Awake surgery in sitting position for chronic subdural hematoma

Single-Center Comparison of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Evacuation Outcomes Under Local Versus General Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a neurosurgical pathology of an aged populace. Pathogenetic risk factors include traumatic brain injury, prolonged use of antiplatelet drugs, hypertension, and some inflammatory processes. The incidence increases as patients age. Burr-hole evacuation is the most common approach in management of symptomatic cases. We compared evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas with general or local anesthesia (GA and LA, respectively) and evaluated the safety, economic benefits, effects of comorbidity, benefits, and shortcomings of both techniques.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 67 consecutive patients who had 74 procedures for CSDH in a single neurosurgical center, the Regional Clinic, Centre of Neurosurgery and Neurology, over a 3-year period. They were grouped into the GA group (n = 44) and LA group (n = 23). Mean duration of procedure, length of hospital stay, complications, and preoperative and postoperative neurologic statuses were compared. The distribution of nominal variables between groups was compared using the Fisher exact test. The average duration of operation and length of hospital stay were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test due to violation of the normality assumption.

RESULTS

LA proved to be as effective as GA in CSDH evacuation. Seventy-four surgical procedures were performed on 67 patients due to recurrence in less than 30 days in 7 patients. Fifteen patients had tension pneumocephalus managed with fluid therapy to full recovery. LA was economical and required shorter hospital stays and surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

In our studies, LA proved to be noninferior to GA, time conserving, and less prone to some of the adverse effects of GA on elderly patients with comorbidity, although some patients who are hyperactive or contraindicated to LA will require GA.

Effectiveness of Burr Hole Sizes on Midline Shift and Hematoma Thickness in the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of the burr hole width on the postoperative chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) thickness and midline shift radiologically.

METHODS

The medical records of 92 patients who had undergone surgery after a diagnosis of CSH between April 1, 2015 and July 1, 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed, and the thickness of the hematoma and midline shift and the diameters of 2 burr holes opened were measured and recorded. The correlation between the burr hole diameter width and CSH thickness on postoperative CT scans and the improvement in midline shift were investigated statistically.

RESULTS

When the CT scans performed on the first postoperative day and first postoperative month were examined, we found that the preoperative hematoma thickness and midline shift were significantly reduced postoperatively (P < 0.001). A positive significant correlation was found between the improvement in the midline shift, posterior burr hole diameter, and anteroposterior burr hole arithmetic mean (P < 0.001 and P = 0.029, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Having examined the current surgical techniques in the treatment of CSH, we found that an increase in the burr hole craniostomy width, especially the posterior burr hole craniostomy width, contributed to the improvement in the midline shift.

Using Local Anesthesia for Burr Hole Surgery of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Reduces Postoperative Complications, Length of Stay, and Hospitalization Cost: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Single Center

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to compare the effects of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) on the surgical process and postoperative recovery of patients with unilateral chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with unilateral CSDH who underwent burr hole surgery between the years 2013 and 2018. Patients who received local anesthesia were allocated to the LA group, and the patients who received general anesthesia were allocated to the GA group. The clinical data, postoperative complication, length of stay, and hospitalization cost of these two groups were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Data from 105 patients was collected for this study. Fifty one patients were assigned to the LA group and 54 to GA group. The duration of anesthesia and operation of the LA group was 37.71 (10.55) min; while for the GA group the duration was 56.04 (8.37) min (p < 0.001). The time from operation to discharge in GA group was greatly longer than that in LA group [(8.51 (1.49) days vs. 10.46 (2.34) days, respectively; p < 0.001]. Hospitalization cost for LA group was 2,721.54 (504.66) USD, which was significantly lesser than that for GA patients [3,314.82 (493.52) USD; p < 0.001]. The total number of complications in LA patients was less than that in GA patients [6 vs. 29 cases, respectively; p < 0.001]. The number of patients with residual hematoma in the LA group was <that in the GA group (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

As compared to GA, LA might be a simpler, safer, and more effective method for burr hole surgery of CSDH to promote patients' recovery. However, further research is still required to confirm this conclusion.