The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was queried for pediatric patients with primary diagnoses of spinal spondylolysis/stenosis or disc herniation and having undergone spinal decompression without fusion or discectomy over more than a decade (2000 to 2012). The primary (indirect) outcomes of interest were in-hospital complication rates, length of stay (LOS), total costs, and discharge dispositions.

RESULTS

A total of 7315 patients, comprised of pediatric spinal spondylolysis/stenosis (n = 287, 3.92%) and pediatric disc herniation (n = 7028, 96.1%) patients, were included in the study. During the years 2000 to 2012, diagnoses of pediatric spondylolysis/spinal stenosis increased from 61 to 90 diagnoses per 3-year period, while diagnoses of pediatric disc herniation decreased from 2133 to 1335 diagnoses per 3-year period. Spinal decompression was associated with higher in-hospital complication rates (18.1 vs 5.3%, p < 0.0001), longer hospital stays (5 vs 1.69 days, p < 0.0001), higher mean total charges ($49,186 vs $19,057, p < 0.0001), and higher non-routine discharge rates (12.3 vs 2.5%, p < 0.0001) versus discectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal decompression is associated with longer hospital stays, more complications, higher costs, and more non-routine discharges when compared to discectomy. The data supports the disparate nature of these disease processes and elucidates basic clinical trends in uncommon spinal disorders affecting children.