Brain biopsy in suspected non-neoplastic neurological disease

Diagnostic yield of postmortem brain examination following premortem brain biopsy for neoplastic and nonneoplastic disease

Medical autopsies have decreased in frequency due in part to advances in radiological techniques and increased availability of molecular and other ancillary testing. However, premortem diagnosis of CNS disease remains challenging; while ∼90% of brain tumor biopsies are diagnostic, only 20%-70% of biopsies for presumed nonneoplastic disease result in a specific diagnosis. The added benefits of performing an autopsy following surgical brain biopsy are not well defined. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent brain biopsy and autopsy at Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2003 to 2022. A total of 135 cases were identified, including 95 (70%) patients with primary CNS neoplasms, 16 (12%) with metastatic tumors, and 24 (18%) with nonneoplastic neurological disease. Diagnostic concordance between biopsy and autopsy diagnosis was excellent both for primary CNS neoplasms (98%) and metastatic tumors (94%). Conversely, patients with nonneoplastic disease received definitive premortem diagnoses in 7/24 (29%) cases. Five (21%) additional patients received conclusive diagnoses following autopsy; 8 (33%) received a more specific differential diagnosis compared to the biopsy. Overall, autopsy confirmed premortem diagnoses or provided new diagnostic information in 131/135 (97%) cases, highlighting the value in performing postmortem brain examination in patients with both neoplastic and nonneoplastic diseases.

Roles and outcomes of stereotactic biopsy for adult patients with brainstem lesion

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk ratio by determining diagnostic yield and safety of brainstem biopsies in adult patients. The secondary objectives were (i) to compare brainstem biopsy safety and postbiopsy patients' outcomes and survival with those of patients biopsied for a brain or cerebellar lesion, and (ii) to assess the impact of brainstem biopsy on final diagnosis and further therapeutic management.

METHODS

Among 1784 stereotactic biopsies performed in adult patients at a tertiary center between April 2009 and October 2020, we retrospectively examined 50 consecutive brainstem biopsies. We compared variables regarding diagnostic yield, safety and post-biopsy outcomes between brainstem biopsy patients and brain/cerebellum biopsy patients.

RESULTS

Brainstem biopsy led to a diagnosis in 86% of patients (94.6% in patients with suspected tumor). Lesion contrast enhancement on imaging was the sole predictor of obtaining a diagnosis. Rates of symptomatic complications and mortality were significantly higher in brainstem biopsy patients compared to brain/cerebellum biopsy patients (20% vs 0%; p < 0.001 and 6% vs 0%; p = 0.01, respectively). Transfrontal trajectory and prebiopsy swallowing disorders were predictors of brainstem biopsy-related symptomatic complications. Brainstem biopsy findings led to diagnostic change in 22% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic biopsy in adult patients with brainstem lesion has a high diagnostic yield. Although stereotactic brainstem biopsy is associated with more functional and fatal complications than biopsies targeting the brain/cerebellum, its safety profile appears acceptable. Thus, the benefit-risk ratio of stereotactic biopsy in patients with brainstem lesion is favorable but should nevertheless be carefully weighted on a case-by-case basis.

Brain Biopsy for Neurological Diseases of Unknown Etiology in Critically Ill Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield

OBJECTIVES

Brain biopsy is a useful surgical procedure in the management of patients with suspected neoplastic lesions. Its role in neurologic diseases of unknown etiology remains controversial, especially in ICU patients. This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility, safety, and the diagnostic yield of brain biopsy in critically ill patients with neurologic diseases of unknown etiology. We also aimed to compare these endpoints to those of non-ICU patients who underwent a brain biopsy in the same clinical context.

DESIGN

Monocenter, retrospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

A French tertiary center.

PATIENTS

All adult patients with neurologic diseases of unknown etiology under mechanical ventilation undergoing in-ICU brain biopsy between January 2008 and October 2020 were compared with a cohort of non-ICU patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among the 2,207 brain-biopsied patients during the study period, 234 biopsies were performed for neurologic diseases of unknown etiology, including 29 who were mechanically ventilated and 205 who were not ICU patients. Specific histological diagnosis and final diagnosis rates were 62.1% and 75.9%, respectively, leading to therapeutic management modification in 62.1% of cases. Meningitis on prebiopsy cerebrospinal fluid analysis was the sole predictor of obtaining a final diagnosis (2.3 [1.4-3.8]; p = 0.02). ICU patients who experienced therapeutic management modification after the biopsy had longer survival (p = 0.03). The grade 1 to 4 (mild to severe) complication rates were: 24.1%, 3.5%, 0%, and 6.9%, respectively. Biopsy-related mortality was significantly higher in ICU patients compared with non-ICU patients (6.9% vs 0%; p = 0.02). Hematological malignancy was associated with biopsy-related mortality (1.5 [1.01-2.6]; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Brain biopsy in critically ill patients with neurologic disease of unknown etiology is associated with high diagnostic yield, therapeutic modifications and postbiopsy survival advantage. Safety profile seems acceptable in most patients. The benefit/risk ratio of brain biopsy in this population should be carefully weighted.

