Risks and benefits of continuation and discontinuation of aspirin in elective craniotomies: a systematic review and pooled-analysis

Perioperative Management of Patients on Chronic Aspirin Therapy for Elective Brain Surgery: A Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

The perioperative management of chronic aspirin therapy in patients undergoing elective brain surgery is challenging due to the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Although aspirin discontinuation reduces the bleeding risk, it can increase thrombotic complications, particularly in patients at high risk of cardiovascular complications. This Delphi study aimed to develop consensus-based guidelines to address these clinical challenges.

METHODS

A 2-round Delphi survey was conducted among an international panel of 42 experienced anesthesiologists and neurosurgeons. Participants assessed the risks and benefits of perioperative aspirin management, including bleeding risk, thrombotic risk, timing of cessation and resumption, and the utility of platelet function testing. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement in round 2.

RESULTS

Round 1 highlighted significant variability in practice patterns. In round 2, consensus was reached on several key areas. Most experts (84%) agreed that continuing aspirin increases perioperative bleeding risk in high-risk procedures, with 87% recommending discontinuing aspirin 5 to 7 days before surgery. Nearly all experts (97%) supported continuing low-dose aspirin in high-thrombotic-risk patients. Conversely, for low-thrombotic-risk patients, only 65% agreed on aspirin continuation, reflecting an ongoing debate. No consensus was reached regarding routine platelet function testing.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi study provides experience-based recommendations for managing chronic aspirin therapy in neurosurgical patients. The panel strongly supports aspirin continuation in high-thrombotic-risk patients, with cessation 5 to 7 days before high-bleeding-risk surgeries. Individualized management is advised for low-bleeding-risk procedures and low-thrombotic-risk patients. Future research should further clarify aspirin management in these groups and explore the role of platelet function testing in neurosurgical settings.

Aspirin Continuation or Discontinuation in Surgically Treated Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Discontinuation of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) during the perioperative phase of treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) may reduce recurrence rates but may also increase the risk of cardiovascular or thromboembolic events. However, the efficacy and safety of discontinuing ASA in this patient population remain unclear.

Objective

To assess the risk of recurrence of cSDH and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing surgical treatment of cSDH with continuous vs discontinuous ASA treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The SECA (Surgical Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma and Aspirin) trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2018 to June 2023 at 6 neurosurgical centers in Switzerland. Adults undergoing burr hole drainage for cSDH and receiving ASA treatment prior to cSDH onset were included. Of 1363 screened patients, 155 were included. Both assessors and participants were blinded to the treatment arms.

Intervention

Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either continuous ASA or placebo for 12 days during the perioperative phase.

Main Outcome and Measures

The main outcome was the recurrence rate of cSDH necessitating reoperation within 6 months. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed, calculating risk differences. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular or thromboembolic events, other bleeding events, and mortality.

Results

Of 155 participants, 78 were assigned to continuous ASA and 77 to placebo treatment. The mean (SD) participant age was 77.9 (8.2) years and 77.6 (9.7) years for the ASA and placebo groups, respectively, and 25 participants (16.1%) were female. A primary outcome event occurred in 13.9% of participants for the ASA group and 9.5% for the placebo group (weighted risk difference, 4.4%; 95% CI, -7.2% to 15.9%; P = .56). The incidence of any cardiovascular or thromboembolic event was 0.27 per person half-year in the ASA group and 0.28 in the placebo group. The incidence of a cardiovascular event indicating ASA treatment was 0.02 per person half-year in the ASA group and 0.06 in the placebo group. Other bleeding events showed an incidence of 0.10 per person half-year in the ASA group and 0.08 in the placebo group. All-cause mortality occurred at an incidence of 0.06 per person half-year in the ASA group and 0.03 in the placebo group.

Conclusions and Relevance

The SECA randomized clinical trial suggests that discontinuing ASA treatment did not reduce the recurrence rate of surgically treated cSDH within 6 months. Recurrence risk estimates for continuous ASA treatment in this trial were distinctly lower than previously reported.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03120182.

The impact of perioperative aspirin utilization on postoperative hemorrhagic complications in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) primarily affects older patients. Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery is a standard treatment. Many iNPH patients have high cardiovascular risks and require aspirin (ASA) therapy to prevent thromboembolic events. Discontinuing ASA increases the risk of these events. This study evaluates the impact of perioperative ASA use on hemorrhagic complications in iNPH patients undergoing VP shunt surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent VP shunt surgery for iNPH from January 2020 to September 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on perioperative ASA use: no ASA (n = 50) and ASA continued (n = 51). Data collected included demographics, surgery details, ASA dosage, and indications for ASA use. Primary outcomes were early and late postoperative hemorrhage incidences. Postoperative follow-up included MRI or CT scans at regular intervals (mean ≈ one year). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0, with Chi-square tests and independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests used to analyze differences between groups.

