DREZ surgery on conus medullaris (after failed implantation of vascular omental graft) for treating chronic pain due to spine (gunshot) injuries

Efficacy and factors determining the outcome of dorsal root entry zone lesioning procedure (DREZotomy) in the treatment of intractable pain syndrome

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is a disabling condition that adversely affects patient quality of life. The dorsal root entry zone lesioning procedure (DREZotomy) is a modality used to treat intractable pain caused by insults to neural structures. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of and the factors that determine the outcome of microsurgical DREZotomy (MDT).

METHOD

All consecutive patients who underwent MDT for treatment of intractable pain during September 2008 to December 2016 were enrolled. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 40 included patients underwent MDT for relief of intractable pain caused by 27 brachial plexus injuries (BPIs), 6 spinal cord injuries, 3 neoplasms, and 4 other causes. A significant reduction in pain was observed post-MDT for both average (p < 0.001) and maximal pain (p < 0.001). Favorable outcome (≥50% pain reduction) was observed in 67.5% of patients, with the best outcome in BPI-related pain. In multivariate analysis, injury of the spinal nerve root (root avulsion or injury) was significantly associated with good average pain relief (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.2-27.5; p = 0.026) and pain freedom (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.12-22.30; p = 0.035). Electrical pain (OR, 6.49; 95% CI, 1.20-35.19; p = 0.030) and lower number of painful dermatomes (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67; p = 0.039) were significantly associated with good maximal pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

MDT is an effective procedure for treatment of intractable pain in well-selected patients, particularly in cases with brachial plexus avulsion pain. Injury of the spinal nerve root (brachial plexus avulsion and cauda equina injury) was associated with good average pain relief and pain freedom, and electrical pain and lower number of painful dermatomes were associated with good maximal pain relief. The results are useful in the selection of candidates for DREZotomy and prediction of surgical outcome.

Gunshot wounds to the spine in post-Katrina New Orleans

BACKGROUND

Gunshot wounds (GSW) to the spine represent a major health concern within today's society. Our study assessed the epidemiologic characteristics of patients with GSW to the spine treated in New Orleans.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed from January 2007 through November 2011 on all the patients who were seen in the emergency room and diagnosed with a gunshot wound to the spine. Epidemiologic factors, as well as the results of admission toxicology screening, were noted. Outcome analysis was performed on patients undergoing conservative versus operative management for their injuries. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the ASIA classification system. Complications related to initial injury, neurosurgical procedures, and hospital stay were noted.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were enrolled. Of those diagnosed with a GSW to the spine, 88 (59.8%) received an admission toxicology screen. Seventy-three (83%) patients out of those tested had a positive screen, with the most common substances detected being cannabis, cocaine, and alcohol. In regards to management, 127 (87%) patients were treated conservatively and only one (0.7%) patient improved clinically from ASIA D to E. Of the 20 patients who underwent surgery, one (5%) patient had clinical improvement post-operatively from ASIA C to D.

CONCLUSIONS

This study evaluates the largest number of patients with GSW to the spine per year treated in a single centre, illustrating the violent nature of New Orleans. In this urban population, there was a clear correlation between drug use and suffering a GSW to the spine. Surgical intervention was seldom indicated in these patients and was predominately used for fixation of unstable fractures and decompression of compressive injuries, particularly below T11. Minimally invasive techniques were used successfully at our institution to minimize the risk of post-operative CSF leak.

Neuropathic pain post spinal cord injury part 2: systematic review of dorsal root entry zone procedure

