Changes in bone resorption markers among Japanese patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with alendronate and risedronate

Risedronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration leading to increased fracture risk. Risedronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts. This is an update of a Cochrane Review that was originally published in 2003.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures for postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk for fractures, respectively.

SEARCH METHODS

With broader and updated strategies, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase. A grey literature search, including the online databases ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and drug approval agencies, as well as bibliography checks of relevant systematic reviews was also performed. Eligible trials published between 1966 to 24 March 2021 were identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials that assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the prevention of fractures for postmenopausal women. Participants must have received at least one year of risedronate, placebo or other anti-osteoporotic drugs, with or without concurrent calcium/vitamin D. Major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. In the interest of clinical relevance and applicability, we classified a study as secondary prevention if its population fulfilled more than one of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, low bone mineral density (BMD)T score ≤ -2.5, and age ≥ 75 years old. If none of these criteria was met, the study was considered to be primary prevention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodology expected by Cochrane. We pooled the relative risk (RR) of fractures using a fixed-effect model based on the expectation that the clinical and methodological characteristics of the respective primary and secondary prevention studies would be homogeneous, and the experience from the previous review suggesting that there would be a small number of studies. The base case included the data available for the longest treatment period in each placebo-controlled trial and a >15% relative change was considered clinically important. The main findings of the review were presented in summary of findings tables, using the GRADE approach. In addition, we looked at benefit and harm comparisons between different dosage regimens for risedronate and between risedronate and other anti-osteoporotic drugs.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-three trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria, among which 33 studies (27,348 participants) reported data that could be extracted and quantitatively synthesized. We had concerns about particular domains of risk of bias in each trial. Selection bias was the most frequent concern, with only 24% of the studies describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Fifty per cent and 39% of the studies reporting benefit and harm outcomes, respectively, were subject to high risk. None of the studies included in the quantitative syntheses were judged to be at low risk of bias in all seven domains. The results described below pertain to the comparisons for daily risedronate 5 mg versus placebo which reported major outcomes. Other comparisons are described in the full text. For primary prevention, low- to very low-certainty evidence was collected from four studies (one to two years in length) including 989 postmenopausal women at lower risk of fractures. Risedronate 5 mg/day may make little or no difference to wrist fractures [RR 0.48 ( 95% CI 0.03 to 7.50; two studies, 243 participants); absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.6% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 7% more)] and withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.18; three studies, 748 participants); ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 5% fewer to 1% more)], based on low-certainty evidence. However, its preventive effects on non-vertebral fractures and serious adverse events are not known due to the very low-certainty evidence. There were zero clinical vertebral and hip fractures reported therefore the effects of risedronate for these outcomes are not estimable.  For secondary prevention, nine studies (one to three years in length) including 14,354 postmenopausal women at higher risk of fractures provided evidence. Risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fractures [RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90; six studies, 12,173 participants); RRR 20% (95% CI 10% to 28%) and ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 3% fewer), moderate certainty], and may reduce hip fractures [RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.94); RRR 27% (95% CI 6% to 44%) and ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 0.2% fewer to 1% fewer), low certainty]. Both of these effects are probably clinically important. However, risedronate's effects are not known for wrist fractures [RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.24); three studies,1746 participants); ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more), very-low certainty] and not estimable for clinical vertebral fractures due to zero events reported (low certainty). Risedronate results in little to no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; eight studies, 9529 participants); ARR 0.3% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more); 16.9% in risedronate versus 17.2% in control, high certainty] and probably results in little to no difference in serious adverse events [RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.07; six studies, 9435 participants); ARR 0% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 2% more; 29.2% in both groups, moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update recaps the key findings from our previous review that, for secondary prevention, risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fracture, and may reduce the risk of hip fractures. We are uncertain on whether risedronate 5mg/day reduces clinical vertebral and wrist fractures.  Compared to placebo, risedronate probably does not increase the risk of serious adverse events.  For primary prevention, the benefit and harms of risedronate were supported by limited evidence with high uncertainty.

