Dietary protein in relation to bone stiffness index and fat-free mass in a population consuming relatively low protein diets

Dietary protein and bone health across the life-course: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis over 40 years

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of published papers assessing dietary protein and bone health. We found little benefit of increasing protein intake for bone health in healthy adults but no indication of any detrimental effect, at least within the protein intakes of the populations studied. This systematic review and meta-analysis analysed the relationship between dietary protein and bone health across the life-course. The PubMed database was searched for all relevant human studies from the 1st January 1976 to 22nd January 2016, including all bone outcomes except calcium metabolism. The searches identified 127 papers for inclusion, including 74 correlational studies, 23 fracture or osteoporosis risk studies and 30 supplementation trials. Protein intake accounted for 0-4% of areal BMC and areal BMD variance in adults and 0-14% of areal BMC variance in children and adolescents. However, when confounder adjusted (5 studies) adult lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD associations were not statistically significant. There was no association between protein intake and relative risk (RR) of osteoporotic fractures for total (RR_(random) = 0.94; 0.72 to 1.23, I² = 32%), animal (RR _(random) = 0.98; 0.76 to 1.27, I² = 46%) or vegetable protein (RR _(fixed) = 0.97 (0.89 to 1.09, I² = 15%). In total protein supplementation studies, pooled effect sizes were not statistically significant for LSBMD (total n = 255, MD_(fixed) = 0.04 g/cm² (0.00 to 0.08, P = 0.07), I² = 0%) or FNBMD (total n = 435, MD_(random) = 0.01 g/cm² (-0.03 to 0.05, P = 0.59), I² = 68%). There appears to be little benefit of increasing protein intake for bone health in healthy adults but there is also clearly no indication of any detrimental effect, at least within the protein intakes of the populations studied (around 0.8-1.3 g/Kg/day). More studies are urgently required on the association between protein intake and bone health in children and adolescents.

The positive association of total protein intake with femoral neck strength (KNHANES IV)

Data gathered from a nationally representative cohort demonstrate that higher dietary protein intake was positively associated with the composite indices of femoral neck strength in both men and women, suggesting that higher protein intake may contribute to lower risk of hip fracture through the improvement of bone strength.

INTRODUCTION

Despite the general belief that higher protein intake may be helpful for bone homeostasis, its impact on human bone health is still debated. Furthermore, the association of dietary protein intake with femoral neck (FN) strength, which can predict fracture risk independently of bone mineral density (BMD), has not been thoroughly studied.

METHODS

This is a population-based, cross-sectional study from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, including 592 men aged 50 years or older and 590 postmenopausal women. The composite indices of FN strength, such as the compression strength index (CSI), bending strength index (BSI), and impact strength index (ISI), were generated by combining BMD, body weight, and height with the femoral axis length and width, which were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

After adjustment for confounders, total protein intake (g/kg/day) positively correlated with all three FN composite indices in both genders (P = 0.006 to 0.035), except for BSI showing marginal significance in postmenopausal women (P = 0.093). Consistently, compared with subjects in lowest total protein intake quartile, those in the highest quartile showed markedly higher CSI, BSI, and ISI values (P = 0.043 to < 0.001), with a dose-response manner across increasing total protein intake quartile categories in both men and women (P for trend = 0.028 to < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide the clinical evidence that higher dietary protein intake can play a beneficial role on bone health through the increase of FN strength relative to load in adults.

Bone Mineral Density and Protein-Derived Food Clusters from the Framingham Offspring Study

BACKGROUND

Dietary protein is beneficial to bone health; however, dietary patterns of protein intake and their relationship with bone mineral density (BMD) have not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship of dietary protein food clusters with BMD at the femoral neck, trochanter, total femur, and lumbar spine among middle-aged and older men and women.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Two thousand seven hundred fifty-eight community-dwelling individuals from the Framingham Offspring Study.

METHODS

BMD was measured by Lunar DPX-L (Lunar Radiation Corporation) in 1996-2001. Dietary intakes were estimated using the Willett food frequency questionnaire in either 1995-1998 or 1998-2001, and the exam closest to a participant's BMD measurement was used. Cluster analysis (FASTCLUS procedure, k-means method) was used to classify participants into groups, determined by major sources of protein. Generalized linear regression was used to compare adjusted least-squares mean BMD across protein food clusters for all pairwise comparisons.

RESULTS

From 2,758 participants (44% men; mean age 61±9 years, range=29 to 86 years), five protein food clusters were identified (chicken, fish, processed foods, red meat, and low-fat milk). Three of these food clusters showed associations with BMD. The red meat protein food cluster presented with significantly lower femoral neck BMD compared with the low-fat milk cluster (red meat 0.898±0.005 g/cm(2) vs low-fat milk 0.919±0.007 g/cm(2); P=0.04). Further, the processed foods protein cluster presented with significantly lower femoral neck BMD compared with the low-fat milk cluster (processed foods 0.897±0.004 g/cm(2) vs low-fat milk 0.919±0.007 g/cm(2); P=0.02). A similar, yet nonsignificant, trend was observed for other BMD sites examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Diets with the greatest proportion of protein intake from red meat and processed foods may not be as beneficial to the skeleton compared with dietary patterns where the highest proportion of protein is derived from low-fat milk.

Dietary protein is beneficial to bone health under conditions of adequate calcium intake: an update on clinical research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To underscore recent clinical studies, which evaluate the association between dietary protein and bone health.

RECENT FINDINGS

Epidemiologic studies show greater protein intake to be beneficial to bone health in adults. In addition, randomized controlled trials show that protein's positive effect on bone health is augmented by increased calcium intake. The relation between dietary protein and fracture risk is unclear. Dietary protein may positively impact bone health by increasing muscle mass, increasing calcium absorption, suppressing parathyroid hormone, and augmenting insulin-like growth factor 1 production; but the effects of other factors that contribute to this association, such as dietary protein dose and timing response, require further research.

SUMMARY

The positive effects of protein intake on bone health may only be beneficial under conditions of adequate calcium intake. Dietary protein's relation with fracture risk requires further investigation.