RESULTS

The study cohort had 101 patients with a mean age of 69.5 ± 7.6 years, 41.6% female and 58.4% male. Early postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 5% of patients, including epidural (1), intraparenchymal(3), and intraventricular hematoma(1). Late postoperative hemorrhages occurred in 4% of patients ( 4 patients in the no-ASA group), with two cases each of unilateral and bilateral subdural hematoma. No significant differences in hemorrhagic outcomes were observed between the ASA continuation and non-use groups (p = 0.092). The mean follow-up period was 300 days. One patient died in non-ASA group due to neurodegenerative disease.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative ASA use does not significantly impact the incidence of postoperative hemorrhages in iNPH patients undergoing VP shunt surgery. These findings suggest that ASA can be safely continued without increasing hemorrhagic risks. This is a particularly significant issue for patients with high cardiovascular risk.

Balancing bleeding, thrombosis and myocardial injury: A call for balance and precision medicine for aspirin in neurosurgery

Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy involves a delicate balancing of the risk of periprocedural blood loss with the cardiovascular and thrombotic risk to the patient. Due to the unique nature of neurosurgery, perioperative bleeding may have devastating consequences and cause major morbidity and mortality. The recommendation to discontinue aspirin prior to major neurosurgical procedures rests upon conventional practice, expert consensus with priority given to avoidance of any major bleed. On the contrary recent prospective data do not support the existence of additional bleeding risk in patients continuing aspirin compared to those who stop aspirin prior to procedure. Patients with cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities are increasingly encountered in the operation theatre these days. In these patients, prevention of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is an important focus for perioperative risk reduction. Prolonged (≥ 7 days) cessation of antiplatelets is one of the most important predictors of MINS. This complicated milieu of risks and benefits highlights the difficulty of practicing evidence-based medicine and minimizing harm in patients on aspirin needing neurosurgery.

Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage After Glioma Surgery in Patients with Preoperative Acetylsalicylic Acid

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Patients with gliomas show an increased risk of spontaneous hemorrhages throughout the disease. Simultaneously, the number of patients taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for primary and secondary prophylaxis is rising in daily clinical practice, and interrupting ASA intake before elective or emergency intracranial surgery is not always feasible. This study aims to evaluate the risks associated with continuing ASA use perioperatively while focusing on hemorrhage and potential thromboembolic events that may arise from discontinuing ASA, particularly in multimorbid patients undergoing glioma surgery.

METHODS

The clinical parameters and imaging data of 7149 patients who underwent intracranial surgery in our department over a 10-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their ASA status: Group 1 (no ASA impact) included those with no ASA use or who discontinued ASA use more than seven days prior to surgery (low stroke or cardiovascular risk), and Group 2 (ASA impact) included those who continued ASA use within seven days prior to operation (high stroke or cardiovascular risk).

RESULTS

In this retrospective study, data from 650 patients with various types of glial tumors who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2018 were examined. Of these patients, 50 experienced a postoperative hemorrhage (POH), and 10 required reoperations due to clinical neurological deterioration and increased intracranial pressure caused by the space-occupying effect of the hemorrhage. In the ASA impact group, 2.7% developed POH, compared to 1.3% in the no ASA impact group (p = 0.098). Our analysis did not show a significantly increased risk of POH after surgery, although patients in the ASA impact group had a one- to two-fold higher risk of developing POH overall. Additionally, other factors contributing to postoperative hemorrhage following glioma surgery were investigated and evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, the perioperative use of ASA was not associated with an increased rate of hemorrhagic complications after intracranial glioma surgery, although a trend was observed. In patients with high stroke and cardiovascular risk, ASA can be continued during elective brain tumor surgery.

Impact of Perioperative Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) Administration on Postoperative Intracranial Hemorrhage (pICH) and Thromboembolic Events in Patients with Intracranial Meningiomas

Background: In routine medical practice, patients are increasingly using ASA for primary and secondary prevention. Although many of these patients discontinue ASA prior to elective intracranial surgery, there are limited data to support whether perioperative ASA use raises the risk of postoperative hemorrhage. This study aimed to investigate the implications of continuing or stopping ASA around the time of surgery in patients with intracranial meningiomas, focusing on postoperative hemorrhage and thromboembolic events. Methods: For this purpose, medical records and radiological images of 1862 patients who underwent cranial neurosurgical procedures for brain tumors over a decade at our neurosurgical institute were retrospectively analyzed. The risk of postoperative hemorrhage was evaluated by comparing meningioma patients who received ASA treatment with those who did not. Furthermore, we investigated other factors that influence postoperative hemorrhage and thromboembolic events, particularly in patients receiving ASA treatment. Results: A total of 422 patients diagnosed with meningiomas underwent surgical intervention. Among the patients who received ASA preoperatively, 4 out of 46 (8.69%) experienced postoperative hemorrhage requiring surgical intervention, whereas the same complication occurred in only 4 out of 376 patients (1.06%) in the non-ASA group (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the incidence of thromboembolic events between the two groups. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed an increased risk of postoperative hemorrhage in patients using ASA.