Reduction of urinary levels of N-telopeptide correlates with treatment compliance in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receiving alendronate

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the factors associated with the effectiveness of treatment with alendronate (ALN) quantified by a reduction in urinary excretion of N-telopeptide (NTx).

METHODS

The study is an observational, prospective, multicenter trial, with a 6-month follow-up. Postmenopausal osteoporotic women (densitometric criteria), who initiated treatment with ALN (70 mg/weekly) without previous treatment with antiresorptive agents (12 month) and calcitonin (6 month), were included. The assessment of NTx levels (nmol bone collagen equivalents/mmol creatinine) in the urine was performed at baseline and after completion of follow-up. A logistic regression model included "achieving a reduction in urinary NTx of at least 30% (minimal clinically significant change [MCSC])" as a dichotomous dependent variable and the following as independent variables: baseline urinary NTx levels, treatment compliance, years since diagnosis of menopause, ALN treatment duration, and treatment with calcium and vitamin D. Treatment compliance was assessed as the percentage of days of medication prescribed as a function of the time between the beginning and end of treatment. Good compliance was defined as a percentage between 80% and 120%.

RESULTS

The variables that reached statistical significance were baseline urinary NTx values (odds ratio, 1.052; 95% CI, 1.025-1.079) and compliance (odds ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5-10.1). Therefore, the women with good treatment compliance were almost 4 times more likely to achieve an MCSC in NTx levels, and the raise in one unit of urinary NTx baseline values increased by 5% of the probability of achieving MCSC.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ALN (70 mg/week) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis effectively reduces the urinary excretion of the bone turnover biomarker NTx. The probability of achieving a clinically significant reduction is greater in those women with higher baseline levels of NTx and in women who comply with treatment.

Response of serum carboxylated and undercarboxylated osteocalcin to risedronate monotherapy and combined therapy with vitamin K(2) in corticosteroid-treated patients: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the responses of serum osteocalcin (OC), undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) and N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) to corticosteroids, and to examine the effects of risedronate therapy with or without vitamin K(2) supplementation on bone metabolic markers in corticosteroid-treated patients.

METHODS

Sixteen patients on corticosteroid therapy for neuromuscular disorders were assigned randomly to 2 groups (A: risedronate monotherapy, n=8; B: combined risedronate and vitamin K(2) therapy, n=8) and treated for 1 year. Another 6 patients who received intravenous steroid pulse therapy were assigned to group C for investigation of the effects of corticosteroids on OC and ucOC 1 month after pulse therapy.

RESULTS

Serial measurements revealed that significant decreases of OC, ucOC and NTx persisted with a similar time course profile during 1 year of treatment in groups A and B, and between-group analysis failed to demonstrate any additional effects of vitamin K(2) on risedronate therapy. Intravenous steroid pulse therapy induced a transient depression of OC and ucOC within 1 week in group C.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that serum concentrations of OC and ucOC become consistently low during corticosteroid administration despite risedronate therapy with or without vitamin K(2) supplementation, and the serum ucOC level may not be a reliable indicator of vitamin K status under corticosteroid administration.

Comparison of monthly ibandronate versus weekly risedronate in preference, convenience, and bone turnover markers in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women

Patient preferences, convenience, and bone turnover markers were evaluated for the monthly ibandronate over the weekly risedronate regimen in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women. This was a 6-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study with a two-period and two-sequence crossover treatment design. After a 30-day screening period, eligible participants with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to receive either monthly oral ibandronate 150 mg for 3 months followed by weekly oral risedronate 35 mg for 12 weeks (sequence A) or the same regimen in reverse order (sequence B). Patient preference and convenience were evaluated by questionnaire. The changes in serum C-telopeptide after 3 months of treatment were analyzed. A total of 365 patients were enrolled in this study (sequence A 182, sequence B 183). Of patients expressing a preference (83.4%), 74.8% preferred the monthly ibandronate regimen over the weekly regimen (25.2%). More women stated that the monthly ibandronate regimen was more convenient (84.2%) than the weekly regimen (15.8%). There was no significant difference in the change in bone turnover marker between the two treatments. The two regimens were similarly tolerable. There were fewer adverse events in the monthly ibandronate group compared to the weekly risedronate group in terms of gastrointestinal side effects (nausea and abdominal distension). This study revealed a strong preference and convenience for monthly ibandronate over weekly risedronate in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women. There was no significant difference in change of bone turnover marker and safety profile between the two regimens.

