Usefulness of an access-site hemostasis device in neuroendovascular treatment

Factors for failure of ultrasound-guided compression repair for femoral pseudoaneurysms after neuroendovascular therapy

OBJECTIVE

Pseudoaneurysms are a serious complication of neuroendovascular therapy with femoral artery puncture, for which ultrasound-guided compression repair (UGCR) is often the first choice of radical therapy. We sought to retrospectively investigate the factors for failure of UGCR for pseudoaneurysm at the femoral artery puncture site.

METHODS

Among patients undergoing neuroendovascular therapy with femoral artery puncture at our hospital between January 2018 and April 2021, those who received a diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm and underwent UGCR were enrolled. They were classified into two groups according to whether UGCR was successful (UGCR group) or was converted to surgical repair (SR group). Patient and procedural characteristics were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 577 patients underwent neuroendovascular therapy with femoral artery puncture, 10 of whom (1.7%) received a diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm and underwent UGCR. There were seven patients in the UGCR group and three patients in the SR group. The sheath diameter tended to be larger in the SR group than in the UGCR group (p = 0.16). The modified Rankin scale score when a diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm was made was significantly lower in the SR group than in the UGCR group (1 [0-2] vs. 3 [2-5], p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Physical activity may be associated with failure of UGCR. In patients with high physical activity, the use of sedatives and analgesics to keep them at rest during puncture site compression after UGCR may lead to successful UGCR.

Comparison of Application Effects of Different Hemostasis Methods After Ischemic Cerebrovascular Intervention

Objective

To explore the effects of two different hemostasis methods, namely, arterial compression devices and vascular closure devices, in the ischemic cerebrovascular intervention to provide a theoretical basis for clinical selection of hemostasis methods.

Methods

A total of 302 patients who underwent ischemic cerebrovascular intervention in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2020 were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into the control group (n = 151) and the observation group (n = 151). The patients in both groups underwent cerebrovascular intervention. The patients in the control group were treated with an artery compressor for hemostasis after the operation, while those in the observation group were treated with vascular closure devices for hemostasis. The hemostatic indexes and vascular parameters at the puncture site before and after the operation were compared between the two groups. The comfort level of the patients was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 h after the operation with the Kolcaba Comfort Scale score, and the postoperative complications were recorded.

Results

There was no significant difference in the success rate of hemostasis between the two groups (p > 0.05). The hemostatic time and immobilization time of (2.69 ± 0.62) min and (4.82 ± 0.93) h in the observation group were lower than those in the control group with (16.24 ± 3.58) min and (7.94 ± 1.86) h (p < 0.05). The differences in the minimum inner diameter of the puncture site and its nearby vessels and the peak velocity of blood flow between the two groups before and after the operation were not statistically significant within or between groups (p > 0.05). The scores of the Kolcaba comfort scale in the observation group (80.16 ± 8.49) and (93.65 ± 9.26) at 6 and 12 h, respectively, after the operation, were higher than those in the control groups (72.08 ± 7.54) and (85.49 ± 8.63) (p < 0.05). The 24 h postoperative Kolcaba comfort scale score was (97.54 ± 9.86) in the observation group and (96.82 ± 9.64) in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In the control group, there were 7 cases of dysuria, 12 cases of low back pain, 14 cases of sleep disorder, 20 cases of mental stress, and 5 cases of wound bleeding, and the total incidence of complications was 38.41% (58/151). In the observation group, there were 4 cases of dysuria, 8 cases of low back pain, 10 cases of sleep disorder, 14 cases of mental stress, and 3 cases of wound bleeding, and the total incidence of complications was 25.83% (39/151). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease undergoing femoral artery puncture intervention, the use of vascular closure devices can stop the bleeding quickly, which can significantly shorten the bleeding time, and the postoperative braking time of patients is short, with high comfort and fewer complications.

Safety and efficacy of Angio-Seal device for transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Angio-Seal is a commonly used device for femoral hemostasis in neuroendovascular procedures. This meta-analysis investigates of the safety and efficacy of Angio-Seal in patients undergoing endovascular neurointerventional procedures.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis on all studies evaluating the Angio-Seal device in neurointerventional procedures from inception through 2020 were performed. We studied rates of groin hematoma, retroperitoneal hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, ipsilateral DVT, and ischemic complications. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

13 studies were included in our analysis. 2250 patients with 104 complications were found {4.5% (95% CI, 2.7%-6.3%)}. Of these complications, groin hematoma was the most common with a rate of 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-3.6%). Retroperitoneal hematoma {0.3% (95% CI, 0%-0.5%)}, pseudo-aneurysm {0.5% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.8%), and ipsilateral DVT {0.3% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.7%) were also not in negligible rate. The rate of other complications were as follows: vessel occlusion/stenosis; 0.2% (95% CI, 0%-0.4%), vascular surgery; 0.2% (95% CI, 0%-0.5%), and infection; 0.2% (95% CI, 0%-0.5%). One patient died as result of hemorrhagic complications {0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.3%)}. Use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy was found to be positively correlated with high risk of any groin complication and groin hematoma (p ≤ .05). Female gender was associated with high risk of ipsilateral DVT (p ≤ .05). Interestingly, large sheath size was associated with low risk of groin hematoma (p ≤ .05).

