Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula-results of endovascular and surgical treatment

An Update on Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae: Case Series and Systematic Review

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (sDAVFs) are rare entities with delayed diagnosis, potentially dramatic clinical manifestations, and complex management. We aim to present our mini case series and perform an updated systematic review of the usual patient profile, to search for established prognostic factors, to compare the effectiveness and safety of surgical and endovascular intervention, and to discuss trends in therapeutic strategy. We retrospectively collected data from patients treated in our department in the last decade (2014-2024) and we systematically reviewed the literature according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria and searched the PubMed database for relevant articles published in the same period. Epidemiologic data, imaging modalities, prognostic factors, and treatment modalities were assessed. Firstly, we identified four illustrative cases from our institution. In addition, our search yielded 559 studies and our review included 82 original studies. 3130 patients were identified (mean age 61; male-to-female ratio 3:1). Most commonly, the fistula level was in the thoracic spine (65%). Surgery was provided to 1837 patients (1213 as primary treatment) and embolism to 1085 (932 as primary treatment). Initial fistula occlusion rate and recurrence rate were 98.1% and 1.9% for surgery and 71.1% and 9.6% for embolism, respectively. No difference between the two modalities with respect to clinical outcome was observed. SDAVFs remain a challenge for neurosurgeons concerning both diagnosis and management. Surgery remains superior to embolism with respect to success as an initial treatment. Embolism can be offered if certain contraindications do not coexist. All symptomatic patients should be offered treatment, whereas asymptomatic patients could be conservatively managed only if the close patient follow-up can be secured.

Surgery versus endovascular treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a multicenter experience and systematic literature review

Surgery and endovascular therapy are the primary treatment options for spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF). Due to the absence of a consensus regarding which therapy yields a superior outcome, we conducted a comparative analysis of the surgical and endovascular treatment of SDAVF through a multicenter case series and a systematic literature review. Patients with SDAVF, surgically or endovascularly treated at four neurosurgical centers from January 2001 to December 2021, were included in this study. Level of SDAVF, primary treatment modality, baseline and post-procedural neurological status were collected. The primary outcomes were failure, complication rates, and a newly introduced parameter named as therapeutic delay. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA-P guidelines. The systematic review identified 511 papers, of which 18 were eligible for analysis, for a total of 814 patients, predominantly male (72%) with a median age of 61 and mainly thoracic SDAVFs (65%). The failure rate was significantly higher for endovascular therapy (20%) compared to surgery (4%) (p < 0.01). Neurological complications were generally rare, with similar rates among the two groups (endovascular 2.9%; surgery 2.6%). Endovascular treatment showed a statistically significantly higher rate of persistent neurological complications than surgical treatment (2.9% versus 0.2%; p < 0.01). Both treatments showed similar rates of clinical improvement based on Aminoff Logue scale score. The multicenter, retrospective study involved 131 patients. The thoracic region was the most frequent location (58%), followed by lumbar (37%). Paraparesis (45%) and back pain (41%) were the most common presenting symptoms, followed by bladder dysfunction (34%) and sensory disturbances (21%). The mean clinical follow-up was 21 months, with all patients followed for at least 12 months. No statistically significant differences were found in demographic and clinical data, lesion characteristics, or outcomes between the two treatment groups. Median pre-treatment Aminoff-Logue score was 2.6, decreasing to 1.4 post-treatment with both treatments. The mean therapeutic delay for surgery and endovascular treatment showed no statistically significant difference. Surgical treatment demonstrated significantly lower failure rates (5% vs. 46%, p < 0.01). In the surgical group, 2 transient neurological (1 epidural hematoma, 1 CSF leak) and 3 non-neurological (3 wound infections) complications were recorded; while 2 permanent neurological (spinal infarcts), and 5 non-neurological (inguinal hematomas) were reported in the endovascular group. According to the literature review and this multicenter clinical series, surgical treatment has a significantly lower failure rate than endovascular treatment. Although the two treatments have similar complication rates, endovascular treatment seems to have a higher rate of persistent neurological complications.

Diagnostic, clinical management, and outcomes in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula

Background

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) are rare spinal vascular malformations, but account for 70 to 80% of all spinal arteriovenous malformations. SDAVFs can be treated either surgically or endovascularly, with surgical treatment appearing to lead to higher closure rates. Our aim was to analyze the demographic data, diagnostic history, treatment characteristics and clinical short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods

The medical records of 81 patients who underwent surgical (n = 70, 86.4%) and endovascular (n = 11, 13.6%) treatment for SDAVF at a university hospital between 2002 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

SDAVF was observed more frequently in men than women (61, 75.3% vs. 20, 24.7%) with a mean age of 63.5 ± 12.7 years and a mean duration of symptoms to diagnosis of 12.0 ± 12.8 months. The most common first symptom was gait disturbance (36, 44.4%), followed by sensory disturbance (24, 29.6%). The location of the fistula point was most common in the lower thoracic region (36, 44.5%), followed by the lumbar region (23, 28.4%). Incomplete or failed occlusion of the fistula occurred in 8 patients (9.9%), with 6 patients (7.4%) undergoing further treatment either surgically or endovascularly. Treatment- or hospital-related complications were observed in 16 patients (19.8%). A single-level laminectomy was the most common approach (31, 44.3%), followed by single-level hemilaminectomy (28, 40.0%), and unilateral interlaminar fenestration (11, 15.7%). Back pain or radiculopathy was observed in 58% of patients (47/81) pre-treatment and had already decreased to 24.7% at hospital discharge (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in sensory disturbances (p = 0.681). The median of American Spinal Injury Association motor score (ASIA-MS) was 94 [82.5-100] at admission, 98 [86.5-100] at hospital discharge, 100 [90-100] at the first, second, and third follow-up (p = 0.019). The median modified Aminoff-Logue scale (mALS) was 5 [2-7] at admission, 3 [1-6] at hospital discharge, 2 [1-5] at the first follow-up, 2 [0.5-5] at the second follow-up and 2 [1-7] at the third follow-up (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

SDAVF occurs predominantly in men in the 6th decade of life and can be safely and effectively treated surgically and endovascularly, improving symptoms such as pain and motor deficits, gait disturbances as well as bowel and bladder dysfunction, but not sensory disturbances.

