Complications of external cerebrospinal fluid drainage in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

External Ventricular Drains: Development and Evaluation of a Nursing Clinical Practice Guideline

External ventricular drains (EVDs) are common in intensive care for neurocritical patients affected by different illnesses. Nurses play an essential role to ensure safe care, and guidelines are tools to implement evidence-based care. Thus, the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the quality of a clinical guideline for critically ill patients with EVDs. Methodological research was conducted. The guideline development was based on a scoping review about nursing care to patients with EVDs. The guideline evaluation occurred in two phases: evaluation of its methodological rigor, with application of the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II to four experts on guidelines evaluation; and the Delphi technique, with a panel of nine specialists in neurocritical care, performed in two rounds. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and content validity ratio. In the first phase of the evaluation, three domains did not reach consensus, being reformulated. The second phase was conducted in two rounds, with nine and eight participants respectively, with 13 recommendations being reformulated and reassessed between rounds, inclusion of an EVD weaning category, and two flowcharts on patient's transport and mobility. Therefore, the guideline can be incorporated into nursing care practices. Further studies are necessary to assess its impact on clinical practice.

Lumbar Drainage After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study reviews the use of lumbar drains (LDs) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and compares the outcomes to those associated with external ventricular drains (EVDs) and controls.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was performed. English language studies with a sample size of more than 10 patients were included. One-arm and 2-arm meta-analyses were designed to compare external drainage groups. Random-effects models, heterogeneity measures, and risk of bias were calculated.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The 2-arm meta-analysis comparing the LD to no drainage after aSAH found a significant improvement in the postoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (0-2) within 1 month of hospital discharge in the LD group (P = 0.003), a lower mortality rate (P = 0.03), fewer cases of clinical vasospasm (P = 0.007), and a lower incidence of ischemic stroke or delayed ischemic neurological deficits (P = 0.003). When the LD was compared to EVDs, a significant improvement in the postoperative mRS score (0-2) within 1 month of discharge was found in the LD group (P < 0.001). In the LD group, rebleeding occurred in 15 (3.4%) cases and meningitis occurred in 50 (4.7%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients without cerebrospinal fluid drainage, patients with the LD after aSAH had lower mortality rates, lower risk of clinical vasospasm, and lower risk of ischemic stroke, and they were more likely to have an mRS score of 0-2 within 1 month of discharge. Compared with patients with EVDs, patients with the LD were more likely to have an mRS score of 0-2 within 1 month of discharge.

Implementation of an Automated Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage System for Early Mobilization in Neurosurgical Patients

BACKGROUND

Automated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage systems allow for the mobilization of patients with an external CSF drain. The aim of this study is to describe the implementation of an automated CSF drainage system in neurosurgical patients with external CSF drains.

METHODS

A feasibility study was performed using an automated CSF drainage system (LiquoGuard^®7, Möller Medical GmbH, Fulda, Germany) in adult neurosurgical patients treated with external lumbar or external ventricular drains between December 2017 and June 2020. Limited mobilization was allowed-patients were allowed to adjust their inclined beds, sit in chairs and walk under the supervision of a nurse or physical therapist. The primary outcome was the number of prematurely terminated drainage sessions.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included. Drainage was terminated prematurely in eight (35%) patients. In three (13%) of these patients, drainage was terminated due to signs of hydrocephalus. Pressure-controlled drainage in patients with external lumbar drains (ELD) showed inaccurate pressure curves, which was solved by using volume-controlled drainage in ELD patients.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an automated CSF drainage system (LiquoGuard^®7) for CSF drainage allows for early mobilization in a subset of patients with external CSF drains. External lumbar drains require volume-based drainage rather than differential pressure-dependent drainage.