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy rate of Angio-Seal was approximately 95%. The most common complication was groin hematoma. Serious complications including retroperitoneal hematoma and femoral artery occlusion were rare.

A Case of Puncture-Site Giant Pseudoaneurysm Following Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Marked Growth and Rupture of a Femoral Artery Pseudoaneurysm

Objective

We report a case of the marked growth and rupture of a giant femoral artery pseudoaneurysm at the puncture site that developed after recanalization therapy for acute basilar artery occlusion.

Case Presentation

A 79-year-old woman developed acute ischemic stroke due to atherosclerotic basilar artery occlusion. Endovascular intervention was performed and recanalization of the affected vessel was achieved. However, she developed brainstem infarction and consciousness disturbance persisted. The femoral access site was treated using a vascular closure device at the end of the procedure. A right femoral artery pseudoaneurysm of approximately 5 cm in size was found 2 weeks after onset during the examination for deep venous thrombosis with right lower extremity edema. Manual compression did not achieve thrombotic occlusion of the aneurysm due to obesity and leg edema. Considering the severe neurological status of the patient, the pseudoaneurysm was followed up without surgical treatment. Dual antiplatelet therapy and direct oral anticoagulant agents were administered. Four weeks after onset, the pseudoaneurysm presented rapid growth, and on the 35th day after onset, it exceeded 15 cm in size and ruptured, causing hemorrhagic shock with massive femoral hematoma. Pseudoaneurysm resection and hematoma removal were performed surgically, and the patient recovered. However, improvement of neurological manifestations was poor and the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days after onset was 5.

Conclusion

A case of giant femoral artery pseudoaneurysm following recanalization therapy for acute ischemic stroke was reported. Pseudoaneurysms at the puncture site can rupture after significant growth. Curative treatment is required without delay.

Analysis of Puncture Site-related Complications in Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET)3

A subgroup analysis of puncture site-related complications listed in the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 3, based on retrospective studies, was performed. Puncture site-related complications occurred in 315 (0.73%, average age: 65.2) of 36,708 patients out of all 43,303 registered cases. Carotid artery stenting (CAS, 95 patients, 1.1%, P <0.01) and extracranial percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA, 21 patients, 1.4%, P <0.01) were associated with significantly higher incidence of puncture site-related complications. The incidence of complications correlated with the number of antiplatelet drugs (P <0.001). Although 40% of the puncture complications were treated conservatively, 13% were treated endovascularly and 5% underwent open surgery.

Access-Site Complications in Transfemoral Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Systematic Review of Incidence Rates and Management Strategies

BACKGROUND

The femoral artery is the most common access route for cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures. Complications of the transfemoral approach include groin hemorrhages and hematomas, retroperitoneal hematomas, pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, peripheral artery occlusions, femoral nerve injuries, and access-site infections. Incidence rates vary among different randomized and nonrandomized trials, and the literature lacks a comprehensive review of this subject.

OBJECTIVE

To gather data from 16 randomized clinical trials (RCT) and 17 nonrandomized cohort studies regarding femoral access-site complications for a review paper. We also briefly discuss management strategies for these complications based on the most recent literature.

METHODS

A PubMed indexed search for all neuroendovascular clinical trials, retrospective studies, and prospective studies that reported femoral artery access-site complications in neurointerventional procedures.

RESULTS

The overall access-site complication rate in RCTs is 5.13%, while in in non-RCTs, the rate is 2.78%. The most common complication in both groups is groin hematoma followed by access-site hemorrhage and femoral pseudoaneurysm. On the other hand, wound infection was the least common complication.

CONCLUSION

The transfemoral approach in neuroendovascular procedures holds risk for several complications. This review will allow further studies to compare access-site complications between the transfemoral approach and other alternative access sites, mainly the transradial approach, which is gaining a lot of interest nowadays.

Risk Factors for Puncture Site Complications Using the Angio-Seal Closure Device in Endovascular Therapy: A Single-center Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the complication rates and risk factors associated with the use of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device during neuroendovascular therapy.

METHODS

In this study, we enrolled 283 patients who underwent Angio-Seal hemostasis between December 2005 and June 2019 at our institute. We retrospectively analyzed the major and minor complication rates and risk factors between the complication and no-complication groups using the medical charts of patients for whom the device was used.

RESULTS

Of the 283 patients, 5 had major complications (1.8%) and 18 had minor complications (6.3%). There were no significant differences between the complication (n = 23) and no-complication (n = 260) groups regarding the baseline characteristics or operation procedures. Among the major complications, superficial femoral artery puncture, 8Fr device, Angio-Seal Evolution, post-carotid artery stenting, dual antiplatelet therapy, and delirium were considered risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The Angio-Seal is a safe and useful hemostatic device. However, puncture site complications need to be considered when the device is used for contraindicated patients or for those with delirium who cannot rest following the procedure.