How I do it: angiography-assisted full endoscopic treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula

BACKGROUND

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (sDAVF) is a rare vascular malformation that leads to serious neurological symptoms. We treat a 52-year-old man with sDAVF in the thoracic segment exhibiting uncoordinated gait.

METHOD

Thoracic MRI of the lesion indicated myelomalacia and dilated blood vessels, while DSA revealed the right T6 radicular artery as the feeding arteriole. A full endoscopic obliteration of the lesion was performed under angiography guidance in a hybrid operation room.

CONCLUSION

The case underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary and individualized approach to successfully manage sDAVF using a fully endoscopic approach.

Recurrence Rates Following Treatment of Spinal Vascular Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Spinal vascular malformations (SVMs), including arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), are a varied group of vascular lesions that can be subclassified according to localization, vascular structure, and hemodynamics. Early intervention is necessary to halt progression of disease and minimize irreversible dysfunction. We sought to characterize initial treatment success and recurrence rates following interventional treatment of various types of SVMs.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. SVMs were categorized into 4 groups: dural AVFs, perimedullary AVFs, intramedullary AVMs, and extradural-intradural AVMs (e.g., epidural, paraspinal). Initial occlusion, recurrence, and complication rates were compared using random-effects analysis.

RESULTS

There were 112 manuscripts included, with a total of 5626 patients with SVM. For treatment, 2735 patients underwent endovascular embolization, 2854 underwent surgical resection, and 37 underwent stereotactic radiosurgery. The initial treatment success and overall recurrence rates following surgical resection of all SVMs were 89.5% (95% CI: 80.5%-98.5%) and 2.3% (95% CI: 0.9%-3.7%), respectively. Those rates following endovascular embolization were 55.9% (95% CI: 30.3%-81.5%) and 27.7% (95% CI: 11.2%-44.2%), respectively. Higher rates of initial treatment success and lower rates of recurrence with surgery were observed in all subtypes compared to embolization. Overall complication rates were higher after embolization for each of the SVM categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of SVMs provided higher rates of initial complete occlusion and lower rates of recurrence than endovascular techniques. Attaining technical success through obliteration must still be weighed against clinical impact and natural history of the specific vascular malformation.

Spinal dural and epidural arteriovenous fistula: Recurrence rate after surgical and endovascular treatment

Introduction

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula consist of an heterogenous group of vascular malformation often causing severe neurological deficit due to progressive myelopathy. This type of malformation could be associated with subarachnoid or subdural hemorrhage inside the spinal canal. In the English literature surgical treatment is regarded as the best option if compared to endovascular procedure, being the latter associated with an increased risk of relapse despite its less invasiveness.

Methods

In this study a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with spinal dural and epidural fistula associated with perimedullary venous congestion was undertaken. The radiological and clinical presentation of each patient is analyzed, and the grade of myelopathy is classified through the mJOA score.

Results

A total number of 31 out of 41 collected procedures (22 surgery vs. 19 endovascular) were dural fistulas while the remaining 10 were classified as epidural. A 46% recurrence rate for endovascular treatment against 0% for surgical (p-value 0.004) was described for dural fistulas, while in the epidural fistula group the rate of recurrence was 80% and 20% respectively for endovascular and surgery treatment (p-value 0.6).

Discussion

According to the results, surgical treatment could be considered as first-line treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Endovascular embolization can be proposed in selected cases, as a less invasive technique, for elderly patients or with important comorbidities. In spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas, in view of the greater invasiveness of the surgical treatment and the non-significant difference in terms of recurrence risk between the two techniques, endovascular treatment could be proposed as a first choice treatment; in the event of a recurrence, a surgical intervention will instead be proposed in a short time.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in intramedullary and extramedullary spinal cord lesions: perioperative considerations and recommendations

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based approach developed to ameliorate the patient recovery process following surgical procedures. Employing a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach, ERAS implements strategies and treatment paradigms that have been shown to improve patient outcomes, reduce hospital length of stay, and ultimately reduce healthcare costs. With a substantial body of the literature supporting the implementation of ERAS in other surgical specialties, ERAS has only recently made its foray into spine surgery. Despite this, current studies are limited to spinal deformity and degenerative disease, with limited data regarding spinal cord surgery. This is due in part to the complex nature and rarity of spinal cord lesions, making the establishment of a formal ERAS protocol difficult. In developing an ERAS protocol, there must be a consensus on what factors are important to consider and implement. To address this, we reviewed the most recent advances in intramedullary and extramedullary spinal cord surgery in order to identify elements that influence patient outcomes. Using this information, the authors provide evidence-based recommendations with the intent of introducing a framework for future ERAS protocols with respect to treating spinal cord lesions.