Effects of risedronate or alfacalcidol on bone mineral density, bone turnover, back pain, and fractures in Japanese men with primary osteoporosis: results of a two-year strict observational study

Although osteoporosis in men is already a major public health problem, there is still a dearth of data about the effects of risedronate in male osteoporosis, especially in Japanese with primary osteoporosis. Therefore, the objective of our study was to investigate the effects of risedronate on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, back pain, and fractures in these patients prospectively for two years (at baseline, three months, six months, twelve months, and twenty-four months) both longitudinally and compared with those of alfacalcidol. The subjects enrolled for this study were 66 Japanese male patients with untreated primary osteoporosis (mean age 63.52 +/- 8.7 years), who were divided into two groups (44 with risedronate and 22 with alfacalcidol). We measured BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at three sites-the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal radius. Risedronate treatment significantly increased BMD at the lumbar spine and at the femoral neck, reduced bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), and reduced back pain, both longitudinally and compared with alfacalcidol treatment. We observed a lower rate of incident fracture in risedronate users. However, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that this trend was not statistically significant, possibly because of the small number of patients enrolled. These potentially beneficial effects of risedronate on bone in male patients with primary osteoporosis suggest the possibility that osteoporosis should be treated with risedronate regardless of gender in order to effectively prevent subsequent osteoporotic fractures.

Changes in urinary NTX levels in patients with primary osteoporosis undergoing long-term bisphosphonate treatment

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates, antiresorptive drugs, are widely used to treat osteoporosis patients. However, recent reports indicated that several osteoporosis patients who underwent long-term bisphosphonate therapy subsequently developed severe suppression of bone turnover. We investigated whether urinary crosslinked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), a bone resorption marker, in osteoporosis patients was highly suppressed during long-term treatment with alendronate or risedronate.

METHODS

We investigated 87 primary osteoporosis outpatients who were treated with alendronate or risedronate for more than 2 years. All patients were women, with an average age of 72.6 years. Altogether, 49 patients were treated with alendronate and 38 with risedronate, and the average administration period was 3.5 years. We defined high suppression as NTX being reduced <9.3 nmol bone collagen equivalent/mmol.Cr and a 35% decrease from baseline.

RESULTS

In total, 11 of 87 patients (12.6%) had high NTX suppression based on the above criteria. The incidences of high suppression of NTX at 1,2,3,and 4 years after starting the treatment were 0%, 1.1%, 11.9%, and 4.7%, respectively. The average age, bone mineral density, and NTX values at baseline and the administration period were not associated with high suppression of NTX during alendronate or risedronate treatment. Regarding suppression of NTX during long-term treatment, there was no significant difference between alendronate and risedronate.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that long-term treatment with bisphosphonates necessitates careful follow-up of the patients.

Efficacy of risedronate in Japanese male patients with primary osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

Although osteoporosis in men previously was relatively neglected, bisphosphonates have been strongly suggested as potent therapeutic agents. However, there are few studies on the effects of risedronate in male osteoporosis, especially in Japanese with primary osteoporosis. The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the effects of risedronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover in Japanese male patients.

METHODS

According to the therapeutic regimen, the subjects were divided into two groups (group A, 22 with risedronate; group B, 10 without risedronate). During a one-year study duration, we measured bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) every 3 months, and BMD at 7 sites by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry every 6 months.

PATIENTS

The subjects were 32 Japanese male patients with untreated primary osteoporosis.

RESULTS

In group A, but not in group B, BMD was significantly increased at the lumbar spine both at 6 months and 12 months, and at the femoral neck at 12 months, compared with baseline. Likewise, in group A, but not in group B, both BAP and NTx were significantly decreased at all time points measured (3 months, 6 months, and 12 months), compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

These results confirmed the beneficial effects of risedronate upon increasing BMD and reducing bone turnover markers in Japanese male patients with primary osteoporosis, comparable to those previously reported in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis.