Cisternography in combination with single photon emission tomography for the detection of the leakage site in patients with cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: preliminary report

Radionuclide Cisternography with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA

Radionuclide cisternography (RNC) is a method for conducting imaging of the cerebrospinal system and can be used to identify cerebrospinal fluid leaks. So far, RNC has commonly employed radiopharmaceutical agents suitable only for single-photon emission tomography techniques, which are thus lacking in terms of image resolution and can potentially lead to false-negative results. Therefore, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA was investigated as an alternative radiopharmaceutical for RNC, employing positron emission tomography (PET) instead of single-photon emission tomography. A formulation of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA was produced according to the guidelines for good manufacturing practice. The product met the requirements of agents suitable for intrathecal application. [64Cu]Cu-DOTA was administered to a patient and compared to the approved scintigraphic RNC agent, [111In]In-DTPA. While no cerebrospinal fluid leak was detected with [111In]In-DTPA, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA RNC exhibited a posterolateral leak between the vertebral bodies C1 and C2. Thus, in this patient, PET RNC with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA was superior to RNC with [111In]In-DTPA. Since radiopharmaceuticals have a very good safety profile regarding the occurrence of adverse events, PET RNC with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA may become an attractive alternative to scintigraphic methods, and also to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, which often require contrast agents, causing adverse events to occur much more frequently.

Efficacy of Imaging Methods in the Detection and Diagnosis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic efficacy of various imaging methods in patients with suspected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Cochrane Trials, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to December 2021.

REVIEW METHODS

Diagnostic accuracy was compared among seven radiological methods: computed tomography (CT), CT cisternography (CTC), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC), CT + MRI, radionuclide cisternography, and intrathecal gadolinium (Gd)-MRC. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used as outcomes of the analysis. Both a traditional pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three trials were included in the analysis. The results of a network meta-analysis performed on a network consisting of seven diagnostic methods showed that all imaging modalities had greater diagnostic accuracy than CT, with the exception of CTC, which had lower sensitivity. Only intrathecal Gd-MRC was significantly superior to other imaging methods with regard to sensitivity and accuracy. Gd-MRC also showed the greatest surface under the cumulative ranking curve values for all of the outcomes (sensitivity: 0.9200; specificity: 0.8364; accuracy: 0.8920).

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis demonstrates that intrathecal Gd-MRC is the most useful diagnostic method to detect CSF rhinorrhea. Laryngoscope, 2022.

Usefulness of imaging studies for diagnosing and localizing cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the usefulness of diagnosis by imaging studies for the localization of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

METHODS

PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched up to July 2021. True and false positive and negative data were collected along with the characteristics of each study. Methodological quality was assessed using the QADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 472 patients were included. The diagnostic odds ratio of imaging studies was 13.6195 (95% confidence interval [7.4756; 24.8129]; I² = 28.1%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.712. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 0.8507 ([0.7773; 0.9029]; 72.1%), 0.7827 ([0.6865; 0.8556], 26.8%), 0.5828 ([0.4398; 0.7132]; 67.4%), and 0.9407 ([0.8935; 0.9678]; 59.1%), respectively. In subgroup analysis, there were significant differences in sensitivity (computed tomography, 0.7421; computed tomography cisternography, 0.8872; magnetic resonance imaging, 0.8365; magnetic resonance cisternography, 0.8565; and intrathecal gadolinium magnetic resonance cisternography, 0.9307; radionuclide cisteronography, 0.7097; p  =  0.0481), and negative predictive value among imaging modalities (computed tomography, 0.3028; computed tomography cisternography, 0.4848; magnetic resonance imaging, 0.4658; magnetic resonance cisternography, 0.7465; and intrathecal gadolinium magnetic resonance cisternography, 0.8611, and radionuclide cisteronography, 0.5263; p  =  0.0046). There were no significant differences among imaging modalities in specificity, positive predictive value, or diagnostic odds ratio (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Imaging studies can be used in the diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Gadolinium magnetic resonance cisternography showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. Also, magnetic resonance cisternography showed fair diagnostic accuracy without intrathecal injection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Diagnosis and Localization of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Systematic Review

Background

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea results from abnormal communications between the subarachnoid and sinonasal spaces. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and localization are vital for positive clinical outcomes. However, the diagnosis and localization of CSF rhinorrhea remain suboptimal due to a lack of accurate understanding of test characteristics.

Objective

This systematic review aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various tests and imaging modalities for diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea.

