Posteroventral pallidotomy in Parkinson's disease

Referrals for Movement Disorder Surgery: Under-Representation of Females and Reasons for Refusal

OBJECTIVE

Referral of movement disorder patients for deep brain stimulation surgery was examined to determine whether referred patients were representative of gender proportions in our population, and reasons why patients do not proceed to surgery.

METHODS

Demographic information on referrals to the surgical program was retrospectively reviewed from our database and from a detailed chart review.

RESULTS

Although almost equal numbers of movement disorder patients are male and female, of the 91 patients referred for surgery, only 31% were female. Sixty-one percent of referred patients did not undergo surgery. Of these, the majority were denied for medical reasons, including cognitive decline (21%), psychiatric concerns (5%) and neurological reasons (42%).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-third of patients referred for movement disorder surgery were denied for medical reasons. This underscores the importance of evaluation of all potential patients by a multidisiplinary team to fully assess suitablity for stereotactic surgery. Interestingly, women were under-represented in those referred. In order that all appropriate patients have the opportunity to consider surgery, education of both physicians and patients, and different strategies to approach females regarding surgery may allow more patients to benefit from this treatment.

Unilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation has a measurable ipsilateral effect on rigidity and bradykinesia in Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND

Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves motor function in Parkinson disease (PD). However, little is known about the quantitative effects on motor behavior of unilateral STN DBS.

METHODS

In 52 PD subjects with STN DBS, we quantified in a double-blinded manner rigidity (n=42), bradykinesia (n=38), and gait speed (n=45). Subjects were tested in four DBS conditions: both on, left on, right on and both off. A force transducer was used to measure rigidity across the elbow, and gyroscopes were used to measure angular velocity of hand rotations for bradykinesia. About half of the subjects were rated using the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (part III) motor scores for arm rigidity and repetitive hand rotation simultaneously during the kinematic measurements. Subjects were timed walking 25 feet.

RESULTS

All subjects had significant improvement with bilateral STN DBS. Contralateral, ipsilateral and bilateral stimulation significantly reduced rigidity and bradykinesia. Bilateral stimulation improved rigidity more than unilateral stimulation of either side, but there was no significant difference between ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation. Although bilateral stimulation also increased hand rotation velocity more than unilateral stimulation of either side, contralateral stimulation increased hand rotation significantly more than ipsilateral stimulation. All stimulation conditions improved walking time but bilateral stimulation provided the greatest improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral STN DBS decreased rigidity and bradykinesia contralaterally as well ipsilaterally. As expected, bilateral DBS improved gait more than unilateral DBS.

Effects of stereotactic neurosurgery on postural instability and gait in Parkinson's disease

Postural instability and gait disability (PIGD) are disabling signs of Parkinson's disease. Stereotactic surgery aimed at the internal globus pallidus (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) might improve PIGD, but the precise effects remain unclear. We performed a systematic review of studies that examined the effects of GPi or STN surgery on PIGD. Most studies examined the effects of bilateral GPi stimulation, bilateral STN stimulation, and unilateral pallidotomy; we, therefore, only performed a meta-analysis on these studies. Bilateral GPi stimulation, bilateral STN stimulation, and to a lesser extent, unilateral pallidotomy significantly improved PIGD, and more so during the ON phase than during the OFF phase.

Hypophonia in Parkinson's disease: neural correlates of voice treatment revealed by PET

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the neural correlates of hypophonia in individuals with idiopathic PD (IPD) before and after voice treatment with the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment method (VT) using (15)O-H(2)O PET.

METHODS

Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes associated with overt speech-motor tasks relative to the resting state were measured in the IPD subjects before and after VT, and in a group of healthy control volunteers.

RESULTS

Behavioral measures of voice loudness significantly improved following treatment. Before VT, patients had strong speech-related activations in motor and premotor cortex (M1-mouth, supplementary motor cortex [SMA], and inferior lateral premotor cortex [ILPm]), which were significantly reduced post-VT. Similar to the post-treatment session, premotor activations were absent (SMA) or below statistical threshold (M1-mouth) in the healthy control group. In addition, following VT treatment, significant right-sided activations were present in anterior insular cortex, caudate head, putamen, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Finally, the VT-induced neural changes were not present with transient experimenter-cued increases of loudness in VT-untreated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective improvement of IPD hypophonia following voice treatment with VT was accompanied by a reduction of cortical motor-premotor activations, resembling the functional pattern observed in healthy volunteers and suggesting normalization, and additional recruitment of right anterior insula, caudate head, putamen, and DLPFC. This treatment-dependent functional reorganization suggests a shift from an abnormally effortful (premotor cortex) to a more automatic (basal ganglia, anterior insula) implementation of speech-motor actions.

A metaanalysis comparing the results of pallidotomy performed using microelectrode recording or macroelectrode stimulation

OBJECT

There is an active debate regarding whether pallidotomy should be performed using macroelectrode stimulation or the more sophisticated and expensive method of microelectrode recording. No prospective, randomized trial results have answered this question, although personnel at many centers claim one method is superior. In their metaanalysis the authors reviewed published reports of both methods to determine if there is a significant difference in clinical outcomes or complication rates associated with these methods.

METHODS

A metaanalysis was performed with data from reports on the use of unilateral pallidotomy in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) that were published between 1992 and 2000. A Medline search was conducted for the key word "pallidotomy" and additional studies were added following a review of the references. Only those studies dealing with unilateral procedures performed in patients with PD were included. Papers were excluded if they described a cohort smaller than 10 patients or a follow-up period shorter than 3 months or included cases that previously had been reported. The primary end points for outcome were the percentages of improvement in dyskinesias and in motor scores determined by the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS). Complications were categorized as mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, visual deficit, speech deficit, cognitive decline, weakness, and other. There were no significant differences between the two methods with respect to improvements in dyskinesias (p = 0.66) or UPDRS motor scores (p = 0.62). Microelectrode recording was associated with a significantly higher (p = 0.012) intracranial hemorrhage rate (1.3 +/- 0.4%), compared with macroelectrode stimulation (0.25 +/- 0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In reports of patients with PD who underwent unilateral pallidotomy, operations that included microelectrode recording were associated with a small, but significantly higher rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; however, there was no difference in postoperative reduction of dyskinesia or bradykinesia compared with operations that included macroelectrode stimulation.