BACKGROUND

Pharmacotherapy may not sufficiently reduce neuropathic pain in many individuals post spinal cord injury (SCI). The use of alternative therapies such as surgery may be effective in reducing neuropathic pain in these individuals. However, because of the invasive nature of surgery, it is important to examine the evidence for use of this treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of published literature on the surgical treatment of neuropathic pain after SCI.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched for articles in which surgical treatment of pain after SCI was examined. Articles were restricted to the English language. Article selection was conducted by 2 independent reviewers with the following inclusion criteria: the subjects participated in a surgical intervention for neuropathic pain; at least 50% of the subjects had an SCI; at least 3 subjects had an SCI; and a definable intervention involving the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) procedure was used to reduce pain. Data extracted included study design, study type, subject demographics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size, outcome measures, and study results. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed for quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) assessment scale. Levels of evidence were assigned to each intervention using a modified Sackett scale.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. One study provided level 2 evidence, and the rest provided level 4 evidence. The DREZ procedure was shown to be more effective for segmental pain than for diffuse pain after SCI. Further, individuals with conus medullaris level injury were found to have a higher level of neuropathic pain relief than those with cervical, thoracic, or cauda equina injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies demonstrated that the DREZ procedure may be effective in reducing segmental pain. Hence, DREZ may be important in treatment of neuropathic pain in individuals resistant to less invasive treatments. Because the studies lacked control conditions and examination of long-term effects, there is a need for larger trials with more stringent conditions.

DREZotomy in the treatment of cancer pain: a review

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related pain is a common problem that may be intractable by medical and neuromodulatory treatment. The dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) is a hyperactive focus in neuropathic pain syndromes, and DREZotomy has been used in selective cases of neuropathic cancer pain.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the technique of spinal DREZotomy in the treatment of cancer pain and review the relevant published literature.

METHODS

A PubMed database search for 'DREZ', 'dorsal root entry zone' and 'cancer', and a search of the references of these manuscripts, was undertaken.

RESULTS

14 papers were identified and reviewed that described a total of 123 patients with cancer pain or radiation-induced pain who have been treated with DREZotomy. Though heterogeneous, these studies reported an overall favorable outcome in carefully selected patients with topographically limited pain syndromes.

CONCLUSION

For patients with well-localized neuropathic cancer pain intractable to medical and first-line surgical management, DREZotomy is a viable treatment option. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the outcomes of this procedure.

Treatment of neuropathic deafferentation pain using DREZ lesions; long-term results

INTRODUCTION

Deafferentation pain secondary to spinal cord injury, brachial plexus avulsion and other peripheral nerve injuries is often refractory to conventional treatments. This study evaluates the long-term efficacy of spinal DREZ (Dorsal Root Entry Zone) lesions for the treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes caused by deafferentation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 18 patients with refractory deafferentation pain treated with radiofrequency DREZ lesions is presented. The immediate and long-term efficacy was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after treatment, the patient's subjective evaluation, the percentage of patients returning to work and the reduction in pain medication.

RESULTS

Pain on the VAS significantly decreased from 8.6 preoperatively to 2.9 (p<.001) at discharge. Over the long-term, with a mean follow-up of 28 months (6-108) pain remained at 4.7 on the VAS (p<0.002). The percentage of patients with moderate to excellent pain relief was 77% at discharge and 68% at the last follow-up. Pain medication was reduced in 67% of the patients and 28% returned to work. The best results were obtained in patients with brachial plexus avulsion, with a significant long-term pain relief in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency DREZ lesion is an effective and safe treatment for refractory neuropathic pain caused by deafferentation.

Destructive procedures for the treatment of nonmalignant pain: a structured literature review

OBJECT

Nonmalignant pain has been treated in the past century with ablative, or more appropriately, destructive procedures. Although individual outcomes for these procedures have previously been described in the literature, to the authors' knowledge this is the first comprehensive and systematic review on this topic.

METHODS

A US National Library of Medicine PubMed search was conducted for the following ablative procedures: cingulotomy, cordotomy, DREZ (also input as dorsal root entry zone), ganglionectomy, mesencephalotomy, myelotomy, neurotomy, rhizotomy, sympathectomy, thalamotomy, and tractotomy. Articles related to pain resulting from malignancy and those not in peer-reviewed journals were excluded. In reviewing pertinent articles, focus was placed on patient number, outcome, and follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 146 articles was included in the review. The large majority of studies (131) constituted Class III evidence. Eleven Class I and 4 Class II studies were found, of which nearly all (13 of 15) evaluated radiofrequency rhizotomies for different pain origins, including lumbar facet syndrome, cervical facet pain, and Type I or typical trigeminal neuralgia. Overall, support for ablative procedures for nonmalignant pain is derived almost entirely from Class III evidence; despite a long history of use in neurosurgery, the evidence supporting destructive procedures for benign pain conditions remains limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly designed prospective standardized studies are required to define surgical indications and outcomes for these procedures, to provide more systematic review, and to advance the field.