Preoperative Risk Assessment Before Elective Craniotomy: Are Aspirin, Arrhythmias, Deep Venous Thromboses, and Hyperglycemia Contraindications to Surgery?

OBJECTIVE

Perioperative risk assessment and stratification before craniotomy is necessary to identify and optimize modifiable risk factors. Due to the high costs of diagnostic testing and concerns for delaying surgery, some have questioned whether and when surgery delays are warranted and supported by the current body of literature. The objective of this scoping review was to evaluate the available evidence on the prognostic value of preoperative risk assessment before anesthesia for elective craniotomy.

METHODS

In this scoping review, we reviewed 156 papers that assess preoperative risk assessment before elective craniotomy, of which 27 papers were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

There is little high-quality evidence to suggest significant risk reduction when 4 common preexisting abnormalities are present: preoperative chronic aspirin therapy, cardiac arrhythmias, deep vein thrombosis, or hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of delaying craniotomy should ultimately be weighed against the perceived risks associated the patient's comorbid conditions and should be considered on an individualized basis.

Management of Patients undergoing Elective Craniotomy under Antiplatelet or Anticoagulation Therapy: An International Survey of Practice

BACKGROUND

 The literature concerning the management of antiplatelet (AP) and anticoagulation (AC) medication in the perioperative phase of craniotomy remains scarce. The aim of this international survey was to investigate the current practice among neurosurgeons regarding their perioperative management of AP and AC medication.

METHODS

 We distributed an online survey to neurosurgeons worldwide with questions concerning their perioperative practice with AP and AC medication in patients undergoing craniotomy. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

 A total of 130 replies were registered. The majority of responders practice neurosurgery in Europe (79%) or high-income countries (79%). Responders reported in 58.9 and 48.8% to have institutional guidelines for the perioperative management of AP and AC medication. Preoperative interruption time was reported heterogeneously for the different types of AP and AC medication with 40.4% of responders interrupting aspirin (ASA) for 4 to 6 days and 45.7% interrupting clopidogrel for 6 to 8 days. Around half of the responders considered ASA safe to be continued or resumed within 3 days for bypass (55%) or vascular (49%) surgery, but only few for skull base or other tumor craniotomies in general (14 and 26%, respectively). Three quarters of the responders (74%) did not consider AC safe to be continued or resumed early (within 3 days) for any kind of craniotomy. ASA was considered to have the lowest risk of bleeding. Nearly all responders (93%) agreed that more evidence is needed concerning AP and AC management in neurosurgery.

CONCLUSION

 Worldwide, the perioperative management of AP and AC medication is very heterogeneous among neurosurgeons.

Aspirin interruption before neurosurgical interventions: A controversial problem

Aspirin is widely used for primary or secondary prevention of ischemic events. At the same time, chronic aspirin consumption can affect blood clot formation during surgical intervention and increase intraoperative blood loss. This is especially important for high-risk surgery, including neurosurgery. Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend aspirin interruption for at least 7 d before neurosurgical intervention, but this suggestion is not supported by clinical evidence. This narrative review presents evidence that challenges the necessity for aspirin interruption in neurosurgical patients, describes options for aspirin effect monitoring and the clinical implication of these methods, and summarizes current clinical data on bleeding risk associated with chronic aspirin therapy in neurosurgical patients, including brain tumor surgery, cerebrovascular procedures, and spinal surgery.

Perioperative Low-Dose Aspirin Management for Planned Clipping Surgery: When, How Long, and With What Precautions?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Perioperative low-dose aspirin (ASA) management for open craniotomy surgery lacked information. We analyze to establish the perioperative ASA strategy to minimize both hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications.

METHODS

The investigators designed a multicenter retrospective study, which included patients scheduled to have clipping surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysm. The incidence and risk factors were analyzed for postoperative hemorrhagic complications and major cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) within 1 month postoperation.