Impact of brain biopsy on management of nonneoplastic brain disease

Introduction

Diagnostic yield of brain biopsy in neoplastic brain disease is high and its clinical impact is well established. In nonneoplastic brain disease with negative conventional investigation, decision to undergo invasive procedures is difficult due to its inherent risk and known lower diagnostic yield. Research question: What is the clinical impact of brain biopsy results on management of nonneoplastic brain disease ?

Material and methods

A multidisciplinary team retrospectively reviewed and included all nonneoplastic brain disease cases submitted to biopsy between 2009 and 2019, in a tertiary hospital in Lisbon. Baseline characteristics were registered, including immunosuppression status, diagnostic workup, and treatment prior to biopsy. Diagnostic yield, clinical impact and in-hospital complication rates were assessed.

Results

Sixty-four patients were included, 20 (31.3%) of them immunosuppressed (15 HIV ​+ ​patients). Thirty-five (67.7%) were previously treated with steroids or antiinfectious agents, with higher percentage (93.3%) in the immunosuppressed group. Biopsy results were diagnostic in 46 (71.9%) cases. More frequent diagnosis was infectious in 20 (31.2%), neoplastic in 12 (18.8%) and inflammatory diseases in 8 (12.5%). Brain biopsy resulted on impact on patient's clinical management in 56 (87.5%), of which 37(57.8%) were submitted to treatment change. In-hospital complications were registered in 4 (6.6%) patients.

Discussion and conclusion

Brain biopsy had clinical impact, including a change in treatment, in most patients studied, and may be considered a useful diagnostic option in nonneoplastic brain disease. However, associated complication rate is not negligible, and previous thorough workup, patient selection and risk-benefit assessment are important.

•

In selected cases, diagnostic success of brain biopsy in nonneoplastic brain disease is high.

•

Most diagnosis had a significant clinical impact on patient management.

•

Although not neglectable, procedure-related complication rate was low.

Central and Peripheral Nervous System Complications of Vasculitis Syndromes From Pathology to Bedside: Part 1-Central Nervous System

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update on the clinical assessment, diagnosis, complications, and treatment of primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV).

RECENT FINDINGS

The developments in neuroimaging, molecular testing, and cerebral biopsy have enhanced clinical assessment and decision making, providing novel insights to prevent misdiagnosis increasing diagnostic certainty. Advances in imaging techniques visualizing the wall of intracranial vessels have improved the possibility to distinguish inflammatory from non-inflammatory vascular lesions. Large recent studies have revealed a more varied histopathological pictures and disclosed an association with amyloid angiopathy. Unfortunately, therapy remains largely empiric. PCNSV is a heterogeneous group of disorders encompassing different clinical subsets that may differ in terms of prognosis and therapy. Recent evidence has described a more benign course, with good response to therapy. New diagnostic techniques will play soon a pivotal role in the appropriate diagnosis and prompt management of PCNSV.

Neurological diseases of unknown etiology: Brain-biopsy diagnostic yields and safety

BACKGROUND

For nonneoplastic neurological diseases, no recommendation exists regarding the place or appropriate timing of brain biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of brain biopsies from patients with neurological diseases of unknown etiology.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018. We analyzed 1847 brain-biopsied patients, including 178 biopsies indicated for neurological diseases of unknown etiology. Specific histological and final diagnosis rates, positive diagnosis-associated factors, complication rate and complication-associated factors were assessed.

RESULTS

Specific histological diagnosis and final diagnosis rates were 71.3% and 83.1%, respectively, leading to therapeutic management change(s) for 75.3% of patients. Brain- biopsy-related mortality and permanent neurological morbidity occurred in 1.1% and 0.6% of the patients, respectively. The multivariable logistic-regression model retained (odds ratio [95% CI] only immunodepression (2.2 [1.1-4.7]; P=.04) as being independently associated with specific histological diagnosis, while supratentorial biopsy-targeted lesions (4.1 [1.1-15.2]; P=.04) were independently associated with a final diagnosis. Biopsies obtained from comatose patients were less contributive to the diagnosis (0.2 [0.05-0.7]; P=.01). Prebiopsy platelet count <100 G/L (28.5 [1.8-447]; P=.02), hydrocephalus (6.3 [1.2-15.3]; P=.02) and targeted lesions <1 cm (4.3 [1.2-15.3]; P=.03) were independently associated with brain biopsy-related complications.

CONCLUSION

For highly selected patients with neurological diseases of unknown etiology, brain biopsy has a high diagnostic yield and low frequency of severe complications. We advocate that this procedure be considered early in the diagnosis algorithm of these patients.