Pain syndromes after missile-caused peripheral nerve lesions: part 2--treatment

OBJECTIVE

To analyze treatment procedures and treatment outcomes of painful missile-caused nerve injuries and factors influencing the outcome.

METHODS

The study included 326 patients with clinically significant pain syndromes, including complex regional pain syndrome Type II, deafferentation pain, reinnervation pain, and neuralgic pain. Treatment modalities included drug therapy, nerve surgery, sympatholysis, and dorsal root entry zone operation. Pain intensity was assessed before and after the treatment using a visual analog scale, and treatment outcome was defined as successful (pain relief >70%), fair (pain relief between 50 and 69%), or poor (pain relief <50%). The outcome was compared between different pain syndromes and different treatment modalities.

RESULTS

A successful outcome was achieved in 28.6% of patients with deafferentation pain, in 76.9% of patients with complex regional pain syndrome Type II, and in 87.9 to 100% of patients with other pain syndromes (P = 0.002). Each type of pain syndrome required a specific treatment algorithm, but average pain relief was similar for all definitive treatment modalities (range, 81-88%; P > 0.05). Ten factors were found to significantly influence the treatment outcome, but only three factors were independent predictors of a successful outcome: type of pain syndrome (P < 0.001), severity of nerve injury (P < 0.001), and absence of pain paroxysms (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The treatment outcome of painful nerve injury depends on several factors, including the type of pain syndrome, severance of nerve injury, and absence of pain paroxysms. Drug therapy (carbamazepine, amitriptyline, or gabapentin) should be recommended, at least as a part of treatment, for patients with reinnervation pain, deafferentation pain, and complex regional pain syndrome Type II. Nerve surgery should be recommended for patients with posttraumatic neuralgia, either as the first treatment choice (acute nerve compression or intraneural foreign particles) or after unsuccessful pharmacological treatment (other causes of neuralgic pain).

Attenuation of pain perception after transposition of the greater omentum to the cauda equina region of rats--a preliminary observation

BACKGROUND

This paper addresses a specific experimental design to suggest the possible role of the greater omentum in the modulation of pain in rats.

METHODS

Fifteen male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 275 and 325 g were selected. The animals were randomized and then anesthetized with pentobarbital (35 mg/kg) and divided into three groups: (1) sham: laparotomy followed by laminectomy with exposure of the spinal epidural space (n=5); (2) transposition of pedicled omentum (n=5) to the cauda equina epidural space; and (3) transposition of pedicled omentum (n=5) to the cauda equina intradural space. The animals were operated upon and once more randomized by an independent investigator, so that the groups were thought to be similar during post-operative testing. The latency of paw withdrawal to noxious heat stimulation was tested and the values (seconds) plotted for 1, 3, 6, 11, 14 and 30 days after surgery. Randomization codes were open after the animals were euthanized. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) without replication was applied for each of the dataset and comparisons established among the different study groups involved. The omenta were removed and standard immunohistochemistry was performed for gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA), serotonin, calcitonin-gene related protein (CGRP), vascular intestinal peptide (VIP) and Met-enkephalin.

RESULTS

The response to high heating rates of stimulation favored intradural versus sham and epidural omental transpositions. High and low noxious heat stimulation suggested an increased threshold to noxious stimulation after the 3 and 30 days of omental transposition. In the low heat stimulation series, responses were comparatively higher than in the sham animals.

CONCLUSIONS

The suggested increased threshold of response to noxious stimulation after transposition of the greater omentum onto the spinal cord of rats suggested a novel role of the omentum and a potential future application in the clinical arena.