Methods

A systematic review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results

Our search identified 4039 articles—53 cohort studies and 24 case series describing 1622 patients were included. The studies were heterogeneous and had a wide range of sensitivities and specificities. Many specificities were incalculable due to a lack of true negative and false positive results, thus precluding a meta-analysis. Median sensitivities and specificities were calculated for cohort studies of the following investigations: high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) 0.93/0.50 (sensitivity/specificity), magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC) 0.94/0.77, computed tomography cisternography (CTC) 0.95/1.00, radionuclide cisternography (RNC) 0.90/0.50, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cisternography (CEMRC) 0.99/1.00, endoscopy 0.58/1.00, topical intranasal fluorescein (TIF) 1.00/incalculable, intrathecal fluorescein (ITF) 0.96/1.00. Case series were reviewed separately. Etiology and site-specific data were also analyzed.

Conclusion

MR cisternography is more accurate than high-resolution CT at diagnosing and localizing CSF rhinorrhea. CT cisternography, contrast-enhanced MR cisternography, and radionuclide cisternography have good diagnostic characteristics but are invasive. Intrathecal fluorescein shows promising data but has not been widely adopted for purely diagnostic use. Office endoscopy has limited data but does not sufficiently diagnose CSF rhinorrhea independently. These findings confirm with current guidelines and evidence.

[A modern approach to the diagnosis of nasal liquorrhea]

Nasal liquorrhea is cerebrospinal fluid leakage from cerebrospinal fluid spaces of the cerebral cavity into the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses due to congenital or acquired abnormalities of the skull base bones and meninges of various etiologies. The severity of liquorrhea varies from hidden manifestations to profuse leakage of cerebrospinal fluid from the nasal cavity. The diagnosis of overt nasal liquorrhea is not problematic, but the diagnosis of latent liquorrhea is a challenge. In this case, the disease leads to potentially fatal complications, such as meningitis (the risk amounts to 10-37%), pneumocephaly, pneumonia, etc. These peculiarites give rise to two main tasks: early diagnosis confirming liquorrhea and accurate identification of the CSF fistula location when planning further surgical management.

PURPOSE

The study purpose was to review and comparatively analyze all modern methods of diagnosing nasal liquorrhea as well as to substantiate the most effective and promising approaches and algorithms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included papers in English and Russian found in the Pubmed database and related to the diagnosis of basal liquorrhea of different etiology and localization.

RESULTS

This review demonstrates that diagnostic tests vary widely in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, invasiveness, and cost. Given all the criteria, detection of beta-2 transferrin or beta-trace protein is the best method for confirming nasal liquorrhea, and high-resolution computed tomography is the best technique for localization of the abnormality.

CONCLUSION

Based on the review, we suggest a diagnostic algorithm for nasal liquorrhea. However, the evidence presented in this review is unfortunately not very reliable, which indicates the existing need for more accurate studies.

Detection of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks: Is There a Radiologic Standard of Care? A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks traditionally involves laboratory testing of markers and appropriate imaging. Surgical localization can be difficult, and the inability to accurately localize skull base defects leads to increased rates of repair failure and complications. Many imaging techniques localizing and identifying CSF leaks have been proposed. Comparisons of current and investigational imaging techniques used to localize CSF leaks are reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, and reference lists from relevant articles was completed to identify literature on sensitivities of different imaging methods for localization and detection of CSF leaks. Prospective, retrospective, and case series published since 1995 that addressed imaging techniques for CSF leaks confined to the skull base were included. Sensitivities of each major imaging technique proposed were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 133 studies initially were screened from 2125 studies on preliminary search. Of these, 38 studies were included based on inclusion criteria. Studies were segregated by imaging modality. A total of 1000 patients with CSF leaks subsequently were evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although radionuclide cisternography has been the historical standard, recent imaging techniques have emerged considering the low sensitivity. Computed tomography cisternography with contrast also has low sensitivity, even in active leaks. Although high-resolution computed tomography is commonly the initial study of choice, magnetic resonance imaging methods, particularly 3-dimensional imaging, may prove to be a more sensitive study of choice. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging combination methods may show promise in localizing CSF leaks. Stratifying by status and etiology may be an important determinant. Further studies investigating various imaging techniques for localizing CSF leaks are needed.