RESULTS

This study included 503 long-term ASA users of 3654 patients at three tertiary centers. The incidence of hemorrhagic complications and MACCEs was 7.4% (37/503) and 8.8% (44/503), respectively. Older age (>70 years, odds ratio [OR]: 2.928, 95% CI [1.337-6.416]), multiple aneurysms operation (OR: 2.201, 95% CI [1.017-4.765]), large aneurysm (>10 mm, OR: 4.483, 95% CI [1.485-13.533]), and ASA continuation (OR: 2.604, 95% CI [1.222-5.545]) were independent risk factors for postoperative hemorrhagic complications. Intracranial hemorrhage was the only type of hemorrhagic complication that increased in the ASA continuation group (10.6% vs 2.9%, P = .001). Between the ASA continuation and discontinuation groups, the overall incidence of MACCEs was not significantly different (log-rank P = .8). In the subgroup analysis, ASA discontinuation significantly increased the risk of MACCEs in the secondary prevention group (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.580, 95% CI [1.015-6.580]).

CONCLUSION

ASA continuation increased the risk of postoperative intracranial hemorrhage. Simultaneously, ASA discontinuation was the major risk factor for postoperative MACCEs in the high-risk group. Without evidence of intracranial hemorrhage, early ASA resumption was indicated (a total cessation duration <7-10 days) in the secondary prevention group.

Challenges in Coagulation Management in Neurosurgical Diseases: A Scoping Review, Development, and Implementation of Coagulation Management Strategies

Bleeding and thromboembolic (TE) complications in neurosurgical diseases have a detrimental impact on clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to provide a scoping review of the available literature and address challenges and knowledge gaps in the management of coagulation disorders in neurosurgical diseases. Additionally, we introduce a novel research project that seeks to reduce coagulation disorder-associated complications in neurosurgical patients. The risk of bleeding after elective craniotomy is about 3%, and higher (14-33%) in other indications, such as trauma and intracranial hemorrhage. In spinal surgery, the incidence of postoperative clinically relevant bleeding is approximately 0.5-1.4%. The risk for TE complications in intracranial pathologies ranges from 3 to 20%, whereas in spinal surgery it is around 7%. These findings highlight a relevant problem in neurosurgical diseases and current guidelines do not adequately address individual circumstances. The multidisciplinary COagulation MAnagement in Neurosurgical Diseases (COMAND) project has been developed to tackle this challenge by devising an individualized coagulation management strategy for patients with neurosurgical diseases. Importantly, this project is designed to ensure that these management strategies can be readily implemented into healthcare practices of different types and with sustainable integration.

Anticoagulation Options for Cranial Procedures: A Comparative Review of Aspirin, Plavix, and Aggrastat

Anticoagulation therapy is critical to avoiding thrombotic events in patients following cranial surgery. Although Aspirin, Plavix, and Aggrastat are used as anticoagulants for this purpose, there is no consensus on which agent is the most effective and safe. In this comparative study, we analyze the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of these three anticoagulants in the context of cranial surgeries. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of each anticoagulant, such as its pharmacokinetics, indications, contraindications, and possible consequences. The outcomes of this study will help physicians choose the best anticoagulant for their patients based on individual patient characteristics and the kind of cranial procedure. Aggrastat's potential to be included as a recommended anticoagulant for cranial procedures warrants further study.

Successful treatment of thoracic myelopathy caused by spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) combined with calcification of the ligamentum flavum (CLF) by posterior percutaneous endoscopic surgery (PPES): A case report

Study Design

A retrospective case report.

Objective

To report a case who developed deteriorated paraplegia by spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) based on calcification of the ligamentum flavum (CLF) at the T10-11 level, achieved full neurological recovery following posterior percutaneous endoscopic surgery (PPES).

Summary of Background Data

CLF rarely occurs at the thoracic spine, and the symptom usually progress slowly. SSEH is another rare spinal lesion that might progress rapidly and cause emergent severe spinal cord compression syndrome. Coexistence of SSEH and CLF at the same thoracic level was rarely reported in English literature.

Methods

A 65-year-old man presented to our hospital with the complaint of sensorimotor loss on the lower limbs and dysfunction of bladder for 1 day after a progressive weakness and numbness of the lower limbs for 3 months. MR examination found a dorsal protruding mass at the T10-11 level, while computed tomography (CT) found the protruding mass contained scattered calcified deposits. The patient was diagnosed with thoracic CLF. Decompression via PPES was carried out to realize bilateral decompression through a unilateral approach.

Results

During the operation, the protruding mass was found to be composed of SSEH and CLF together. After the operation, the patient's neurological function recovered quickly. One week later, the patient could walk by himself. After 3 months, complete neurological function had recovered.

Conclusion

SSEH could develop based on CLF at thoracic level and cause serious neurological dysfunction. PPES might be an advisable method to remove CLF and evacuate SSEH with good clinical results.