Gunshot wounds to the spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The incidence of violent crimes has risen over the past decade. With it, gunshot injuries have become increasingly more common in the civilian population. Among the most devastating injuries are gunshot wounds to the spine.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to provide a thorough review of the pathomechanics, diagnosis and treatment of gunshot wounds to the spine.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Literature review article.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of gunshot spine fractures differs from other mechanisms. Fractures are usually inherently stable and rarely require stabilization. In neurologically intact patients, there are few indications for surgery. Evidence of acute lead intoxication, an intracanal copper bullet or new onset neurologic deficit can justify operative decompression and/or bullet removal. Overzealous laminectomy can destabilize the spine and lead to late postoperative deformity. For complete and incomplete neural deficits at the cervical and thoracic levels, operative decompression is of little benefit and can lead to higher complication rates than nonsurgically managed patients. With gunshots to the T12 to L5 levels, better motor recovery has been reported after intracanal bullet removal versus nonoperative treatment. The use of steroids for gunshot paralysis has not improved the neurologic outcome and has resulted in a greater frequency of nonspinal complications. Although numerous recommendations exist, 7 to 14 days of broad-spectrum antibiosis has lead to the lowest rates of infection after transcolonic gunshots to the spine.

Dorsal root entry zone lesioning used to treat central neuropathic pain in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review was conducted for studies of any design.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dorsal root entry zone lesioning in treating central neuropathic pain of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Central neuropathic pain has a great impact on the quality of life of many patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Dorsal root entry zone lesioning has become one of several treatment options. No previous systematic reviews were found that address this indication for the procedure.

METHODS

Several computerized databases were searched along with reference lists of eligible articles and personal files of advisory panel members. Only primary studies of patients older than 13 years with both traumatic spinal cord injury and central neuropathic pain receiving dorsal root entry zone lesioning were included. Two assessors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment for all the studies.

RESULTS

The selection criteria were met by 11 studies. All were case series of 5 to 54 patients. As reported by 10 of the studies, at least 50% of the patients attained more than 50% pain relief or experienced no pain limitation of activity and no need for narcotics. However, all the studies had poorly defined eligibility criteria or none at all, no control groups, and inadequate reporting of adverse effects. Only one study provided adequate patient description. None of the studies reported the validity, reliability, or responsiveness of outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Reviewed studies indicate promising results from dorsal root entry zone lesioning for the treatment of central neuropathic pain in selected patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. However, the strength of the evidence provided by the studies was poor in terms of study design, outcome measures, reports on the severity of adverse effects, patient selection criteria, and patient description. For these reasons, the evidence is weak for the use of dorsal root entry zone lesioning to relieve central neuropathic pain in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.

Microsurgical DREZotomy for pain due to spinal cord and/or cauda equina injuries: long-term results in a series of 44 patients

According to the literature estimations, 10-25% of patients with spinal cord and cauda equina injuries eventually develop refractory pain. Due to the fact that most classical neurosurgical methods are considered of little or no efficacy in controlling this type of pain, the authors had recourse to microsurgery in the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ). This article reports on the long-term results of the microsurgical approach to the dorsal root entry zone (DREZotomy) in a series of 44 patients suffering from unbearable neuropathic pain secondary to spine injury. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 20 years (6 years on average). The series includes 25 cases with conus medullaris, 12 with thoracic cord, four with cauda equina and three with cervical cord injuries. Surgery was performed in 37 cases at the pathological spinal cord levels that corresponded to the territory of the so-called 'segmental pain', and in seven cases, on the spinal cord levels below the lesion for 'infralesional pain' syndromes. The post-operative analgesic effect was considered to be 'good' when a patient's estimation of pain relief exceeded 75%, 'fair' if pain was reduced by 25-75%, and 'poor' when the residual pain was more than 75% of preoperative estimations. Immediate pain relief was obtained in 70% of patients and was long-lasting in 60% of the total series. The results varied essentially according to the distribution of pain. Good long-term results were obtained in 68% of the patients who had a segmental pain distribution, compared with 0% in patients with predominant infralesional pain. Regarding pain characteristics, a good result was obtained in 88% of the cases with predominantly paroxysmal pain, compared with 26% with continuous pain. There were no perioperative mortalities. Morbidity included cerebrospinal fluid leak (three patients), wound infection (two patients), subcutaneous hematoma (one patient) and bacteremia (in one patient). The above data justify the inclusion of DREZ-lesioning surgery in the neurosurgical armamentarium for treating 'segmental' pain due to spinal cord injuries.