[Endoscopic endonasal diagnosis and treatment of skull base meningoencephalocele]

PURPOSE

The study purpose was to determine the successful outcome rate of endoscopic endonasal reconstruction of skull base CSF fistulas with removal of meningocele as well as analyze disease relapses. The second purpose of the study was to describe the treatment outcomes, depending on the type, location, and size of meningocele as well as on a technique used to reconstruct the skull base defect.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three hundred and eleven patients diagnosed with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea who underwent surgery at the Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute in the period between 2007 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Meningocele was detected in 141 (45.3%) of all patients with CSF rhinorrhea. The diagnosis was made before surgery and verified during endoscopic endonasal reconstructive closure of skull base defects. Therefore, the analysis group included all cases of meningocele and meningoencephalocele verified during surgery. The study analyzed the gender, age of surgery, follow-up period, comorbidities, use of lumbar drainage, etiology of the defect, localization, type of reconstructive material, complications, and disease relapses. We defined the efficacy of endoscopic endonasal meningocele resection with fistula reconstruction as the absence of signs of CSF rhinorrhea and a hernia sac based on the data of control CT and endoscopy performed in the late postoperative period. The follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 5 years.

RESULTS

All patients underwent endoscopic endonasal reconstruction of the skull base defect. The treatment efficacy was 110 (78%) patients for primary surgery and 26 (84%) patients for repeated surgery.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic endonasal surgery is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive technique for treatment of meningocele and meningoencephalocele, which enables resection of a hernia sac and reconstruction of dura mater and skull base defects.

Diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: an evidence-based review with recommendations

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic strategies employed for cases of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea vary widely due to limited evidence-based guidance.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 1990 through September 2014, to examine 9 diagnostic and localization modalities for CSF rhinorrhea. Benefit-harm assessments, value judgments and recommendations were made based on the available evidence. Study exclusion criteria were language other than English, pre-1990 studies, case reports, and nonrhinologic leak. All authors agreed on recommendations through an iterative process.

RESULTS

We reviewed 68 studies examining 9 practices pertinent to the diagnosis of CSF rhinorrhea, with a highest aggregate grade of evidence of C. The literature does not support the use of the ring sign, glucose testing, radionuclide cisternography (RNC), or computed tomography cisternography (CTC) for identification of CSF leak. Beta-2 transferrin is the most reliable confirmatory test for CSF leak. High-resolution CT (HRCT) is then recommended as the first-line study for localization. Magnetic resonance cisternography (MRC) should be used for CSF leak identification as a second line for each of these if beta-2 transferrin is not available or if HRCT is ambiguous. Intrathecal fluorescein (IF) may also be of benefit in certain clinical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Despite relatively low levels of evidence, recommendations for the diagnosis and management of CSF rhinorrhea can be made based on the current literature. Higher-level studies are needed to better determine optimal diagnostic and clinical management approaches.

Severe craniofacial fractures with frontobasal involvement and cerebrospinal fluid fistula: indications for surgical repair

BACKGROUND

The management of posttraumatic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulae is a controversial topic. Although recent literature shows that endoscopic repair of CSF fistula is efficacious and minimally invasive, in specific conditions open operative approach remains imperative.

METHODS

A series of 36 patients underwent surgery for posttraumatic CSF fistula according to specific selection criteria. These criteria included: bone displacement more than 1 cm (5 cases), location of fracture in proximity to the midline (6 cases), involvement of cribriform plate (12 cases), presence of encephalocele (3 cases), and failure of the conservative treatment (10 cases). The dural defect was closed using vascularized pericranium and fibrin glue. Closure of the basal bone defect was necessary in very large fractures or in special localization of the fistula, such as near the optic nerve. Mean clinical follow-up was 5.7 years.

RESULTS

Two patients presented meningitis without sequelae, and 12 with hyposmia. One patient died of the severity of the primary brain injury and associated extracranial lesions. None of the patients had recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that surgical dural repair in selected cases is related to low morbidity and mortality preserving from delayed risks such as recurrence and infections.

[Management of cerebrospinal fluid fistulae: physiopathology, imaging and treatment]

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulae can produce leakage through a defect in the bony skull and meninges into the contiguous air-filled cavities at the base of the skull. The major risk is central nervous system infection. When abundant clear rhinorrhea or otorrhea is present, the diagnosis is obvious and imaging is used to localize the fistula. Computed tomography (CT) with millimetric slices and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most effective diagnostic tools. CT cisternography, an invasive procedure, should only be used when the diagnosis remains uncertain following CT scan and MRI. When CSF leakage is sparse or intermittent, the diagnosis can be made by measuring beta-2 transferrine in the escaping fluid. CT scan followed by MRI are also useful for making the diagnosis and locating the fistula when exterior leakage is absent. CT scan alone is effective for assessing isolated otorrhea. If the diagnosis remains uncertain after all these studies have been used, the patient should be closely followed clinically and isotopic study or surgery should be considered.