Robustness of the residue conservation score reflecting both frequencies and physicochemistries

Global computational mutagenesis provides a critical stability framework in protein structures

A protein’s amino acid sequence dictates the folds and final structure the macromolecule will form. We propose that by identifying critical residues in a protein’s atomic structure, we can select a critical stability framework within the protein structure essential to proper protein folding. We use global computational mutagenesis based on the unfolding mutation screen to test the effect of every possible missense mutation on the protein structure to identify the residues that cannot tolerate a substitution without causing protein misfolding. This method was tested using molecular dynamics to simulate the stability effects of mutating critical residues in proteins involved in inherited disease, such as myoglobin, p53, and the 15^th sushi domain of complement factor H. In addition we prove that when the critical residues are in place, other residues may be changed within the structure without a stability loss. We validate that critical residues are conserved using myoglobin to show that critical residues are the same for crystal structures of 6 different species and comparing conservation indices to critical residues in 9 eye disease-related proteins. Our studies demonstrate that by using a selection of critical elements in a protein structure we can identify a critical protein stability framework. The frame of critical residues can be used in genetic engineering to improve small molecule binding for drug studies, identify loss-of-function disease-causing missense mutations in genetics studies, and aide in identifying templates for homology modeling.

Codon substitution models based on residue similarity and their applications

Codon models are now widely used to draw evolutionary inferences from alignments of homologous sequence data. Incorporating physicochemical properties of amino acids into codon models, two novel codon substitution models describing the evolution of protein-coding DNA sequences are presented based on the similarity scores of amino acids. To describe substitutions between codons a continue-time Markov process is used. Transition/transversion rate bias and nonsynonymous codon usage bias are allowed in the models. In our implementation, the parameters are estimated by maximum-likelihood (ML) method as in previous studies. Furthermore, instantaneous mutations involving more than one nucleotide position of a codon are considered in the second model. Then the two suggested models are applied to five real data sets. The analytic results indicate that the new codon models considering physicochemical properties of amino acids can provide a better fit to the data comparing with existing codon models, and then produce more reliable estimates of certain biologically important measures than existing methods.

L1pred: a sequence-based prediction tool for catalytic residues in enzymes with the L1-logreg classifier

To understand enzyme functions, identifying the catalytic residues is a usual first step. Moreover, knowledge about catalytic residues is also useful for protein engineering and drug-design. However, to experimentally identify catalytic residues remains challenging for reasons of time and cost. Therefore, computational methods have been explored to predict catalytic residues. Here, we developed a new algorithm, L1pred, for catalytic residue prediction, by using the L1-logreg classifier to integrate eight sequence-based scoring functions. We tested L1pred and compared it against several existing sequence-based methods on carefully designed datasets Data604 and Data63. With ten-fold cross-validation, L1pred showed the area under precision-recall curve (AUPR) and the area under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.2198 and 0.9494 on the training dataset, Data604, respectively. In addition, on the independent test dataset, Data63, it showed the AUPR and AUC values of 0.2636 and 0.9375, respectively. Compared with other sequence-based methods, L1pred showed the best performance on both datasets. We also analyzed the importance of each attribute in the algorithm, and found that all the scores contributed more or less equally to the L1pred performance.

A comparative study of conservation and variation scores

BACKGROUND

Conservation and variation scores are used when evaluating sites in a multiple sequence alignment, in order to identify residues critical for structure or function. A variety of scores are available today but it is not clear how different scores relate to each other.

RESULTS

We applied 25 conservation and variation scores to alignments from the Catalytic Site Atlas (CSA). We calculated distances among scores based on correlation coefficients, and constructed a dendrogram of the scores by average linking cluster analysis. The cluster analysis showed that most scores fall into one of two groups--substitution matrix based group and frequency based group respectively. We also evaluated the scores' performance in predicting catalytic sites and found that frequency based scores generally perform best.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservation and variation scores can be classified into mainly two large groups. When using a score to predict catalytic sites, frequency based scores that also consider a background distribution are most successful.