Contemporary clinical neurophysiology applications in dystonia

Debunking the Puzzle of Eyelid Apraxia: The Muscle of Riolan Hypothesis

PURPOSE

Apraxia of eyelid opening (AEO) has been defined by the presence of an intermittent nonparalytic bilateral loss of the volitional ability to open the eyes or to maintain the eyelids in a sustained elevated position. It is not known whether the condition represents an apraxia, a dystonia, or a freezing phenomenon, and several different nomenclatorial terms have been suggested for this condition including the so-called AEO (scAEO), blepahrocolysis, focal eyelid dystonia, and so on. The primary goal of this review is to attempt to clarify the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying scAEO as a clinical phenomenon. This review also addresses the issue of whether scAEO is part of the spectrum of blepharospasm (BSP) which includes BSP, dystonic blinks and other dystonic eyelid conditions, or whether it is a separate phenomenologically heterogeneous disease with clinical features that merely overlap with BSP.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), NCBI Bookshelf, and Embase for several related keywords including the terms "apraxia of eyelid opening," "pretarsal blepharospasm," "blepharocolysis," "eyelid freezing," "eyelid akinesia," "levator inhibition," "blepharospasm-plus," as well as "blepharospasm." The clinical findings in patients with scAEO who fulfilled the classic diagnostic criteria of the disease that were originally set by Lepore and Duvoisin were included, while patients with isolated blepharospasm or dystonic blinks (DB) were excluded. In addition, electromyographic (EMG) studies in patients with scAEO were reviewed in detail with special emphasis on studies that performed synchronous EMG recordings both from the levator muscle (LPS) and the pretarsal orbicularis oculi muscle (OO).

RESULTS

The apraxia designation is clearly a misnomer. Although scAEO behaves clinically as a hypotonic freezing phenomenon, it also shares several cardinal features with focal dystonias. The authors broadly categorized the EMG data into 3 different patterns. The first pattern (n = 26/94 [27.6%]) was predominantly associated with involuntary discharges in the OO muscle and has been termed pretarsal blepharospasm (ptBSP). The commonest pattern was pattern no. 2 (n = 53/94 [56.38%]), which was characterized by involuntary discharges in the OO muscle, together with a disturbed reciprocal innervation of the antagonist levator muscle and is dubbed disturbed reciprocal innervation (DRI). This EMG pattern is difficult to discern from the first pattern. Pattern no. 3 (n = 15/94 [15.9%]) is characterized by an isolated levator palpebrae inhibition (ILPI). This levator silence was observed alone without EMG evidence of contractions in the pretarsal orbicularis or a disturbed reciprocal relation of both muscles.

CONCLUSION

EMG evidence shows that the great majority (84%) of patients show a dystonic pattern, whereas ILPI (16%) does not fit the dystonic spectrum. The authors propose that a spasmodic contraction of the muscle of Riolan may be the etiological basis for levator inhibition in patients with ILPI. If this is true, all the 3 EMG patterns observed in scAEO patients (ptBSP, DRI, and ILPI) would represent an atypical form of BSP. The authors suggest coining the terms Riolan muscle BSP ( rmBSP ) for ILPI, and the term atypical focal eyelid dystonia ( AFED ) instead of the term scAEO, as both terms holistically encompass both the clinical and EMG data and concur with the authors' theorem.

Pain in cervical dystonia: mechanisms, assessment and treatment

INTRODUCTION

In patients with cervical dystonia (CD), pain is a major contributor to disability and social isolation and is often the main reason patients seek treatment. Surveys evaluating patient perceptions of their CD symptoms consistently highlight pain as a troublesome and disabling feature of their condition with significant impact on daily life and work.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, the authors review the epidemiology, assessment, possible mechanisms and treatment of pain in CD, including a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial data with abobotulinumtoxinA.

EXPERT OPINION

Mechanisms of pain in CD may be muscle-based and non-muscle based. Accumulating evidence suggests that non-muscle-based mechanisms (such as abnormal transmission and processing of nociceptive stimuli, dysfunction of descending pain inhibitory pathways as well as structural and network changes in the basal ganglia, cortex and other areas) may also contribute to pain in CD alongside prolonged muscle contraction. Chemodenervation with botulinum toxin is considered the first-line treatment for CD. Treatment with botulinum toxin is usually effective, but optimization of the injection parameters should include consideration of pain as a core symptom in addition to the motor problems.