The HUPO Brain Proteome Project – No need to hurry?

Proteomics data collection (ProDaC): publishing and collecting proteomics data sets in public repositories using standard formats

In Proteomics, fast enhancements with regard to technology are responsible for the creation of huge data sets. Consequently, in 2006 the European Commission funded a Coordination Action named ProDaC (Proteomics Data Collection) within the 6th EU Framework Programme to foster a community-wide data collection and data sharing. The aims of ProDaC were the development of documentation and storage standards, setup of a standardized data submission pipeline and collection of data.To reach these goals, the necessary work was structured in six thematic fields (work packages): Standards for Proteomics Data Representation, Standards Implementation, Data Integration Tools, Proteomics Repository Adaptation, Data Flow Management, and Proteomics Data Exploitation. The methods building the basis of the respective fields and the achieved results are described in the following sections.

Improved comparative proteome analysis based on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

The purpose of this study was to test the extent to which differences in spot intensity can be reliably recognized between two groups of two-dimensional electrophoresis gels (pH 4-7, visualized with ruthenium fluorescent stain) each loaded with different amounts of protein from rat brain (power analysis). Initial experiments yielded only unsatisfactory results: 546 spots were matched from two groups of 6 gels each loaded with 200 microg and 250 microg protein, respectively. Only 72 spots were higher (p<0.05), while 58 spots were significantly lower in the 250-microg group. The construction of new apparatuses that allowed the simultaneous processing of 24 gels throughout all steps between rehydration and staining procedure considerably lowered the between-gel variation. This resulted in the detection of significant differences in spot intensities in 77-90% of all matched spots on gel groups with a 25% difference in protein load. This applied both when protein from 24 biological replicates was loaded onto two groups of 12 gels and when two pooled tissue samples were each loaded onto 6 gels. At a difference of 50% in protein load, more than 90% of all spots differed significantly between two experimental groups.