Percutaneous dorsal root ganglion block for treating lumbar compression fracture-related pain

Paravertebral Nerve Block for Procedural Pain in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to unidimensionally measure procedural pain at each percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) stage and evaluate the effectiveness of paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) in reducing procedural pain.

METHODS

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was conducted on 66 patients who underwent PVP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (fluoroscopic-guided PVNB; 5 cm 3 of 0.75% ropivacaine on each side) and group B (local anesthesia). To investigate procedural pain associated with PVP, the visual analog scale score was assessed at each surgical stage: before the incision (stage 1), transpedicular approach (stage 2), and polymethylmethacrylate cement injection (stage 3). After the procedure, patients were asked about their surgical experience and satisfaction using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale. Periprocedural complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients (78.65 y of age) were finally enrolled: 30 from group A and 33 from group B. In both groups, a significant ≥2-point increase in procedural pain was observed during PVP compared with that during stage 1 ( P < 0.001). In stages 2 and 3, the pain intensity was significantly lower in group A ( P < 0.001). Upon discharge, the visual analog scale score improved in all groups; however, the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale score was significantly higher in group A ( P < 0.001). There was no difference in periprocedural complications between the two groups ( P = 0.743).

CONCLUSION

PVP causes significant procedural pain, and PVNB is a potentially effective modality for enhancing patient satisfaction and reducing procedural pain.

The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease in the USA and the world. It is a subclinical condition until complicated by fracture(s). These fractures place an enormous medical and personal burden on individuals who suffer from them and take a significant economic toll. Any new fracture in an adult aged 50 years or older signifies imminent elevated risk for subsequent fractures, particularly in the year following the initial fracture. What a patient perceives as an unfortunate accident may be seen as a sentinel event indicative of bone fragility and increased future fracture risk even when the result of considerable trauma. Clinical or subclinical vertebral fractures, the most common type of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a 5-fold increased risk for additional vertebral fractures and a 2- to 3-fold increased risk for fractures at other sites. Untreated osteoporosis can lead to a vicious cycle of recurrent fracture(s), often resulting in disability and premature death. In appropriate patients, treatment with effective antifracture medication prevents fractures and improves outcomes. Primary care providers and medical specialists are critical gatekeepers who can identify fractures and initiate proven osteoporosis interventions. Osteoporosis detection, diagnosis, and treatment should be routine practice in all adult healthcare settings. The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) - formerly the National Osteoporosis Foundation - first published the Clinician's Guide in 1999 to provide accurate information on osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Since that time, significant improvements have been made in diagnostic technologies and treatments for osteoporosis. Despite these advances, a disturbing gap persists in patient care. At-risk patients are often not screened to establish fracture probability and not educated about fracture prevention. Most concerning, the majority of highest risk women and men who have a fracture(s) are not diagnosed and do not receive effective, FDA-approved therapies. Even those prescribed appropriate therapy are unlikely to take the medication as prescribed. The Clinician's Guide offers concise recommendations regarding prevention, risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men aged 50 years and older. It includes indications for bone densitometry as well as fracture risk thresholds for pharmacologic intervention. Current medications build bone and/or decrease bone breakdown and dramatically reduce incident fractures. All antifracture therapeutics treat but do not cure the disease. Skeletal deterioration resumes sooner or later when a medication is discontinued-sooner for nonbisphosphonates and later for bisphosphonates. Even if normal BMD is achieved, osteoporosis and elevated risk for fracture are still present. The diagnosis of osteoporosis persists even if subsequent DXA T-scores are above - 2.5. Ongoing monitoring and strategic interventions will be necessary if fractures are to be avoided. In addition to pharmacotherapy, adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, avoidance of smoking and excessive alcohol intake, weight-bearing and resistance-training exercise, and fall prevention are included in the fracture prevention armamentarium. Where possible, recommendations in this guide are based on evidence from RCTs; however, relevant published data and guidance from expert clinical experience provides the basis for recommendations in those areas where RCT evidence is currently deficient or not applicable to the many osteoporosis patients not considered for RCT participation due to age and morbidity.

Effects of teriparatide versus percutaneous vertebroplasty on pain relief, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in postmenopausal females with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a common disease in senior patients. Conservative treatments (usual care) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) are typically applied to treat OVCFs; however, their efficacies are not fully satisfactory. While Teriparatide (TPTD) is effective in both anti-osteoporosis and bone healing, whether TPTD could be applied as a conservative treatment for acute OVCFs remains unclear.

METHODS

This investigation represents a real-world prospective cohort study, where 60 postmenopausal women (≥55 years old) with acute OVCFs were equally assigned to a TPTD conservative group or PVP (plus alendronate) group based on the patient's choice. TPTD (20 μg, s.c., once daily) or alendronate (70 mg, p.o., once weekly) were administrated together with 0.6 mg Caltrate and 500 iu Vitamin D3 per day. A health survey (SF-36) was conducted at 0-, 1- and 3-months post-treatment. Back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were measured at 0-week, 1-week, 1-month and 3-months after treatment, while the direct medical cost was analyzed at the end of the third month.

RESULTS

Both treatments with TPTD and PVP significantly and similarly improved the patients' health quality, with reduced visual analogue and ODI scores at the end of the first and third months. PVP was more effective in reducing pain at the early time point (1 week, p < 0.05). 24 of 27 patients who were rescanned with magnetic resonance imaging in the TPTD group showed bone healing. The mid-vertebral height was increased by PVP (p < 0.05) but not by TPTD. The cost of TPTD treatment was 21,868.61 ± 167.05 RMB per capita, while the cost for PVP treatment was 33,265.95 ± 1491.11 RMB per capita (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TPTD conservative treatment obtained similar therapeutic effects but cost less than PVP in terms of treating acute OVCF.